Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kirk Leech

GET UPDATES FROM Kirk Leech
 

Can a gold mine save a village?

Posted: 01/10/11 01:00 BST

Since antiquity Romania has been home to Europe's richest gold mines but after millennia of drilling much of the easily available gold has gone. As recently as 1989 one in ten of the population relied on gold for their livelihoods; today just 50,000 work the mines. Now, rather than prospectors flocking to the hills, Romanians are leaving in droves to look for work elsewhere.

One mine, below the village of Rosia Montana, might spark a new gold rush. The Rosia Montana Goldmine Corporation (RMGC), a joint venture with the Romanian Government who holds a twenty percent stake, estimates the reserves at $30 billion. Yet this possible reversal of fortunes has been halted and the village finds itself at the centre of an international controversy that sets local landowners and cultural preservationists against desperate locals and a giant multi-national mining corporation.

The company proposes stripping down the hills of Rosia Montana, crush the result, and put everything through a cyanide wash that separates gold from surrounding minerals. Extracting gold from low grade ore using cyanide is a process used in over 400 mines worldwide, including Romania. The project would leave most of the village intact, but part of it and the surrounding hills would be consumed in the process, creating new man-made countryside in its wake.

Opponents of the mine have moved to make the village and surrounding area a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This would preserve ancient mine workings for posterity but kill the new mine. With the price of gold likely to break $2000 an ounce, and with rising sovereign debt, can Romania afford to choose eco-friendly tourism over the one chance locals have of saving their livelihoods and boosting the country's economy?

Today clusters of crumbling buildings and rutted roads lead to a cul-de-sac at the end of a deep valley where the mine sits. Rosia Montana is a dying village in a waning area. Unemployment stands at more than 80 per cent since the state gold company Minvest shut up shop in 2006. Just half of the homes have reliable water and it is often rationed to 90 minutes a day. Over 70 per cent of homes lack inside toilets. Rosia Montanans live on one-third of the income of the average Romanian. One in ten lives on about 6 Romanian Lei a day which is equivalent to £1.25 GBP.

There is no public evidence of significant local participation in a grassroots campaign for Rosia Montana to be added to the UNESCO world heritage site list. In fact, most locals appear in favour of the mine. Of the fourteen who competed in the last mayoral election only one opposed its development. He was out of the race after the first stage having garnered only 129 votes. The only local opposition comes from Alburnus Maior, founded in 2000 in response a public announcement of the mining plans. Its alternative is to boost the local economy through organic farming, small craft-based industries and tourism using the cultural heritage of the area. Perhaps motivated by a fear of the unknown, its original 1000 members have now dwindled to just sixty.

Alburnus Maior's membership may have fallen, but it counts powerful international environmental activists, and cultural preservationists as allies. Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, and the Open Society Foundation are just some of the organisations who have joined the opposition. During September, over 500 activists mainly from outside of Romania set up a 'solidarity camp' in the village to oppose the mine. The irony of opposing a mine welcomed by the vast majority of local people, and the Romanian Government, seemed lost on them.

Ironically as well, RGMC has spent millions to excavate and preserve the ruins now being used to justify World Heritage status. It has spent $11 million USD on archaeological research and architectural restoration and has budgeted $45 million USD for an ongoing heritage project.

Romanian archaeologists have unearthed and catalogued fascinating glimpses into the country's history, yet this doesn't mean that Rosia Montana will make the World Heritage List. For Dr Mechtild Rössler, in charge of European and North American World Heritage Sites for UNESCO, the question is whether the site has outstanding universal value, "This can not be judged in the abstract. Naturally people always say their sites are unique, but its uniqueness comes through a global comparative study."

It seems unlikely that Rosia Montana is quite so unique - the Romans and then the Romanians have been busy miners. Over 47 sites of Roman antiquity have been discovered and researched in Romania alone. Further afield the Roman Empire dug up areas from Egypt to Spain to Bulgaria and even to South Wales in its quest for metal.

