Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lord Boateng

GET UPDATES FROM Lord Boateng
 

How We Can Lift 2.7 Billion People Out of Poverty

Posted: 05/02/2013 00:00

A remarkable revolution is taking place in finance, not in the City, but under the shade of large communal trees in villages across Africa and the developing world.

It's a savings revolution, and one with the potential to pump $157 billion into the global economy, and particularly developing nations, if the 2.7bn adults worldwide who are 'unbanked' participate in savings-led microfinance programmes.

That is a finding in a report entitled, 'Banking on Change: Breaking the Barriers to Financial Inclusion'. It's an initiative by Barclays, and two NGOs, CARE International and Plan UK that aims to break down the barriers that prevent poor people from accessing financial services. It introduces some of the world's poorest people to a saving culture by joining a 'village savings and loan group' and then linking these groups to formal banking services.

Village savings and loans groups allow people to save together and lend to each other rather than relying on moneylenders. Interest is charged and the money shared out at the end of the year. Individuals have established successful businesses, sent children to school, and found an ability to manage their money against the hardship of a fluctuating low income.

The $157billion savings boost could support jobs and growth agenda in developing world. This is why, David Cameron and the panel appointed to work out the next set of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) need to take financial inclusion seriously following their meeting in Liberia over the weekend..

Financial inclusion is absent from the current MDGs, but in its final report, the UN high-level panel should recommend that alongside goals on hunger and maternal health, the post-2015 development framework has financial inclusion either as a goal in itself or as a measurement of development progress and inclusive economic growth. This will help to ensure that discussions taking place amongst central banks and regulators are informed by the need for financial inclusion to reach the poorest.

As a former chief secretary to the Treasury and high commissioner to South Africa, I know just how vital access to even the most basic forms of finance can be for those living in poverty. The majority of savings group members are women who live on less than $2 dollars a day and yet the report finds that that no one is too poor to save. The group members save tiny amounts, and without any external injection of funds bring about enormous changes to the lives of their families. Women gain a new-found confidence, with many becoming leaders in their community.

I have seen these groups in action, and have powerful memories of a group of women savers in Mali singing joyfully under a tree - their impressive savings are allowing them to better feed, clothe and educate their children.

The savings revolution may just be the saviour of the much attacked microfinance world, accused of over indebting poor people much as easy access to credit in the West led to the US subprime mortgage collapse.

While many here rightly line up to criticise banks, there are 2.7billion people in the world for whom just having a bank account would be a luxury - they are considered too poor to warrant an account and for reasons explored in the report, have never been thought of as a viable market for global banks to explore, but that is a short-sighted view.

To their credit, Barclays have recognised this and have developed savings products and overdraft facilities that enable people in very poor communities to bank with them as a group.

These efforts are bearing fruit, the Banking on Change partnership has reached over 510,000 people in just three years. On average, each member has saved $58 per year. Multiplying this figure by the 2.7billion 'unbanked' people could represent a total of $157 billion that could be pumped into the formal economy each year.

Europe and the US may be in the grip of financial recession, but seven of the world's top 10 fastest-growing economies are in Africa. Amidst this picture of economic dynamism, poverty and inequality remain high.

Across Africa, I have witnessed the potential that the 'unbanked' represent and how developments in communications technology now offer opportunities for commercial and financial linkages. In the DRC I have seen how farmers affected by conflict are rebuilding their communities by accessing finance and market information via mobile phone.

It is a missed opportunity that there are an estimated 2.7billion people globally who do not have access to formal financial services. This represents a huge pool of potential savers who are not depositing in savings accounts or passing through other formal financial channels.

Lord Paul Boateng is a member of The House of Lords, he is co-chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Microfinance and wrote the forward for the Banking on Change: Barriers to Financial Inclusion Report.

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
A remarkable revolution is taking place in finance, not in the City, but under the shade of large communal trees in villages across Africa and the developing world. It's a savings revolution, and one...
A remarkable revolution is taking place in finance, not in the City, but under the shade of large communal trees in villages across Africa and the developing world. It's a savings revolution, and one...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:01 PM on 02/06/2013
can we define poverty ... is it like UK poverty when not having at telly makes you poor .. or Africa where not having a roof ,food or water ?

and if poverty is define as being a % below the average , then there will always be poverty
09:47 AM on 02/06/2013
Now that those of us in the west are getting wise to the banks and their practices of how to dissolve our savings we have Lord Moneybags spouting the virtues of having a bank account for those who have nothing to begin with, enslaving the ignorant in Africa while they're just above slave status presently might work wonders for the ruling classes and our banksters but encouraging ever more debt didn't do the west much good and I cant see it doing the average destitute African any favours either.
03:43 AM on 02/06/2013
As little to none of foreign aid goes to the poor we will have to hope good governance gets people out of poverty. It worked for Finland and Switzerland.

However mans rule of the earth under the devil is finally coming to its end. Gods kingdom is close and he will bring an end to corruption.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
07:18 PM on 02/05/2013
Europe and the US may be in the grip of financial recession, but seven of the world's top 10 fastest-growing economies are in Africa.
Well let Africa lift itself out of poverty then.
07:04 PM on 02/05/2013
It is interesting that people keep citing 'birth control' as the best measure against poverty. In actual fact, the most effective means of reducing the birth rate in a country is to educate the women. Not only does it support their access to the workplace, but changes the long-term financial fortunes of a family. No longer are female relatives financially dependent on the male relatives (thereby needing a lot of them in paid work), but there are also improved life chances for the offspring of educated women. Working women also have improved access to pre- and post-natal health care, thereby reducing the chances of infant mortality (a motivator for larger families).
05:41 PM on 02/05/2013
The term "unbanked" should put the fears up everyone. That's the reason behind so much acrimony over banks today - a great advertising campaign in the 1980s persuaded people this was the best thing since sliced bread. They were misled with free ball-pens, vouchers, into signing up, not realising that banking wasn't free as they'd been told. If you're unbanked, stay that way!

