Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patrick Thompson

GET UPDATES FROM Patrick Thompson
 

Priced Out, Is a Masters a Must Have That Students Can't Afford?

Posted: 05/02/2013 00:00

Anecdotally at least, it seems that a bachelor's degree isn't what it once was. Three years at university used to set you up for life but now it seems that rising student numbers (the last few years excluded) and a highly competitive job market have seen the value of a BSc or Ba fall. Tales of recently graduates working in bars and retail, first as a summer stop gap and then more permanently are becoming more common. This begs the question, what does one need to get a good graduate job?

The answer might be a master's degree. An extra year of specialist study to rack up your employability sounds to the uninitiated like a bomb proof idea. The problem is the cost. While students have spent the last three years protesting about undergraduate fees the issue of master's fees has gone unchallenged. In a nation that relies heavily on the 'quaternary' industries of research and technological development the monetary cost of pursuing such a path is, for an individual without means, alarmingly high.

Unlike the three years you will spend drinking and cramming your way through an undergraduate degree there are no student loans for post-graduate study. Under the current fees system a three year degree at one of Britain's top ranked university costs around £21,000. Some of the same establishments charge more than this for a one year taught masters degree.

Oxford University is currently being sued by a student who claims that the requirement for proof of an ability to pay £12,900 a year in living expenses on top of fees, which the Observer reports can reach up to £41,000, breaches his human rights. Perhaps it is no surprise that about 1,000 students a year decline an offered postgraduate place at Oxford due to the need to provide hefty financial backing to their studies. Ironically in the case reported above the student in question had been preparing to read an MSc in Economics.

It would be unfair, as well as a lazy exercise in Oxbridge bashing to single out Oxford for its grand fees. The fact is that most universities in Britain charge the sort of money for a master's course that bangs the door firmly in the faces of students from lower income households. The LSE charges well over £10,000 for most of its taught postgraduate programmes, with some costing double that. The University of Manchester charges less, with a full-time MSc in Economics costing just of £6,000 while my own institution, UCL, would charge a student £8,250 to study an MSc in geoscience. While there is a relatively wide range of fees most of them are still beyond the means of a student from middle to low income background.

There are other options. More universities are beginning to offer the Msci, a four your course that brings an undergraduate and one year matters programme together as a single qualification that, crucially, can be funded by the Student Loans Company. Not all universities offer this and even at those that do not all subjects can be taken, but for some this is a viable path to greater employability. Scholarships do exist for postgraduate study, although they are few and their number is shrinking fast. There is also the call of study abroad, with a number of European countries offering free post graduate tuition in courses taught in English, albeit over two years and with the counterweight of higher living costs to contend with.

I would propose that although the idea of a masters being essential for graduate employment is to be ridiculed, it is true that having an MSc or MA genuinely helps, especially in highly competitive or technical fields. It is something every student should consider both before and during their time at university. Do you need a masters? Do you want one? How will you pay? On a broader note the cost of post graduate study is also a question for wider society. If we want to preserve our position as one of the world's leading centres of learning we need students to be able to qualify for research. This isn't just a question of students not being able to pursue personal academic interests or having to enter employment at a lower salary but a fundamental issue of how learning is regarded in Britain. Until we can agree on a way of making masters courses more accessible they will remain for a fortunate few who can afford the expense.

 

Follow Patrick Thompson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Patcheyx

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
Anecdotally at least, it seems that a bachelor's degree isn't what it once was. Three years at university used to set you up for life but now it seems that rising student numbers (the last few years e...
Anecdotally at least, it seems that a bachelor's degree isn't what it once was. Three years at university used to set you up for life but now it seems that rising student numbers (the last few years e...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:43 AM on 02/07/2013
"Priced Out, Is a Masters - value of a BSc or Ba - "

