iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Laura Bates

GET UPDATES FROM Laura Bates
 

Chris Brown's Tattoo Shows Exactly How Seriously We Take Domestic Violence

Posted: 13/09/2012 00:00

In the UK, 45% of women have experienced some form of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. At least 80,000 women are raped every year. On average, two women per week are killed by a violent partner or ex-partner, making up an enormous 40% of all female homicides.

In the US in 2005, three women every day on average were murdered by an intimate partner. One third of all female homicides were perpetrated by an intimate partner. The National Crime Victimization Survey suggested that 232,960 women were raped or sexually assaulted in 2006.

Globally, at least one third of all women are beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused by an intimate partner in the course of their lifetime. And several global surveys suggest that half of all women who die in homicide cases are killed by their current or former partners.

Singer Chris Brown is famous for being charged with assault after he attacked his then-girlfriend, singer Rihanna, leaving her face battered and bruised and her lips split. This month, he unveiled a new tattoo extremely prominently located on his neck - visible to everybody in almost any outfit.

It is a tattoo of a woman's face. One eye is considerably blacker than the other, with a clear dark circle drawn widely around it and the lid squeezed shut. Black smudges and lines around the rest of the face are extremely reminiscent of bruises and wounds, though it is not clear whether this is what they are meant to represent. Across the lips of the face are three sharp, clearly drawn lines resembling splits, or animalistic claw marks.

After his conviction, Brown's lawyer spoke publicly in his defence. He said "He has always wanted to take responsibility... He wanted to put out the message that domestic violence is not acceptable."

Yet Brown's behaviour since the assault has sent anything but a message of contrition. First he posted a public video attacking those who had criticised him, saying "Everybody that's haters, they just been haters" and claiming "I ain't a monster". Then, in February this year, US Weekly published a report from a woman who claimed Brown approached her at an awards show using the pick-up line "Can I get your number? I promise I won't beat you." After he won two awards at this year's Grammys, he tweeted "HATE ALL U WANT BECUZ I GOT A GRAMMY Now! That's the ultimate F**** OFF!" He swiftly followed this with ""IM BACK SO WATCH MY BaCK as I walk away from all this negativity".

With this tattoo, he has surely surpassed his self-proclaimed "ultimate F*** OFF" by unashamedly emerging in public with an enormous, clear brand of the crime he committed proudly splashed across his body for all to see. If ever there was a screaming message of utter disdain for the severity of his actions, the seriousness of his conviction or the impact of his influence, this is it.

It is almost impossible to believe that Brown could have failed to notice the obvious correlations when he chose the tattoo, though his rep (unsurprisingly) claims it is based on a "sugar skull" and a MAC cosmetics advert, not an abused woman or an image of Rihanna.

But whether or not Brown intended these implications when he chose the tattoo; whether it was 'supposed' to come out as such a close likeness to a bruised and battered female face is almost irrelevant. The important fact is that given its overwhelmingly clear resemblance to the picture of the woman he assaulted, Brown has felt confident enough flaunting utter disrespect in the face of the crime he was convicted of to appear in public with it blazoned across his body.

It is critical to note that no minder, manager, PR advisor or other member of Brown's entourage felt concerned enough about the public reaction to advise covering the tattoo or wearing concealing clothing. In a world in which celebrity dress, appearance and speech are policed and manipulated ad infinitum, nobody in Brown's publicity team was worried that this public glorification of a crime that affects hundreds of thousands of women globally; a crime of which Brown has actually been convicted, could cause sufficient public anger to damage his reputation.

But really, it is no surprise that Brown feels so confident. Why would he be concerned that reminders of the assault would harm his career, when it has gone from strength to strength in the wake of his conviction? Kristen Stewart has been forced 'into hiding' by the severity of the vitriolic public backlash after her brief liaison with a married director. Emma Watson sparked thousands of outraged and salacious reports across the web this week when a sliver of her (covered) nipple was visible for a moment at the edge of her red carpet dress. Britney Spears's career plummeted into a crash landing after she publically shaved her head. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan faced international outrage and claims she was "letting her fans down" when she chose to lose weight slowly after the birth of her daughter.

Yet whilst Stewart has reportedly been dropped from the sequel of the movie directed by the man with whom she had a liaison, actor Charlie Sheen, who has been convicted of assaulting his wife, has just started starring in a new TV show (the ironically named Anger Management). While Spears nosedived off the map after her public meltdown, Brown's album hit number one in the UK charts on Sunday.

