Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rachel Preece

GET UPDATES FROM Rachel Preece
 

Imprisoned for Love: Human Rights in Egypt

Posted: 22/02/2012 00:00

On 11 February 2011, the Egyptian nation celebrated freedom, as Hosni Mubarak's 30 year rule came to an end. Thousands gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square and the exultant images were transmitted to TV screens the world over. Egypt had its carte blanche.

But this wasn't absolute. On 16 October 2011, American Jessica Albrent married Ahmed Azzam, a Blackhawk helicopter pilot in the Egyptian military. The marriage was legal and binding under Egyptian law. Jessica and Ahmed's families and friends joined them to celebrate their union. The couple were married for less than two months, when Ahmed was arrested. His crime? He married the woman he loved. And she wasn't Egyptian.

2012-02-18-GM2AH1.jpg

The Egyptian military's disregard of human rights is long-standing and deep-seated - for many officers, human rights simply do not exist. Jessica explains: "Officers in the Egyptian military are not permitted to vote, become a member of any political party, attend any rallies or political meetings, or protest. They may not complain of any aspect military service and military operations to the press, any governing bodies separate from the military, embassies, human rights groups, NGOs, or to any judiciary not supervised by the military.

"They may not criticise the military to any of the above listed groups, nor may they criticise the military to their friends, family, or even in the privacy of their own homes. They may not form a union or other group to advocate for their rights, even within the structure of the military. All infractions of Egyptian civil law committed by officers are tried in military courts, not in civil courts. Egyptian officers may not receive any training for any career not sanctioned and approved by the military- meaning they may not attend a college or university program unless they have permission from the military. Officers are not permitted to ever travel outside of Egypt, unless express permission is granted, and it rarely is. Officers are not supposed to have an account with any social networking site.

"Officers are not permitted to obtain a non-military passport. They may not marry foreigners. A contract with the military is ten years. After an officer's ten years have been completed, he should, under his contract, have the option of "retiring" or leaving service with the military. However, certain officers, especially those in scarce positions, such as doctors, engineers, pilots, etc. are often not permitted to retire until well into their fifties."

Entering into the military is a common option for young Egyptian men - very few are wealthy enough to pay for university study (student loans aren't available), there are few scholarships, and a university education doesn't guarantee an income - unemployment currently stands at over 9%. The military provides education and a solid income.

Ahmed and Jessica knew that their marriage could result in a backlash from the military, and they looked into all possible ways to avoid this outcome. At first they hoped that Ahmed would be permitted to retire, but when he approached his superiors about it, he was told not to even try to request retirement. As a helicopter pilot he was too valuable to let go, so despite Ahmed having more than completed his contracted 10 years of service, he was forced to remain in the military. Yet hypocrisy has manifested itself - a valuable helicopter pilot is in jail.

After long discussions and having weighed up all of the options, which really came down to forgetting each other or taking the risk, the two decided to marry. Neither of them expected such an astringent reaction from the Egyptian military. In fact, according to military law, Ahmed should not be in jail at all, nor should he ever have been brought to trial. Egyptian military law explicitly states that officers who marry foreigners should not be sued and should be discharged. Because the Egyptian military and the military judiciary acts with impunity, and without extrinsic checks, Ahmed was illegally brought to trial and sentenced to one year. He has no recourse and no legal methods of fighting this violation of law.

2012-02-18-36xx2.jpg

Jessica now lives in Tanzania, in turmoil: "I am not sure what Ahmed does, but I cry a lot. I miss him, and can't believe this happened to him. We were married for less than two months when he went to jail, so I am not used to the idea of being married. I get down, and then I keep fighting for him, I can't do anything else. I keep writing letters that no one answers, keep writing requests that no one reads, I keep writing to my senators and representatives, who never respond - and won't be getting my vote - and keep talking to officials who know nothing. Every once in a while, I think I have done everything I can, but then I can't stop fighting for Ahmed. If I don't speak up for him, no one will. So I write again. I badger my friends for help, because I cannot stop.

"I was able to visit Ahmed once. I do not currently live in Egypt, and, as a foreigner, I am not normally allowed to set foot on any military property at all, including the jail. As a result, Ahmed must apply for special permission for me to visit him, and visits can only occur on Thursdays for two to three hours. While I was happy to see him, he asked that I not come again - he did not want me to visit "this hell" - his words - again. We do not have direct communication, as he does not have access to a phone, so his family visits him regularly and they bring letters back and forth. Ahmed's lawyers have filed two appeals since his sentence. The appeals were put in a file and are forgotten. There are no tracking numbers, and there is no obligation for the judicial system to review the appeals at all. No right to due process as well.

