Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Liam McLaughlin

GET UPDATES FROM Liam McLaughlin
 

Absolutism, Not Islam, Is The Problem

Posted: 12/09/2012 21:57

At first glance, religion has always been the enemy of freedom. By its very nature, religion is seemingly didactic and absolutist, claiming to be the answer to all the world's problems - to be the source of fundamental truth.

So it is that Islam is again attracting negative attention in the press. The needless death in Benghazi of the American Ambassador Chris Stevens, killed by smoke inhalation after the US consulate was stormed by Muslims livid about the trailer for a US-made film apparently disrespectful of the Prophet Mohammad called The Innocence of Muslims, is a nasty reminder of the inability of Islam to bear criticism or insult.

That Channel 4's decision to cancel a screening of Tom Holland's documentary Islam: The Untold Story was announced only a day before the tragedy in Libya is a strange coincidence. After it was broadcast in late August, Channel 4 reportedly received around 1200 complaints. The documentary focused on Islam's early history, and speculated that the version of Islam that exists today developed not in Mecca, but somewhere in the vicinity of Palestine around 200 years after the Prophet Mohammad passed away.

Whatever you may think of a film which insults the Prophet Mohammad, or Tom Holland's conjectures, they are to be countered by rational debate, not bigoted threats or actual violence. It is not acceptable for any group to use their liberty and/or free speech to deny the same to another. Each time a religion claims that its own ignorance is sacred, it strikes a blow not only to freedom of speech but also to the idea of a common humanity.

However, we must remember that intolerance is not a characteristic unique to religion. As with all organic symbols rooted deeply in human identities, Islam - like all other religions - is open to abuse by those seeking to wield power and terror. But many other divides have also been exploited in the same way, such as race in Nazi Germany, class in Soviet Russia, and tribe in Rwanda. Whatever Islam's problems and failures, they are the result of human fallibility, not some contrived view of religion or God. In fact, both the Nazis and the Soviets were secular regimes.

The issue, rather, is absolutism. Every human has their own conception of how to achieve 'the good life', but besides very limited exceptions, it is wrong and unnatural to impose these onto anyone else. One of the most important things shared in common by belief systems which turn into absolutist ideologies is that despite their supposedly noble aims for humanity, they begin to violently enforce these beliefs onto people regardless of whether or not they agree.

Islam is no different because, like all other beliefs, it is a spectrum, and can be manipulated to extremity for the sake of power. But that is not to say that at its essence it is fundamentally illiberal and destructive, just as Communism, Republicanism, and even Nationalism were not fundamentally illiberal and destructive until they were steered by often psychopathic leaders to forcefully impose themselves onto people; becoming as a result the terrible absolutist extremes of Stalinism, Bonapartism, and Fascism, respectively. Islam, when left alone by intolerant psychopaths, is actually a peaceful and humane religion.

Ironically, negative and ignorant criticisms of Islam often come either from atheists who believe their own rationality to be the objective truth, or fundamentalist Christians who would argue against abortion rights for women who were raped. Tellingly, one of the producers of The Innocence of Muslims was Pastor Terry Jones who last year burned the Qur'an. Worse, the director of the film, Sam Bacile, said in a recent interview that "Islam is a cancer, period," while Richard Dawkins has in the past described Islam as "one of the great evils in the world". It is these levels of ignorance and hatred which lead along that dangerous road to absolutism.

All human beliefs contain within them the seeds of absolutism. As citizens it is our duty to respect the beliefs of others without resorting to the extremes of condoning morally reprehensible behaviour or condemning ideas we can't understand. Ultimately, the only way to fight absolutism is to first fight the absolutist tendencies that lie within ourselves.

