There is a real problem with knife crime in poor urban areas like Enfield. Recently two rival gangs fought with machetes, knives and guns there and a sixteen year old was stabbed in the hand. These are terrible incidents which traumatise the community as well as those actually involved. But I don't agree that the answer is to lock them up. David Burrowes and Nick de Bois want all those found in possession of a knife to get a mandatory sentence of imprisonment. It is proposed in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill that all adults found with knives should be locked up, but children are excluded. David Burrowes and Nick de Bois want children and teenagers to get the same punishment as adults. But their plea is based on flawed logic - that imprisonment of knife carriers will create a safer society.
Thousands of children and teenagers have already been imprisoned for carrying knives, but this has not acted as a deterrent. Of the under 18 year olds who are imprisoned, over 70% are reconvicted within a year. Of those who are released, many are back in prison within six months. Prison does not act as a deterrent. The individuals who are imprisoned keep on committing crimes and their friends carry on carrying and sometimes using knives. The only answer to knife crime is to make teenagers feel safer and get them to understand the harm knives cause.
Teenagers carry knives because it makes them feel safer. They feel they need a strong means of protecting themselves from their peers who carry knives. We need to break this vicious circle - to persuade teenagers that there is a greater risk in carrying a knife than not. Part of the answer is to get teenagers to understand the damage knives can do, both physical and psychological. We need more prevention programmes where nurses prove how lethal knives are, and more restorative justice. There is no more powerful way of changing behaviour than to get someone to face their victim and their victim's family, to hear the devastation a thin blade caused and to make amends for the hurt done. Restorative justice is not a fail-safe, but I have come across nothing else that has the same power to turn someone away from crime. In Northern Ireland teenagers who carry knives have to face their potential victims, say sorry and make a plan of how to make up for the harm they've caused. Teenagers in North Ireland still re-offend, but on average they re-offend less often than their counterparts in England and Wales. We are all agreed on the need to stop teenagers habitually carrying knives but imprisonment is a blunt, and ineffective, instrument.
Follow Penelope Gibbs on Twitter: www.twitter.com/outoftrouble
Olivia Rose: I Know This is Controversial, but I am Bored of Shanking
Vicki Helyar-Cardwell: Prison for Knife Crime Youth Isn't the Answer
The "Liberal Democracy" that we live in has gone too far in trying to "understand" the reasons for these anti-social behaviours. The message must go out loud and clear, "If you choose to carry a knife, the Law will choose to imprison you".
I have respect for Ms..Gibb’s position but I do not agree with her statement that “The only answer to knife crime is to make teenagers feel safer and get them to understand the harm knives cause”.
It seems to me that teenagers are fully aware of the harm that knives cause. Surely the answer to knife crime is to lock the perpetrators up for longer, and keep them away from the rest of society?
British youth seems to be intent upon three things, namely, getting drunk, getting pregnant, and knifing each other. Surely the simple answer is as follows:-
a) we should accept that the British people are not mature enough to cope with unrestricted drinking hours. We should therefore bring back pub closing times, and raise the age limit on the sale of alcohol.
b) we should increase the fines for drunk and disorderly behavior to levels that would cover the cost of the policing involved.
and
c) the Attorney General should instruct the judges to hand down maximum sentences to those found guilty of knife crimes.
With luck, in a short time the youth of today will either be sober enough to know what they are doing or locked up where they cannot be a danger to others.
Sincerely, Derek Lantin. http://dereklantin.booksabuzz.com
Britain hanged numerous people who have either been posthumously exonerated or their culpability has been seriously questioned; Derek Bentley, Ruth Ellis and Timothy Evans to name but a few. There is no such thing as "definitely guilty". You cannot legislate for that. Barry George was "definitely guilty" as were the Guildford Four.
Britain has a mandatory life sentence for murder which starts at a 15 year tariff although aggravating factors such as the use of a knife or firearm carry enhancements up to 30 years and judges have set tariffs as high as 50 years, such as in the case of Roy Whiting (reduced to 40 on appeal).
Common sense may reason that the death penalty is a deterrent. The fact of the matter is, there is little evidence for this. Some even suggest that it may have a brutalising effect upon society and result in a rise in violent crime.
By your last incoherent sentence I can only surmise that you are suggesting executing juveniles who kill. By that rationale we should therefore allow them to drive cars, buy alcohol and cigarettes, own companies and buy dangerous items such as knives and shotguns. It sounds ridiculous doesn't it?
Yes, it does.
Is it uncivilised? Well, Malaysia and Singapore are very civilised countries, and they use flogging, - and very effevrive it is too.
Establishing why children carry is not easy. ''So you carry a knife. Is that too show off. To imitate those who show off or is it because you are afraid of others with knives my little sweet darling prole ?''
Lower class kids know how to play it comes to talking about their naughtiness.
When I talk to lower-class teenagers, they treat me as an equal, not an outsider because I am lower-class. They can tell, you know. But you, Penelope, and your cohorts of do-gooders and social scientists will know much more about teenagers' reason than I do because of ''research.'' Yeh, sure.
As for the punishment for carrying a knife, I have no idea what what it should be. Middle-class ways of extending rights through law have made it so easy for the young, criminalized lower-classes to get away with crime after crime. If these crimes were committed in middle-class areas, things would change soon enough.
Respectable lower class folk have been disabled by the ''humanizing'' of the law, to protect themselves from the minority of maniacs who spread their violent ways through the young like a plague.
Psycho crazy proles on the one hand, do-gooders with their heads in the clouds on the other. Maybe I should carry a knife to protect myself.
Therefore the final paragraph certainly has some merit but the criticism of the two MPs is not justified.