One can understand why some may want to preserve the peace of the mountains or simply keep their land, but the people of Rosia Montana deserve more than living in a museum foisted on them by outside interests.

I will be chairing a discussion on the politics of cultural preservation at the Battle of Ideas conference in London, 29 & 30 October 2011. Two days of high-level, thought-provoking, public debate organised by the Institute of Ideas, hosted by the Royal College of Art.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:13 PM on 11/27/2011
@All the RMGC employees posting here, saying 'there are no alternatives for Rosia Montana':

Oh yes there are lots of alternatives my narrow-minded RMGC employees....maybe you could see more clearly without that shroud of cyanide infested money around your eyes...I see no bigger diabolical hypocrisy than to claim 'There aren't any alternatives' after 10 years of suffering of RM comunity because of what RMGC (your PR company) did: putting pressure on the authorities to declare a mono-industrial zone, this means that for 10 long years those people became poorer and poorer, and now with a broken spirit they are almost begging....and RMGC (the very reason of their starvation) shows now, after 10 long years of suffering as the holly Mesiah, the salvation, the only alternative....pardon me but this is PURE EVIL. Any alternative is better than the RMGC project ;)
11:13 PM on 11/25/2011
Yes it can! If it couldn't then we wouldn't be discussing it nor accepting it! Those who won't accept it are from far very few!
07:33 PM on 11/25/2011
This project can definitely save the community by offering so many jobs (over 3600 jobs both for locals and for other people), by contributing to development, stimulating the economy, offering opportunities and eliminating poverty.
07:22 PM on 11/25/2011
My sincere opinion is that THIS gold mine will not save Rosia Montana and indeed its preparatory works – such as the forced resettlement of the population and the destruction of properties with important heritage values - clearly evidence this already. The gold lies in and around Rosia Montana and the consequences of this are clear when one simply looks at the mine proposal.

Much of Romania’s economy is conducted informally (up to 70% of it) and the £35/month figure thus doesn’t reflect the reality at Rosia Montana.

It is misleading to say that there will be 3600 new jobs as most of the jobs in that figure relate to the very short time of mine construction (1.5 years). During mine life most of the jobs will go to foreign mine experts (expads) and mine jobs during peak production (year 6) are just under 100. There will be a steady 30 jobs for administrative tasks during the 16 year mine life.

In light of the damage that the mine will cause directly the mine owner is proposing mitigation measures such as the replanting of monocultures to replace the destruction of rich ecosystems, the reconstruction to new towns to replace the destruction of the Rosia Montana community and the reconstruction of plastic 3DRoman Mine galleries to replace their destruction by open cast mining.

