Historians will be rubbing their hands with glee - a film due to hit cinemas this week is centred around one of the most famous names in modern history: Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States of America.
Screenwriters and researchers have rolled up their filmmaking sleeves to delve 150 years into the past to tell the story of the man who led the US through the constitutional and military crisis that was the American Civil War.
But wait, what's the full title of this big budget production? Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. Oh.
I may not have a degree in American Studies, but I don't recall being taught that Lincoln dabbled in the extermination of fanged blood suckers. Is it all a terribly clever metaphor? Lincoln's fight against slave masters of the era? No, it really is about Abraham Lincoln discovering that "vampires are planning to take over the United States... he makes it his mission to eliminate them."
What harm can be done by including the legendary president in an imaginary crusade against vampires?
One word: erosion.
As we recreate, change and play with the details of the past, all in the name of poetic licence, we erode the facts and lose sight of the truth.
This may not be a problem now, but who is to say that future generations will be able to accurately disentangle fact from fiction when studying our current books and films?
To be fair, I do agree it would be hard to convince a future student from the year 2212 that Abraham Lincoln was mixed up in vampire shenanigans - but other more subtle blurs between fact and fiction are not so easy to spot.
A literary example is the award-winning novel The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne. The book follows the friendship between the young son of a Nazi Concentration Camp Commandant and a Jewish boy who is a prisoner in the camp.
Though well received by the majority of readers, the novel was met with some criticism for trivialising the holocaust. Perhaps the most obvious and startling inaccuracy of the novel is that in reality there were no children in Auschwitz; the Nazis gassed them as soon as they stepped off of the trains.
This popular novel may well be the first and only holocaust book that young people read. When delving into history, authors have a sacred responsibility to convey the truth, however unpleasant or horrifying.
Another cinematic culprit lurking on the horizon is the forthcoming release Chernobyl Diaries.
The title itself sounds like an in-depth documentary of the shocking Chernobyl disaster that changed the way the world viewed nuclear power forever.
But no, Chernobyl Diaries is about a group of American 20-somethings who fancy some 'extreme tourism', only to discover that the Chernobyl complex is inhabited with what appear to be flesh-eating nuclear mutants.
The Chernobyl disaster was devastating - the explosion in 1986 released 100 times more radiation that the atom bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, more than 350,000 people resettled away from the affected areas and the total death toll through cancer and related illnesses is around the 200,000 mark.
The explosion is still making headlines to this day - radioactive particles became accumulated in grazing sheep in England and Wales - restrictions covering sheep movements have only just been lifted this month, 26 years after the disaster.
To make a horror movie that completely distorts the truth of Chernobyl into the realms of fiction is irresponsible filmmaking. Yes, we make films about disasters - World War I and II, Titanic, Pompeii - but giving the same treatment to such a recent disaster is disrespectful to those still living the nightmare.
However, having not seen the film, I could be accused of ignorant condemnation. The trailer is below - I'll let you decide for yourself.
For those of you still reeling from the historical vandalism of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, fear not, Steven Spielberg is in the midst of making a more accurate account of the President's life and times.
Chernobyl Diaries trailer:
Follow Matthew Tucker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Matt_Tucker
W. Scott Poole: Why Historians Should Be Vampire Hunters
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (2012) - IMDb
Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter - YouTube
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter - Rotten Tomatoes
'Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter': Fake history, but an honest Abe ...
On the other hand, 'Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter' will be understood by everybody who sees it as a bit of fun, not intended to be taken seriously. As such, it is probably the wrong movie on which to base complaints of Hollywood inaccuracy.
Was he the one who told his father he’d just eviscerated the Constitution family tree?
"I don't recall being taught that Lincoln dabbled in the extermination of fanged blood suckers."
Though if he did, he’s really needed now.
"One word: erosion."
Isn’t that a thing of the past (circa 1930’s)? We’ve moved on from there at a fracking pace.
"we erode the facts and lose sight of the truth."
At last. Some recognition for what humans are really good at.
"who is to say that future generations will be able to accurately disentangle fact from fiction when studying our current books and films?"
Or that we can, with what we have to work from.
"in reality there were no children in Auschwitz"
in reality the rights to disputed lands were conferred in someone’s dream.
"radioactive particles became accumulated in grazing sheep in England and Wales"
But hey, lets expensively revisit the previously rejected proposal of burying nuclear waste under Cumbria.
"Steven Spielberg is in the midst of making a more accurate account of the President's life and times."
Abe Lincoln. My life as a miniaturised chimney sweep in his stove-pipe hat.
turned to savagery and EVIL..the name German NAZIS.. still makes one shudder
MUST BE THAT AT THE CORE OF MAN IS EVIL
Actually, I find it easier to believe that Lincoln was a vampire hunter than anything Roland Emmerich puts out ... ;)