Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nick Clegg

GET UPDATES FROM Nick Clegg
 

Just as We Need a Media That Is Properly Regulated, We Need to Encourage Responsible Reporting

Posted: 12/07/2011 17:15

The Huffington Post's emergence onto the UK media scene could not have come at a better time. With newspapers under fire over phone hacking allegations, public confidence in our media establishment has been well and truly rocked. New news outlets, like this one, will undoubtedly provide a welcome breath of fresh air.

The hacking scandal throws up an array of insights. But one in particular stands out to liberals: information is power. It always has been. When elites deploy secretive and opaque practices, it is nearly always to protect their own position. And when you reveal those secrets, you rock the foundations of the powers that be. Just think back to Wikileaks for that.

Or think of the Arab Spring. It's well-understood that Twitter and other social networking sites are playing an unprecedented role in galvanising support for popular uprisings across North Africa and the Middle East. So, yes, he who holds the secret holds the key. But those who can spread the word can break the door down.

And it's how we treat information that divides societies across the world today. There are closed societies, where dictators and propagandists reign supreme; where citizens are discouraged from looking out at the world; and the rest of the world is prevented from looking in.

And there are open societies, where information is dispersed; where people are given the facts to make their own choices; and the state is properly transparent so that the people it serves can hold it to account.

The UK falls of the right side of that divide - an open and democratic society. But this week's headlines remind us we mustn't take that for granted. We must continuously work to ensure that those who wield power do so in plain view. And we must make it possible for the powerless to speak out against vested interests.

In the media, that means a full, judge-led public inquiry to get to the bottom of the hacking allegations, as well as a further inquiry into the culture, ethics and practices of the British press. And we need to replace our feeble Press Complaints Commission with a body that is truly independent, and willing and able to take on powerful media interests when needed.

Just as we need a media industry that is properly regulated, we also need to encourage responsible reporting that serves the public interest - impartial, investigative journalism, in print, on screen and online. That's why the Government is reforming English libel laws to better protect public-spirited journalists, bloggers and academics seeking to blow the whistle on big corporations and wealthy individuals.

We're shining a light across our politics too, not least so taxpayers can see where their money is going. It will now be easier than ever to find out how much was spent, on what, and paid to whom, with public spending figures regularly updated online.

And, as the Government set out yesterday in our blueprint for Open Public Services, we want the UK to set the bar in terms of the access to information people have about the schools, hospitals and other services they rely on. Unprecedented levels of data will now be made available - in plain English and in a way people can really use.

Parents, for example, will be able to see how successful local schools are in helping children of different abilities achieve better. People will be able to judge nearby health services by reading up on the experiences of other patients. You'll have access to a map that shows you how well crime is combated on your street. And, where information isn't already available on how well local services are performing, people will have a new, legal right to request it.

So, from the media, to politics, to public services, we need to be vigorous in breaking up opaque practices and in dispersing information. That's how we empower citizens. Its how we create institutions they can trust. That's an open society. And it's a liberal society too.

 
FOLLOW UK
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:10 PM on 07/13/2011
The new & interesting politics 'Boutique Leftism' http://t.co/ZZyB9QP
05:51 PM on 07/13/2011
If only Parliament was as focused on the British people as you are, it would have as much credibility. Well done!
09:57 PM on 07/12/2011
It's time to take action. I've cancelled my Sunday Times and it's only by direct action in removing our money from News International that change will occur. All the legislation you can think of just give NI a further challenge which their lawyers will find a way around. We as readers have more responibility than any one to hit the Sun, The Times, Sunday Times and Sky
05:03 PM on 07/12/2011
Nick, we also need politicians who do what they say NOT say whatever they think will make them popular. Clearly, we now understand that the press was unscrupuous in its methods and it appears that the police were willing and mercenary accomplices. But this partly came about because politicians have an unhealthy dependance on the press which they use to gain short - term popularity. There is so much to put right and that includes the behaviour of politicians.
02:46 PM on 07/12/2011
Dear Nick Clegg,

The problem isn't to do with regulation, it's to do with ownership and the structure of the industry. The fact papers rely on PR reports and wire copy for 80% of their stories and have been cutting staff numbers for tyhe past three decades to increase profits. That's the real story, not this passing storm. In short, B*******, come off it, the enemy is profit.

Yours sincerely,
Max
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
11:26 AM on 07/12/2011
When Rupert Murdoch took on the Unions during his move to Wapping, he said one of the reasons for this was "Managements right to manage." Now is the time to tell Rupert Murdoch that he has no electoral mandate and an elected government has a right to govern and not be dictated to by an un-elected individual who is not even a citizen of this country or has any loyalty to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
04:17 PM on 07/12/2011
Exactly, This is a salient point that only now is finally being realised by an increasing number of this country's citizens. We cannot have foreign owned powerful media corporations holding sway over our elected politicians and others who would dare oppose their interests. Effectively it would seem cowering them so that they were too frightened to speak out on pain of having the full weight of Murdoch's Queen Bee's wrath organising concerted stings against them.

