A scream follows a thud. Then the crying comes. I step into the room and observe today's carnage. I sport three titles today, as parents do the world over - criminal investigator, referee and arse-kicking prosecutor with washing-up gloves on.
One kid - Kid B - is flat on the floor, whimpering. Kid A is standing over her, hands in the air. "It's not my fault" has been expressed by both parties at different volumes. I try to sieve through the bogey-nosed protests and get some concrete evidence so I can dish out some yellow cards.
"So you pushed her over..." I say to Kid A. "Do you confirm?"
"And why did you resort to this specific gesture?"
"Cause she bit me." (Kid A)
"Is it true that you bit him?"
Head nod. (Kid B)
"And why did you perform such a cannibalistic act?"
"He took my toy." (Kid B)
"It wasn't your toy, it was mine." (Kid A)
"But were you actually playing with it?"
"No, but it's mine, and I don't want her touching it. She touches all my stuff. Always." (Kid A)
I look down at the toy in question, expecting to see an X-Wing or a lightsaber. It's a red rubber band. A red rubber band.
At this point I suck back a sigh and manage to squeeze in that time-old gem that sharing is important between siblings, within a family unit - however misshapen - as much as it is vital in our contemporary society of unfettered capitalism. Despite the stares, I continue the investigation to uncover the truth and to see some I'm sorrys fly around. A few minutes on, I get to the bottom of it. Just before the bit where they both forget entirely how it all started.
They're facing each other now. Kid A, three heads higher than Kid B, has said that his sister can play with his red rubber band for 5 minutes per day, tops, and that if his sister bites him again, he'll call me instead of flooring her. Kid B, three heads lower has nodded three times. First at the biting part, because humans don't bite other humans. She's also nodded at the idea of playing more with her own toys and not always stealing her brother's. She's nodded a third time for some reason. Hmm.
Each in turn switches on the I'm sorry button and looks up at the ceiling. So I ask them to look each other in the eye, because if we don't, we don't mean it.
"Sorry," says Kid A, looking into his sister's eyes without meaning it.
"Sorry," says Kid B, looking into her brother's eyes without meaning it.
As they go off to scratch each other's eyes out, I think about our society of sorry sayers and decide to divide them into neat little categories.
I'm sorry for existing - The Constant Sorry Sayer.
A British baby is born and its first word is sorry. Right in the delivery room. After wailing its lungs dry, deafening the anaesthetist and spewing up gunge over the starch white sheets, it turns to its mother and apologises. That doesn't happen here. French babies swear when they break free of the uterus and into this world. They say putain, though not with the successful emphasis that comes with age and a CV of traffic jams and administrative problems and existential angst under their belts.
Hey. I'm sorry. Really - The Artful Apologiser
These are the dudes who have mastered the art of apology. They probably know they've done wrong somewhere along the line, but they don't dig deep, they surface skim. The Artful Apologiser knows the shortcuts to return to the status quo, to get some make-up sex or another reconciliation package for the benefit of themselves. Saying sorry here becomes a reflex like checking your inbox. No genuine empathy of the damaged feeling in sight. Zilch. But ever so effective.
Oh come on, I said I was sorry - The Total Twat
Fine, sometimes the one who's being said sorry to will milk the sorry-saying phase just to see the sorry-sayer crawl, but often The Total Twat is the Reluctant Apologiser who says sorry because they feel they have to, regardless of whether they mean a word of it or not. As soon as the sorry is said, they want to memory-frazzle the other and backtrack to the position of pre-drama, which means avoiding the grovelling part that shatters the ego.
I'm... - The Reluctant Apologiser or Mr./Ms. Bad Faith
This happens a lot in France. It's part of "mauvaise foi", coined by philosopher Sartre. When you say someone is "de mauvaise foi" (interestingly the translation shows a barren wasteland in English, perhaps because we are all Constant Sorry Sayers) it means they refuse to admit that they're wrong. Politicians are gurus of Bad Faith. For them, and a battalion of others, from inside banks to on the streets, saying sorry is losing face, it's messing up the hierarchy which took a very long time to build. They won't even go there, get close to understanding, nope, you're just wrong. So non merci, je ne dirai pas pardon.
I'm sorry - The Genuine Apologiser
Kid B is in bed and Kid A is next to me on the sofa, flicking through a book on reptiles. Calm reigns. "Mum, I'm really sorry for pushing my sister over. I won't do it again," says Kid A. As apologies go, this is pretty high up there in the ranking, even though I'm not the victim here and the sleeping monster is equally to blame. All evidence points to it. Eye-contact, acknowledgement of responsibility, the naming of what one did wrong, the conveying of empathy and remorse, an offer to repair in order to restore trust and liking. It's humbling and cathartic being a Genuine Apologiser, it's even cool.
"Can I have a biscuit now?" he says.
Illustration by Arash RazaviSuggest a correction