Singers like Brown are entirely dependent on public opinion, the support of their fans and sales of their music to maintain their celebrity and popularity. If he feels confident appearing in public with an image of a woman's beaten face tattooed into his neck it is because all evidence has taught him that public concern about domestic violence simply isn't strong enough to outweigh celebrity adulation. That whilst female celebrities are endlessly scrutinised, criticised and made to pay over and over for their mistakes, male celebrities seem able to act with near impunity. That domestic violence and sexual assault just don't sit high enough on our list of priorities even to stop Radio 1 from starting to play his songs again just two years after his conviction.

And perhaps it is not only the general public that needs to take a tougher stance on domestic violence and assault:

The police report from Brown's attack on Rihanna describes how he "shoved her head against the passenger window... causing an approximate one inch raised circular contusion" and how "he punched her in the left eye with his right hand. He then... continued to punch her in the face with his right hand. The assault caused [her] mouth to fill with blood and blood to spatter all over her clothing and the interior of the vehicle." After he began to punch her for a third time, the report describes how she bent over in an "attempt to protect her face and head from the barrage of punches being levied upon her". Next, he "placed her in a head lock... and bit her on her left ear". After yet another bout of punching, he put pressure on her carotid arteries "causing her to be unable to breathe and she began to lose consciousness".

After Brown's hearing, the judge said "I want Mr. Brown to be treated the same as any other defendant who would come into this court. That means something like graffiti removal and a two-week domestic violence program."

 

Follow Laura Bates on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EverydaySexism

FOLLOW CELEBRITY
In the UK, 45% of women have experienced some form of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. At least 80,000 women are raped every year. On average, two women per week are killed by a violent ...
In the UK, 45% of women have experienced some form of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. At least 80,000 women are raped every year. On average, two women per week are killed by a violent ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 333
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
20:35 on 20/09/2012
I tried to wonder why he would put this tattoo on himself, wondering if maybe he did it for some sort of healing or apology, but after some thought I came to the conclusion that this could not possibly be the reason. There are many ways in which he could apologize, maybe by taking some of his fortune and opening up domestic violence shelters and offering counseling to victims of domestic violence who cannot afford the expense. He continues to be loved because people do not understand until they experience something for themselves or touches someone close to them. Chris Brown, the entertainer is all people see. I personally refuse to give money to anyone who thinks violence towards women is OK.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Fleischer
08:56 on 15/09/2012
Those of you attempting to call the author out having obviously never had a fist to your eye or your esophagus nearly crushed.

Enjoy life in ignorance.
00:05 on 15/09/2012
i'm agreeing with LB.furthermore, reports stated that CB threatened to kill R once home.he had numerous incidents in the last couple of months.good that the UK barred him from entering.obviously there's something wrong with the guy.R's handling of the situation is disappointing to many but maybe excusable - medical experts say something like this stays with you for the rest of your life.the one most at "fault" is the justice system:the average person gets way more serious penalties for an assault of this magnitude.
botazefa
Sounds like Bodhisattva
17:54 on 14/09/2012
Maybe Brown was indulging a bit of self-control by putting his own version of a Scarlet Letter on himself. Maybe he's trying to do some healing.

