Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Martin Davidson

GET UPDATES FROM Martin Davidson
 

We Must Engage With China Through Culture

Posted: 18/04/2012 00:00

This week the Chinese government has sent a delegation of more than two thousand political, cultural and educational figures for a week of dialogue and events around the London Book Fair.

This year's London Book Fair is a sign of China's increasing international engagement and visibility. Elsewhere, by the end of August 2011, 353 Confucius Institutes had been established in 104 countries. There is no reason to think that this international cultural and educational expansion won't continue - the Chinese government aims to increase that total to one thousand by 2020. How things have changed.

When I first went to China in 1984, the British Council there was an operation of six people working in a converted bicycle shed at the back of the British Embassy. The only way to speak to a Chinese 'man on the street' was in the cycle lanes that criss-cross the city. From time to time cyclists would lean across at the traffic lights, pull aside their facemasks and practice their English with me through the exhaust fumes.

This surge in cultural relations between our two countries also naturally leads to questioning some aspects of our societies. While events like the London Book Fair provide an invaluable opportunity to engage with a country of real long term importance to us, others ask whether it is right to engage with a country that imprisons intellectuals over a difference of opinion. Can we engage effectively with such a country?

Well my answer is an emphatic yes - not only can we, but we must. Having experienced the extraordinary level of change in China over the past 30 years, it is not only in our material interests it is also a moral imperative to be part of that change. It is easy to criticise an individual event or set of events but all cultural exchange has to be seen in the round and over a length of time.

Some seem to have misunderstood the role of the British Council and our involvement in the cultural programme at the book fair. Our task for Britain is not to criticise or praise the governments in the 110 countries where we work. Our role is to strengthen ties between people there and the UK - to the benefit of both. And in doing so we do have to work with ministries to actually make educational and cultural exchange happen. If we didn't we would not have been able to work in Eastern Europe in the cold war, in South Africa before the release of Nelson Mandela, through recent unrest in the Arab world and in Burma, Iraq and Afghanistan through the last decade. Ours is a story of engagement and we stay in countries through good times and bad.

The programme of events before, during and after the fair includes festivals and a variety of partners from around the UK throughout 2012. So, while the London Book Fair is a major event, it is just one of a series. We have participation from a variety of voices including Ma Jian, Diane Wei Liang, Yan Liang, Ou Ning, Murong Xuechen, Guo Xiaolu, A Yi, Sheng Keyi, Han Dong, Tsering Norbu and Jung Chang. Censorship and human rights are featuring prominently in all the discussions and debates. These are key issues for UK audiences and it is right that they are debated. We believe that exposure to our open and pluralistic society leads to long term benefits both for the UK and the countries in which we operate.

It is unfortunate that some people feel that Chinese writing cannot be good quality or legitimate unless the author is imprisoned or exiled. The writers we are welcoming to London this week as part of the book fair's cultural programme do not primarily represent a country or ideology: they are first and foremost writers. It is in our interest to engage openly and frankly with them and also to ensure that there are ever greater opportunities for further exchanges with them and others in the coming years. The London Book Fair is a moment in a continuing series of exchanges with China. I hope that there will be many others.

 
FOLLOW UK CULTURE
This week the Chinese government has sent a delegation of more than two thousand political, cultural and educational figures for a week of dialogue and events around the London Book Fair. This year'...
This week the Chinese government has sent a delegation of more than two thousand political, cultural and educational figures for a week of dialogue and events around the London Book Fair. This year'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:11 PM on 04/23/2012
"It is unfortunate that some people feel that Chinese writing cannot be good quality or legitimate unless the author is imprisoned or exiled."

The issue at stake is the exact opposite: when inviting authors to this event your overriding concern is that China hasn't imprisoned or exiled them. Whether they are any good is secondary to that consideration. As far as you are concerned, Chinese writing cannot be good quality or legitimate -- IF the author is imprisoned or exiled.

