Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and I have set two tests for George Osborne's budget today. First, will it get our economy moving - delivering the jobs and growth we need to get the deficit down? And second, will it be fair to families on low and middle incomes now bearing the heaviest burden of Osborne's spending cuts and tax rises?
We need a plan for jobs and growth because the Chancellor's decision to cut too far and too fast has backfired. The government's complacency about the ability of the private sector to fill the gaping void left by public sector cuts has meant a flatlining economy and opportunities for recovery squandered.
Stalling growth and rising unemployment means weaker tax receipts and a growing benefits bill - so Osborne is now on course to borrow £158 billion more than he said he would, meaning more tax rises and spending cuts, and extending his deficit reduction timetable two years into the next parliament.
And far from ensuring that the costs of his economic failure are borne by those with the broadest shoulders, Osborne has loaded the heaviest burden onto working families with children, with those on middle and low incomes suffering the most. The squeeze is set to continue this year - analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that families with children will be, on average, £530 worse off as a result of changes due to come into force next month.
George Osborne should use this Budget to correct his mistakes and rectify these injustices.
To help hard-pressed households and get our economy moving again, we favour a temporary VAT cut, which would be worth £450 to the average family with children at the same time as cancelling the effect of the increase in fuel duty planned for August this year. Increasing the personal tax allowance would be better than doing nothing - but as the IFS confirmed last week, this wouldn't help pensioners or those on the lowest incomes.
We'd also bring forward new infrastructure investment, which could create jobs now, boost the beleaguered construction industry, as well as laying the foundations for our economic future. But the steps taken so far by government to get work on these vital projects underway amount to far too little, far too late.
Other measures to boost jobs and growth include a further cut in VAT to 5% on home repairs, improvements and maintenance and a national insurance holiday for small firms taking on extra workers. And with bank bonuses still high we should repeat Labour's bank bonus tax to fund the building of 25,000 new affordable homes and the creation of 100,000 new jobs for young people.
While a plan for jobs is vital to get the deficit down, so are tough choices on tax, spending and pay. We can't duck that reality. But that means our values and priorities matter all the more. We want the Chancellor to do more to help families currently bearing an unfair share of the burden.
So we say he should reverse cuts to tax credits next month, and cancel planned changes to rules on working hours that would leave some low paid couples with children better off quitting work. These changes could be paid for by a clampdown on the avoidance of stamp duty on properties worth over £1 million, and by reversing a pension tax relief boost the Chancellor has given to people on incomes of more than £150,000.
We are also calling for an urgent rethink of changes to child benefit due to come in next January that would mean a single mum, or family where mum or dad stays at home, on £43,000 would lose all their child benefit, while a dual earner household on £84,000 could keep all of theirs.
We've said we'll support the Chancellor on a mansion tax if its purpose is to ease the squeeze on low and middle incomes. And we have been consistent in calling for tougher action to reduce tax evasion and avoidance. But a tax cut for the top 1% on incomes of £150,000 a year cannot be the priority when small businesses are struggling, living standards for the majority are falling, and the number of young people unemployed is still rising.
In tough times like these we need to prioritise jobs, growth, and fairness for families - those are Labour's priorities, and I believe they are also the priorities of the British people.
Follow Rachel Reeves on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rachelreevesmp
UK inflation dip provides relief ahead of budget
Budget 2012: UK borrowing expected to fall below £100bn and OBR growth ...
Sterling edges up vs euro after UK CPI; focus on budget
Labour Party members these days haven't read their George Orwell and assume we know nothing about Doublespeak.
It's nice to see the Labour Thought-Police haven't got to everyone yet!
Any group that squanders potential NHS funds sending out un-requested information to tax payers. When a simple slider screen on the interweb could do the job for practically nothing. Is beyond all hope. What’s needed is not answers to the questions they want to provide. But answers to those questions the people want to ask. Through a transparency site. Where 'why are you wasting our taxes on this or that' could be revealed. Even if never responded to.
"I believe they are also the priorities of the British people."
But we’ll never really know. Because republics got out in the guise of democracies, don’t actually function like that.
But probably you take great pride in selling your country to the highest bidder. Problem is: When they move on to greener pastures, there'll be no one left to drag you out of the gutter.
So I must say to the person who wrote this story or quoted someone else, they have a great deal of common sense, and knows what side their bread is buttered on.
The following statement/paragraph is so well put/wrote; it speaks for so many peoples plight today.
Osborne has loaded the heaviest burden onto working families with children, with those on middle and low incomes suffering the most. The squeeze is set to continue this year - analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that families with children will be, on average, £530 worse off as a result of changes due to come into force next month.
Amazing headline from Labour ? What a laugh. Poor old George Osborne is still having to contend with correcting all the mistakes of his predecessors, Darling and Brown, and their advisers at the time, Miliband, Balls and Co.
And second, will it be fair to families on low and middle incomes now bearing the heaviest burden of Osborne's spending cuts and tax rises?
Do you believe in Miracles if so then this government will never deliver? The above statement is made by either a poor person, or by someone who may have money, but has tons of common sense.
Now I don't know if the paragraph is from Rachel Reeves who seems to write the story perhaps? Or maybe she is quoting from someone else who knows what hard times are.
Nevertheless as I said the statement couldn't be truer, especially the second paragraph/question.
I must say someone knows and feels for those of us who fall into the second paragraph/question. Thanks to whomever it is who is, that is thinking along them lines.
There is a child in our house who is just 3 months old, and it’s disgraceful that the child has to live without heating as we cannot afford it, and I’m sure I’m speaking for 1.000s of people here.