I am not entirely sure whether to be pleased or depressed that the latest Britain's Got Talent sensation, Jonathan and Charlotte, are becoming such a phenomenon. On the one hand, it partially proves the theory that there is an enormous untapped appetite for opera (or operatic-like noises) in the UK. On the other hand, it confirms that people still find it something of an exotic beast that they only encounter - and by which they find themselves impressed - on programmes like this.
Is that a bad thing? Well, yes to an extent and mainly because whatever real talent may turn up on those programmes, it will end up packaged, dumbed down and ultimately minced by the Simon Cowell money machine. What won't happen is that Jonathan, who does appear to have an instrument of sorts, will go to a conservatoire and see where he can take it, fully trained. That is a shame but then again, he will probably earn squillions anyway so why should he worry? Many people in the business will find lots to fault the duo on and yes, the techniques are questionable, the Italian atrocious and Charlotte, bless her, isn't really filled with enormous potential. But I think Jonathan has something about him, especially when you consider his age. With focus and training there could be something very interesting there.
In reality, though, this is not the point. What bothers me is that these episodes of transient stardom continue to keep opera and classical music - in the minds of the wider general public at least - in the box marked 'weird but wonderful' and rarely do the audience go beyond the ropey versions of 'Caruso' to explore the art form. It is often claimed by fans of acts like La Jenkins and the moaning mechanic Alfie Boe that they provide a gateway to the art form but I don't think they do actually. Boe had a real opportunity to do some good but chose instead the knicker-chucking world of musicals and decided to bite down hard on the hand that had fed him his opportunity. A real shame - but I digress. The same questionable claims apply to programmes like Maestro at the Opera, even though some credible and important people from opera are involved in that series (big-up to our mate Steve Higgins among others). Trevor the DJ said he was now a convert to opera having learned O Mio Babbino Caro* but did he and the audience really have to go through all of that to realise that there is something in opera he could enjoy? His is indeed an interesting example of what is possible (hmm, am I arguing with myself here?) because as an "urban" DJ he had never supposed there was something in opera that might appeal to him. Through his entire adult musical life, it had passed him by and then bam! on the strength of listening to one aria he underwent his Damascene conversion. Opera companies need to keep trying to make connections but the temptation is to take the easy route; Hip Hop Cosi or celebrity participation... need I say more? We sometimes appear afraid of our own artform.
From a televisual point of view there is something compelling about watching the participants of Maestro go through the nerve-shredding experience of standing in front of an orchestra. Anybody who has done so (and we give people the chance at the OHP Open Day in our 'Minute Maestro' activity) will know what an unreconstructed monster a full orchestra can be so you have to admire them for their grit. And despite everything, I always marvel at the guts of amateurs on BGT who do what they do in front of millions (and for Jonathan we should reserve some special praise because he is clearly a deeply shy and self-conscious young man). Performing is never an easy thing to do at any level.
Perhaps I am being too idealistic and these programmes are better than nothing, but the overwhelming feeling I am left with is that we are almost there, on the verge of real breakthroughs, but TV Land is just too afraid to get serious with it, choosing instead to introduce a celebrity angle in a dot-to-dot representation of the world of classical music; the premise being that you might not be interested in this but you will be when we show you how difficult it is to sing/conduct/act etc. And better still, we will get someone really unexpected to do it and possibly make a real tit of themselves. I suppose many mean well but then again, maybe they are right because despite the cheers, irritating standing ovations during the performance and the millions of YouTube hits, the British public eventually voted for the dog who can walk on its hind legs. Ultimately, we get the culture we deserve, right?
*To be heard in our production of Gianni Schicchi this summer!
Follow Michael Volpe on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mikeohp
Sarah Bond: And the Winner is... Britain's Got Talent!
Jonathan and Charlotte beaten by Pudsey in BGT final, taking ...
Jonathan and Charlotte | Facebook
Britain's Got Talent final 2012: Jonathan and Charlotte are runners ...
Britains' Got Talent Final: Pudsey closes in on Jonathan and Charlotte
Jonathan and Charlotte - Britain's Got Talent 2012 Final - UK version ...
BGT's Ashleigh Thought Jonathan And Charlotte Would Win The Show
Jonathan And Charlotte “Britain's Got Talent” Final Performance (Video)
Britain's Got Talent: Jonathan and Charlotte roundup of best bits
Jonathan and Charlotte sing a Prayer
Britain's Got Talent: Jonathan and Charlotte, The Loveable Rogues, Only Boys ...
In a sense I agree, and would echo Cassius: "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings", but for different reasons.