When you think about the many giants of literature that have suffered for their art, that is some claim!
11:08 AM on 04/23/2012
I fear Mr Davidson may have been misinformed by his colleagues about the ‘participation’ of author Ma Jian (a Chinese writer resident in the UK who was denied a visa to return to China last summer) in the British Council’s programme of events around the London Book Fair. Although it is true that Ma Jian appeared in events related to the book fair, one was organised by PEN and one by myself in collaboration with the Oxford branch of Blackwell. In organising the Blackwell event, my aim was in part to draw attention to Ma Jian’s exclusion from the British Council programme. Therefore, for the British Council to claim the event as their own, which they have done repeatedly despite letters of protest from Ma Jian, is disingenuous to say the least. Presumably they would say that I was working 'in partnership' with them, yet this was not how I saw it. Yes they arranged for officially invited writers Li Er and Bi Feiyu to come to Oxford, but with definite nervousness and much prompting. Indeed, Bi Feiyu pulled out at the last minute. I am taken aback by the disrespect the British Council has shown to Ma Jian and the cause of freedom of speech. To exclude him is one thing. To try to paper over that exclusion is another.
02:50 PM on 04/19/2012
"It is unfortunate that some people feel that Chinese writing cannot be good quality or legitimate unless the author is imprisoned or exiled." Did anyone say such a thing? It was my impression that many people felt that writers of merit should not be excluded simply because they were effectively blacklisted by the Chinese authorities, and objected to the British Council colluding in that exclusion.
09:25 AM on 04/19/2012
This is a very good article. I just got back from a short spell teaching English in Wuhan. Only about 8 million people live there. We have to work to understand the chinese, both on the macro and micro level. They are, overall, a friendly kind and curious people. Once you get used to being stared at , China is both fascinating and frightening. Many things strike you immediately. If they have a highway code it is at best optional, especially for taxi drivers who think it is unlucky to wear seat belts, and gobbing on the street is both widespread and not very nice.The pollution is truly frightening. You could film Bladerunner in Shanghai without special effects. One myth to dispel is that the language is difficult. It is not; it is just different. Mandarin is quite a simple language to speak and hear, but to read and write you need to know about 2000 characters! If you are interested, please read my comments on a blog I did, just google ianinchina. I'm going back there in summer, so it can't have been that bad! Zaijian!
10:47 AM on 04/19/2012
My niece in law is a palaeontologist, she spent a couple of years in the dinosaur fields of China and enjoyed her tenure immensely.

I have no personal experience of the country, but worked for some time in a shipyard with a Chinese joiner, he came from Shanghai, and was one helluva great guy,.
Locally, I now live in south Wales, I have done much work for a takeaway, the owners of which, who also happen to originate from Shanghai, are some of the nicest people I have ever met or worked for.

I have also worked for another ethnic group, also nice enough people, as individuals, except unlike the Chinese, these follow a certain religion that gives me the creeps.
06:58 PM on 04/18/2012
Why has Martin Davidson not used this opportunity to refute the claims made by Nick Cohen in the most recent edtion of The Observer, or address the comments made by Jonathon Heawood? It would appear that he is condoning the self-censprship of some of the authors represented as well as the censorious Chinese government.
This comment has been removed.
10:38 AM on 04/18/2012
What will it be like to live in a China-shaped world? Author of the global best-seller ‘When China Rules The World’, Martin Jacques argues that it will be profoundly different.
http://iai.tv/video/when-china-rules-the-world-short
11:06 AM on 04/18/2012
I see that scenario far less worrisome than being ruled under Sharia Law.
08:18 AM on 04/18/2012
It may have escaped your attention, but the British have been engaging with both the Chinese and the culture of China for well over a century and half. not always to the mutual benefit of both,

But since WW2 I reckon our political and social contacts have resulted in a depth of friendship,both commercial and social, that is apparent on every high street in Britain, we have welcomed the Chinese diaspora to become a part of our social fabric, and I suggest that the sensible and quietly negotiated return of Hong Gong to China, once the lease was up, gave kudos to both countries

I believe most Brits genuinely like the Chinese, (far more so than a whole host of other nationalities), we have a long long beneficial and amicable history between us, and I can see absolutely no justifiable reason to believe this will be fractured any time in the foreseeable future.

But, If the chattering class now suddenly finds common cause with the rest of us, maybe we should be wary of any potential damage to our current UK/ Chinese relations that could ensue.
01:04 AM on 04/18/2012
The British Council's engagement as a commercial competitor in English Language Teaching around the world has damaged its image. There is blatant abuse of alleged or real government connections to manipulate commercial contracts up for bid in their favour.

You want to lecture us on cultural matters as neutral while playing disreputable games in the commercial EFL/ESP world. And you increase your market leverage by citing your BBC contacts.

It would not be so bad, if your methods were good. But the Council ELT folk are weak in pedagogy. They are too tied up in applied linguistics. Your folk still believe that teaching method is derived from curriculum content. How quaint.