Lord Corbett

GET UPDATES FROM Lord Corbett
 

Avoid Another Srebrenica at Camp Ashraf

Posted: 21/07/11 01:00

At first glance, the massacre of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica almost two decades ago has little in common with the plight of some 3,500 dissident Iranians at a place called Camp Ashraf in Iraq.

But a closer look shows the opposite.

In 1995, Dutch forces serving as UN peacekeepers to monitor the situation during the siege of Srebrenica did nothing to protect Muslim civilians, who were turned over to the Serb military and slaughtered.

In 2003, residents of Ashraf surrendered their weapons to U.S.-led Coalition forces and, after a 16-month investigation, the U.S. government recognised each one of them as a Protected Person under the Fourth Geneva Convention and issued every resident an ID card and a "Protected Person under Fourth Geneva Convention" card.

Now, eight years later, Iraqi forces - at the instigation of their masters in Iran - have besieged Ashraf. In assaults carried out in July 2009 and last April, 47 of these "protected persons" were killed and 1071 injured. So, just as the Dutch failed in Bosnia, so has the U.S. in Ashraf.

So what?

Until recently, that might have been the answer: But then, a surprise legal event took place. On July 5, the Dutch court of appeals held the country's government accountable for the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. The court said that the Dutch forces failed to protect the lives of civilian Muslims, and the judges ordered the Dutch government to pay retributions to families of the victims. The court rejected the argument offered by the government that its soldiers were acting under the command of the United Nations thus removing their responsibility for the situation.

Sounds a lot like Ashraf, doesn't it?

Indeed, as the President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, said the U.S. inaction is far more serious. The U.S. individually questioned every resident of Ashraf, took all their weapons, even what might be needed for self-defence, ruled that they posed no threat of terrorism, and assumed full responsibility to provide protection until their final disposition.

Nothing that has happened since relieves the United States of this responsibility. Yet, the U.S. has refused to interfere in the situation, a decision far more unacceptable than the inaction of Dutch forces during the Srebrenica tragedy. There is no doubt that the United States, by virtue of the responsibility it accepted to protect the lives of Ashraf residents, should be leading an investigation into the Iraqi actions and demanding answers for the killings and injuries committed at Ashraf.

Rather, it has turned a blind eye to the situation.

The irony is that in every area except Ashraf and the People's Mujahadin of Iran (PMOI), whose members have lived there for 25 years, the U.S. has assailed the mullahs in Tehran and their activities in Iraq. Recently, it blamed the increase in U.S. casualties in Iraq on weapons sent there by Iran. It also has decried Iran's export of terrorism.

Yet, it has sat on the sidelines as the Maliki government in Baghdad cosies up to the mullahs. And it has done nothing to remove the PMOI from its place on the list of terrorist organisations, a designation that goes back to the days when the State Department thought they could get closer to "moderates" in Tehran through appeasement. The mullahs are still laughing at the success of that ploy, as it advanced their programme of nuclear weapons development.

Now, it's "put-up-or-shut-up" time for the Obama administration.

Most urgently, it must act to protect those 3,500 at-risk residents of Ashraf, whose plight is getting more desperate every day as another military assault it prepared. They don't want reparations for their families following their slaughter; they want a safe haven, outside of Iraq.

It must also remove the terrorism label from the PMOI so it can continue to lead the struggle for a free and democratic Iran. That's all the Iranian opposition wants - no troops, no funds, just to have the unjustified "terror" tag removed. It is this that Iran and Iraq use to justify the killings of Ashraf residents.

Lord Corbett of Castle Vale is Chairman of the British Parliamentary Committee for Iran Freedom. He is a former Chairman of the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
19:02 on 23/07/2011
"Iraqi forces - at the instigation of their masters in Iran"

This is a very strange accusation. As, the US is currently training, funding, and arming the Iraqi Army.

"Beyond the various courses and programs being held in-country, both American staff colleges and military academies have begun taking Iraqi applicants, with Iraqi cadets being enrolled at both the United States Military Academy and the US Air Force Academy."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Army

In fact, the US is getting ready to sell the Iraqi National Army 36 F-16 fighter jets.

"WASHINGTON - Iraq has renewed talks to buy up to 36 U.S. F-16 fighter jets in a deal worth billions that Washington hopes will help contain neighboring Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported July 11."