Yeah, I doubt it too but it's possible.
CorpTreason
Fascism... it's what's for breakfast
17:20 on 14/09/2012
The lowest common denominator prevails yet again. People are far more primitive than the fancy clothes and sophisticated tech gadgetry might suggests. The entire world of "professional" wrestling should establish the developmental level of a lot of people. The world of "gangster rap" still more evidence. Actually, in general there is far more evidence that people are over-dressed wild beasts than that we are thinking, feeling beings capable of wisdom and compassion. The latter is the exception. The masses are ignorant and savage, and make stars out of their own.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald Bowman
21:01 on 14/09/2012
This is racist. Chris Brown is a singer, not a gangster rapper. At least get your information straight.
CorpTreason
Fascism... it's what's for breakfast
23:45 on 14/09/2012
I find you racist for thinking this racist. I didn't say Chris Brown was a gangsta rapper OR a professional wrestler! Get your reading comprehension straight.
photo
Rob Gadianton
Reeking Havoc In America Since 52 AD
16:33 on 14/09/2012
Who's Chris Brown and who's we?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charleyvldm9
He thinks outside the box.
16:00 on 14/09/2012
Why do "intelligent" humans inject their bodies with loads of black ink, to prove what???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RagaMuffin
Fighting ignorance & stupidity 1 post at a time
14:24 on 14/09/2012
OMG!!! Will you get off Chris Brown jock strap. Charlie Sheen assaulted his wife and put a knife to her neck. You and others are making it really hard to believe that this constant Chris Brown hate is not racial.
Fellow American
I prefer not to have a micro-bio
16:21 on 14/09/2012
The author of this article is against domestic violence... not black people. You should seek help.
16:52 on 14/09/2012
It is against men and hating on men is WRONG! If she wants to talk about domestic violence then why doesn't she mention Rihanna's repeated and public violence against Chris Brown? This article is sexist and biased.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RagaMuffin
Fighting ignorance & stupidity 1 post at a time
17:10 on 14/09/2012
Did you say, she needs help? Because to constantly focus on a situation that has long since been resolved to the point that the so called victim has forgiven the perpetrator really speaks to someone with personal issues. People create their own issues that it is up to them to resolve. As a man I treat people like I want to be treated. But if a woman feels that she can strike a man without repercussions then she is a bigger man than the one she hit.
12:15 on 14/09/2012
I would say the article is rather sexist, feminist generated and a little off the point.
In my opinion Brown's career has continued to grow as the majority of his sales are to young girls, an audience with a very immature perspective on domestic violence. With that in mind I think it is fair that some continue to criticize Brown's actions, despite the pair seeming to have moved on, as many of his audience do require educating on the issue.
The tat is rather questionable and is probably intended to be as any press for these dim-wits seems to be an industry standard objective. Regardless of it's influence, it is an image of a horrifically injured female face plastered on someone who makes horrific injuries to female faces.
I think questioning reasons behind his actions, his background, up-bringing, relation to US gang culture tattooing, whatever ...... it all serves to create more headlines for Mr Brown and they don't seem to be hurting his career.
For me it comes down to one message that influenced me growing up in the UK from the majority of my male peers. That is, a real man doesn't use his naturally gifted greater power on women, children or elderly. But now that's the sort of sexist 'real man' superiority blurb feminists have been stamping out.
16:03 on 14/09/2012
"I think it is fair that some continue to criticize Brown's actions, despite the pair seeming to have moved on, as many of his audience do require educating on the issue."

Why don't we rely on parents to educate their kids about domestic violence and stop leaning so hard on a young couple who made some terrible choices. I am sure if your past was put out their would be many decisions you are not proud of. There are plently of otehr ways to teach about doemstic violence without using these two.
18:51 on 14/09/2012
When it comes to educating youth about serious issues, anything that gets the message across is a good thing. It is always best to try to make something positive out of something negative.
My message is that the headlines are not having the desired effect and are potentially aiding his career through excessive press coverage.
Also, I mention the message that was instilled in me by my male peers, my father included.

"I am sure if your past was put out their would be many decisions you are not proud of"
Fortunately I don't work in the public eye or have a responsibility to behave appropriately in front of such a massive impressionable audience. As a parent you are responsible to help your children learn from your mistakes. If you don't beat women personally or have a criminal record to impress your little ones with, I would recommend using these fools as an example.
08:19 on 14/09/2012
"At least 800,000 women are raped every year."

This can't be real, right??
GHO
Sooner or later you run out of other peoples money
12:16 on 14/09/2012
A striking number indeed. I had to wonder the same thing once the author juxtaposed the US 2006 figure of around 233k. The US is 5x the size of the UK, yet there are only 1/3 the sexual assaults? This seems very unlikely. Either the 800k number is far too high or the 233k number is way too low.
17:16 on 14/09/2012
I suggest you read the link the author provided it says 80,000 not 800,000.
17:14 on 14/09/2012
The author added a ZERO so she just published an our right LIE.

"45% of women have experienced some form of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.1
Around 21% of girls, experience some form of child sexual abuse2
At least 80,000 women suffer rape every year."

I went to the link provided and it clearly says 80,000.
21:27 on 14/09/2012
Thanks for the update. And I haven't seen a correction. New to the editorial quality in huffingtonpost UK.
07:04 on 14/09/2012
i cant understand why people just give this guy a pass no one is holding him accountable for what he did not even rihanna i think their both sick! im tired of seeing men get away with brutalizeing woman chris brown, charlie sheen,mel gibson,mike tyson they have all brutalized woman more than once and people just look past it i dont get it these pricks are not to be idolized and any one who thinks their funny or charming is demented!if your one of those people who defends any of these guys then mabey you need to ask yourself this question what if someone you loved was beaten or killed by a man your sister your mother would you be ok with that? would you give the guy a pass then?
16:04 on 14/09/2012
why are you giving charlie sheen a pass and all the otehr celebrities
photo
SocratesFan
Elitist who loves books and learning
17:04 on 14/09/2012
Um...seeingred75 DIDN'T give Charlie Sheen and the other celebrities a free pass. In fact that whole list of celebrities he was criticizing as not being held accountable, his argument was that society is already giving them a free pass.
16:55 on 14/09/2012
" im tired of seeing men get away with brutalizeing woman chris brown, charlie sheen,mel gibson,mike tyson they have all brutalized woman more than once "

For one Chris Brown was punished and prosecuted and what men are sick of is all these women getting away with domestic violence. This happens all the time and men need to stop calling the police every time so we can see what equality really looks like.
photo
SocratesFan
Elitist who loves books and learning
17:05 on 14/09/2012
Could you be more specific, good sir? I'm not really familiar with the statistics on women committing domestic violence against men. Will you please inform me what your sources were, so that I may learn something new?