"I think people ignore this story because it is not happening right in front of them. There are no pictures of anyone being beaten or gassed, no one crying into a camera for justice, and no flags waving in this case. This is a man without a voice, a man who has no one to turn to."

Jessica and Ahmed's story illustrates a pattern of disregard for human rights in Egypt and by the Egyptian military. Herein lies the greatest injustice and the biggest story of all - thousands protest in Tahrir Square, fighting justly for their rights, feeling hatred for the soldiers and police standing right beside the protesters, but those soldiers have no one to fight for them. The men in uniform from whom the average citizen expects respect and protection have almost no human rights; and no place where they can scream and chant for their freedom.

You can show your support of Jessica and Ahmed's marriage by signing this petition.

 

Follow Rachel Preece on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Rachel_Munich

On 11 February 2011, the Egyptian nation celebrated freedom, as Hosni Mubarak's 30 year rule came to an end. Thousands gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square and the exultant images were transmitted to TV ...
On 11 February 2011, the Egyptian nation celebrated freedom, as Hosni Mubarak's 30 year rule came to an end. Thousands gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square and the exultant images were transmitted to TV ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:36 AM on 02/27/2012
Egyptians may have their freedom, but it is
severly limited, not a lot has changed.
wes
09:46 PM on 02/25/2012
There seem to be some glaring misrepresentations in this article but with that said, it's still unacceptable that story's such as this go missing from the mainstream press coverage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon archer
Facebook name is Yuyun Archer
04:50 AM on 02/23/2012
How long before people admit that things were better under Mubarak?
10:23 PM on 02/22/2012
It's always a good idea for a journalist to fact check before posting such a story. It is not at all unusual that a country imposes very specific and restrictive rules on those with sensitive jobs in government, especially in the military. In the USG, some jobs with clearances require PRE-approval following a thorough background check. Not allowing military officers to marry foreigners is customary in many places. However, when he chose to enter the military academy and then go on to specialized training, Ahmed knew what these restrictions were.

Oh, but he HAD to go to the military academy because he couldn't afford college. PLEASE! Egypt's many public universities charge NO tuition. Students from the poorest of backgrounds attend, if their grades are good enough. No need for "student loans." Even if this were not the case, a commitment is a commitment. What "human right" is violated when a person pays the consequences for breaking a regulation?

There is no shortage of human rights violations for which the Egptian govenrment has been guilty as charged. However, this is not one of them. This is a matter of institutional discipline. There are historical reasons for the seemingly stringent rules.

These are facts that Huff Post readers deserved to be informed about within the article.
04:02 AM on 02/23/2012
So you also missed the part where they violated due process, violated their own laws, and refused to let him leave service when his (very long) contract was finished? You did not understand the part where Egyptian military law states that he should not serve any jail time? Yes, other countries are very restrictive as well, but most of them provide alternatives and allow officers to leave their contract when it is finished. All human rights are rights and should be protected, and all people deserve them, no matter how awful their country is.
05:35 AM on 02/23/2012
The question is whether one choses to accept "the part" as stated by the writer without further research into the matter. Also, on the one hand, we hear that he has no legal recourse, on the other, that he has lawyers and they have filed two appeals. Which is it? Did this young man consult his lawyers before he decided to proceed with the marriage? What did they advise? Did he take any formal steps to address the issue before challenging the regs? What IS clear is that this article does not represent a well-researched story that takes into consideration both the story as presented by the couple and broader knowledge of both the case and Egyptian law.
02:30 PM on 02/22/2012
Too bad. If Ahmed were a rich, blonde, American 20-something in Aruba, the mainstream media, especially Nancy Grace, would be all over this story. Saturation coverage.
12:55 PM on 02/22/2012
Turkey still has national service, many recruits are
treated very severely, i have spoke to many.
There are a few loopholes in order to evade being
conscripted in to the forces,
Most have to go though.
wes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:46 PM on 02/21/2012
"Imprisoned for love"?

No, it's imprisoned for creating a threat to security. Try marrying a foreigner and getting a TS/SCI clearance in the United States, it won't fly.
04:11 AM on 02/22/2012
So did you miss the part where they violated due process, violated their own laws, and refused to let him leave the military when his contract was finished? Try doing that in the US to an officer for getting married and see what happens then.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:55 AM on 02/22/2012
You're kidding me, the Egyptian military violated due process?