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=7074667&c=AIR&s=TOP
17:54 on 23/07/2011
how about avoid another Srebernecia in SYRIA as we speak.
15:31 on 22/07/2011
The U.S. never published reports on crimes committed on July 2009 and April 2011 in camp ashraf and did not respond to the insistence of the U.S. Congress to publish the outcomes of a visit to Ashraf by the U.S. Embassy representatives, the U.S. forces and doctors two days after the April 8 attack. Some members of the US Congress described it as an intentional cover up of crimes committed. This is something that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has also underscored.
12:02 on 22/07/2011
In addition to all other negligence of the Americans and their efforts to flee from their responsibilites towards ashraf residents one should reiterate that for the past year and a half, up to 300 powerful loudspeakers installed around Ashraf have been blaring abusive remarks and threats into the camp, day and night, which amounts to constant psychological torture of the residents. So far there has not been a single ordinary public objection by the United States and its embassy in Iraq against such measures. This has emboldened the criminals and their agents even further. Forcing patients who are in pain to their deaths and depriving others from free access to medical services and medicine still continues. A number of residents have so far died as a result of this situation.
10:48 on 22/07/2011
For the attention of Iranian regime lobby who try to demonize the PMOI:
1- Regardless of all the lies leveled against PMOI's past and present, even if there were Al-Qaida terrorists in Guantanamo Bay, they should not have been treated the way they have been in Iraq in the past two years and especially the savage attack on 8 April 2011 with armored vehicles and machine guns is not justifiable by any means. Where are the American left to raise their voice as the have been over Abu Quraib and Guantanamo?
2- The PMOI and the National Liberation Army of Iran have never had any military operation outside of Iran and even have officially stopped all military operations in Iran since 2001. The French judges recently concluded that all PMOI and NLA's operations in the past too fall within the definition of "resistance against tyranny". While the west is supporting a newly born Liberation Army in Libya, why is there so much fuss about leaving the Liberation Army of Iran alone instead of suppressing it by an illegal and unjust label?
02:58 on 22/07/2011
How did you conclude this?

"It must also remove the terrorism label from the PMOI so it can continue to lead the struggle for a free and democratic Iran. That's all the Iranian opposition wants"

You think PMOI (MEK) struggle for a free and democratic Iran? Which part of this organization is free? Electing the head of organization which was someone and has been changed to his wife?
Look at articles about "MEK's Human Rights record". How they can lead to freedom while they are a cult group?
You think Iranian ever forget that MEK betrayed them by helping Saddam during war on Iran and to be the leader of Iranian?!!
Who are these Iranian opposition you're talking about? MEK or NCRI (which is the same thing and is just front organization)
What do you know about Iranian Green Movement? You think people who took to street are supporters of which one of Iranian opposition you talking about?

Some might say if they don't have supporters in Iran why government want to remove them.The answer is every government in world fight with armed group!

Don't get me wrong.I'm not talking about people ,I'm talking about an organization.

By the way about freedom in this group look at these

New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/13/magazine/13MUJAHADEEN.html

Also BBC report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIwCOdHQgfc
10:49 on 22/07/2011
3- The lies about being a 'cult' and 'human rights' violations within the organization have all come form Iranian regime intelligence and counter intelligence agencies and their proxies in the West. All the allegations in American media, if one follows the links to find the origins, come from dubious sources even if they are printed in accredited newspapers or institutions. Iranian regime has been paying dearly for each article. As one such man said in a Toronto Star Article: Thompson, who heads up the Mackenzie Institute, a security minded think-tank, says China isn't alone in trying to gain influence. Thompson, who is often called on by media outlets to offer up analysis, says he was offered $80,000 by a man tied to Iran’s mission in Canada. “They wanted me to publish a piece on the Mujahedin-e khalq," he said. "Iran is trying to get other countries to label it as a terrorist cult.” Thompson says he turned down the offer". See the link here: http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2010/07/05/14616126.html
06:41 on 24/07/2011
Ok,That's a good link that you sent.It comes from credible newspaper and It makes sense that Iranian government tries to destroy MEK,but it doesn't mean all the accusations are wrong.(For example you're not saying BBC documentary about MEK paid by Iran government?!)

I have a simple question :
How you justify MEK helped Saddam during the war against Iran? (You're not gonna deny it.Are you?)
23:04 on 21/07/2011
I think Lord Corbett has hit the nail on the head in this article. In contrast to the situation in Srebrenica, the current situation in Ashraf results from the occupation of Iraq by the US-led Coalition Forces, and therefore, the US is wholly responsible; In Srebrenica, the Netherlands had no role in causing the situation in which the Muslim civilians found themselves in Srebrenica.