If gold mining generally creates wealth how come that most communites around the world where modern mines operate are amongst the poorest of their country?
06:20 PM on 11/25/2011
My sincere opinion is that a gold mine may save a village. As you already wrote, the habitants of Rosia Montana are living with only 35 pounds/month. It's a cruelty. But, the mining project RMGC can give them a chance for a better life, with 3600 new jobs, protection for the environment (nowadays, the village is severely pollution), care for patrimony and important contribution to national budget of Romania.
This comment has been removed.
04:21 PM on 11/25/2011
So, no, dear, a gold mine can save no one.
A gold mine has a 20 year future while a village having a more than 2000 year past can expect better for the word "SAVE".
04:27 PM on 11/25/2011
a gold mine in a village having a more than 2000 years past in mining. another important aspect that you missed out. And by the way actually doing something (something that the locals want) has a much much better chance of saving the village than just saying "save the village".
08:28 PM on 11/25/2011
well the gold mine will also bring other benefits to the area including infrastructure and heritage conservation, this is probably the most important thing , keeping the history alive
03:24 PM on 11/25/2011
Is it acceptable for a British newspaper to be so take sides ?
I did not notice even the slightest intention of equidistance.
11:24 PM on 11/25/2011
So, when other newspaper are taking sides of thos NGOs it's ok right? I hardly think that! It's ok to take sides, hell, I'm taking the side of Rosia Montana's villagers and you don't! So, what's the problem here?
02:27 PM on 11/25/2011
It really is ironical that the ones opposing the mining project are called in translation "save Rosia Montana" when more than 90% of the people living there want the project to start. Not only do they want it but they have come to need it, as unemployment is over 80%. I don't really understand how this goes, to save someone against their will?
03:28 PM on 11/25/2011
Consider that according to Romanian administration the community consists of several villages, some quite remote, and only two of them would be impacted by the project. The oldest and most important village of the Rosia Montana commune is the one to be destroyed, while people living in the former train station in Gura Rosiei surely do not care !...
03:53 PM on 11/25/2011
how is it going to be destroyed if the mining company has invested a lot of money and will invest even more money into preserving the historical houses and galleries? It doesn't make any sense.
01:46 PM on 11/25/2011
Please people do not start with the disaster from Baia Mare. There was another situation, the project was one superficial, which did not provide European standards, given that Romania was not part of the European Union, at that time!!
03:30 PM on 11/25/2011
Nevertheless, Baia Mare exists, and the disaster happened. There is no guarantee that another one would never happen. And there is no guarantee that bankruptcy of a mining company would not occur, which would mean all the ecological costs come to the state. Not to the EU. Quite alike to Baia MAre situation, isn't it ?
03:51 PM on 11/25/2011
actually, no, since the EU laws also provide for an environmental fund to be set up, so that no matter what happens the state doesn't have to pay for the rehabilitation of the environment.
12:06 AM on 11/26/2011
actually there IS! the technology is way better than that one and there are lots of money who can guarantee that a disaster won't happen because the investments are big enough to protect the village and the nature.
01:32 PM on 11/25/2011
Even if it's unbelievable, but in Romanianot only Rosia Montana can be saved with gold but in time the entire economy!! People desperately need jobs, especially as the unemployment is very high!!
03:32 PM on 11/25/2011
You surely had bad mark in Economy class.
Compared to the debt we have right now, the part of the Romanian State is just a drop in the Ocean, while the entire wealth of the site, supposing no costs, would not do it to cover a quarter...
04:01 PM on 11/25/2011
Have you ever heard of the multiplier effect? Have you ever heard of horizontal development? Have you ever heard that the national budget is not the same as the national economy and that in the economy every cent spent by the company, by its workers, partners, suppliers etc.. will be felt? (I'm not really sure if you're actually referring to the sovereign debt or the external debt, which is not actually a debt but more of an accounting trade balance)
04:46 PM on 11/25/2011
so you're saying that we should drop everything until one miraculous investment falls from the sky until our entire external debt is paid off? or we should put everything to work so that we pay the external debt all at once? Welcome back Mr. Ceausescu, I'm sure there are people who've been missing you. really, you should study some economics before...
08:34 PM on 11/25/2011
the project can and will help the entire economy. right now if another wave of the crisis will come we will be doomed if the projects that are pending aren't going to start, and this includes the one at rosia
11:03 PM on 11/26/2011
The other wave is already here, unfortunatelly... So yeah, the project is one of the best options they have.
12:43 PM on 11/25/2011
The resistance against the Rosia Montana gold mining project is one of the rare civil movements in Romania. On the other side, the RMGC has reached to keep the Romanian media - private as well as public ones - quiet by their intensive campaigning for the project. Not even the submission of 100,000 Romanian signatures against the mining project was covered in the news, and the mainly positive reporting about the project itself is very much questionable...
Saving Rosia Montana from mining means to save a village by giving other opportunities than just to destroy it, to save civic behaviour in a country where such thing is poorly developed and to show that values do mean more than just money.
So: Save Rosia Montana!
02:18 PM on 11/25/2011
How do you save Rosia Montana? collecting 100,000 signatures? not a single person who signed, will help people out with anything!! That's for sure!
03:15 PM on 11/25/2011
Do not be so sure of that, niculan ;-)

