Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mehdi Hasan

GET UPDATES FROM Mehdi Hasan
 

While We Wring Our Hands Over Syria, There's a Deafening Silence Over Torture in Bahrain

Posted: 13/09/2012 12:00

Believe it or not but a funny thing happened at the 16th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran last month. When the new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, denounced the "oppressive" Syrian government, it didn't go down so well with the pro-Assad Iranians. So, local journalists decided deliberately to mistranslate "Syria", in Farsi, as "Bahrain", prompting the latter to feign outrage.

The problem for the Bahrainis is that their government is indeed "oppressive" and therefore lends itself to such easy substitution. Over the past 18 months, Bahraini security forces, aided by troops from Saudi Arabia, have engaged in a brutal crackdown against the island nation's own Syria-style uprising. Bahrain is home to the Arab Spring's forgotten revolution. Since
February 2011, there have been near-daily protests against the regime, a repressive Sunni monarchy ruling over a Shia-majority country. These have been met with tear gas, live ammunition, mass arrests and torture. While the fighting in Syria is debated in the corridors of the United Nations building and reported on the front pages of the world's newspapers, the unrest in Bahrain is quietly ignored by our leaders and relegated by journalists to the box marked "news in brief".

"[The violence] has got worse," Maryam al-Khawaja, acting president of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, tells me during a rare visit to London. "The Bahraini regime has made some superficial changes but the situation on the ground hasn't changed...Torture has moved from official torture centres to unofficial torture centres."

The death toll

Apologists for the Bahraini regime claim it is offensive to compare the moderate, pro-western king, Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, to the Assads or Gaddafis of this world. They point out that the death toll in Syria is far, far higher than in Bahrain. True, says Khawaja, "[but] one of the things you have to do is look at things per capita. Bahrain's population is 600,000 and you are looking at 100 people dead. If Bahrain had the same population as, say, Egypt, that's [equivalent to] more than 11,000 people dead in just a year and a half."

Meanwhile, thousands of Bahrainis languish behind bars on trumped-up, politically motivated charges, including around 90 children under the age of 18. Torture, in the words of the government's own official inquiry, is "systemic" - detainees have been beaten on their backs and the soles of their feet; deprived of sleep; subjected to sexual assaults, including the insertion of hosepipes and rifle barrels into the anus; forced to urinate on themselves and, in one reported case, eat their own faeces.

Maryam al-Khawaja's father, Abdulhadi, co-founder of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights, was sentenced to life imprisonment by a military court in 2011 on spurious "terrorism" charges and has since been designated by Amnesty International as a "prisoner of conscience". Her two brothers-in-law were also detained and tortured - "psychologically, physically and sexually", she says - while her sister Zainab was arrested in August for allegedly tearing up a picture of the king.

"When you want to judge a human-rights situation in any country, look at where the human-rights defenders are," says Khawaja, who is remarkably calm and articulate for a 25-year-old whose family are behind bars and who herself is regularly subjected to death threats. "In Bahrain, they are in prison."

So why the silence from the west? You guessed it: unlike Syria, or, for that matter, Libya, the Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain (under British rule from the 1860s to 1960s) is a key ally. It hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and is a strategic bastion against growing Iranian influence in the region. President Obama's call for freedom across the Middle East, Khawaja adds, is "the essence of hypocrisy".

She says the UK government, in particular, has much to answer for and "has been worse than the US government" in pandering to the regime. King Hamad was invited to the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations at Windsor Castle in May; his elder son, the Crown Prince, has been hosted by David Cameron at No 10; his younger son, Nasser bin Hamad, accused of sanctioning the torture of dissident Bahraini athletes, attended the opening ceremony of the Olympics in London in July.

Odious regime

Our support for this odious regime goes beyond mere hospitality. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills authorised the sale of £2.2m of arms to the regime between July and September 2011. And the Home Office raised not a peep when the former Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner John Yates was appointed by the Bahrainis as an "adviser" on security - in which capacity he defended the use of live ammunition against protesters during the Bahrain Grand Prix in April.

