iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Jones

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Jones
 

Rhinos in Crisis - and Why the Market Won't Save Them

Posted: 29/05/2012 00:00

The world's rhinos are in crisis.

Demand for rhino horn in the Far East has escalated in recent years to the point that a kilo of powdered horn is now reported to be selling for as much as US$65,000 on the black markets in Vietnam and China.

Although there is no evidence that it has any medicinal value, powdered rhino horn has long been a component of traditional Chinese medicine and is used to treat anything from headaches and fevers to rheumatism and gout. Rumours that a high-ranking official in Vietnam used rhino horn to cure his cancer began circulating a few years back and since then, the demand, and the price, has soared.

Rhino horn is now worth more by weight than gold, cocaine or heroin.

In South Africa alone, where roughly 70% of all remaining rhinos are to be found, more than 1,200 rhinos have been killed by poachers since 2007, and the killing is accelerating.

Criminal networks

The high value of rhino horn has attracted well-financed criminal networks that use helicopters, sophisticated veterinary drugs and highly efficient and evasive routes to move the horns out of the African range states and onwards to the main markets in China and Vietnam. These networks always seem to be one step ahead of the authorities.

No mercy is shown by the poaching gangs. Instead of shooting to kill with rifles, which is noisy and attracts attention, the poachers have shifted tactics and now more often knock out rhinos using dart guns and immobilizing drugs and then hack off their horn and half their face using chain saws. The rhinos, left mortally wounded, are considered lucky if they die while still sedated, because those who recover face a far worse fate where they are left to stagger around in agony while they slowly bleed to death or die from infection. Pregnant or nursing females aren't spared, and their calves are either killed for their own tiny horns or left to starve as they mourn their dead mothers.

Value

Rhinos are ancient animals. They are vital components of the ecosystem in which they live and they also attract tourists making them an important source of income for many range countries. Around a quarter of all rhinos in South Africa are owned by private ranchers who support tourism but also, regrettably, attract trophy hunters to their ranches. A debate is now raging about how rhinos can best be protected against the poaching scourge. The South African government has poured resources into protecting rhinos in its parks and has even deployed the military to patrol the long border with Mozambique that borders one side of the massive Kruger National Park. Private ranchers have employed security teams, and some have even dehorned their rhinos or resorted to infusing toxic substances into the horns in an attempt to deter potential poachers.

Legal trade

Now some private rhino owners are calling for the international trade ban, introduced by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species in the 1970s, to be lifted so that the stockpiles of horn from rhinos who have died or been dehorned can be sold off.
Reports suggest that the South African government is considering bringing such a trade proposal to a future CITES meeting.

The idea that legalising trade in an endangered species can help to reduce poaching and protect the animals isn't new, and it can sound persuasive until you examine the evidence.
For example, bears have been "farmed" for decades for their bile in parts of Asia. As many as 10,000 currently exist in appalling conditions on Asian bear bile farms. However, this hasn't stopped bear farmers capturing wild bears to replenish stocks, nor has it reduced demand for the bile and gall bladders from wild bears as far afield as North America. "Wild" bile products are considered 'cleaner' and more potent than their farmed equivalent.

On the ivory front, CITES has sanctioned two 'one-off sales' of ivory from southern African stockpiles to China and Japan in recent years on the assumption that it will help control or reduce elephant poaching, but it hasn't worked. Seizures of illegal ivory have risen markedly since the last legal 'one-off sale' took place in 2008, with at least 30 tonnes seized in 2011 alone, representing around 3,000 dead elephants. This is probably only 10% to 20% of the total illegal trade. Elephant massacres continue, with hundreds killed in parts of Central and West Africa earlier this year, threatening the survival of whole elephant populations.

Tigers have fared no better. China has a scheme for registering, labelling and selling the skins from tigers who have died on tiger farms. In spite of a domestic and international ban on the trade in tiger parts, particularly bones, China still allows tiger farmers to breed tigers and store the carcases of those who have died. Meanwhile, wild tigers remain on the brink of extinction with as few as 3,000 remaining in the wild whilst three times that number are estimated to be languishing on Chinese tiger farms.

The way forward

The truth is, despite the pro-trade hype, none of these trade mechanisms has succeeded in protecting endangered species. Legalising the sale of rhino horn won't save wild rhinos. At best, it will result in farmers 'harvesting' the valuable horn from captive rhinos. It will give legitimacy to a 'product' that has no real value, confuse the consumer, and provide a means by which illegal rhino horn can be laundered into trade.

