Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matthew Tucker

GET UPDATES FROM Matthew Tucker
 

Fact or Fiction? When History Becomes a Filmmaker's Playground

Posted: 20/06/2012 00:00

Historians will be rubbing their hands with glee - a film due to hit cinemas this week is centred around one of the most famous names in modern history: Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States of America.

Screenwriters and researchers have rolled up their filmmaking sleeves to delve 150 years into the past to tell the story of the man who led the US through the constitutional and military crisis that was the American Civil War.

But wait, what's the full title of this big budget production? Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. Oh.

I may not have a degree in American Studies, but I don't recall being taught that Lincoln dabbled in the extermination of fanged blood suckers. Is it all a terribly clever metaphor? Lincoln's fight against slave masters of the era? No, it really is about Abraham Lincoln discovering that "vampires are planning to take over the United States... he makes it his mission to eliminate them."

What harm can be done by including the legendary president in an imaginary crusade against vampires?

One word: erosion.

As we recreate, change and play with the details of the past, all in the name of poetic licence, we erode the facts and lose sight of the truth.

This may not be a problem now, but who is to say that future generations will be able to accurately disentangle fact from fiction when studying our current books and films?

To be fair, I do agree it would be hard to convince a future student from the year 2212 that Abraham Lincoln was mixed up in vampire shenanigans - but other more subtle blurs between fact and fiction are not so easy to spot.

A literary example is the award-winning novel The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne. The book follows the friendship between the young son of a Nazi Concentration Camp Commandant and a Jewish boy who is a prisoner in the camp.

Though well received by the majority of readers, the novel was met with some criticism for trivialising the holocaust. Perhaps the most obvious and startling inaccuracy of the novel is that in reality there were no children in Auschwitz; the Nazis gassed them as soon as they stepped off of the trains.

This popular novel may well be the first and only holocaust book that young people read. When delving into history, authors have a sacred responsibility to convey the truth, however unpleasant or horrifying.

Another cinematic culprit lurking on the horizon is the forthcoming release Chernobyl Diaries.

The title itself sounds like an in-depth documentary of the shocking Chernobyl disaster that changed the way the world viewed nuclear power forever.

But no, Chernobyl Diaries is about a group of American 20-somethings who fancy some 'extreme tourism', only to discover that the Chernobyl complex is inhabited with what appear to be flesh-eating nuclear mutants.

The Chernobyl disaster was devastating - the explosion in 1986 released 100 times more radiation that the atom bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, more than 350,000 people resettled away from the affected areas and the total death toll through cancer and related illnesses is around the 200,000 mark.

The explosion is still making headlines to this day - radioactive particles became accumulated in grazing sheep in England and Wales - restrictions covering sheep movements have only just been lifted this month, 26 years after the disaster.

To make a horror movie that completely distorts the truth of Chernobyl into the realms of fiction is irresponsible filmmaking. Yes, we make films about disasters - World War I and II, Titanic, Pompeii - but giving the same treatment to such a recent disaster is disrespectful to those still living the nightmare.

However, having not seen the film, I could be accused of ignorant condemnation. The trailer is below - I'll let you decide for yourself.

For those of you still reeling from the historical vandalism of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, fear not, Steven Spielberg is in the midst of making a more accurate account of the President's life and times.

Chernobyl Diaries trailer:

 

Follow Matthew Tucker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Matt_Tucker

