Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ned Simons

GET UPDATES FROM Ned Simons
 

Where Are the Female Lib Dem MPs on the Lord Rennard Allegations?

Posted: 26/02/2013 15:31

If anyone sees a female Lib Dem MP can they let us know? Given that there are only seven women out of the 56 Lib Dems in the Commons, it is rather conspicuous that only one of them has spoken publicly about the allegations against Lord Rennard.

The reasons may be varied - one MP's voicemail inbox was full, presumably stuffed with messages from other journalists jostling for her attention - but when contacted none of them wanted to, or was able to, talk.

To date, only the party's former equalities spokesperson, Jo Swinson, has commented on the controversy (which Lord Rennard denies).

And the Lib Dem business minister was forced to do so after become embroiled in the messy 'who knew what, when' buck passing playing out in the press.

The sex-scandal that has "rocked the party to the core" can't be doing wonders for the party's stated desire to recruit more female parliamentary candidates.

But the other six, Lynne Featherstone, Annette Brooke, Sarah Teather, Jenny Willott, Tessa Munt and Lorely Burt have not yet spoken out about the allegations against Rennard.

Sarah Teather's office said the former education minister, who hasn't been shy since being sacked from the government, was "not doing interviews" on the issue.

Solihull MP Lorely Burt was also not available to speak on the matter.

Jenny Willott (Cardiff Central) is currently on maternity leave.

Tessa Munt (Wells) is off to Eastleigh to campaign so, her office told the Huffington Post UK, was not available to comment on Rennard.

The office of Mid Dorset and North Poole Annette Brooke had, by 5pm, not returned a call placed at midday.

And, as mentioned, there was no room in Lynne Featherstone's voicemail inbox to leave a message. (But, if there had been, the Lib Dem international development minister - and former equalities minister - would no doubt have called back instantly...)

By contrast female Lib Dem peers, activists and former MPs have spoken to the press about the Rennard affair.

Baronesss Hussein-Ece told HuffPost UK the party "institutionally" had a problem with not having enough women in senior positions. She said:

"The [male dominated] culture allows for these things to happen. There are aren't sufficient checks and balances in place; there isn't a sufficient number of high-ranking women in place to curb some of this behaviour."

And former Romsey MP Sandra Gidley told the BBC the party didn't handle the allegations well and "got this wrong". She added: "What the problem was nobody was clear about who they could go to get something done."

One of the women who allege harassment at the hands of Lord Rennard also told the BBC's World at One that the actions had put women off becoming MPs. "I know of people who've left the party because of this," she said.

The Lib Dems desperately need more female MPs. So much so that the party, which has until now avoided all-women shortlists, plans to debate a proposal to allow job sharing in the Commons and thereby encourage more female parliamentary candidates. It is a little odd, then, that the handful of female MPs that it currently does have has failed to address the issue of alleged sexual harassment head on.

 

Follow Ned Simons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nedsimons

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
If anyone sees a female Lib Dem MP can they let us know? Given that there are only seven women out of the 56 Lib Dems in the Commons, it is rather conspicuous that only one of them has spoken publicly...
If anyone sees a female Lib Dem MP can they let us know? Given that there are only seven women out of the 56 Lib Dems in the Commons, it is rather conspicuous that only one of them has spoken publicly...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:42 AM on 03/07/2013
Lynne Featherstone is too busy writing blogs to respond
06:23 PM on 02/27/2013
Personally I think that 'patriarchal hegemony' is a better marker for what is happening in modern society. I would also posit that women as much as men can subscribe to a patriarchal hegemony, enable it, excuse it and at times benefit from it. Equally men can be the victims of such a structure. For labour and Tory adherents, it is pleasing that the holier than thou Lib Dems are being humbled. Sadly however, the subjects of unwanted attention will remain thus. Its not criminal, just unprofessional.
12:53 PM on 02/27/2013
I imagine the Lib-Dem lady MPs affected know better than to join in the current and ongoing undignified mealy mouthed political and media motivated, blame-game show. Instead the ladies will no doubt have their say at any future official enquiry into the matter. Whether it be established religion, politics, or in the business world, there never seems to be a shortage of unpleasantly arrogant men in trusted positions of power and influence who are convinced they are irresistable to women; and who regard women only as willing sex toys.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:45 AM on 03/07/2013
I hope almost all men regard women as WILLING sex toys; presumably you dont wish it to be otherwise do you ?
And presumably normal hot blooded hetrosexual women regard men as sex toys ? Certianly the older more experienced woman who ' deflowrered me' had little interest in intellectual matters or my views on world matters !
08:26 AM on 02/27/2013
What a facile view of the world this writer has. As I understand it, there were two women senior in the Lib-Dem party hierarchy who were aware of specific allegations going back to the mid-2000's who also decided not to rock the boat too much. I suspect they decided not to rock the boat too much for the same reasons that the men who were aware of the allegations decided not to rock the boat too much, which was mostly to do with cowardice. The fact that they were women was of no help to them. The writer, speaking as a man, agrees with Baronesss Hussein-Ece that the problem was "male dominated culture". I am a man and don't accept this characterisation of masculinity. I am certain the writer is sincere in what he says and believes he has a sound basis to speak with authority about men. However, he does not speak about me. The only possible conclusion I can come to, therefore, is that he is speaking about himself. I think he should should stop excusing himself by attributing unpleasant aspects of his character to his masculinity, but should instead work on correcting them. It is not his masculinity, but him. I would also ask him to stop trying to implicate me in his vices. They are his, not mine.
09:39 AM on 02/27/2013
I agree with this is so far that simply saying "male dominated culture" implies a problem with all men. The situation is more nuanced than that. It is a problem with a particular type of culture: one characterised by a strict hierarchy of (generally male) power with one or a few who see themselves as alpha-males at the top. There is some evidence that once a critical mass of women in positions of authority exist, this problem tends to diminish quite substantially. To adopt the language of mathematical culture, for this sort of behavior to manifest a male-dominated culture is necessary but not sufficient.
10:14 AM on 02/27/2013
"There is some evidence that once a critical mass of women in positions of authority exist, this problem tends to diminish quite substantially."
I see no evidence for this whatsoever. It is not my experience. My experience is that human beings have a propensity to abuse power. The cause is not genitalia, and neither is the solution. 
"To adopt the language of mathematical culture, for this sort of behavior to manifest a male-dominated culture is necessary but not sufficient."
You are not thinking clearly. To adopt the language of reason and logic, the characterisation you describe is called a categorical error. Committing categorical errors will never aid your thinking - it will only ever confuse it.