First of all, of course, the local council of Rosia Montana has to withdraw its decision once taken to favor RMGC by declaring the town a mono-industrial area where no other investment is possible than those in mining. Of course, under this conditions, locals have no other source of income than mining. If local authorities lift off this restriction, free and diverse investment will be possible.
03:41 PM on 11/25/2011
Many of this 100 000 people visited the place and spent some money there. This is not easy, while there is basically no hotel, but some extremely modest pensions, no restaurant, terrace with view to the mountains, sport or fun facilities, and guess why ? Because it is a MONOINDUSTRIAL ZONE. Nothing else can be legally done. And guess why ?
03:35 PM on 11/25/2011
You were right. It is the first time we witnessed a civil movement which was not secretly lead by any party. This is maybe the most important achievement till now.
03:08 AM on 11/25/2011
This comment is not for Mr. Leech but for the people that read this.
My remarks on Paragraph 6.

Mr. Leech, how do you define local ? If you talk about people living within 10 meters of your desired disaster than you have a different definition than mine. About 1 million of people live within a radius of 50km. All are locals dear sir ! Cyanide is carried by rain further away than you can imagine.

For example:
-- the cyanide spilling accident from 2000 in Romania is considered the biggest ecological disaster after Chernobyl.
-- useless to say the cyanide reservoir was way smaller than the one projected for Rosia Montana.
-- cyanide was traced all the way in the Danube, thousands of kilometers away from where the accident happened.
-- fact is Hungary won a process against Romania which has to pay them 120.000.000 euros compensations.
-- the mining company bankrupted, obviously, before paying any compensation to Romania and HUngary.

All this is online info. Just google it please.
02:30 PM on 11/25/2011
cyanide is not carried by rain anywhere, only in your imagination. It is one of the myths created surrounding cyanides in our country, the opposers of the project have created a real mythology without any real basis. You don't say that the concentration will be half as much as the maximum EU allows (from 2018 onward). You don't say anything about the environment fund which will be set up according to the same legislation. Why is that? I think these are very important facts which you ignore just so you can keep on protesting. But blind protesting is never a good option. Face the reality.
03:37 PM on 11/25/2011
Reality. You are very active, answering almost every post. But we can do better.
You also seem to know a lot about mining.
What's your job, by the way ?
03:51 PM on 11/25/2011
Regarding the cyanide issue please read my reply to Calimandru.
Nevertheless, the opposer of the project have the sour experience of Baia Mare in 2000.
There's no mythology.

A fund for environment ? Excuse me but we all came across this pathetic scheme. What is the value of the fund and what is its percentage of the profits ? Let's make a bet. I say it's less than 0.1%. Can you please check for me ?

Every dubious person/business in this world has a Foundation to clean their public image. The financial speculator Mr. Soros or the gold miner Mr Paulson are not an exception. I'm sure you know more such as McDonald's Foundation, Tim Horton's Foundation etc etc

Cheers to all the readers !
08:36 PM on 11/25/2011
the cyanide spilling accident from 2000 could have been avoided easily if the romanian authorities would have checked the dam, the same case applies for the tragedy in Ukraine from 2010, the dam was overfilled and it collapsed.
10:24 PM on 11/25/2011
As usual, the deceased is guilty.

To me is one more case of unfulfilled promises.
"we ll build the safest thing in the world, trust us"

