Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Philip Nash
 

Chelsea Flower Show 2012 - Will It Be the Same Old, Same Old?

Posted: 22/05/2012 00:00

Every year, so much controversy surrounds the medals awarded to expectant designers and their diversely pigeonholed exhibits.

Chelsea is THE most prestigious, acclaimed garden show on Earth - although some dissenters will no doubt disagree - and the winning of a Gold Medal is held in the highest esteem.

Beware this hunting of the Snark however, for it is fraught with pitfalls that undoubtedly distort the purity of creative expression we would all aspire to.

Don't get me wrong - receiving one of these golden accolades IS life changing - but truly, is a garden, with so much blood, sweat and tears (literally), often a year's worth of effort, hung on a collective decision of the 'peers' of our profession? Modern, contemporary gardens lumped in with the most traditional of offerings, are evaluated by the same, select exemplars - and we all crowd round to see what has been pronounced on every garden exhibit - Gold! It must be brilliant, Bronze - ah well, hmm... ! Judged and pitted against fellow designers, all whom have invested their hearts and souls into creating their visions.

Every, but every year, the judges face the critical tightrope of public and media scrutiny - never, ever pitching a balance of approval - so often there are conflicting criticisms one way and the other. It's an impossible and unenviable task - only the most brave and resilient amongst the ranks can stand the tsunami of opinions!

I think it's time to sub-divide the categories for judging the show gardens into traditional and contemporary or modern, with judges from both within our profession - peers with experience in their fields of passionate dedication - and those of critical expertise, without - architects, interior designers, artists - who will bring a breath of fresh air to the critical evaluation of the exhibits.

No-one should have to sign up for the formulaic show garden mantra - it is after all, an exhibition, a gallery , an opportunity to show on a world stage, your individual visions, passion and artistic expressions of what a garden can be, to those that are interested around the world. Accolades have their importance, but let's not forget, it's always subjective, and, history does support this, the brightest, the best, are not always recognised in the moment - most often, they are appreciated and recognised after their passing - ( except by the few !!)

Never lose sight of the vision and the passion that so drives one to be so exposed, so vulnerable, and burns so brightly, yet can be so easily extinguished by those who cannot see!!

 
FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
Every year, so much controversy surrounds the medals awarded to expectant designers and their diversely pigeonholed exhibits. Chelsea is THE most prestigious, acclaimed garden show on Earth - althoug...
Every year, so much controversy surrounds the medals awarded to expectant designers and their diversely pigeonholed exhibits. Chelsea is THE most prestigious, acclaimed garden show on Earth - althoug...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:23 PM on 05/22/2012
As someone way... way outside the gardening profession, but having enjoyed a few visits to the Chelsea Show, it does seem like many 'institutions' that they are resisting an obvious need for change in favour of tradition and what they are comfortable with. There is clearly a diversity of style that warrants more than one category and unless there are sufficient judges involved from each school of design, it surely makes more sense to have each category judged by appropriate peers.
09:45 AM on 05/22/2012
I couldn't agree more with Philip Nash's assesment of the garden designs at this years Chelsea, and more specificallly the judging of them. Having seen some of his own designs and then comparing them with the "looks like it needs weeding" gardens I've seen so far on the BBC Chelsea coverage, there is no comparison! For me, I love contemporary gardens. I love the pleasing lines, the asthetics and a taste for the architectural, but I'm also at heart a "lazy" gardener, and Phil's type of design is right up my "Corian" street. I've thought for a long time now that the expert judgements are biased towards the more traditional gardens and shy away from the more contemporary designs. and so Yes, there should be a different section judged by suitably experienced peers for these types of designs. There are of course some exceptions, and the quite frankly ridiculous "pyramid" offering from certain "celebrity" designers should always be taken with a pinch of "shock" salt, and perhaps these should be moved into their own category of "Interesting, but!!"
12:21 AM on 05/22/2012
BBC TV uses it as an excuse to wheel out its favoured celebrities which turns it into something very clubby. The programming of the CFS becomes about the BBC, the CFS itself being a means to that BBC end. Pity really. But that's the BBC these days. It's all about it's list of favoured folk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:13 PM on 05/22/2012
Totally agree with you, I turned it off last night, very disappointing, it was more of a chat show!

I don't want to hear every garden expert and celebs view, I can make up my own mind on the exibit's, all I need is the story behind them. I want to see the Gardens and flowers and definitely not celebs.
Another event ruined by the by BBC's obsession with celeb culture.

And the camera work was awful when they did show you a garden.