The only real hope for rhinos is better protection on the ground and sensitive, well-thought-out education programmes aimed at consumers in Asia, many of whom don't realise or understand the impact their demand is having.

If we are to save these ancient and majestic creatures from the ravages of the marketplace, we must get away from valuing rhinos simply on the basis of the price of their parts. Indeed, we need to rethink how we should value the amazing and fast-diminishing diversity of all life on Earth.

Otherwise the true value of rhinos and other endangered wild animals may only become apparent once they've gone.

 

Follow Mark Jones on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hsiglobal

FOLLOW IMPACT
The world's rhinos are in crisis. Demand for rhino horn in the Far East has escalated in recent years to the point that a kilo of powdered horn is now reported to be selling for as much as US$65,000...
The world's rhinos are in crisis. Demand for rhino horn in the Far East has escalated in recent years to the point that a kilo of powdered horn is now reported to be selling for as much as US$65,000...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:48 PM on 06/05/2012
The charities stand to lose a lot of money if the endangered species problems are solved. Private ownership of tigers, cheetahs, and ocelots would greatly increase their numbers, bring them back from the bring of extinction, and cost various animal charities billions of dollars in donations.
01:49 PM on 05/30/2012
7 GOOD REASONS TO LEGALIZE RHINO HORN TRADE

1. Legal trade will give the consumer the option of buying the product from a legal, ethical, controlled source.
· There will be no need for rhinos to be killed to provide the product

2. Legal trade will increase rhino numbers.

· Rhinos will once again become desirable wildlife on game farms and reserves due to the financial benefits

3. Legal trade will alleviate poverty
· Community-based natural resource management is a successful working concept in many Third-World and developing countries. It is time for South Africa to get on board.

4. Legal trade will encourage farmers to create habitat for rhinos
· This will lead to healthier ecosystems for many plant and animal species.

5. Legal trade is conservation-based solution to the rhino crisis
· Legal trade in rhino horn will satisfy the needs of consumers by supplying a sustainable, ethical product that contributes to biodiversity and habitat restoration, as well as preserving the rhino. This is the true nature of conservation.

6. Legal trade will not threaten rhinos

· No rhinos ever have to die to provide horn and it continues to grow throughout the animal’s life.

· Tiger bones, elephant tusks, shark fins and numerous other wildlife products require and represent the death of an animal whereas rhino horn does not.

7. Legal trade will allow to keep rhinos in Africa, where they belong

· Rhinos offer an economic benefit to the country and its population
12:01 AM on 06/03/2012
you clearly did not read the whole article as it clearly states that this has been tried before & has failed miserably. The only way to protect these magnificent animals is to have them under 24hr protection regardless of cost & bring the severest of penalties on any poachers, dealers or consumers caught with products made from endangered animal parts. This has to be done with the cooperation of Far Eastern governments, who must take responsibility for educating their people & rigorously enforcing penalties on those caught with animal parts. The penalties must be sufficient to deter these people
09:46 PM on 06/05/2012
I actually do not believe that this idea has failed.
01:22 PM on 05/30/2012
Looking back through history, we find another species that was persecuted for a seemingly inane human desire for its product. This species is the vicuña (Vicugna vicugna), a member of the camelid family, similar to a llama but smaller in size. It is native to the Andean highlands of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Peru. The product that it produces is the world’s most expensive fabric. A pure vicuña wool coat will effortlessly set you back over $15000.

In the mid-1960’s, it was estimated that vicuña numbers were down to only about 6000 animals - they were teetering on the brink of extinction and they were declared endangered.
In 1975, vicuña were listed as a CITES appendix 1 species and all trade in their products was prohibited.

Thanks to the work of conservationists and private ranchers, vicuña numbers started to climb very gradually.
In the 1980’s, Grupo Inca, the textile manufacturers, initiated the “Shear a vicuña to save a vicuña” campaign and developed a business plan where they would pay local communities to protect vicuña populations and gather vicuña wool sustainably.
The last survey, done in 2007, has placed Peru’s vicuña population at 188 000 animals (55% of the global population), with the entire vicuña population, in all of its range states at 342 727 animals – an incredible feat in a mere 5 decades and an undeniable recipe for success. . .
So why are our rhino still being killed?
09:20 PM on 05/29/2012
In response to Will Travers comments, it is true that SA can sustain 400 poached rhinos per year. While I am sure Will is not suggesting this is acceptable, I interpret his comment as a concession that a trade ban plus enforcement will not work (plus I think that the figure quoted of 400 rhinos hunted per year is incorrect). As for the suggestion that all international trade should be banned (and I assume he means trophy hunting as well), this is a terrible idea. Such a policy would result in be a reduction in much needed income to private rhino owners (who have to pay to protect their rhinos from poaching), and decrease the ability of National Parks to conserve their rhinos. The outcome would be BAD for rhinos.