So what is to be done? Those of us who decry western inaction on Bahrain are not calling for air strikes or no-fly zones; we don't want to arm rebel groups or send in the tanks. But we do insist our governments speak out, loudly and forcefully, against the regime's ongoing crimes. Why isn't the US State Department or our own Foreign Office calling for the release of all political prisoners? Why aren't they considering a travel ban on senior members of the regime?

"The inaction of the international community has really emboldened the Bahraini government into believing that they are immune," says Khawaja, who is clear on what has to happen in order to bring an end to the state-sponsored violence. First, western governments must put pressure on the regime to allow access to the UN's special rapporteur on torture, and to foreign journalists and NGOs such as Human Rights Watch; second, the threat of economic and diplomatic sanctions must be made. She is right: the US and UK governments' "softly softly approach" hasn't worked and is, frankly, a moral disgrace. I can't get Khawaja's words out of my head: "Your government has the power to stop this mess."

This piece can also be read on the New Statesman

 

Follow Mehdi Hasan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mehdirhasan

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Believe it or not but a funny thing happened at the 16th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran last month. When the new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, denounced the "oppressive" Syrian gover...
Believe it or not but a funny thing happened at the 16th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran last month. When the new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, denounced the "oppressive" Syrian gover...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:03 AM on 09/21/2012
i've always been told the problem in bahrain comes from the non-native Shia population, of which the royal family are not members. the shias were very unwelcoming to ex-patsand very insular within their villages.

i don't know whos in the wrong there. we're a long way away so how can we judge anything without personal experience of the regimes involved.
photo
charlesfrith
Allegedly Bright. Empirically Stupid.
10:28 AM on 09/17/2012
This will be the only 'what about Bahrain?' piece you will see. If any mainstream media voice started to bang the drum for the victims of torture in Bahrain they would stopped. That's the way the corporate media works.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
09:47 AM on 09/17/2012
The west should keep out of all these so called Arab Spring countries..its time we let them solve their own problems, and stopped trying to impose our way of life on them..Its the politicians who like to stick their noses into other peoples affairs, mostly the ordinary joe public is not bothered because one way or another we know its going to cost us lots money in the end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
08:49 PM on 09/17/2012
and what should the west do when other countries are sticking their nose into Arabs business to the detriment of those same people...

It is obviously OK for Iran to Meddle in Arab affairs? Russia? But not the US...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
10:11 PM on 09/17/2012
Its up to the Arab people who they choose to deal with, if they think they will be better off dealing with Iran and Russia, so be it!.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
Might as well laugh while you still can.
11:48 PM on 09/16/2012
Policing the morality of the world is a no win situation. THe west should spend more time working with poor countries where the right foundations and level of effort to improve exist and wish those countries who want to kill over matters of opinion and free speech the very best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
08:50 PM on 09/17/2012
as opposed to stop them from killing, and reducing the toll of human suffering on the world?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
Might as well laugh while you still can.
11:44 AM on 09/18/2012
We never reduce it though do we? And no is gratefulfor the help, mainly because we get it wrong because we dont have a clue what we are doing.
05:39 PM on 09/16/2012
Hasan where are all the pictures of your lunatic brothers demonstrating in London!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11:18 AM on 09/16/2012
I am just for somebody to say: "They brought it on themselves".
01:58 PM on 09/16/2012
I am waiting!
photo
lkfman
Look out, Big Brother is watching
02:18 AM on 09/14/2012
This is totally absurd! The US condemns the governments of Libya and Syria claiming they are murdering civilians when they are/were simply trying to defend their country. Bahrain is doing the exact same thing yet the US has no problem with it. This hypocrisy is ridiculous!
01:38 AM on 09/14/2012
Bahrain strive was unadulterated, obvious and ugly sectarian turmoil financed and agitated by Iranian Ayatollah. The sectarian Shia-Suni fire that Iran is fueling will ultimately consume the medieval theocracy in Iran. After the failure of the 2009 uprising, the time is due for an Iranian Spring to free the Iranian people from the tyranny of the mullah and allow the region to focus on economic development instead of meaningless wars?
01:27 AM on 09/14/2012
The voltage used on genital electrodes in Bahrain is far lower than those used by the heinous Alawite regime of Syria. People should understand the difference !
05:43 AM on 09/26/2012
Be honest how do you know this. Were you twisting some of the dials?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
12:58 AM on 09/14/2012
I find it mind boggling that the unlike situations in Syria and Bahrain keep getting compared as if they were somehow similar...
photo
lkfman
Look out, Big Brother is watching
02:32 AM on 09/14/2012
I'll try to make it simple for you:

The unhappy minority who disapprove of the legitimate government try to violently overthrow it and take offense when the government fights back.

