Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Natalie Gyte

GET UPDATES FROM Natalie Gyte
 

Government Cuts to the Women's Sector are Tantamount to State Discrimination

Posted: 08/11/2012 00:00

Many people in the UK have little or no understanding of the women's sector; they have not needed to use our services. However, there is a massive and ever growing number of women whose lives, and often the lives of their children, depend on these crucial organisations. This is no overstatement; the women's sector saves lives. From rape crisis centres to domestic violence refuges, services for trafficked women to women's health centres, the women's sector is the backbone of the lives of marginalised and oppressed women in the UK.

It is to women's organisation's that women who have experienced violence and/or abuse turn. The police consistently show their misogynistic attitudes and institutional failings in their dealing with rape investigations, from Saville, to Worboys, to Rochdale. Instead, only the women's sector provides specific services and safe spaces for women, it is a safety net for millions of women every year, particularly for those who have experienced violence.

Sadly the need for these services just keeps on rising. A report last year found that incidents of domestic violence have increased by 17% during the recession. You could be forgiven for expecting that funding for these essential services may have increased in order to meet demand. Unfortunately, the absolute opposite is true. The women's sector is experiencing the worst crisis it has ever seen; so many services are being forced into closure, are not able to provide services to fit the demand, or are having to turn women away. Women's Aid has reported that 230 women per day are turned away from domestic violence refuges. This week, Huffington Post published findings of its Freedom of Information request into cuts by 152 top-tier councils in the UK. It revealed £5.6m worth of cuts to services in the last four years, including refuges, domestic violence centres, and centres for women who have been raped or sexually assaulted.

These findings are not surprising to those of us who work in the women's sector, but they are extremely important in providing an external evaluation which proves, unequivocally how hard we have been hit under the coalition. Although funding has always been piecemeal and insufficient, women's organisations have survived through their creativity, dedication and commitment to improving the lives of women and girls across the country. However, these cuts are unique in their depth, their breadth, and in their discrimination against the most marginalised and oppressed in our society. They are tantamount to state discrimination against women.

Again, the majority of people in the UK have little or no understanding of the women's sector, and who could understand or care less than a conservative government, composed for the most part of white, middle class men? This government's disregard for women and other marginalised groups is so blatant that it is willing to flatly ignore the staggering cost saving which the women's sector provides to the state. It fills gaps in statutory provision, millions of pounds worth of service provision by police, social services, and the National Health Service. Mary Mason, CEO of Solace Women's Aid told The Huffington Post UK that 'for every £1 spent we save £8 to statutory services'.

How can we make sense of such obvious cost savings being flouted by a government consumed by austerity measures? The answer is that the cuts are specifically aimed at the most marginalised in our society, money is being saved off the backs of those who have least capital to fight back, they have always been the easiest to impose upon. David Cameron regularly talks about social inequality; he spoke eloquently on International Women's Day about taking steps to address the almost epidemic levels of gender based violence, he made the (empty) promise that half of his cabinet members would be women, and he has spoken of a Big Society whereby "we are all in this together". However, this rhetoric is a smoke screen, it blindfolds us. We are told that 'benefit thieves' and immigrants are the enemy, and while our attention is diverted, the marginalised are undercut in the name of austerity. Meanwhile, this 'austerity' has not been extended to large corporations such as Starbucks, which made over £3bn in UK sales since 1998 and yet paid less than 1% in corporation tax.

Thus the cuts highlighted by The Huffington Post UK are specific in their discrimination against women, they target a women's sector at a time when demand is rising, and should be viewed in the wider context of government policies that push women ever further from achieving equality. This is a government which is not only making drastic cuts to the women's sector but to women's lives directly by cutting an additional £10bn to welfare, with zero gendered analysis, while all reports show that welfare cuts disproportionately affect women. This is a government which has instated a health minister who believes in cutting the abortion limit to 12 weeks, in the face of evidence against it, and even where there is a threat to the mother's life. This is a government which is rolling back women's rights across the board, but which goes unrecognised as no-one is joining up the dots.

Our system is broken; the power, the political capital, and the money resides at the top of a hierarchy. Meanwhile those in most need are further disempowered and pushed to the fringes of our society. Without funding the women's sector simply cannot provide lifesaving services to women in desperate need. We have seen a crisis in our financial system, how far will the government go in starving service providers before it recognises a politico-cultural crisis? How many women have to be turned away? How many lives have to be lost?

We are here, and we are making as much noise as we possibly can with our depleted resources, but it seems that only money talks and the government can hear only the rich, dulcet tones of its big business friends. This broken capitalism is being resuscitated at the cost of women's equality, and at the wider cost of social equality.

