Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Phil Shanks

GET UPDATES FROM Phil Shanks
 

Housing: A Place to Live or a Personal Investment Plan?

Posted: 14/06/2012 00:00

Today I'll get straight to the point. The British public needs to fall out of love with housing as an investment and start looking at their homes as being a place to live. Pretty strange thing for someone launching one of the first social and special needs housing Real Estate Investment Trusts. I think I had better explain...

The housing market is rather stagnant at the moment and this is likely to remain the case for some time. That, however, is only part of the problem. Having owned my own home since my early 20s and having moved several times I know from my own experience that selling your 'investment' is complex. It can also be a lengthy affair even in a buoyant market.

Housing is a highly subjective issue and selling a house relies on you being able to find a willing buyer that shares your love for that particular property. They must be persuaded that the house meets their needs and that your valuation is fair. Location, decoration and landscaping all plays a role.

While a residential property investment can be a wise move it also presents a liquidity challenge: recovering your investment takes time and often the outcome falls short of expectations.

To make matters worse, deposit levels currently required by lenders are making it hard for first-time buyers to get their foot on the ladder. Long-term savings are at risk for those who fail to keep up their mortgage payments and distressed sales recover at best 75% of the original purchase price.

To pour more water on the notion that it is wise to invest in your own bricks and mortar; part of the crisis we now face has arisen from 'home investors' releasing equity from their home to fund a lifestyle beyond their needs.

My critics will say that investing in your own home is wise because the house price index shows that house prices over the long term do rise and that the long term gains outweigh these considerations. Others will say it is the aspiration of all to own their own home. Having been bought up in council housing, I believed this to be the case myself.

However, the housing market's performance over the last couple of decades has been predicated on a housing shortage. The laws of supply and demand have led to a steady growth in house prices. Despite the challenges of liquidity it looks like a good investment on paper. But as part of the government's response to the recession, house building looks set to accelerate and this will begin to affect the supply curve. The point of equilibrium will shift as and the rate of price rises will begin to slow down.

In other countries, home ownership is not considered the be all and end all that it is in Britain. Many people consider their home as a place to live - nothing more. In a rental market it is easier to move and easier to find another person to pay the rent. Housing for rent, if managed properly, seldom lies empty because people do not have to satisfy mortgage requirements, find and risk a large deposit or face losing their home if their circumstances change. Thankfully we have a safety net for that: the housing benefit system.

I suppose we like to own our houses because it makes us feel safe and of course we can personalise it to meet our own taste and needs. Yet all tenants who live in properties that I have invested in have standard assured tenancy agreements and can, subject to using properly qualified contractors, make the changes to their home as they wish. The objective is to encourage tenants to stay.

Investing in bricks and mortar still represents a sound investment decision but the way that we do it has to change. Housing for rent gives a good steady income to those who invest in it and the new residential REITs offer a great opportunity to do so. Investing in one provides a return but without the risk and liquidity issues of buying your own home.

My point is that we can achieve a balance. By further extending the rights of tenants and by establishing a working balance between the needs of investors (private individuals and institutions) and the needs of people to have a place to call home.

The SAF Housing REIT will achieve this balance. When we reach the point of floating it, it will provide an alternative investment opportunity in the residential housing market. Just to be absolutely clear what we want to achieve, it will be called 'Houses for homes'.

 

Follow Phil Shanks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PhilShanksSays

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
14:08 on 15/06/2012
When houses prices equal where they would have been if the bubble of 1986-1997 had never happened, then progress will have been made. Houses will then be affordable to new buyers. So till that happens, houses prices will need to keep falling from the farcible levels they are still at.
14:33 on 16/06/2012
which kind of makes my point Using bricks and mortar as a personal investment plan is only really successful if you get cyclical bubbles of the 80s and 2000s.it creates winners and losers and with the consequences for losers of losing both money and their home. if we are to achieve truly affordable housing you are quite right, however no one wants to take the hit. If the government are successful in substantially increasing social housing stock for rent then there is some prospect of affecting the supply curve and therefore the price.

The real objective is to make renting as desirable as home ownership and with people,if they wish to invest in housing to do so via a REIT. This would call for a massive overhaul of tenants rights which is long overdue.

thanks for taking the time to comment :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
15:17 on 16/06/2012
You sound too sensible, you cannot be a politician.
21:58 on 14/06/2012
germany built a manufacturing base when people had jobs they built houses, spain, ireland etc built houses hoping people would have jobs and now pay the price house prices are artificialy being supported by reducing home building. when greece and the rest crash house prices will plummet leading to negative issues and increased repossession and increased debt. once house prices have reset to what they should be the property market will start moving again but only if people have jobs in areas other than building. are your social/special needs housing GOV funded to a degree a sort of alternative to care homes etc or care in the community but keeping them all in one place in their own little community.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
12:33 on 14/06/2012
You said "Housing for rent, if managed properly, seldom lies empty because people do not have to satisfy mortgage requirements, find and risk a large deposit or face losing their home if their circumstances change. Thankfully we have a safety net for that: the housing benefit system."

The problem with that however is that housing benefit won't necessarily cover your rent and you could easily lose your home if you fall on hard times
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:48 on 14/06/2012
The market forces you describe (supply and demand) wont happen the way you think for a number of reasons. Housebuilders must keep supply short or prices drop they lose money so when a dip is predicted or happens building ceases or slows or changes.
17:22 on 14/06/2012
http://www.safhousing.co.uk/blog/real-estate-investment-trusts-the-rules-of-the-game/

i wanted to stimulate the debate about housing as personal investments mainly because it is that area more than any other that has led to our current parlous financial situation. Other countries that looked on housing as a place to live and who's citizens enjoy the benefits of secure long term low cost housing e.g Germany have not found themselves in the same position
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Steve Clarke-Keating
22:34 on 14/06/2012
Secure, long term, low cost housing in this country? That can't apply to the private rented sector surely? We desperately need some form of rent control in this country outside of social housing. The government will take a very long time if ever to allow social housing providers the financial will to expand their stock anywhere near enough to satisfy the ridiculous numbers of people on waiting lists. Living in social housing myself and having being a housing officer for a housing association, I know first hand the level of need you have to have to get offered a property. It really leaves many hundreds of thousands of people on the fringes of poor quality private sector housing that is still too expensive for its quality. Anything decent in a half decent area and rents just go through the roof!

That problem will still exist even if attitudes towards home ownership change. There will just always be a ridiculous amount of people who have no desire or the means to ever own property.