It's got to stop.
10:19 AM on 07/12/2011
Nick,

I'm a life-long Labour member. However, it seems to me that you are probably in a stronger position than most senior MPs here. You have not been in power so should have no political skeletons or questionable relationships with NI.

As you pointed out so eloquently at the beginning of your post, we are trying to create an honest, transparent and accountable society. Increased personal communication makes that possible now in ways we might not have imagined twenty years ago. The scandals emerging now (NI, MPs expenses, bank culture) are remnants of an old age, old power-bases.

Nick, this is an issue about the culture of an organisation that controls much of our media and wants (lots) more. You have an opportunity to make an incisive and indelible mark on history here. Please focus on the issue. Watering down your post(s) with party political rhetoric reduces your stature and muddles your message.

Good luck to you.
10:06 AM on 07/12/2011
"...information is power."

The media have known and used this for years - they know if they have information that someone wants to be kept secret, then the very existence of that information can be used to bring them down.

The trouble is that 90% of the time that power, with the strength of a pile driver, is used irresponsibly.

Gordon Brown's case today is a good example. The health of his son is NOTHING to do with anyone. The Sun maybe happy they got the story legally, but the real point is why do they think they had the right to print the story in the first place?

The problem here is that the media, as private businesses, feel they have a right to power and influence that the rest of us does not have.

Newspapers in the UK are NOT independent public bodies, they have no mandate to "speak for the people" and they have no loyalty other than to their owners.

"freedom of the press" has been confused with the right of people to know what is going on in their country. That does NOT include a right to know celeb private lives - no one has a right to that.

The British Tabloids have a foul reputation round the world. I hope that Clegg and the government can come up with some sort of way of bringing out of control private companies into line. But I am not sure that this is possible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:40 AM on 07/12/2011
Excellent article, thank you.

Interesting that you mentioned Wikileaks... When they were accused of breaking the law, Visa and Mastercard imediatley ceased dealing with them as a matter of policy, a full financial blockade. So as News International holdings have been shown to have broken the law, why have thier services not been suspended?

Something to think about there, a matter of corporate perception perhaps... and so much of the coming investigations and revelations will be a matter of perception. I hope you can see things from the publics point of view.
09:18 AM on 07/12/2011
Hi Nick - I agree with Nick!

BUT

So long as we allow single entities, whether human or corporate, to own multiple titles then we allow power to grow exponentially. It is time for the nettle to be grasped very firmly and to pull up the roots of media superpowers. Plurality should be the watchword, not just in looking at the proposed takeover of BSyB, but within the media industry generally.

No entity should own more than one national newspaper - let's break up the evil empires now!
04:42 PM on 07/12/2011
"Plurality should be the watchword, not just in looking at the proposed takeover of BSyB, but within the media industry generally."

Well said!
09:15 AM on 07/12/2011
Dear Nick,
-We need a media that is not as compromised as the Government.
-We need a media that seeks out news / real news / truth and not celebrity scandals.
-We need investigative journalism.
-We need existing laws to be utilised.
We do not need you
10:55 PM on 07/12/2011
Too true mate
09:14 AM on 07/12/2011
At least having something like Huffpo, gives everyone a chance to have this dialogue and keep things in the open.
08:28 AM on 07/12/2011
hi Nick nice to see you on huff post uk . I think what we really need is Vince back in a post where he can go to war with murdoch :)
03:41 PM on 07/12/2011
Assume you mean Vince Cable, the man with all the answers until they put him in the hot seat where he has fixed nothing, done nothing. A man of straw.

More proof that care in the community is deeply flawed.

Pass the syringe nurse.
10:59 PM on 07/12/2011
I see you know him too
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
08:26 AM on 07/12/2011
Mr Clegg, I'm a bit worried about government hacking too.
07:47 AM on 07/12/2011
So who is going to regulate the regulators? And the definition of 'responsible reporting' will be decided by whom?

Y'see this is the problem with this mad dash to 'do something about the papers' - it will invariably end up with a neutered journalistic culture that will discourage real investigative journalism as editors decide to play it safe for fear of regulators and public opprobrium crashing down on their heads.

Now I for one am glad to see the back of the News of the World and wouldn't shed any tears if The Sun is next to bite the dust. Yes, let's talk about ownership and if there's any way we can diversify it but when Clegg et, al. start talking about regulation and 'responsible reporting' we're talking about regulating what people can write or read. We simply cannot go down that road. Either we want a free press or a regulated press - the two are mutually exclusive and we can't have both.
08:57 AM on 07/12/2011
Hi Nightslacker, the broadcast (tv/radio) media have been regulated for donkeys and they do a far better job than most newspapers in reporting & exposing serious issues.
12:32 PM on 07/12/2011
Not sure that's the case; Corporatism is just as prevalent in broadcast as elsewhere. Just need to look at trivialisation/dumbing down of C4 news to appreciate that.