Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matthew Handley

GET UPDATES FROM Matthew Handley
 

An Apologia for Diving in Football

Posted: 18/04/2012 00:00

During Sunday afternoon's match between Manchester United and Aston Villa at Old Trafford, Ashley Young was accused of taking a dive. During the first half, as he broke into Villa's penalty area, he was clipped by defender Ciaran Clark; Clark tried to get his leg out of the way, but Ashley Young, looking to gain a penalty, ensured that contact was made, then leapt to the ground in a heap.

The referee pointed to the spot, and Wayne Rooney converted the subsequent penalty. In the game's aftermath, Alec McLeish decried the decision and also the 'cheating' of Young, whilst even the player's own manager S'Ralex Ferguson churlishly admitted that the winger went down easily. All around the country people made rubbish Tom Daley puns and lambasted Young for encapsulating everything that's wrong in the game. I'm not going to join that crowd; I'm going to praise Ashley Young's actions.

Let me first make one thing clear; simulation should be against the rules. If no contact is made and a player acts as if there was, then the referee can and should punish the player for that offence. And there are obvious ways that diving could be eradicated from football; issuing significant bans retrospectively to high-profile players would vastly diminish the incentive for players to go to ground easily. But the key word in that last sentence is 'incentive'. When a player goes to ground they are making a cost-benefit analysis of what best serves their team's interests. It is a legitimate one to for those players to make.

Players are employed by their clubs to do a job. They're given outrageous salaries to churn out results, win trophies and gain their clubs further success and revenue. What they're not there to do is to uphold abstract Corinthian values of sportsmanship and fair play. When Ashley Young decided to try to gain the penalty on Sunday a few things would have went through his mind. Firstly, is the probability of, were he to carry on, he'd be able to create a goalscoring chance. Second, is whether that likelihood is outweighed by the potential benefits of going down; namely winning a penalty and perhaps getting Clark sent off. Finally are the risks of taking the dive; the decision not being given, a yellow card for himself, and the adding to of an already growing infamy which may mean that borderline decisions go against him in future. Taking these into consideration, Young took the decision to hit the deck; and it paid off.

We often applaud acts in which players give preference to sportsmanship over success. This is tantamount to a club's shareholders rewarding someone who throws a share of the company's profits to a struggling rival; it's simply not what the business (and make no mistakes, football is a business) is about. For example in 2000, ref-shoving fascist-sympathiser Paolo di Canio was awarded the FIFA Fair Play award for catching the ball and spurning a certain goal, as opposing keeper Paul Gerrard lay on the floor injured. If I were a West Ham fan I'd have been incensed; a paid employee of the club was refusing to do his job. Why is a player lying on the floor through injury any worse than them leaving themselves out of position? It's simply not the concern of the other side; their concern should be, exclusively to win.

Another example is panto-villain Luis Suarez's blatant hand-ball to deny Ghana a spot in the World Cup semi-finals. Suarez was rightly sent off for preventing a certain goal; but that's what it was. A certain goal. A goal that would have sent his country, Uruguay, out of the competition. In that moment, Suarez decided that his preventing the goal, and incurring a sending-off was the preferable option to allowing his opponents a certain victory. It proved to be the correct decision, as Uruguay triumphed in the ensuing shoot-out.

My argument is not to say that 'rules are there to be broken'. But that it's right for players to weigh up the benefits of breaking that rule with the cost of getting caught; if that results in scoring a few dishonest goals, then I don't really care. Players are paid to do a job by their clubs, and sometimes that necessarily entails angering a few people and fighting dirty. Dive away Young. We'll make a Tom Daley out of you yet.

 
FOLLOW UK SPORT
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:24 PM on 04/20/2012
It happens in most sports. Victory is more important to people than anything especially when money comes in. People get away with what they can.

I am a fan of rugby league and players are always trying to make out they are being held down to milk a penalty or ripping the ball out of the tackle to try to make out the player has knocked on.

The problem is no one goes back and punishes the cheats. They change the course of the game by cheating and no one reacts. Ashley Young should be in trouble right now, instead people make excuses for him and he will carry on as if nothing happened. And he isn't the only one, so many are at it.
12:04 AM on 04/19/2012
The cheats are killing the game....its inevitable that some thing will have to be done, I hought these current issues , would have been dealt with years ago, would have been easier then.
The whole thing is a pathetic joke.
04:58 PM on 04/18/2012
Oh dear oh dear. What has happened to a society that strives for honesty, integrity and fairplay in life and in sport.? Everything is about money, what can I get out of a situation, how can I beat the system? Richer people are pillioried for finding ways to pay less tax, poorer people sometimes think they've done well to get benefits they're not entitled to, cigarettes are smuggled in to evade tax and on and on. Now we have sportsmen wanting success and not paying the right price for it. Referees make mistakes OK but players that fling themselves dramatically to the floor and then often feign great injury only to be running round soon after are plain and simple cheats, dishonest.

Watch children play and what do you see? Children flinging themselves to the floor in the same way.

What a shame.
12:44 PM on 04/18/2012
Classic business>sportsmanship point of view. Sports should be there to promote morals not make a show of undermining them.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
12:41 PM on 04/18/2012
You should get a job as a banker immediately. You'd do really well with your "all that matters is winning and short term gain" philosophy.

Maybe what you're arguing is that football should have rules that unstintingly reward decent behaviour. That wouldn't be hard to do at all.

On the other hand, maybe you're arguing that football, as an analogy and happy substitute for a war between tribes, will contain all the more drama if the full range of villainy and decency that people are capable of is stirred into the mix. Thus generating more passion.

And maybe you're right. Football would even more dull than it already goal-lessly is if it was actually organised as simply a contest of footballing skill between two teams of decent sportsmen.
09:59 AM on 04/18/2012
Hmmm...an interesting point of view. The business of football and the fans of football are two different things that are inextricably linked. The business part of my brain agrees whole-heartedly, the football fan part of my brain wants to scream at you for advocating the ruination of the beautiful game.

I also have the added dilemma of being a father. By that I mean that I have a social obligation to promote fair play in my children, but personally and selfishly I also want them to be able to compete and be ruthless if necessary for their own advancement. As children look up to footballers I would like to see them advocating fair play and gentlemanly conduct, being good role-models as it were, but appreciate that being fair isn't always the same as being right.

Hmmm...an interesting paradox indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kevin Graham
02:28 PM on 04/18/2012
Really well put gnomeotoole - an interesting paradox it certainly is
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kevin Graham
07:45 AM on 04/18/2012
Your point about Suarez is a good one and the means justify the end on that - not necessarily ethically right but that's my view.

Re Di Canio - I think you're looking at that from a very narrow view point, without considering the good will West Ham and Di Canio were afforded for that gesture or their league position at the time - the result of the game was not life or death at that point, and to have a gesture of that nature is in my opinion laudible because it demonstrates a human, emotional side to the game that at least gives hope to those football fans who grieve for the loss of the game's soul! It isn't just a business, and even if it was, the indirect benefits Di Canio's gesture may have created could well have benefitted football PLC or West Ham FC in terms of media exposure, good will and continued, additional support from paying fans.

I would also suggest that you over estimate Young's capacity to weigh the situation up - its about instinct and a mind created by Premier League/pro football culture. He automatically looks to go down any time a defender looks remotely interested in challenging Young in the penalty area. He did it at Villa and will continue to it until he is publicly villified by his gaffer.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
11:41 PM on 04/17/2012
I agree. Besides, there are far worse aspects to football at the moment.

Banana, anyone?