The U.S. forces disarmed Ashraf residents and took away all their weapons, including those needed for self-defense. Therefore, this increases the responsibility of the U.S. forces towards Ashraf residents.

Moreover, the U.S. forces signed an agreement with each and every resident of Ashraf promising to protect them until their final disposition. In contrast to the situation in Srebrenica, Ashraf residents are not only considered Protected Persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention by the ICRC and the United States as a group, but every single one of them was interviewed by various U.S. agencies, and after a sixteen-month investigation, the U.S. government recognized each one of them as a Protected Person under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and issued an ID card and a “Protected Person under Fourth Geneva Convention” card for the residents. The 47 residents of Ashraf who were killed during the assaults of Iraqi forces in 2009 and April 2011 and the 1071 who have been injured since 20 February 2009, all have legal statuses, Protected Persons' ID cards, and have signed agreements with U.S. forces.
21:16 on 21/07/2011
I agree 100% with Lord Corbett. The Obama administration is in the verge of being labeled collaborator in a 'crime against humanity' committed against the residents of Ashraf on 8 April 2011 by Iraqi army under the command of Iraqi PM, Nuri al-Maleki. I am sure the Obama administration would not like the idea of being condemned after being summoned to a court (in Spain or the Hague) for being party to a third crime against humanity that happened under their watch by 'soldiers' trained and equipped by US army. So wake up Mrs Clinton, don't bring more shame to your boss.
19:31 on 21/07/2011
Great article. Too many crimes against humanity have bin committed. Camp Ashraf should stop being one of them.
17:23 on 21/07/2011
The US has a legal obligation towards the residents of Ashraf, whether they like it or not, they could be held accountable for the consequenses of thier actions. International laws are cristal clear in this area.

So US must resume the protection of the Camp until a final solution is reached. If not they will be held responsible for any crime perpetrated by the current iraqi governement.
16:25 on 21/07/2011
This ia a fantastic piece by Lord Corbett. Thank you very much Lord Corbett and Huffington Post UK for this very interesting article.
14:15 on 21/07/2011
If I recall correctly, while Nato flew high above the balkans watching Serbs massacre Bosnian Muslims, Iran's Quds Force sent weapons and training to Bosnia to protect themselves. Anyway, there is not going to be a massacre in Camp Ashraf. Iraqi government is coordinating with International Red Cross to relocate the residents, and we have to remember that Iraq is their country, Camp Ashraf covers a lot of territory, there is bad history between Iraqi and MEK, and it's Iraq's right to want the Camp closed. Perhaps, it would be better if EU and US offered refugee status to Ashraf residents instead of wasting so much time on the blogs advocating for removal of the group from FTO so that MEK can get money from CIA to destabilize Iran through terrorist activities.
21:31 on 21/07/2011
You are really a magician making up this story that the PMOI wants to come off the FTO list to get money form CIA to disturb your masters in Tehran. Your argument about the "recovering territory" is also very funny. We are talking about an international court ruling that has summoned top Iraqi leaders for questioning about participating in two acts of 'crime against humanity' and you are raising arguments that even a cooked chicken will laugh at.
I must also thank you for revealing your identity as an Iranian regime advocate by referring to terrorist Quds Force, responsible for all the atrocities in the Middle East since the inception of the Force, as a savior. I am thankful because these days a lot of regime advocates cover themselves under a 'Green' vail.
09:49 on 21/07/2011
I like this article. It is very important to protect Ashraf from another massacre. Thanks.
09:01 on 21/07/2011
I agree with Lord Corbett.
U.S administration must act to protect those 3,500 at-risk residents of Ashraf, whose plight is getting more desperate every day as another military assault it prepared. They don't want reparations for their families following their slaughter; they want a safe haven, outside of Iraq.

It must also remove the terrorism label from the PMOI so it can continue to lead the struggle for a free and democratic Iran. That's all the Iranian opposition wants - no troops, no funds, just to have the unjustified "terror" tag removed. It is this that Iran and Iraq use to justify the killings of Ashraf residents.
06:59 on 21/07/2011
The US must remove the unfair labeling of the PMOI. The PMOI was listed in the FTO solely to please the religious fascism in Iran and for the hopes that it can reform. The continued inclusion of the PMOI in the list only makes the Iranian regime happy and more aggressive. The PMOI never belonged to the list. Its continued inclusion only discredits the US and its foreign policy. Change in Iran is inevitable. The PMOI will prevail. The questions: does the US want to continue being on the side of mullahs? The Iranian regime will not reform. It can only become more repressive and expand its regional and international terrorism.