As a geologist, Peter, you can be excused for not knowing how to punctuate or use the correct norms of writing, though that is debatable for a university educated young man. As a future journalist, I would enjoin you to proofread what goes to to press, even 'Cyber-Press'. Otherwise, your article is reasonably put together and describes the facts quite well..
12:12 PM on 02/07/2013
I think you will find that the blogger's name is Patrick. And perhaps you follow your own advice with your comments. Or is that to to just for emphasis?
08:37 PM on 02/07/2013
Indeed you are right! Alack poor young Patrick ! And indeed I should have seen the repetition of 'to'.  But when I used to write articles as opposed to posts on this difficult to read system, I can assure you that there were no errors. I am retired now and never was a journalist. All I was saying is that when you want to become a writer, you need to be careful how you spell, punctuate and write acromyms, especially if you want to express ideas you should understand. Otherwise, it doesn't look very professional. I am sure Parick will appreciate your defending him, though. Well spotted!
03:25 PM on 02/05/2013
Just received a conditional offer for an MA programme in Medieval Studies (another way of saying Medieval History basically) and the only way I am able to afford it is because my dad is semi-retiring and getting a massive lump sum which he is putting towards my fees. I can't help but feel guilty because I am sure he could use it for other things and I want to be able to pay my own way. However I simply can't because no matter how many interviews I go to I cannot get a job, least of all one that would allow me to be self sufficient. The problem is I feel I need an MA in order to be at least vaguely employable because as of yet I clearly am not. That may change once I graduate this year and have my undergrad qualification but even so I feel I need an edge. It does feel sometimes like an necessary yet costly route to follow.
09:31 AM on 02/07/2013
I fully sympathise with you; however, you could do a PGCE which would make you employable if you are any good with youngsters and can hold a class together. If your father's lump sum can only go towards your fees, it can't be that massisve! Not by today's standards of 'massive'. What do you hope to do with a history degree anyway? If research, you need to do a PhD first in a subject with prospects. Otherwise, train in something that has a job attached to it. Personnel, Management, etc. Best of British !
01:31 PM on 02/07/2013
My sister is a teacher and from what she goes through it's enough to put me way off it haha...plus I'm terrible with kids and most assuredly worse with older ones. And he's putting a lot of it towards my fees (which are stupidly expensive for what they are but hey ho) but he's also putting some towards one of my sister's trips as well as my other sister's wedding. It's still a stupid amount of money regardless. To be honest I'm doing the medieval masters rather than the straightforward historical studies because I absolutely love the medieval as a time period (and it is the one I'm doing best in at undergrad) but more pragmatically it extends my knowledge and skills that I've acquired over the past few years (communication skills, ability to argue points academically in essays and in debates, timekeeping, list goes on) within a very focussed period of time. While it may seem to limit my options afterwards the skills I acquire are highly transferable to whatever I wish to do. Although I wouldn't mind the band taking off as an alternative lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Philip J Sparrow
When your work speaks for itself, keep quiet
12:48 PM on 02/05/2013
I've just been accepted onto an LLM programme, but in the Netherlands, not the UK. My tuition fee will be €1800 for the entire year, which I'm delighted with as it's half what I paid at undergrad and the living expenses over there are far cheaper than in London.

For most law students, a Masters is not necessary. My grades and references were good enough to get me a pupillage or training contract in London; I'm just not interested in any of the typical areas of law practiced in the City - finance, M & A, , insurance, private equity etc.

The best thing about the course I'm taking is that it includes the chance for an internship with a major legal institution such as the ICC or ICJ. This kind of work experience is absolutely invaluable when competing for the top jobs and it's something that more postgrad courses should prioritise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
11:48 AM on 02/05/2013
I can't speak for other industries but in my own highly competitive field I prefer not to employ people with a master's. I'd far rather recruit people who had the initiative to do relevant work experience. People considering this move should seek advice from successful people in their chosen field about what would be best for them, before embarking on a costly master's that might prove to be more of a hindrance to employability than a help.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LadyRokujo
05:47 PM on 02/06/2013
One can only hope other employers take a sensible approach like that! Education and training are valuable, but they don't equal real life working experience, and never will. My field has a deluge of masters graduates who are very bright, and could no doubt pass any exam you put in front of them, but some of them struggle when put in actual work situations because they have never had to do a real job in their life.
It's a sad state of affairs when having a masters is the only way to gain good employment, and potential employers can't see the value of hard work and initiative past an expensive academic qualification.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
10:13 AM on 02/05/2013
When I did my PhD, I had the fees waived as my research could be used by the university. I also received VL money in respect of teaching time. Has this all stopped?

Also, a Masters is mostly research and is composed of very little "taught subject." I seem to recall that as a Masters student, my tutorials were always being "rescheduled" as undergraduates came first and postgraduate education did not feature high on the agenda unless you were a research student.

Is the financial statement unfair? Of course it is, but such is the way of English universities these days. Fees are meant to put intelligent, but low income, students off the idea of higher education. It's all a ploy by the ConDemLabs to make sure that the lower classes "know their place!"