 

Follow Liam McLaughlin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LiamMc108

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
At first glance, religion has always been the enemy of freedom. By its very nature, religion is seemingly didactic and absolutist, claiming to be the answer to all the world's problems - to be the sou...
At first glance, religion has always been the enemy of freedom. By its very nature, religion is seemingly didactic and absolutist, claiming to be the answer to all the world's problems - to be the sou...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:45 PM on 09/24/2012
Absolutists, or merely guilty of taking their religion seriously? Islam, when left alone by politically correct apologists, is a natural home for intolerant psychopaths.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clownzozo
Magician, Novelist and an Angry Old Git
10:32 AM on 09/17/2012
Absolutism? How I despair whenever someone seeks to justify the unjustifiable especially concerning Islamic extremism. It's inability to accept criticism - tough, they need to grow up. Most of us are sick and tired of apologists for a religion that teaches killing a non-believer is a passport to Paradise, and yes they are still preaching that.
They openly boast that they intend to make Britain an Islamic State, whether we like it or not - and we don't. Already the usual apologists are suggesting that Shira Law could be allowed in heavily Muslim populated areas.
Here's a challenge - name one Islamic State that is not fighting against another Islamic sect and does not rely on despotic military control?
02:34 PM on 09/15/2012
Agree with the sentiment, however the article takes a narrow view in applying the idea to the current "big bad monster" in the room.
Absolutism or extremism etc, is bad for just about everything, not just eastern religion.Take the polarisation of US politics, according to the media voters have the choice of picking a missile loving, hard line tea party capitalist or a lovey-dovey flippy floppy pinko.
Extremes of anything are bad: love chocolate? maybe so, but eat it exclusively and you'll soon end up with serious problems, continue and it will kill you.
Absolutism of politics, ideology, religion, budget management, etc is like over correcting the altitude on a 747, a some stage it'll end in a big nasty ball of flames.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kella
02:21 PM on 09/15/2012
Responding to some comments, I would say that there are manipulative atheists, scientists and religious people. That's a human tendency. Granted, Atheist are to be aware that many scientific conclusions are true for the time being and would lose its rational substrate by intending to impose it. The nature of religions make them a great instrument of political domination, which happened frequently in the past, as they adhere to irrefutable texts and dogmas. Nowadays, these views are unacceptable. Proselytism is looked down and subjugation of women, abhorred. Islam as a political ideology continues to be more antiquated in its beliefs. Polygamy was born of the need to take care of women. It doen't have a place in a modern society. As a political ideology with expansionists goals. it remains irreconcilable with global views. The world appreciates whatever measures Islam takes to control the ones that believe in creating chaos. America as a whole is against crazy pastors that spew hate for power and economic, certainly not religious, gain as Jesus was a defender of the poor not the rich..
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saulius Muliolis
The Free Market's Alibi
12:27 PM on 09/15/2012
Ever hear of an Objectivist committing murder because someone insulted Ayn Rand?

I'm not sure what the author means by "absolutism". Of course, if, as it seems, he means absolutism means imposing your idea of the right way to live on everyone else, Objectivism is the total opposite of absolutism.

The problem is, absolutism has two different definitions. One is the political definition, which involves government with absolute power. In this, Islam is absolutist by its very nature, but Objectivism is not. The other is "any theory which holds that truth or moral or aesthetic value is absolute and universal and not relative to individual or social differences", which does describe both Islam and Objectivism, and it seems people use this to equate Islam and Objectivism.

There are some ways in which we are all absolutists. We all believe that water is wet, human beings need oxygen to breathe and food to eat.

There are certain ideas on which Objectivism is absolutist, asserting that certain ideas are universal. One is that human beings need to be free to live their lives, to choose their own paths.

