Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leigh Purves

GET UPDATES FROM Leigh Purves
 

Why Should Katy Perry Sacrifice Her Career for Kids?

Posted: 02/01/12 00:00

So this is 2012. And reports today in Britain suggest Katy Perry, shock horror, chose her career over having a baby with Russell Brand.

First of all I find it very hard to believe having worked with Russell Brand on several TV shows, that the loveable lad would insist on Katy quitting her global music plans to have children with him. I really do.

But it does throw up the question - what right does anyone have to insist that a woman should put their partners needs to spread sperm before her own needs? This is not 1952.

Hell no, this is an era where women are climbing the career ladder much more effectively than some men. Babies or no babies.

More and more women I know are making the most of both worlds - working full time and being a mum whilst sending their MEN home to be house husbands. And I dare say the blokes are doing a decent job at it too (although their multi-tasking abilities may never be a strong point, think feeding and faxing whilst doing an online shop).

My point is this. Katy Perry has been singing since she was a child. At the age of 17 she was working hard to become a signed solo artist. She's not relied on cheap publicity or reality TV to make her fame. She's a true talented artist who made a name for herself in her own right.

Some may say she could have kids then come back to her glittering career. But this is a woman who knows what she wants and has fought tooth and nail for the success she has today. And she's clearly happy doing her own thing.

Unlike some men.

A friend recently dated a guy who was 36 - she, 24. It was all going well until the recent phone call. "I don't mind you having your career til you're 28," he says seriously. "But then I want kids."

Understandably she ended it there and then. I'd be keen to hear from men who disagree and think it is okay for women to put their careers on hold to have kids. Sure, there's an element of deciding what you'd both like from life before throwing yourself into commitment.

But I'd love to know I'm not alone thinking there's something strangely grotesque and weak about women churning out children just because a man says so....

 

Follow Leigh Purves on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RealLeighPurves

So this is 2012. And reports today in Britain suggest Katy Perry, shock horror, chose her career over having a baby with Russell Brand. First of all I find it very hard to believe having worked with...
So this is 2012. And reports today in Britain suggest Katy Perry, shock horror, chose her career over having a baby with Russell Brand. First of all I find it very hard to believe having worked with...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
17:25 on 15/01/2012
Surely, surely this is something that should be discussed and mutual consent agreed to BEFORE tying the knot. Every couple thinking about marriage should discuss this before getting engaged!! Too much rushing into marriage due to lust and not enough thinking through all these big questions. No, he cannot tell her what to do - but he should have made his feelings known, as should Katy, before they thought about marriage!!
17:22 on 15/01/2012
Surely, surely this is something you discuss and come to mutual consent over BEFORE tying the knot. This is a crucial decision that all couples should discuss before deciding to get engaged and married!!
11:04 on 09/01/2012
1. Russell Brand and Katy Perry appear to have separated because Russell was consistently unable to contain his scornful opinions of Katy's family's evangelical Christianity - nothing whatever to do with any insistence upon Katy having children.
2. Katy Perry has argued strongly that no-one should (or has any right to) attempt to "speak for her" regarding her separation. This would include you, Ms Purves. If you feel an overwhelming urge to throw in your few cents' worth, it might be a good idea to check the basis for your arguments, rather than relying on early assumptions made by a lazy media in the absence of any comments from the affected parties?
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
03:26 on 09/01/2012
Climbing the ladder and having babies. As one of the 1st truly Independent women I know, I cannot believe I'm going to say this.

Have your career. But, when you have a baby, be a Mother. There is nothing more important than having a Mom at home and a Dad for your children. Nothing replaces that sense of love and security.

I wish I'd had it, and now that I see the difference, I wish I'd done it. Being a stay at home Good Mom and Housewife is the hardest and most important job in the world.