The idea that poaching can be stopped through a concerted public education programme in consumer markets, increased enforcement measures and effective sentences has been around for 20+ years. But it has yet to be successful. It's always the same story - if only we could beef up law enforcement...
01:23 PM on 05/30/2012
Rhino Bill is right in some respects. I am not suggesting that 400 rhino or more a year being poached is acceptable! And I am certainly not conceding that a trade ban with enforcement will not work - quite the opposite. The figure of just short of 400 animals shot as trophies is not per year but since 2009. However, its impact - in addition to increased poaching - should not be ignored or marginalised.

As far as resources are concerned I would suggest it's not a question of there being no money or that money can only come from exploitation and consumptive use. The Los Angeles Zoo has recently, for example, created a new elephant exhibit for its 3 Asian elephants (a male and 2 post-reproductive females) covering about 3 acres at a cost of US$42 million. Money is clearly out there (and that includes in South Africa). It's a question of prioritisation and deployment and, frankly, getting away from the 'it only stays if it pays' mantra.

Yes, enforcement, education and sentencing have been on the table for a long while but I would draw your attention to the words 'concerted', 'increased' and 'effective'. It is a lack of unity on these issues that has allowed poaching and international organised crime to get away with murder and until we act to fully protect wildlife instead of speculating on it they will continue to do so.
03:27 PM on 05/30/2012
"It's a question of prioritisation and deployment and, frankly, getting away from the 'it only stays if it pays' mantra."

Will Travers would you invest your time and money in something that doesn't pay back and you risk to lose it everyday? And some people do... for the future of rhinos!
08:55 PM on 06/05/2012
It's too bad this forum is moderated or I would take the opportunity to tell you what I really think of you, Will Travers.
08:24 PM on 05/29/2012
In his opening statement, Mark Jones implies that the high price of rhino horns on the black market is the result of an increase in demand. I think it is rather a result of rarity, or in this case, the lack of a legal means to obtain rhino horns. The demand for rhino horn in Asia can only be met illegally, making it expensive.

Regarding the comparison with other examples of when trade has been attempted in the past, when it comes to the ivory one-off sales, Mark fails to mention that poaching decreased after the first sale, and that poaching was already increasing before the second sale, making it difficult to interpret what effect trade had on poaching. Additionally, in all three cases discussed, the animals have to die to extract the product (including wild bears). Rhinos don't have to die to get their horn. Mark also doesn't mention cases where trade has benefited threatened species, such as crocodiles, ostriches and vicuna. When considering whether trade will help a threatened species, each case has to be judged on its own merits.

The truth maybe instead that, despite the anti-trade hype, trade bans rarely, if ever work, and the rhino is a good example of a failure. International trade in rhino horn was banned in 1977, but poaching continued in Africa until rhinos were virtually wiped out in the 1990's. The main reason we still have wild rhinos is the sustainable utilization policy of South Africa (and Namibia).
12:02 PM on 05/29/2012
Mark Jones is right. Talk of legalising rhino horn smacks of a panic reaction by a country that has not experienced epidemic levels of poaching in living memory.

South Africa claims to have 20,000 rhino. Allowing for a net recuitment rate of 3% (the number of rhino born, less the number that die of natural causes) the population will continue to rise EVEN with losses to poaching of 400 animals a year. However, when you add current poaching rates (1 rhino every 15 hours) AND the trophy hunting rate (nearly 400 animals shot - mainly by Vietnamese - since 2009) then growth could zero out.

Some kind of cartel that will 'control' trade into the Asian market is a pipe dream, conceived by people who are truly out of touch with reality and with the impact of the market forces that a country such as China can exert. A few tonnes of 'legal' rhino horn will only whet the appetite of Far Eastern consumers, confirm the widespread misconception that rhino horn is a valuable medicinal product - and ramp up demand.

If you think it's bad now in South Africa, legalise trade and see what BAD really means.

A moratorium on all international trade (horn, body parts, live rhino), a concerted public education programme in consumer markets, increased enforcement measures and effective, deterrent sentences, will work - if only there is the political will to make them happen.

Will Travers
CEO The Born Free Foundation
CEO Born Free USA