Dear Muslim protester,
Where do I begin? Having watched you shout and scream in front of the world's television cameras, throw petrol bombs and smash windows, I reluctantly decided to write this open letter to you.
Let me be blunt: you and I have little in common other than our shared Islamic faith, our common belief that there is no God but God and Muhammad is His Messenger. You live in a Muslim-majority country, where religion (or should that be religious extremism?) defines the boundaries of political debate and the limits of free speech; I was born and brought up in the liberal, secular west as a member of a minority Muslim community.
If I'm honest, I have to say that, listening to your belligerent rhetoric and watching your violent behaviour, I struggle to recognise the Islam in which you profess to believe. My Islamic faith is based on the principles of peace, moderation and mercy; it revolves around the Quranic verses "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256) and "Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion" (109:6). Yours is a faith disfigured by anger, hate and paranoia.
Self-control
Please do not misunderstand me: yes, you have every right to be angry. I have no time for those neoconservatives here in the west who airily dismiss "false grievances" in the Middle East and beyond. Muslims have much to be aggrieved over - from Bagram to Guantanamo Bay, from Abu Ghraib to Haditha, from US soldiers urinating on the Quran to the spate of racist films and cartoons depicting our beloved prophet as a terrorist/murderer/paedophile/rapist/ delete-as-applicable.
Anger, however, is not an excuse for extremism. Have you not read this saying by the Prophet? "The strong is not the one who overcomes the people by his strength, but the strong is the one who controls himself while in anger."
Today, 14 centuries later, too many of us seem to have lost all self-control. Your fanatical counterparts on the Christian evangelical right have a phrase they often deploy: "WWJD", or "What would Jesus do?". Perhaps you and your fellow protesters should ask "WWMD": what would Muhammad do? Would the Prophet endorse your violent attacks on foreign embassies and schools, on police stations and shops?
We both know the answer. As a child, you will have been taught, like me, about how Muhammad was verbally and physically abused by the pagan worshippers of Mecca - but never responded in kind. The Quran calls him a "mercy for all of creation".
But your anger has blinded you. You tell foreign reporters you are protesting against injustice - but the fight for justice begins at home. Where were you and your fellow flag-burners when a poor, 14-year-old Christian girl in Pakistan was arrested on trumped-up charges of "blasphemy" in August and threatened with the death penalty? Where are you today when the Syrian regime continues to wage war against its own (Muslim) people? Why do you not protest outside the embassies of the Bahraini regime, which tortures and tear-gasses its (Muslim) citizens?
You say you love the Prophet and cannot bear to see him abused, yet in Saudi Arabia the house of the Prophet's first wife, Khadija, was flattened to make way for a public toilet, while the house where Muhammad was born is now overshadowed by a royal palace. Where is your rage against the Saudi regime? Or is your selfprofessed love for the Prophet just a cynical expression of crude anti-Americanism?
You and I have long complained of the west's double standards in the Middle East; it is time for us to recognise that Muslims are guilty of equally egregious double standards. Egyptian state television has broadcast a series based on the infamous anti-Semitic forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Pakistani television channels regularly air programmes demonizing the country's Ahmadiyya community. Islamic scholars appear in online videos ridiculing the core beliefs of Judaism and Christianity. Yet you and your allies demand special protection for your religion and your prophet. Why? Is your faith so weak, so brittle? Muhammad, lest we forget, survived Dante's Inferno. Trust me, he'll survive a 14-minute clip on YouTube.
Own goal
Perhaps the greatest irony, and tragedy, is that by publicising the online insults directed at the Prophet, you have given the wretched "Sam Bacile", the maker of the offensive movie, and his Islamophobic, evangelical Christian ally, Steve Klein, a victory they could never have achieved on their own. Need I remind you that when the full-length film, Innocence of Muslims, was released earlier this year, it was shown only once, to an audience of fewer than ten people, at a run-down cinema in California?
Meanwhile, the reputational damage done to our faith - exacerbated, I hasten to add, by lazy journalists in the west who cannot seem to distinguish between Islam and its adherents - has been immense. Have you not seen the cover of Newsweek magazine? "Muslim rage", screams the headline.