 

Follow Natalie Gyte on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@whywomen

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Many people in the UK have little or no understanding of the women's sector; they have not needed to use our services. However, there is a massive and ever growing number of women whose lives, and oft...
Many people in the UK have little or no understanding of the women's sector; they have not needed to use our services. However, there is a massive and ever growing number of women whose lives, and oft...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:29 PM on 12/02/2012
This man doesn't understand men, so how can he understand women? Depriving a part of society that is being proven, more and more, to be in need of support is despicable. To refuse help to mothers, sisters and grandmas is criminal.
12:50 PM on 11/27/2012
[comment continued] But when Parliament and the Lords are mostly made up of middle to upper class white men, there is a cognitive disconnect from policy of what is seen as a minority issue. A minority issue that serves the needs of HALF THE POPULATION. It is completely senseless, the long term effects on children witnessing domestic abuse is going to cost us dearly.

Like the disabled, chronically, terminally or mentally ill people dying after being declared fit for work by ATOS, austerity is potentially killing the vulnerable and those in most need of protection. Women and men in hard times are turning to prostitution to make ends meet. which comes down to a choice between a awful option and a more awful one, and leaves people open to yet more violence.
12:48 PM on 11/27/2012
Sure Start and childcare, Rape Crisis centres. Women's Aid and other domestic abuse shelters, services for trafficked women and refugees, you know, the things mentioned in the article!

2 women a week are killed by partners or ex-partners. With the introduction of universal credit, which can only go to ONE person in a couple, I'd expect this to start creeping up soon, as women are left with no means of escape. LHA caps on housing benefit are already hitting organisations that help women escape abuse. Cuts will trap and kill women in abusive relationships. As the article suggests, this is a false economy. the cost of a shelter place vs the cost of a murder investigation, the loss of hours worked , the increase of dependence on benefits, and the long therm psychological effects of things like PTSD in rape and domestic abuse survivors and the cost to the NHS in treating the trauma.. An ounce of prevention is better than a ton of cure.

Faith based groups are winning contracts for abortion counselling. Now I know that some of these groups are pro-choice, but to what degree? Where is the transparency? Attempted attacks on abortion rights from the Tories, "pro-life" Health secretary and Women and Equalities secretary in the cabinet;. Wee need to acknowledge that domestic abuse often begins or escalates during pregnancy, making the escape of violent or abusive partners impossible if they cannot access these services.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter Cranie
10:12 PM on 11/25/2012
***URGENT*** Hey Huffington Post - that previous comment has shown up as Peter Cranie, when it was Spencer Fitz-Gibbon who wrote it. Please don't post it in Peter's name, please post it in mine. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter Cranie
10:10 PM on 11/25/2012
Natalie, I think this is absolutely spot on. Comprehensive evidence presented succinctly and coherently. Nobody could rationally argue against this.

Just one point, though - you say no-one is joining the dots. For 20 years I've been a member/activist/candidate/employee of a political party (the Green Party) that joined those dots long ago. Just as you're frustrated that the horrors you describe are happening, Greens are frustrated that we've actively campaigned against those cuts (etc), yet well-informed people like yourself will still proclaim that there isn't a political alternative on the ballot paper.

I would ask you to consider this, please: the big three neoliberal/neoconservative parties will keep getting away with it as long as the electoral alternatives to them are not recognised by people like yourself. Congratulations for pointing out very accurately, perceptively and powerfully some of what's wrong, and who is responsible - now will you go a step further and actively support a political party that has all the policies you appear to want?

Thanks for listening.
08:51 PM on 11/13/2012
you tell familys to speak up about domestic violence in the home , then you with draw the only safty net n help from them , some women live in fear of there lifes on a daily basis, yet then... after they speak out ......and you now wont protect or help them and there children in the most difficuilt frightning moments to a better way of life .........this is a life line .......for your country...no one shud fear for there own safety after speakin out about abuse or domestic violence............cuting vital access to thease safe houses or centers helplines ....just gives abuse n violence n neglect a priority SHAME ON YOU .....
02:20 PM on 11/08/2012
So make cuts, as long as it doesn't bother women in any way. Right.
02:00 PM on 11/08/2012
I find it sad and troubling that the only comments this article has received so far are negative. No one should need a spoon-fed explanation of what women's services are - clearly, they are services ie. refuge centres, rape and domestic violence charities, etc. that work to protect women. DV affects a rising number of women in the UK and is a leading cause of death - any cuts made to the services that help women in such situations show a clear disregard for the gravity of those situations and the importance of the support services involved.
11:12 AM on 11/08/2012
What on earth is "the Women's Sector"?
11:50 PM on 11/07/2012
More women than men say they'd vote Tory in latest polls.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:01 PM on 11/07/2012
You need a less holistic name than ''Women's Sector''. You do not represent ALL women, nor do you describe services or processes affecting ALL women.

I Googled Women's Sector - I found no listing for ''Women's Sector'' in the sense you are using it.