Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Manuel Barcia

GET UPDATES FROM Manuel Barcia
 

Catholic Church Must Change Stance on Same-Sex Marriage

Posted: 23/03/2012 00:00

Recently the debate about the same-sex marriage bill has gathered momentum. On the one hand Prime Minister David Cameron and Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone have made the case for much needed reform.

On the other, the likes of Cardinal Keith O'Brien and the Daily Telegraph have run a campaign attempting to stop the bill from becoming law. Among the many things that have been said, one caught my attention, because it reflects a viewpoint more appropriate for a piece published in the 13th century, rather than the 21st century.

In an article written on 5 March for the Daily Telegraph Cardinal O'Brien likened gay marriage to slavery. Now, it is a bit rich for a representative of the Catholic Church, one of the institutions that supported and encouraged the enslavement of human beings for almost 400 years, to try to teach us about morality and to use slavery as a reference point while doing so.

Same-sex marriage is nothing like slavery, and the Cardinal should know that well. Slavery, at least the sort that the Catholic Church merrily supported for centuries, involved wars, kidnappings, rapes, destruction of the environment, removal and breakdown of families, extra-economic exploitation of labour, and yes, deaths. Millions of deaths.

Same-sex marriage, on the other hand, is a right that people who happen not to be heterosexual wish to have, and one that the vast majority of the British people, and it pleases me to say, the British government, agree with.

If anything, the opposition of the Catholic Church to same-sex marriage bears a striking resemblance to their opposition to the abolition of slavery in the 19th century; an opposition they also based on the same moral values they are using today. It was not until well into the 19th century, in 1839, that Pope Gregory XVI finally and belatedly condemned slavery in his bull In Supremu Apostolatu. And it took another century and a half for Pope John Paul II to apologise for the participation of the Church in the enslavement of millions of people during a visit to the island of Goree in Senegal in 1992.

Beyond his unfortunate and badly informed comparison between same-sex marriage and slavery, Cardinal O'Brien should also think twice before referring to gay marriage and abortion as aberrations. No other institution has been more exposed to condemnations of aberrations -and I should add cover ups of aberrations- as the Catholic Church has in recent years. Perhaps Cardinal O'Brien may want to talk about and condemn instead the paedophile priests that have abused children all around the world under the negligent eyes of the institution he represents.

David Cameron and Lynne Featherstone have shown leadership and understanding of an ever changing world. Cameron's position in particular, coming from a conservative background, should inspire rather than deter the leadership of the Catholic Church towards a much needed change in their stance.

This bill is not about the Catholic Church or about the Catholic faithful, but about a human right for a considerable number of fellow human beings that has been neglected for far too long. It is time for Cardinal O'Brien to close his window into the 13th century and show some solidarity towards his own kind, regardless of their sexual orientation.

 
 
 

Follow Manuel Barcia on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mbarcia24

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
11:32 AM on 03/24/2012
Well said Manuel, but I am not optimistic about Catholic Church changes.
08:06 PM on 03/23/2012
Thank you Mr. Barcia for this timely article. Gary T.Smith
05:56 AM on 04/06/2012
This man is an idiot and doubly so as he is not only highly educated but is indoctrinating our young at university with this garbage and you non believers say the church brainwashes. The universities are more dangerous, especially as the students have to agree to get a pass.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:19 PM on 03/23/2012
Muslims first.
05:18 PM on 03/23/2012
Why should the Catholic Church change its stand on gay marriage?
They are perfectly entitled to ban gay marriages in their churches if they have an objection to them.
But what they may not do is tell the rest of us that we can't have gay marriages anywhere else.
04:12 PM on 03/23/2012
The Catholic Church has the right to oppose same sex marriages. The church believes such marriages are wrong for a variety of reasons. You can disagree with the church, but use reason to argue with them; don't take away their right to follow the dictates of conscience.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
05:26 PM on 03/23/2012
If the Roman Catholic Church had a conscience there might be merit in what you say.
11:22 PM on 03/23/2012
Ian,