My hat is off to all the Mom's who were smart enough and lucky enough to do that!
17:23 on 15/01/2012
well done, well done, well done. I am so thankful that I had the option to and chose to be an at home mum. Best decision ever!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
django707
Reinhardt not Unchained
21:34 on 08/01/2012
A bit of reading between the lines is in order when it comes to celebrity breakups. Wanting a baby may be the polite way of saying he was tired of his wife's "partying." Nobody, male or female, likes being in a marriage with a "self indulger."
I find your knee-jerk response a bit reactionary and unenlightened.
Career has been made into a holy concept for feminists. They continue to struggle for the right to have their careers be recognized as important as men's. As if having a career actually was so fulfilling for men. Which is why most of them drone off to jobs they despise, drink copious amounts of alcohol, pops pills, cheat on their spouses and have been, historically, unavailable for their children.
All in the name of these holy careers.
Women are vastly superior to men in many ways. What they juggle on a daily basis, fifty men couldn't accomplish.
Their abilities to hold together communities and negotiate difficult (usually male) personalities leaves me feeling that only women should run things. Politically and economically.
However, this career thing needs some exploring.
The elevation of women's status should have lead to a remaking of enslaving economic models.
This hasn't happened.
Kate Perry's right to be indulged has no more value or importance than any male narcissist's.
And every time a woman in power behaves as poorly as her male counterpart, it does nothing to further our evolution.
Spoiled children are everywhere.
Male and female.
photo
Savine
The course of true love never did run smooth. WS.
06:12 on 09/01/2012
A very interesting perspective - and refreshing really.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
django707
Reinhardt not Unchained
19:00 on 09/01/2012
Thank you. Would just like to see gender concepts evolve a bit more and take part in that dialogue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peggy Kendrick
Edited micro-bio. Happy now!?
12:36 on 08/01/2012
I suspect the whole baby thing is a ruse. In effect, we marry strangers. We don't know what our spouse is truly like until we've lived with them for a long time. In the eighteen months they were married how many consecutive nights did they spend under the same roof? The warmth radiated from your partner soon wears off if they're not actually close enough for you to feel it. He says "I want a baby" thinking this will make them a family. She says "I don't want one right now" thinking his idea is unreasonable and will so alter her life she will be forever trapped and unhappy. For both it becomes a deal breaker because the relationship has little foundation. It's a good excuse to file for divorce and it excites the media enough to boost a few careers and create pages like this where people who really know absolutely nothing about what went on in the relationship can comment like experts.
11:21 on 04/01/2012
This article honestly baffled me, because I haven't even considered this divorce from this point of view.

Of course, Russel Brand shouldn't put his needs or wants to have children before Katy Perry wants/needs to have a career, and she has EVERY RIGHT to refuse if she doesn't feel like it.
On the other hand, if Russell Brand feels like his goal of have a family aren't met by Katy Perry, he has every right to divorce her to find a better-suited partner for him. I would say exactly the same about a woman who left her husband because she wants kids and he doesn't.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
23:05 on 02/01/2012
More pertinently, why would she want a child that shared genetic material with Russell Brand?
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ppenguinator
Life's too imprtant to be taken seriously.
22:09 on 02/01/2012
Different people want different things. Some men and women want to be part of a "traditional" family, others want their families to be any one of countless different types. You just have to hope you find someone who wants the same thing.
21:59 on 02/01/2012
Is it any coincidence this news has come out just as both these 2 "performers " careers seem to be dead in the water ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
13:44 on 03/01/2012
Are you kidding? Katy Perry is still phenomenally successful. Grammy nominations, the most consecutive top 5 Billboard singles of any female artist, huge international presence... regardless of whether or not you rate her, she's incredibly successful by most objective assessments. Russell Brand's career has waned but only slightly. Neither of them is this desperate for publicity - just because you don't like them doesn't mean they're not successful.
21:52 on 02/01/2012
Isn't that something the couple should discuss and decide together, preferably before getting married? I know plenty of women who have more or less foisted their desire to have children on men. Wouldn't this cooperative decision be a sign of maturity?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
12:23 on 02/01/2012
Women should have THEIR choices and should always resist falling for the pressure of traditions. Brand was stupid on this thing. She is the mother, she decides. period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
15:43 on 03/01/2012
So what, if she decides she wants kids and he doesn't, that's tough luck on him? Having kids should always be a mutual decision. The stupid thing here is that they got married without talking about little things like "whether we want kids in the near future", and that's on both of them.
17:16 on 08/01/2012
How do you know who was right or wrong? Unless we know whether they got married after agreeing to start a family within 2 years and which Katy since went back on her commitment to do so, we have absolutely no idea who is 'right' or 'wrong'. It's ridiculous to make out that starting a family is always a woman's choice alone! It is a JOINT decision & those women repeately commenting to the contrary are simply selfish feminists who don't believe in equality but in the 'I'm always right' mentailty. Getting married is a joint decision and a commitment and what and how people agree to it and under what conditions are for each couple to decide. The worst thing possible is to arry under false pretences - on either side e.g. if the man or woman pretends to want kids to get married but then changes their mind later.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kneadles
00:06 on 02/01/2012
The man has the right to want whatever he wants and to make his wishes known. The woman then can say yea or nay. I don't think men should be ashamed of wanting a stay-at-home wife/mom, but nor should the women be ashamed If they don't want the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
11:21 on 02/01/2012
That's about the size of it in my view. People need to discuss things before they commit to each other - hopefully they'll then be able to make whatever they agree on work for them.
23:10 on 01/01/2012
'churning out kids because a man says so' suggests that women don't want children. This is by no means the case. Lots of people genuinely want to become parents, they know what sort of age they want to do that at and what kind of upbringing they want these children to have. There are a lot of people of both sexes looking for that person who will be the other half of a parenting team. This is not necessarily a men vs women issue and its quite anti-women to act as though women who want to be mothers have surrendered to become a passive womb - no matter which partner goes into full time work outside the home.
17:21 on 08/01/2012
Isn't it just ironic how women used to complain that men 'didn't' want kids when they 'did' - and now they just complain that men 'want' kids when they don't! Clearly it's pointless having any kind of debate on issues with anyone who believes they're right regardless of their opinions when they hold double standards!