The regional hosepipe ban has become an annual event almost as regular as Easter itself. But while millions of Britons all over southern England will be understandably peeved over being unable to water gardens and hose down patios over the coming weeks, it is important and timely to remind ourselves of the vast amount of water that's squandered every year on animal agriculture.
Around 90% of the world's total managed water supply is used to grow food. Most of this is completely wasted by irrigating land used to grow crops for livestock rather than food for direct consumption by humans. A staggering one-third of the world's total cereal crop and more than 90% of the world's soya crop is used for animal feed. The water that it takes to grow all that, plus what it takes to clean away the filth of factory farms, transport trucks and abattoirs, means that the livestock industry is placing a serious strain on our water supply, and not surprisingly, most of the water comes from the countries that have the least.
These revelations have led to an influential UN report naming the livestock sector "one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global". The 2006 report, Livestock's Long Shadow, highlighted freshwater scarcity among the many environmental problems and called the livestock sector "a key player in increasing water use" and "probably the largest sectoral source of water pollution."
It takes, on average, 15,500 litres of water to produce one kilogram of beef. To put this in context, that is the equivalent of 50 baths of water to produce one steak - 15 times more water than is needed to produce one kilogram of wheat. To produce the diet of a typical meat-eater takes the equivalent of 5,000 litres of water per day - more than enough to water your garden and the gardens of all your neighbours as well.
The aforementioned report concludes that the meat industry "should be a major policy focus when dealing with problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity". And others have gone further than that.
A leading authority on climate change, Lord Stern, told The Times, "Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources". He indicated that he favoured significantly higher prices for meat and other foods that contribute to climate change and concluded that "[a] vegetarian diet is better".
Similarly, in 2008, John Anthony Allan, a professor at King's College London and the winner of the prestigious Stockholm Water Prize, urged people worldwide to go vegetarian because of the tremendous waste of water involved in eating animals.
The most logical way for us to conserve water, land and other resources - and reduce animal suffering - is to kick our meat habit. We can save more water by not eating meat for just a few days than we can by not showering for an entire year. By going vegan, we'll be able to clean our cars and clear our consciences.
Follow Mimi Bekhechi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@Mimi_Bekhechi
Gene Baur: Farm Animal ER: Factory Farming Hurts Everyone
Rabbi Edward Bernstein: Teaching Our Children the Ethics of Eating Meat
Hosepipe ban has Lincolnshire bowls and golf clubs hoping for a wet summer
I'd pay extra to fill my little girl's paddling pool
Welsh Water should sell its water 'like oil' during hosepipe ban
I shall now go back to my Steak tartare.
It's also surely the easiest thing to fix? I gave up meat, it was simple, but it'd be much harder to give up my car or my central heating.
Apart from the water there is a big issue with pollution caused by farming for meat production.
The end result of my four year experiment is that I finally realized why cattle have four stomachs, it is to process a vegan diet. Since i didn't have four stomach (even though the gas from my vegan diet sometimes made me feel like i did) I was finally forced to realize that I was not properly equiped to process the food of a vegan and with regret went back to allowing cows to do the primary processing of vegan foods for me. the results were I feel much better, no fainting spells and my vitamin and suppliment budget is 1/10 of what it was before.
My advice to anyone considering a vegan diet is to wait until you develope four stomachs so you can properly process it. Til then let the cows do the heavy work for you after all they have nothing better to do..
Also I should mention that if you just take out things you're eating that could be boring (at least if you were raised in a meat and potatoes family like mine)! But if you add things, mock meats and cheeses, food from around the world (Thai, Ethiopian, and Indian cuisines all have excellent veggie offerings) eating vegan can be the most exciting culinary experiment ever! Best of luck to you, I hope you'll consider giving it another go!
This is HuffPost, if their staff doesn't want your comment up on their site, they rightly don't have to put it up. It's the same reason you can't call your boss a "khunt" and avoid getting sacked by claiming "Free speech!"
For the record ,I am my own boss and I never call myself a khunt.
As a species we cannot support the 7 billion people on the planet eating as much meat as we do in the west. However this is more to do with population size.
The article is a thinly disguised attack on meat eating because of ethics/animal welfare rather than pure concern for planets resources.
The two should not be mixed, though both have some validity. Scottish beef is lovely and involves some of scotlands abumdant fresh water.
Water is never used, surely you all studied the water cycle at school?
What a lot of people in the UK don't realise is that even local British meat is usually fed on imported soya grown in former rainforest land. Here in the UK we are the 2nd largest importer in the world of soya, and much of it is genetically modified. The vast majority of it is used in animal feed. That means even if you buy local meat or Scottish beef, you are probably directly contributing to the rainforests being chopped down - to the tune of 16 kilos of imported soya for every kilo of British beef you buy. And obviously all that soya took vast amounts of water to be grown.
That's why local UK meat is most certainly not sustainable.
Cutting back on that soy-fed beef would mean there's more fresh water available where the soy is grown. It won't do a thing about the water that's available in the UK.
Reducing one's meat consumption can do all kinds of good things for one's health and for the environment, but let's not mis-state things.
I have bit-by-bit recovered in health over the last 5 years by including meat and fish back in my eating plan, so no food groups are left out.
Do not be fooled by these reports; it is part of the UN agenda for the 21st century to propagandise us all towards a certain direction ie veggie, save the planet, no private transport, rationing, etc..
It's all been discussed decades ago and think tanks are used to come up with answers and we are shaped ever so craftily by the information we receive...and we all go under the illusion that things are just happening in a random sort of way.
What you are saying doesn't make sense. There is a huge body of research that proves a vegetarian diet is considerably healthier than one including meat - and this research has been carried out by independent bodies including the WHO.
Vegetarians live on average five years longer than meat eaters.
Growing cotton is by far the biggest waste of water, and bottling it for sale is the second.
Don't you do basic science?
"Around 90% of the world's total managed water supply is used to grow food. Most of this is completely wasted by irrigating land used to grow crops for livestock rather than food for direct consumption by humans. A staggering one-third of the world's total cereal crop and more than 90% of the world's soya crop is used for animal feed."
Sometimes actually knowing what you're talking about is the best argument. WWF is right - but alas it's still 'Clownzozo meat eaters that is putting us vegans at risk'.