I'm not condoning any wrongs committed by catholics, but I do draw a distinction between the actions of individuals and the reasoning used by the church when it comes to its position on same sex marriage. It sounds like you have a closed mind when it comes to the Roman Catholic Church. You might inquire into why the church opposes same sex marriage as well as its teachings toward homosexuality in general.
03:30 PM on 03/23/2012
God and churches/religions have different agendas.... God is LOVE... churches are judgemental... so simple.. My church is the great outdoors and I talk directly to God...
11:26 PM on 03/23/2012
"churches are judgemental" and hypnoblonde is not? Know thyself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EAPrince
My other car is an Al'kesh
02:43 PM on 03/23/2012
I'm quite sure the Catholic church will, indeed, change their stance on gay marriage. And, based on historical precedent, you should expect that announcement around the year 2120. They are consistently a century or so behind the rest of the world and I expect that to continue.

Erik
http://eaprince.blogspot.com
Seamus OMalley
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
10:16 AM on 03/23/2012
Marriage is a civil matter. The Church's opinion is irrelevant. If two consenting adults want to marry ... enter into a civil contract ... then it's their business, no one elses.

Also, if you're not Catholic what do you care what the Cardinal says?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:42 PM on 03/23/2012
Agree with your last statement. But you say "if two consenting adults want to marry... enter into a civil contract..." - but civil ceremonies are already legal. Just an observation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
08:42 PM on 03/23/2012
It's also a civil matter to decide whether we call it marriage or a civil ceremony.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
11:42 AM on 03/24/2012
What is the big deal about calling it marriage?Seriously, I cannot understand why the problem. Etymologycally "marriage" doesn't mean the union between man a woman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
candcje
Progressive, Liberal Democrat and Proud of it!
06:33 PM on 03/23/2012
It only matters what the Cardinal says when he's lobbying the leaders of the nation to try to push his personal religious agenda on the rest of the citizens. If the governing body believes that same sex marriage should be legal (doesn't have to happen in a church), then the Cardinal should not be allowed to do more than voice his opinion as the rest of the citizens are. But if the Cardinal is given extra power to lobby and sway legislative votes, then everybody must pay attention to what he's saying as his words then effect everyone.
Seamus OMalley
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
06:56 PM on 03/23/2012
Are you saying that there aren't LGB also lobbying the government and trying to sway legislative votes?
This comment has been removed.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
06:30 AM on 03/23/2012
A thoughtful piece indeed, but I would opine the columnist is utterly wasting his time trying to appeal to any shred of human decency (that does not exist) at the core of a "cardinal" who has made so many ugly, evil, morally repugnant statements on behalf of one of the most sinister, moralyly bankrupt and shockingly shameful organizations extant on the face of the Earth. Responding to O'Brien does nothing but pander to the cardinal's own sense of self-importance and moral authority. The man is heartless and deserves nothing short of a full public rebuke... except perhaps to be ignored utterly for the societal dinosaur he is.
photo
Mac Howard
Thank god we got convicts, you got the puritans
12:49 AM on 03/23/2012
Mmm. The slippery slope argument again from the cardinal. Always reveals that there is no argument against the subject under discussion. Gay marriage is to slavery as a football match is to a Mars landing - different planets!

Why do we have to listen to these guys still? Their sell-by date was around 1650.
12:38 AM on 03/23/2012
Honestly, in UK no one gives a jot what the catholic church thinks about gay marriage. Glee is of no interest either.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
06:31 AM on 03/23/2012
LOL! Really? No one the care whether Finn and Rachel tie the knot? Or Sue Sylvester has her baby? So sad!!!
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
02:10 PM on 03/23/2012
I've always thought the term 'glee' has a vaguely sinister sound to it, as in 'The Archbishop cackled with glee as gay marriage was thrown out of the House of Lords by his henchmen...'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
08:39 PM on 03/23/2012
I thought it was a type of butter?