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
Historians will be rubbing their hands with glee - a film due to hit cinemas this week is centred around one of the most famous names in modern history: Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United S...
Historians will be rubbing their hands with glee - a film due to hit cinemas this week is centred around one of the most famous names in modern history: Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United S...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
21:17 on 26/06/2012
I has a seriously quesy feeling when the boy in the stripped pajamas was released, largely because it's so easily taken as historically accurate when it contains, as you say, some really serious historical innaccuracies. It struck me as sentimental and trivialising of the Holocaust, even if it did have "good intentions" it's missleading and feeds into a process of fictionalising the Holocaust, something people should be deeply warry of for obvious reasons. The Chernobyle Diaries anoyed me for somewhat different reasons, yes it comes across as insensitive (because it is) but as much as anything it's a blatant rip off of a sub culture in the Ukraine around Chernobyle and the Zone of Alienation which has essentially blended the pre-chernobyle melt down short story "Roadside picknick" with the events surrounding the meltdown, it's a fairly distinct sub culture which has culminated in the "STALKER" games and while it might seem like something of a trivialisation it is a homegrown Ukrainian response to the disaster and so is interesting and in my opinion, legitimate in itself. The Chernobyle Diaries is a shameless rip off of this subculture.
12:25 on 21/06/2012
This is an anti-nuclear rant thinly disguised as a movie critique. There's nothing wrong with making a horror flick surrounding that stricken reactor. I doubt that after watching Chernobyl Diaries people will start to believe that Godzilla is going to crawl out of the ocean next to the Fukushima reactors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
21:36 on 20/06/2012
Of course, Herodotus' classic history of the Greco-Persian wars (which I just started reading) is full of tall tales.
16:01 on 20/06/2012
Hollywood has always misled film-goers with it's portrayal of "historical" events. Perhaps most irritating to British viewers is Hollywood's habit of insisting that the 'heroes' are always American (even when no Americans were involved in the original events). This sort of historical reinvention is dangerous, because it's insidious nature means that many viewers may be taken in and assume that they are witnessing historical truth.

On the other hand, 'Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter' will be understood by everybody who sees it as a bit of fun, not intended to be taken seriously. As such, it is probably the wrong movie on which to base complaints of Hollywood inaccuracy.
15:19 on 20/06/2012
Is it any different than the fact that brave British servicemen died acquiring the Eningma machine, but the movie made out it was all the US?
14:29 on 20/06/2012
It's a smart combination of a prominent historical figure everybody knows with one of the top fads in current books and movies, but I hope it stays with this one movie. I don't want to read or see FDR hunting zombies or Frank Sinatra traveling around the world as a pro-JFK James Bond type.
lastpost
see biography
13:35 on 20/06/2012
"Abraham Lincoln"
Was he the one who told his father he’d just eviscerated the Constitution family tree?

"I don't recall being taught that Lincoln dabbled in the extermination of fanged blood suckers."
Though if he did, he’s really needed now.

"One word: erosion."
Isn’t that a thing of the past (circa 1930’s)? We’ve moved on from there at a fracking pace.

"we erode the facts and lose sight of the truth."
At last. Some recognition for what humans are really good at.

"who is to say that future generations will be able to accurately disentangle fact from fiction when studying our current books and films?"
Or that we can, with what we have to work from.

"in reality there were no children in Auschwitz"
in reality the rights to disputed lands were conferred in someone’s dream.

"radioactive particles became accumulated in grazing sheep in England and Wales"
But hey, lets expensively revisit the previously rejected proposal of burying nuclear waste under Cumbria.

"Steven Spielberg is in the midst of making a more accurate account of the President's life and times."
Abe Lincoln. My life as a miniaturised chimney sweep in his stove-pipe hat.
09:39 on 20/06/2012
It's not true to say that "there were no children in Auschwitz; the Nazis gassed them as soon as they stepped off of the trains." Elie Wiesel tells us in NIGHT that the word would pass down the line to children that if they could get away with pretending to be older than they were, then they should do so. Also there were children kept alive for medical experimentation. And in the newsreel footage of the liberation of the camps, there are children clearly present. It's certainly accurate to say that the majority of children were murdered almost immediately after arriving at the camps, but not all.
11:03 on 20/06/2012
I think, what it actually means is that the plot of TBitSP is improbable and that there is nothing in the book to help people to navigate it and to tell what's fiction and what's historically accurate.
14:53 on 20/06/2012
What can you say... when a so called civilised western country... an entire nation
turned to savagery and EVIL..the name German NAZIS.. still makes one shudder
MUST BE THAT AT THE CORE OF MAN IS EVIL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirectProf
23:12 on 19/06/2012
I suppose it's no more or less a travesty than "Anonymous" was ...

Actually, I find it easier to believe that Lincoln was a vampire hunter than anything Roland Emmerich puts out ... ;)
22:24 on 19/06/2012
How about the bozo's who made "Inglorious Basterds", the most impossible WWII movie of all time. Sure, Adolph Hitler died in a fire while watching a new propaganda movie, in France, in 1944?. All those stories about Hitler in his bunker in Berlin as the Russians took the city are simply balderdash. What the heck. Most of history is already balderdash so why not continue the trend. Scalp 'em!