Since antiquity Romania has been home to Europe's richest gold mines but after millennia of drilling much of the easily available gold has gone. As recently as 1989 one in ten of the population relied on gold for their livelihoods; today just 50,000 work the mines. Now, rather than prospectors flocking to the hills, Romanians are leaving in droves to look for work elsewhere.
One mine, below the village of Rosia Montana, might spark a new gold rush. The Rosia Montana Goldmine Corporation (RMGC), a joint venture with the Romanian Government who holds a twenty percent stake, estimates the reserves at $30 billion. Yet this possible reversal of fortunes has been halted and the village finds itself at the centre of an international controversy that sets local landowners and cultural preservationists against desperate locals and a giant multi-national mining corporation.
The company proposes stripping down the hills of Rosia Montana, crush the result, and put everything through a cyanide wash that separates gold from surrounding minerals. Extracting gold from low grade ore using cyanide is a process used in over 400 mines worldwide, including Romania. The project would leave most of the village intact, but part of it and the surrounding hills would be consumed in the process, creating new man-made countryside in its wake.
Opponents of the mine have moved to make the village and surrounding area a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This would preserve ancient mine workings for posterity but kill the new mine. With the price of gold likely to break $2000 an ounce, and with rising sovereign debt, can Romania afford to choose eco-friendly tourism over the one chance locals have of saving their livelihoods and boosting the country's economy?
Today clusters of crumbling buildings and rutted roads lead to a cul-de-sac at the end of a deep valley where the mine sits. Rosia Montana is a dying village in a waning area. Unemployment stands at more than 80 per cent since the state gold company Minvest shut up shop in 2006. Just half of the homes have reliable water and it is often rationed to 90 minutes a day. Over 70 per cent of homes lack inside toilets. Rosia Montanans live on one-third of the income of the average Romanian. One in ten lives on about 6 Romanian Lei a day which is equivalent to £1.25 GBP.
There is no public evidence of significant local participation in a grassroots campaign for Rosia Montana to be added to the UNESCO world heritage site list. In fact, most locals appear in favour of the mine. Of the fourteen who competed in the last mayoral election only one opposed its development. He was out of the race after the first stage having garnered only 129 votes. The only local opposition comes from Alburnus Maior, founded in 2000 in response a public announcement of the mining plans. Its alternative is to boost the local economy through organic farming, small craft-based industries and tourism using the cultural heritage of the area. Perhaps motivated by a fear of the unknown, its original 1000 members have now dwindled to just sixty.
Alburnus Maior's membership may have fallen, but it counts powerful international environmental activists, and cultural preservationists as allies. Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, and the Open Society Foundation are just some of the organisations who have joined the opposition. During September, over 500 activists mainly from outside of Romania set up a 'solidarity camp' in the village to oppose the mine. The irony of opposing a mine welcomed by the vast majority of local people, and the Romanian Government, seemed lost on them.
Ironically as well, RGMC has spent millions to excavate and preserve the ruins now being used to justify World Heritage status. It has spent $11 million USD on archaeological research and architectural restoration and has budgeted $45 million USD for an ongoing heritage project.
Romanian archaeologists have unearthed and catalogued fascinating glimpses into the country's history, yet this doesn't mean that Rosia Montana will make the World Heritage List. For Dr Mechtild Rössler, in charge of European and North American World Heritage Sites for UNESCO, the question is whether the site has outstanding universal value, "This can not be judged in the abstract. Naturally people always say their sites are unique, but its uniqueness comes through a global comparative study."
It seems unlikely that Rosia Montana is quite so unique - the Romans and then the Romanians have been busy miners. Over 47 sites of Roman antiquity have been discovered and researched in Romania alone. Further afield the Roman Empire dug up areas from Egypt to Spain to Bulgaria and even to South Wales in its quest for metal.
One can understand why some may want to preserve the peace of the mountains or simply keep their land, but the people of Rosia Montana deserve more than living in a museum foisted on them by outside interests.
I will be chairing a discussion on the politics of cultural preservation at the Battle of Ideas conference in London, 29 & 30 October 2011. Two days of high-level, thought-provoking, public debate organised by the Institute of Ideas, hosted by the Royal College of Art.
Oh yes there are lots of alternatives my narrow-minded RMGC employees....maybe you could see more clearly without that shroud of cyanide infested money around your eyes...I see no bigger diabolical hypocrisy than to claim 'There aren't any alternatives' after 10 years of suffering of RM comunity because of what RMGC (your PR company) did: putting pressure on the authorities to declare a mono-industrial zone, this means that for 10 long years those people became poorer and poorer, and now with a broken spirit they are almost begging....and RMGC (the very reason of their starvation) shows now, after 10 long years of suffering as the holly Mesiah, the salvation, the only alternative....pardon me but this is PURE EVIL. Any alternative is better than the RMGC project ;)
Much of Romania’s economy is conducted informally (up to 70% of it) and the £35/month figure thus doesn’t reflect the reality at Rosia Montana.
It is misleading to say that there will be 3600 new jobs as most of the jobs in that figure relate to the very short time of mine construction (1.5 years). During mine life most of the jobs will go to foreign mine experts (expads) and mine jobs during peak production (year 6) are just under 100. There will be a steady 30 jobs for administrative tasks during the 16 year mine life.