But I have some (bad) news for you (and, for that matter, Newsweek). You represent no one but yourself. You do not speak for Islam or for the Prophet. Nor are you representative of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims. In a recent Gallup survey conducted in ten Muslim-majority countries, representing more than 80 per cent of the global Muslim population, believers, when asked what they admired most about the west, cited political freedoms, fair trials and...wait for it...freedom of speech.
Your actions undermine not just the great religion of Islam but a worldwide Muslim community, or umma, whose members want to live in peace and freedom despite the provocations from the bigots, phobes and haters.
Like freedom, tolerance is not a western invention or innovation; it is an Islamic virtue. As the great Muslim caliph Ali ibn Abu Talib once wrote: "Remember that people are of two kinds: they are either your brothers in religion or your brothers in mankind."
Yours faithfully, Mehdi.
Mehdi Hasan is an NS contributing writer and the political director of The Huffington Post UK.
This post also appeared on the New Statesman.
Follow Mehdi Hasan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mehdirhasan
Lord Weidenfeld of Chelsea: Who is Going to Stop the Fanatics?
Once they are run by the cherry-pickers, compromisers and realists - they start approximating social responsibility. Throw in a truckload of secularity, and they manage to actually acknowledge the human rights of others.
But it takes an atheistically cynical audience to inspire stand-up comedy.
You start your third paragraph with the statement;
"If I'm honest, I have to say that, listening to your belligerent rhetoric and watching your violent behaviour, I struggle to recognise the Islam in which you profess to believe."
When were/ are you honest?
WAS IT WHEN YOU WERE REFERRING TO NON-MUSLIMS AS ANIMALS?
I think you are an ANIMAL who is now hiding his religious beliefs and pretending to be honest. As you know, A LEOPARD NEVER CHANGES ITS SPOTS.
And despite your declaration of your personal adherence to Islam, you WILL abide by the will of those that drive the agenda,
But please try to prove me wrong. Be my guest.
There's nothing wrong with intense devotion to a religion. It's when that devotion turns into violence towards others that the problems begin.
Isaac and Ishmael were brothers from the same father and while Isaac fathered (essentially) the Jews and the Christians, Ishmael fathered those who became Muslims. There is one argument for peace amongst religions, and that applies to the extremists in each. There is no "single" religion as the Egyptians who conquered Jerusalem indicated by not killing all monotheistic religions when they conquered it, unlike the Crusaders who rampaged through killing Jews and Muslims alike. We can all live in peace and harmony if we take Mehdi's eloquently stated view and learn to treat our neighbors, regardless of their political and religious affiliation, as brothers and sisters.
Err..didn't Muhammed create an army, rise up and butcher the Pagan's?
I'm sure thats how Islam was established!
Islam long pre-dates Muhammed, being one of the three Abrahamic religions along with Judaism and Christianity, all three of which stem from a single source. Or at least from a single family. It is true that Muhammed united many diverse elements under one banner of Islam, but the religion itself was there long before.
Muhammed was the last of the prophets, not the first. Modern followers of Islam do so under the guidance of Muhammed's teachings, in the way that Christians follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Both were prophets of the same God.
Islam was established as a major religion by Muhammed. Fact.
Degree of Muslimness ranging from moderate-extreme-radical is another creation to accommodate the issue at hand. The Quranic verse cited by Hasan "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256) is a camouflage thrown by Muslim apologetics to appease and sanitize the otherwise more virulent oppressive attack on Non-muslims and their damned fate in hell in the same Quran a few pages away. It is also to cover Mohamed's declaration (This is well documented in the Hadiths) before he died that at the end of time on judgment day Jesus will return to confess his belief in Islam, become a Muslim, break the cross, and kill the pig. Now either Hassan is ignorant of these facts about his religion or he is hiding that for the sake of looking peaceful and to white wash his Quran. In both case he is not trustworthy and must be exposed.
'After eight years of fighting with the Meccan tribes, his followers, who by then had grown to 10,000, in a largely peaceful conquest gained control of Mecca where he destroyed the pagan idols in the city[16] and then sent his followers out to destroy all of the remaining pagan temples throughout Eastern Arabia'
Do we have differences? You bet. But do we also have foundations for mutual respect, fellowship, and dare I say it?...friendship? Also so.
As a species, it's time for us to recognize we face survival issues much larger than our various "Isms", and the greatest tool any of us have for winning hearts is our own example.