So its important not to confuse the two kinds of absolutism.
04:28 AM on 09/15/2012
ever heard of a Jain extremist killing some one? no. Some religions provide justification for atrocities others do not. Islam is the problem, but so are many other religions.
07:21 PM on 09/14/2012
Islam at its core might be considered absolutist since the Medinese Part of the Qu'ran is nothing else than a law code that rules all aspect of social and political life. It's philosophically very hard to distinguish Islam and Absolutism. The sufists have always been able to put the surats in their historical contexts but were massacred for a long period of time...The secular Muslims in the western world are also successful in putting aside the bad from the good but are unfortunately not representative of the Muslim world...There won't be any progress towards more Democracy and Secularism in these countries if we keep on saying that the problem does not come from the core of the Islam corpus. Islam needs its Protestantism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
06:13 PM on 09/14/2012
Many muslims are NOT happy in Gaza, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Afghansitan, Pakistan, Syria and Lebanon etc.
They ARE happy in Australia, New Zealand, UK, USA, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Norway, Denmark etc.
So they are happy in every country that is NOT muslim.
Who do they blame ? Not Islam, not their leadership, not themselves. NO !!, they blame the Western ( Christian ) countries where they are happy in . AND they want to change them to be like countries they came from, where they were unhappy !!. Have I missed somethuing ??
11:15 AM on 09/15/2012
Yep, you have clearly missed a lot...
01:30 PM on 09/15/2012
you nailed it mr. jimbraid1... without stating the obvious (the stuff you "missed" out).
05:31 PM on 09/14/2012
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the argument, at the end of the day all Muslims everywhere get their inspiration, moral code and example from reading the Immortal, Immutable and Eternal Words of Allah in their Holy Qur'an. I have read it from page to page. One trend throughout it is hatred of the Jew and the Unbeliever. To all you unbelievers I would quote you this- "..And there has arisen between us and you hostility and hate forever until you believe in Allah only." Qur'an 60.4
Says it all really doesn't it. And no, I don't hate Muslims or anyone else for that matter.
10:08 PM on 09/15/2012
I think most Muslims are like most everybody else. They don't read scripture. The get their behaviour from the same place we all do. From the culture in which they were raised.
04:28 PM on 09/14/2012
Moderate muslims don't seem to make a great effort to rid the religion of extremists - who, we are constantly informed are a minority. If the extremists bring the religion into disrepute then why is there no concerted effort bring them down. It is pathetic to hear people constantly parroting 'Don't judge Islam by the actions of a few extremists' while those same people never bother to condemn the hatemongers who tie explosives to their children.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
02:14 PM on 09/14/2012
Religions state that there is a God and that he has a set of rules for you to follow.

Atheism says there is no God.

Either the atheists are right, or the religions are.

Is that absolutism? To make that statement?

Atheists will always argue that you have the right to believe whatever you want, no matter how ludicrous, as long as it doesn't impede the ability of others to have their beliefs.

Is that absolutism?

The trouble with your argument is that it tends to advocate that if two views are in opposition, we must all concede that the truth lies somewhere in between.

And it absolutely doesn't.
This comment has been removed.
06:22 PM on 09/14/2012
Mr SecularAdvocate, we all know you are an atheist. I respect your views and beliefs as long as you do mine.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
11:04 PM on 09/14/2012
I have no respect for your beliefs, but I respect absolutely your right to entertain them.
Not a respect which many of your fellow Muslims would allow.  When your religion teaches that religion is not worth shedding blood over, your belief system will have more respect than it currently affords itself.  
01:53 PM on 09/14/2012
Freedom of speech is one of the first things to go on the rocky road to despotism. The great thing about living in a democracy is that we can mock who and what we like.
12:43 PM on 09/14/2012
It appears that the difference with Islam is that it appears to be much easier to 'manipulate' the ideology to incite believers to react OR there is a larger proportion of Muslims that don't need to be manipulated in order to act this way, they do it willingly.