Easy enough?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
03:14 AM on 09/14/2012
Too bad simple means wrong...
The majority of Syrians hate Assad.... and want him dead and gone for his evils...
It is the misguided morally depraved minority who support him.
That is reality... You can repeat the opposite as much as you like it...

But the truth is... that the Plurality of Syrian Society want Assad's neck on a rope.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ali1812
one misconception at a time
04:34 AM on 09/16/2012
nope because bahrains majortiy is actually shia and syriaa maj is shia so technically...
11:28 PM on 09/13/2012
Bahrain is our puppet regime. It's ok for our puppets to torture. But guess what happens when those places get rid of their dictators that our puppets?
They become radical regimes like Iran and now Egypt. They come home to roost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
12:57 AM on 09/14/2012
How exactly is the democratically elected government, run by civilians comparable to the unpopular regime that took over by force of arms in Iran?
10:46 PM on 09/13/2012
You have to pick your spots. Hopefully some quiet diplomacy is going on. syria is an enemy. Bahrain is a friend. Thus the US acts differently. what don't you understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ali1812
one misconception at a time
04:35 AM on 09/16/2012
the double standards
05:55 AM on 09/26/2012
You are basically in agreement with today's NY Times article on the contradictions and dilemmas that Obama faced as the Arab Spring riots shifted from one country to the next (NYT, Tues Sept 25, In Arab Spring, Obama finds a sharp test).
10:00 PM on 09/13/2012
It suits us and for that matter the US to support the Bahraini status quo and its monarchy. We do the same in SA, Oman and the other Trucial States. The bottom line is all about political/social stability and the smooth flow of oil. Nothing positive has been achieved by intervention - Egypt,Iraq and Libya are all still in turmoil and seem likely to become hard line Islamist States.
08:22 PM on 09/13/2012
To win this argument and obtain real change on the ground, you have got to learn to stop speaking the language of morals and human rights, because that is a language which goes in one ear and out the other when the listener is the government. Frame the issue in terms of interests. It is in the short term interest of the U.S. and U.K. to support the Bahraini monarchy, because the Fifth Fleet and other highly valuable assets are located there. However, that situation is unstable. The monarchy has the support of a minority of the population, and frankly authoritarianism is just inherently unstable, even if it can obtain temporary public support. Eventually the demographic situation in Bahrain suggests the rebel forces are likely to gain greater power and influence. Early support by the U.S. and U.K. will be remembered, as will continued opposition (Iran wouldn't hate the U.S. as much without the Shah debacle), and in the long term that may prove the best way to keep the strategic status quo in the region. Thus, it is in the long term interest of both the U.S. and U.K. to intervene and, while not calling for the overthrow of the current regime, at least exert pressure and moderate its oppression in order to create the basis for future relations with the opposition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nizar Qalb
12:54 AM on 09/14/2012
It is in the long term interest of the US not to support the overthrow of a friendly peaceful country in favor of an Iranian influenced Ayatollocracy like in Southern Lebanon, Southern Iraq and Saddam city in Baghdad... and Iran.
01:03 AM on 09/14/2012
Of course, but continued oppression in that country will lead to more violence rather than less.  An easing of tensions and the creation of a credible opposition with which to share power is a stabilizing step.  Something America should encourage and perhaps exert some pressure in achieving.  
05:58 AM on 09/26/2012
You are basically right and your analysis will show the short term nature of the decisions that President Obama was forced to make by the strategic considerations he faced. Any president faces the tough decisions that are created by previous choices of his predecessors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
08:20 PM on 09/13/2012
Im not sure their is a deafening silence, just more of a hum from the oil terminals.