No one is willing to insure these things because the probability of accident is 1.
03:04 AM on 11/25/2011
This comment is not for Mr. Leech but for the people that read this.
My remarks on Paragraph 5:
Mr. Leech, why don't you mention that (corrupted) politicians (paid by the Canadian owned Rosia Montana Gold Corporation) classified the zone as monoindustrial. No other type of business is allowed there ! Unemployment high? It's a surprise for you only!
02:32 PM on 11/25/2011
and again you make no mention that this is only on a portion of the commune, the rest of it, 80%, is free for any business. But it would be weird to be a residential zone where the mining project will be, don't you think?
02:56 PM on 11/25/2011
he doesn't mention that because it would defeat his argument. I think that's the real problem, when speaking about the mining project, the people against it select the information so that it fits their needs, but end up ignoring very important pieces of information which make their arguments redundant. This is a very good example. Another example would be the European legislation, its very existence is ignored by people against the mining project because it doesn't fit with the image that they are trying to create. Nevertheless, that legislation is real, whether they like it or not.
03:49 PM on 11/25/2011
While the impact zone of the commune is the one of highest touristical, historical, traditional and cultural interest, why would it be that touristic business should be located elsewhere ? We do not speak about a computer business, but of business whose success depends precisely on the location.
On the other hand, beautiful villages of the community which would be of some interest like Vartop for instance are deprived of access roads. You see, I know places as well as you know figures...
Rosia Montana is one of the very few villages where you can get to a center of interest on a normal road. Remember we are in Apuseni, and most of the villages have poor road acces. (this is for the others, you know it well).
08:38 PM on 11/25/2011
Come on we all know that politicians are corrupt, but in this case if they would have taken the bribe the project would be started right now. Think how fast other projects/privatizations were started and finished, think of petrom, bcr and the list is almost endless
12:16 AM on 11/26/2011
Exactly my point! It already took so long so it can't be a about bribe since our president is at his 2nd mandate...
It's about decisions! Very good ones, finally!
03:02 AM on 11/25/2011
This comment is not for Mr. Leech but for the people that read this.
My remarks on Paragraph 3

. I believe cyanide is used in over 400 countries. This doesn't make it better. Mr. Leech, why don't you refer people to this article published yesterday

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/industries/thousand-protest-against-newmont-gold-mine-in-perus-highlands/2011/11/24/gIQAYkOXtN_story.html

Mr. Leech why don't you hint people on the volume of those "hills of Rosia Montana" ? They want 200 tones of gold, and they can get 1.5g of gold from 1 tone of rock. Mr. Leech, can you do the math for us ? Nothing these big was ever done in Europe ! When you blow up so much rock you think the village, which is in the immediate vicinity, will remain intact ?

Mr. Leech, why don't you explain people that 240.000 tones of cyanide will be used and 1.500.000 tones of dangerous chemicals will be used in the process ? You should also mention that 1.5mg/kg is lethal. Sure cyanide evaporates at 26C but where does it go ? Does it turn to rose oil ?
02:52 PM on 11/25/2011
Mr. Cookies cyanide only evaporates at certain pH conditions, so it "goes" nowhere. It decays fairly quickly. you should mention that also. Also you should mention that it will end up in an isolated pond with a concentration far below the maximum concentration allowed by the EU, because there are strict guidelines regarding this activity, the strictest in the world. also you should point out that the village will not remain intact (as is) because the mining company will invest a lot of money into the rehabilitation of cultural elements, buildings, roman galleries. Maybe these things don't interest you, but they are realities which should not be ignored when assessing the project.
03:33 PM on 11/25/2011
Mr/Ms Calimandru.

I can't be happy with your explanations on cyanide. You make it sound as if they are scientific. If you are a scientist, of any kind, like myself, you know that it's impossible to understand such a complex experiment.

My intuition on this, that comes from the fact that I am a scientist but not a chemical engineer, was confirmed by the president (and not only him) of the Romanian Academy of Science who is an established researcher and teacher in the University of Cluj (and not some private, 5 years old universities). He emphasized many times the impossibility of fully understanding this process. On TV, in the newspaper.

More importantly, please note how often you use "will": concentration will be strictly controlled, the company will invest a lot of money etc.
Let's learn from our experience. Promises were made before the accident at Baia Mare in 2000.

The trick is also established in the business community: make promises than default when it comes to paying for your mistakes.

Last but not least, why don't you post your comments using some facebook/twitter account so that we know we talk with someone really interested and so that we won't SUSPECT you are paid for the comments you post.
03:57 PM on 11/25/2011
Sorry. The roman mining galleries you mentioned are built precisely in those mountains which are to be destroyed, Carnic, Orlea, Cetate, because the Romans were not stupid to mine gold where there was none. So what would your employer rehabilitate ? I will tell you: a plaster copy.