Islam is 600 years younger than Christianity. Similar scenes were being enacted due to Christianity 600 years ago and they continued until the last 200 years or so. We can only hope that the interconnectedness of the modern world speeds up that maturity process for Islam.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
02:49 PM on 09/14/2012
Gotta pull you up on the Christians are less violent than Muslim thing, Rwandan priests nuns and even a Bishop involved in inciting the mob, Northern Ireland, Orthodox Serbs being blessed before firing on Sarajevo. If you believe in any false ideology you are just fodder for what ever crack pot scheme your masters deem fit.
05:07 PM on 09/14/2012
Fair point. I wasn't trying to say that Christians are intrinsically better, not at all, although I can see that it reads that way. My point is that the Christian violence is more in 'pockets' (as vile and bloodthirsty as those pockets are) whilst it appears that the current Muslim reactions are of a much more mainstream nature, much like Christianity years ago in the Western world. The Muslim violence looks like an unfortunate rite of passage as the religion 'matures'.
For the record, if people want to believe in magic (any religion) they should do it in their own home, in a way that doesnt impact anybody else except voluntary members of the same cult and we should discriminate against any imposition of religion (taking a religious oath, prayers in school etc.) on secular society.
03:43 PM on 09/14/2012
Any belief system or ideology, be it political, religious, racial etc., can be manupiulated against the 'other'. The key question about any analysis of the belief system is not what its practioners do in any period of history, but what does the belief system actually teach in its doctrine? Here I would take issue with the idea that communism, nationalism and other are not fundamentally illiberal. Christianity has a history of violence in many periods, but this is clearly contrary to the teachings of Christ. Indeed Christains were essentially extreme pacifists for the first 300 years of their history, as some groups are today. The problem with Islam is that violence was taught and practised by its prophet from the very beginning, as it testified by numerous verses in the Koran as well as the Hadiths. So the problem not only lies with extremists today but also with the example of Mohammad who has always been held as an ideal model for all Muslims. Throw out the problematic elements of Mohammad from a modern human rights viewpoint, and you leave a large hole in Islamic belief system that would threaten the whole. This is the issue that liberal Muslim reformers are struggling with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saulius Muliolis
The Free Market's Alibi
12:36 PM on 09/15/2012
Please explain how Objectivism, with its absolute attitude on the non-initiation of force, could be manipulated in such a way.
lastpost
see biography
12:20 PM on 09/14/2012
“the source of fundamental truth.”
We will kill one another for wearing the wrong soccer club shirt. No wonder extraterrestrials have given up on us.

“rational debate, not bigoted threats or actual violence.”
If a cogent argument cannot be concocted to counter controversy. What was used by the convert, to conclude that the concept was convincing?

“ignorance is sacred”
where the opportunity to question is suppressed. If something is correct what problem is there in proving it, and thus promoting it to all the peoples on Earth?
Surely only those who fear, or worse know of, flaws in an understanding, would seek to keep those discrepancies secret.

“those seeking to wield power and terror”
tremble in the presence of open debate. For truth itself, may be lurking there.

“human fallibility”
There’s an awful lot of it about. Its as if someone were handing it out free, with each gift of life.

“the most important things shared in common by belief systems”
is that they're not shared. Write them down and compare.

“atheists who believe,”
they know what cannot be known. Should consider becoming agnostics.

“Dawkins has in the past described Islam as "one of the great evils in the world"
Those who pervert tenets, may well be evil. If we knew the definitive quantification of that term.

“All human beliefs”
are dwarfed by one acme. Belief that anyone’s rendition of reality is actually reality.

“to fight absolutism”
Ask for a thumbnail sketch of the supreme being, from each.
11:41 AM on 09/14/2012
Shouldn't the title read Islam is the problem not Absolutism? Because Islam is inextricably linked to politics it is like no other religion. The violence you see in Libya and the Middle-East is not perpetrated by Islamic extremists but by the average man on the street. Enough with this political correctness.
01:09 PM on 09/14/2012
that mean, i would judge Christianity and say its religion linked to sex before marriage and having kids without marriage! cause majority of Christians have a relation and even kids without the holy marriage!
u can't judge a religion from people behavior, cause nowadays its really hard to find religion people! Please don't tell me, you believe the 11 Sept and this Osama bin Laden fairy tale! this is Osama Bin laden have nothing to do with Islam!!! killing innocent people its not in any religion!!!

I'm Muslim Egyptian and i'm against any violence happening in middle east now, and a lot of us actually against it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
02:59 PM on 09/14/2012
I lived in Egypt for 7 years, my children were born their. A very nice bunch of people and lots of good friends. I wish Egypt luck for the future but fear that Egypt has got rid of an earthly dictator only to vote in the almighty dictator.
If people are willing to believe the unbelievable, who are we to say that Osama bin Laden is wrong but the Pope is right. Both tell their followers to believe the unbelievable.
Mar salama and I truly wish Egypt all the best for the future, I think your going to need it.
03:01 PM on 09/14/2012
Dont judge us all. A lot of Christians believe in marriage still.