This savings and loans is a good idea like funding circles here but it still needs watching.
03:22 PM on 02/05/2013
seeing that the catholic church refuse the use of birth control, why not have them pay for all these children, the church has plenty of money stashed away in banks around the world, poverty is not new it's been around for years and it seems nothing changes, i am 66 and remember when i was 7 years old collecting for the children in africa surely by now things should have changed, in my opinion there are far too many charities with some taking 90% of the money raised for expenses, we have seen an explosion of new charities with those at the top earning 6 figure salaries, i find it disgraceful that someone running a charity can be earning £150,000 or more plus expenses, i wonder if people know at present there are close to 190,000 charities in the u.k. which i find disgraceful i believe we could manges with maybe 50 charities at most to help those in need and get rid of those who are in the businees of helping themselves and not those who need it most. i give to the salvation army and no one else
01:12 PM on 02/05/2013
Birth control is the real issue. A United states of Africa would be the richest nation on earth, but global population rises are destroying any hope of better living standards for all. Even in the UK there are thousands of people with no access to bank accounts.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
07:35 AM on 02/06/2013
Unfortunately children are seen as pensions to help the parents in old age, so the more children you have, the more chance you have of one or two surviving to subsidise the elderly. And I can understand that - but I would rather it wasn't that way!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abandon hope
12:17 PM on 02/05/2013
The greatest threat to mankind,is not climate change,it is the population explosion.If we can get birth control in place,not just in Africa,but around the world,it would go a long way towards cutting the depletion of the world's resources,less hungry mouths to feed ,less energy usage,more food to go round.However,there is a huge obstacle in the way,and that is Religion,while Catholics and Moslems,especially,encourage their followers to have as many children as possible,(in order to increase their followers)then there will always be starving children on the planet.It is also why Britain will have a Moslem majority in the next two generations,they will,and are outbreeding the indigenous population.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
07:21 PM on 02/05/2013
Only ignorance could have prompted your post about catholics trying to have as many chidren as possible. Nearly 50 years ago the vatican conceded that child birth could be controlled. Try reading Humanae Vitatae. they have a problem with artifical birth control for some reason but not with the principle of limiting family size.
07:28 AM on 02/06/2013
That system relies on the male being compliant. Try telling some drunk Irish navvy "No" when he wants a bit of nookie after a night in the pub and I think you would find that Humanae Vitatae would not be a good excuse!

Sadly, even the priests could not control their urges!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abandon hope
12:56 PM on 02/06/2013
I didn't say or mean Catholics,I said their leaders encourage them.How else are they supposed to practice birth control,abstinence?.You know ,and I know,the principle of not using birth control,is to increase the size of the flock.Tony Blair used the same principle to increase the size of the Labour vote,by allowing unlimited,unfettered immigration,knowing that they were much more likely to vote for him,than any other party.The net effect of both is,social engineering,and that's putting it politely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 AM on 02/05/2013
"It's a savings revolution, and one with the potential to pump $157 billion into the global economy".

Having read this story, I've seen nothing to justify the above statement. Mind you, I wasn't really expecting it to. It reads more like a fairy tale, the type that goes down really well in charity and political circles, perhaps as a powerpoint type presentation.

Also, yet another time serving politician with a title. Jeez.
10:52 AM on 02/05/2013
See 'Ethics at Barclays went into the shredder:
http://hereisthecity.com/2013/02/05/barclays-ceo-zero-bonus-genuine-attempt-at-reform-or-simply-pr/
photo
greatbrittan
love or leave my country
08:20 AM on 02/05/2013
i know lets send loads of durex,and the pill over,there,and tell them not to keep having kids they cannot feed,simples
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 AM on 02/05/2013
Quick show of hands, who trusts Barclays to act in the interests of poor people? Anyone, anyone?
No I thought not.
This smacks of wanting to increase the market for your dodgy products lads.
I'm pretty much against aid (most of which never leaves this country, fact fans) and I think the best thing the West can do for the South is treat them fairly, such as not creating trade barriers for their exports.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 AM on 02/05/2013
Barclays has ALWAYS worked in their own interests!
This comment has been removed.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
06:07 AM on 02/05/2013
What's described here is the old structure of a cooperative, this time on a village basis. 'The system' doesn't like that grassroots structure very much because they prefer the top-down of big corporations but the villages in Africa are not ready for the business of the big end of town. It is no surprise that the thrust has to come from the women because ... the men are often elsewhere. It could work, but hopefully the women will go for quality, rather raise one or two children and give them a start in life than 5 or more children with resources thin on the ground for everyone.

It is heartbreaking to see African poverty on TV, but with the single-mother-family so prevalent, it's what you'd expect. If I had been a single mother of 5, I would have never had a quality of life. This village cooperative structure looks like the best way to do something and one wonders why it has not been tried before. Surely prevailing ideology could not have played a part?