In light of the damage that the mine will cause directly the mine owner is proposing mitigation measures such as the replanting of monocultures to replace the destruction of rich ecosystems, the reconstruction to new towns to replace the destruction of the Rosia Montana community and the reconstruction of plastic 3DRoman Mine galleries to replace their destruction by open cast mining.
If gold mining generally creates wealth how come that most communites around the world where modern mines operate are amongst the poorest of their country?
A gold mine has a 20 year future while a village having a more than 2000 year past can expect better for the word "SAVE".
I did not notice even the slightest intention of equidistance.
Compared to the debt we have right now, the part of the Romanian State is just a drop in the Ocean, while the entire wealth of the site, supposing no costs, would not do it to cover a quarter...
Saving Rosia Montana from mining means to save a village by giving other opportunities than just to destroy it, to save civic behaviour in a country where such thing is poorly developed and to show that values do mean more than just money.
So: Save Rosia Montana!
First of all, of course, the local council of Rosia Montana has to withdraw its decision once taken to favor RMGC by declaring the town a mono-industrial area where no other investment is possible than those in mining. Of course, under this conditions, locals have no other source of income than mining. If local authorities lift off this restriction, free and diverse investment will be possible.
My remarks on Paragraph 6.
Mr. Leech, how do you define local ? If you talk about people living within 10 meters of your desired disaster than you have a different definition than mine. About 1 million of people live within a radius of 50km. All are locals dear sir ! Cyanide is carried by rain further away than you can imagine.
For example:
-- the cyanide spilling accident from 2000 in Romania is considered the biggest ecological disaster after Chernobyl.
-- useless to say the cyanide reservoir was way smaller than the one projected for Rosia Montana.
-- cyanide was traced all the way in the Danube, thousands of kilometers away from where the accident happened.
-- fact is Hungary won a process against Romania which has to pay them 120.000.000 euros compensations.
-- the mining company bankrupted, obviously, before paying any compensation to Romania and HUngary.
All this is online info. Just google it please.
You also seem to know a lot about mining.
What's your job, by the way ?
Nevertheless, the opposer of the project have the sour experience of Baia Mare in 2000.
There's no mythology.
A fund for environment ? Excuse me but we all came across this pathetic scheme. What is the value of the fund and what is its percentage of the profits ? Let's make a bet. I say it's less than 0.1%. Can you please check for me ?
Every dubious person/business in this world has a Foundation to clean their public image. The financial speculator Mr. Soros or the gold miner Mr Paulson are not an exception. I'm sure you know more such as McDonald's Foundation, Tim Horton's Foundation etc etc
Cheers to all the readers !
To me is one more case of unfulfilled promises.
"we ll build the safest thing in the world, trust us"
No one is willing to insure these things because the probability of accident is 1.
My remarks on Paragraph 5:
Mr. Leech, why don't you mention that (corrupted) politicians (paid by the Canadian owned Rosia Montana Gold Corporation) classified the zone as monoindustrial. No other type of business is allowed there ! Unemployment high? It's a surprise for you only!
On the other hand, beautiful villages of the community which would be of some interest like Vartop for instance are deprived of access roads. You see, I know places as well as you know figures...
Rosia Montana is one of the very few villages where you can get to a center of interest on a normal road. Remember we are in Apuseni, and most of the villages have poor road acces. (this is for the others, you know it well).
It's about decisions! Very good ones, finally!
My remarks on Paragraph 3
. I believe cyanide is used in over 400 countries. This doesn't make it better. Mr. Leech, why don't you refer people to this article published yesterday
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/industries/thousand-protest-against-newmont-gold-mine-in-perus-highlands/2011/11/24/gIQAYkOXtN_story.html
Mr. Leech why don't you hint people on the volume of those "hills of Rosia Montana" ? They want 200 tones of gold, and they can get 1.5g of gold from 1 tone of rock. Mr. Leech, can you do the math for us ? Nothing these big was ever done in Europe ! When you blow up so much rock you think the village, which is in the immediate vicinity, will remain intact ?
Mr. Leech, why don't you explain people that 240.000 tones of cyanide will be used and 1.500.000 tones of dangerous chemicals will be used in the process ? You should also mention that 1.5mg/kg is lethal. Sure cyanide evaporates at 26C but where does it go ? Does it turn to rose oil ?
I can't be happy with your explanations on cyanide. You make it sound as if they are scientific. If you are a scientist, of any kind, like myself, you know that it's impossible to understand such a complex experiment.
My intuition on this, that comes from the fact that I am a scientist but not a chemical engineer, was confirmed by the president (and not only him) of the Romanian Academy of Science who is an established researcher and teacher in the University of Cluj (and not some private, 5 years old universities). He emphasized many times the impossibility of fully understanding this process. On TV, in the newspaper.
More importantly, please note how often you use "will": concentration will be strictly controlled, the company will invest a lot of money etc.
Let's learn from our experience. Promises were made before the accident at Baia Mare in 2000.
The trick is also established in the business community: make promises than default when it comes to paying for your mistakes.
Last but not least, why don't you post your comments using some facebook/twitter account so that we know we talk with someone really interested and so that we won't SUSPECT you are paid for the comments you post.