Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Paul Carroll

GET UPDATES FROM Paul Carroll
 

A Shining Example on How Not to Write a Novel?

Posted: 10/12/2012 11:42

Stephen King's On Writing is often quoted as being the essential book for would be authors to read before setting out on their virgin manuscript. It's good fun too, with the first half comprising a very amusing biography before the second half tells you all the dos and don'ts of writing a book.

Did it help me write my first novel? Well, yes, I found it very reassuring, not least because SK is straightforward, unflappable and the master of common sense. But on one area, I definitely had to say, 'come on Stephen, you're joking, right?' Why? Because SK thinks plot is something you should develop as you go along.

At a conservative estimate, King has sold over 300 million books, and what the hell do I know, but isn't writing a book without a clear plotline a bit like setting off in a car with a full tank of petrol and seeing where you end up? It may work out, but more than likely you're going to end up at the equivalent of the Overlook Hotel. In winter. Without a toothbrush.

There are a lot of 'how to write a novel' guides out there (The Guardian published an extensive supplement recently on how to write the first draft of a novel in 30 days which I reckon would have taken 29 days to get your head around) and there are endless courses where you part with your money to discover you haven't got what it takes (but thanks for coming, anyway).

Surely, writing a book is predominantly a logical process? In AMOLAD's case, I started with the blurb - 120 words. All I had to do then was stretch it to 80,000 words. Before I started writing the book I roughly planned what happened to each of the key characters and working from that I gridded up a rough chapter guide.

The route was mapped out - I knew pretty much where Z was before I embarked from A; all I had to do then was write it, and from that blueprint the characters and action took on lives of their own. I also stuck at it - 1500- 1800 words a day, Monday to Friday, mornings only. They soon add up, particularly when you don't have to stop to think 'where's this going next?'

Or look at it another way. Writing a book is like cooking a meal. You have a recipe, you assemble the ingredients, you do the preparation. Then you cook it. Name a famous chef who doesn't operate that way? If Stephen King ever invites you to dinner discreetly enquire whether he's cooking before you accept?

So, Mr King, forgive me, but my advice to any would-be author - and I'm not charging for this - is to get your finger out, get a plan, get organised and get on with it. We all know what happened to Jack Torrance in The Shining after he lost the plot.

www.amolad.co.uk

A Matter of Life and Death http://www.amazon.co.uk/Matter-Life-Death-Paul-Carroll/dp/1780883161/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1355138369&sr=8-4

 

Follow Paul Carroll on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@paulcarrollink

FOLLOW UK CULTURE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:04 PM on 12/19/2012
Pantser or plotter? SK, like most of us, is a bit of both, I suspect. And everyone has a variation on that theme with no one being right, except as it applies to themselves. Trouble is, when you start writing, you are desperate for any hint of a magic formula and this is what gives rise to entrenchment, with the pantsers calling the plotters stolid and the plotters calling the pantsers insane. But I'm with SK. I prefer the scaffolding technique. The bare bones of what the book is about. I know if I have that, I won't fall off. And I can bolster it and make it as strong as I like before I climb on up there. But once I'm on that platform above the ground, I have to be prepared to step off, and get lost in the void just as Tasha describes. And as for endings...well. there is always the sequel, right?
08:55 AM on 12/11/2012
I agree that you need to have a rough plot, an idea of where your story is going, but what Stephen King says is right - when you get into your writing it can take on a life of its own, and you often end up somewhere very different to where you imagined your story was taking you. Writing is a mystical process in many ways, and I think it's a shame when writers knock that idea. Readers love to "get lost" in a novel, so it stands to reason that writers should be able to do the same. Loosen up – I dare you! Thanks for an interesting article.
06:47 PM on 12/10/2012
Stephen King is not noted for wrapping up the ends of his books well, so there is something to that.

Lawrence Block writes in a similar fashion, but also admits that he has filing cabinets full of busted books that he started but didn't know how to finish.

OTOH, both are best-selling novelists, so obviously their methods work for them. Maybe it seems best to do whatever works for you.