Let's be frank: maintaining one's attention for the entirety of an opera (or play, or film) is not something that necessarily comes naturally to us. I am an ardent lover of opera, and an opera singer to boot, but find that my attention lapses in virtually all concerts, shows and gigs that I attend, and movies or TV shows that I watch. The degree of attention deficit is highly variable, depending on the quality of the cast, production and music, or the degree of exertion I've undertaken during the day. It is no mean feat to seek out and stick out a performance that might run to 3 hours, or more.
Even within an ROH audience - even among those of us who have spent a great deal of time in acquaintance with opera - the majority might only be there to for the "Vissi d'arte"s and "Ah! Mes amis"', or at least will expectantly be awaiting those moments while enjoying the rest of the music to a lesser degree.
I do not believe that the popularity of sound-bites over whole operas is a product of some deep-seated failing of our culture, our intellect or our society, but a product of our humanity. While opera, 'classical music' concerts and theatre were at one time dominant entertainments, these have since been replaced with other media that provide quicker fixes, such as TV. It should also be remembered that opera has always been an art form for the privileged - for the few who were well known to use the theatre as a social meeting point rather than as a temple for the arts. As we also know, The Beggar's Opera - a show filled with popular airs of the time - broke the record for a theatre run with 62 consecutive performances, and yet was a 'low' satire of the more 'serious' Italian opera that was popular at the time. In our present day, we know that serious documentaries and long complex dramas attract smaller audiences than populist shows like BGT, The Voice and The X Factor.
We might love opera, but we ought not be disheartened, disappointed or surprised that the majority do not appreciate it as we do - it is a brute fact of (human) life.
We all get bored of things...how many times have you given up on a book or movie? It is all about engagement and quality whatever the artform.
Yes we all get bored of things, and I could never sit and watch an entire episode of the X-Factor as it bores me to tears. I think valiant attempts are made to bring opera to a wider audience, and they should continue, but I don't think we ought to expect that 50% or more of those who receive that exposure become regular opera house visitors. The music is fantastic, and various choruses, arias, ensembles and overtures are already in the public consciousness, but appreciating an opera performance in its entirety really is another matter entirely. In a similar way, while I love a small number of Bob Dylan songs, I have no desire to buy all of his albums and devote hours of my life to listening to them.
The strength of 'love' of opera - and any art form - across the population probably sits on a bell-curve, with those who abhor it and those who adore it at either end. We - at the adore extremity - are going to be the most passionate, and also the most perturbed by where the bulge of the curve rests. For those in the bulge, they are happy with their brief operatic encounters, and who knows, they may gravitate at some point.
Luke
In a nation like Britian where most prefer to read a newspaper with an eductational reading age of 8.5 years, and take in so much of the Murdoch rubbish how can we say that the failings of the government are anything less than a reflection of our own failings.
As for culture, is that not for the bourgeois liberal-elite who love to boast of their expensive seats at the opera and talk about the junk in the Tate Gallery as if it were the pinnacle of civilization. Perhaps Goring was closer than most in respect of the elitism within today's culture when he said, "when people speak of culture I want to reach for my revolver" but not forget to steal all the art treasures of course.
Royal Opera £210
British Grand Prix £169 for one day
Glastonbury £155 for the weekend
Men's final, Wimbledon £91
Lord's Test (England v SA) £75
Stamford Bridge, Chelsea: £65
Hairspray, London: £60
The God of Carnage play: London: £47.50
Odeon Leicester Square £17.50
Free
£12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Millions of Brits enjoy classical music and many more would go to live performances if there were any to go to. Millions live in smaller towns. The appetite for classical performance around the country is not being met because the subsidy, donation and sponsorship funds are largely sucked up in London.
Like Opera Holland Park sponsored by Investec Wealth & Investment.
You want the culture to spread while you yourself are a lackey of an oligarchy. Yeah, a profound understanding of the democratization of culture goes with that.
Should there be more opera on TV? Maybe, but why should it be up to television to do Opera's work? Stop berating the bad points and reflect on the fact that the PUBLIC voted these people into the final of the most watched programme on TV, the PUBLIC buy Jenkins and Boe's work, that's the PUBLIC or YOUR POTENTIAL AUDIENCE. What is the opera fraternity doing to follow up on Britain's Got Talent? What a PR story it would be if Jonathan was offered a free place at a conservatoire. Or if he became a spokesman for the benefits of opera to his life. No, I suspect arrogance will ensure that they probably won't because, well, he's not trained, he might go for money, he doesn't fit YOUR box.
If 0.1% of BGT viewers go on to buy opera CD's or tickets that'll probably be more than the audience engagement work by The Royal Opera House and ENO who collectively receive £45million of Arts Council funding.