Thank you very much in advance.
06:47 on 14/09/2012
Where to begin... First of all, the author mentions how appalling it is that a radio station started to play his music again "just" two years after his conviction. What? What about your defense of women whose careers go into a tailspin as a result of their own actions?

The way she painted all the females in the article as being badgered, hounded and "forced into hiding" after their slips and mistakes (she refers to a woman cheating with a married father of two as a "brief liaison", if that were a man I have a feeling there would be some very different adjectives there), then insinuated that all men should be continuously hounded years after their transgressions is unbelievable. No mention, either, that Rihanna engaged in her own assault as well. Any valid arguments this author had were completely negated by her blatant sexism and extremely irrational feminism. Any article about gender equality SHOULD DEMONSTRATE EQUALITY. I'm sick of people screaming about sexism, then bashing men and completely letting women off the hook from any amoral transgressions.

Relating his Tweets about "leaving the negativity behind" to being unremorseful for his actions is absurd. How dare you say that years later he should be wallowing in pity, shame and despair instead of moving ahead with a productive life! Time to forgive him and move on. If you feel it necessary to opine about his tattoo, maybe I'll take it seriously if it isn't completely saturated in delusional feminist overtones.
13:05 on 14/09/2012
ANOTHER comment making out that the author is suddenly randomly going after poor Chris Brown years after the assault for no reason whatsoever! Open your eyes!!! The guy just got a tattoo of a beaten woman's face on his neck!!!
15:27 on 14/09/2012
Ummm..No he didn't.
16:05 on 14/09/2012
and this tattoo would mean what that he likes to beat women? I am confused by the outraged.
16:57 on 14/09/2012
" Any valid arguments this author had were completely negated by her blatant sexism and extremely irrational feminism. Any article about gender equality SHOULD DEMONSTRATE EQUALITY. I'm sick of people screaming about sexism, then bashing men and completely letting women off the hook from any amoral transgressions."

Brilliant, and thank you for understanding what true equality means. I wish more people did.
06:20 on 14/09/2012
Oh and another thing, Bringing up Charlie Sheen is a fantastic comparison though because we need to examine why this man in his forties has been accused of multiple violent offenses against women (accidentally shooting one, holding a knife on another, choking another, and bashing another ones face into the ground) yet NO STORIES written about how someone with those issues continued to be the highest paid actor on U.S. tv and still has a lucrative career. Charlie gets a "mention" from you....a mention, not a story. No one protests when he reunites with his ex that said he held a knife to her throat and threaten to have her killed and disposed of so no one can find her. But somehow Chris Brown draws most of your ire. Yes we don't apparently take DV as seriously as we should... Including you. Where's the fury for Charlie, I mean the genuine fury? Was it because his "victims" just aren't high profile enough (I think so)? Is it because he's a celeb (which you ask or allude to within the article and that is a good question in general) or is it because we only care about the victim when they are pretty, seemingly nice young women, not women like Brooke Mueller who have a bit of a past. Where was the outpouring of support for her? I'm always amazed that people are so riled up about Chris Brown but virtually mute on others.
06:12 on 14/09/2012
Ma'am this article is REACHING! You even referenced a bogus US Weekly article that he denied happened (and anyone with any level of common sense realized was manufactured). Clearly you are attempting to set a tone by including gossip rag rumors. The tattoo artist confirmed the tattoos origin and it is a day of the dead tattoo and a MAC cosmetics ad. The image is NOT an image of a battered woman, go online and research Dia de Los Muertos tattoos.

Are you seriously attempting to compare the publics reaction of Kirsten Stewarts affair with the reaction of people with the Chris Brown assault? Are you serious? Or Emma Watson (didn't even hear about a firestorm about nipple slippage in the States). And Britneys meltdown was much more involved than you are attempting to make it, she held her children hostage and has to be removed from her own home. Lost primary custody and was placed in a cOnservatorship....not just shaving her head. But you decided to wrap this balanced article with the summary of the assault (from a search warrant affidavit, not the final police report concluding the investigation) that is 3years old. You, and others, are still talking about it so clearly it hasn't faded from the worlds consciousness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
s3dg
02:29 on 14/09/2012
M-A-L-E B-A-S-H-I-N-G