For me, the Olympics are over. As I sat on my train home having left the Olympic Park on Friday for the last time, panicking that I had yet to iron a shirt for the wedding I was supposed to be attending in the morning, a sense of irrevocable sadness enveloped me.
I am gutted it is all done with. I went into the Olympics expecting disaster and full of cynicism. But I was won over.
The only thing I am left feeling bitter about is the fact that I may never see an event on this scale in my own country again.
However, as I left the park, probably never to return, it wasn't this which left my heart so heavy. It was knowing that we are not going to get the chance to do it all again in six years, as we would have done, were the 2018 World Cup being hosted in England.
The following may be something you have already read, or indeed something you will read quite a lot over the coming weeks. If that is the case, good, because I couldn't be more certain of it and the more people saying it, the better.
Like it or not, football is the national sport. Yes, I am fully aware that many English people proudly claim to "have no interest in football" and often moan about the cheating, preening, ill-educated buffoons who parade around the pitch earning more in an hour than many will earn in a lifetime.
But can you honestly say that if the English national team were to walk out to a World Cup Final at Wembley Stadium, you can think of a single person who wouldn't at least be keeping their eye near a television screen?
Remember that feeling when Mo Farah was running down the final straight to win his gold medal last weekend? Can you really say that you wouldn't have been going at least 50 times more crazy if you replaced Mo for Wayne Rooney, and the running track for the goal of Victor Valdes in the 90th minute?
Much has been said about the Olympic legacy and the ripple effect that should be felt as a result of hosting the Olympic Games. I cannot think of a greater way to capitalise on the current national euphoria or legacy to the games than launching a fresh World Cup Bid.
When the World Cup was awarded to Russia, after the initial anger, a few people piped up with relief, claiming that, as a nation, we were not ready to host an event on that scale, and that the Olympics would prove it. How laughable an idea is that now?
London, usually a miserable place full of rude, self-centred people, has undergone a transformation over the past two weeks. Friendly volunteers at train stations have smiled as they wave Olympic visitors through the busiest stations with little disruption to London's grumpy commuters. In fact, the 'grumpy Londoners' have been among the greatest ambassadors for the country, welcoming our guests and brimming with as much enthusiasm as those attending the games.
If England were to host the World Cup, the entire country would benefit from this kind of makeover as the action would be more evenly distributed throughout the country, rather than largely concentrated to one 500-acre site in East London.
This would also benefit local business in a way that the Olympics has not been able to for the area surrounding the Olympic Park. Last week I visited Leyton High Road, a high street visible from the park. Shop owners said that they had not seen any boost in trade, as the Olympic Park was fenced off, preventing tourists from exploring the local area. Football stadiums are not designed like this, and the areas surrounding the grounds would benefit from the additional visitors.
"But an English World Cup isn't the same as a British Olympics." Isn't it? The Olympics have largely taken place on one site surrounded by high level security. How British is that? Also, what is to stop us launching a joint bid with our Scottish or Welsh friends? Unlikely, sure, but it isn't totally out of the question.
And as for the English 'football hooligans' who would pick fights with all the foreign fans, presumably all these people were on holiday for the past fortnight? Or are they such democratic thugs that they simply only pick fights with fellow football fans?
Unless the Royal Family are involved, Britain doesn't 'do' national pride particularly well. Patriotism all too often gets hijacked by a vocal right-wing minority that no sensible person wants to be associated with. If the Olympics has helped the progressive majority reclaim British patriotism, imagine what an English World Cup could do, and not just for the English people, but for English football also.
If the FA are smart (leave it), as soon as the Paralympics are over with they will leap on this goodwill and use the astonishing efforts of this summer to get everyone fully behind a bid for a World Cup to be played on English turf. Preferably before I am buried six feet beneath it.
Follow Luke McGee on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lukemcgee85
Andrea Mann: The Unofficial Olympic Inspiration Legacyâ„¢
Callum Jones: Why School Sport Isn't the Answer to the Olympic Legacy Question
Peter Cranie: Olympic Dreams, Titanic Cuts
London 2012: Who will take the stage at Sunday's closing ceremony?
Next up, Rio! 2016 hosts learn lessons from London Olympics, vow Brazilian 'party'
London 2012 Olympics: Brazil Clobbers Japan in Volleyball to Advance to Final
London 2012 Olympics: day 15 – live!
London 2012 Hockey: Woeful India lose to South Africa, finish last
Cheers on yet another gold for our ladies.
You should play it here and pick up a few pointers from our girls.
I somewhat enjoyed the Games, for the most part. I didn't jump on any bandwagon. I was never a fan of shooting, rowing, fencing, swimming, diving etc, and I wasn't gonna be now, if at best slightly swayed. But the athletes & volunteers are the heroes. True legacy will depend well after the Games, the future of the Olympic Park, other potential 'white elephants', affordable ticket allocations, sport legacy within schools (half of our medal winners after all went to public schools, & we know what Cameron & Gove's planning).
So if we're serious about hosting the World Cup, these issues need to be ironed out.
All those olympic volunteers and you couldn't find one to iron your shirt?
You're a bit mixed up, eh?
The athlete'scommitmentt, sacrifice, humility and respect for their countries has been awesome and it has been these attributes which have made the games so compelling.
These attributes will never been seen ifootballll players, because, as you say yourself they are 'cheating, preening, ill-educated buffoons' who are aiming for a world record in spitting!
Do you know how mans of Olympians in the past have been stripped of medals for doping (ie cheating) and how many have never been caught?
All women's athletic world records from 100m to 10000m are probably 'dirty' and a number of medallists at these Olympics have served bans in the past and will do so in the future
By all means accuse footballers of being boorish, but don't make the mistake of thinking all Olympians and their sports are much better
Football as a sport is so much bigger than those in the Olympics that is has its own dynamic - the tribal nature of it also transcends sport as well, making its supporters often irrational
I won't waste my time asking him to apologise for his patronising accusation that ALL Scottish football teams are riddled with corruption simply based on one team. There is absolutely no evidence that any other teams are corrupt but he tars us all with the same brush.
Where i live there are many decent English people, they make up around a third of the local population. In the vast majority of cases they live, work and play alongside their Scottish neighbours with no animosity from anyone.
We are known around the world as a friendly and open minded people, if he has experienced hostillity from Scot's, i have to wonder what he has said or done to provoke it. I doubt however that he has ever been here and with an attitude like his im glad he does'nt cross the border.
It could be said that he is a good advocate for independance, who want's to be run by a goverment elected by his ilk?