Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Shrubb

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Shrubb
 

The Psychedelics Debate: The Expert's Viewpoint

Posted: 22/10/11 14:48

Psychiatrist Dr Ben Sessa was on Prof David Nutt's team when Nutt reported the findings of the relative harms and safety of ecstasy to the Advisory Council on Misuse of Drugs to the Labour government in 2009. Nutt was summarily fired because independent research clashed with the opinion of politicians.

Speaking to him, Sessa says the feedback from the government of the day was "the findings may stand up scientifically but clash with the political climate."

Political clashes with hard science infuriate Sessa. "In the 1950's and early 60's there was a lot of good research being done into the therapeutic benefits of LSD by scientists. Essentially the hippy movement got hold of the drug which annoyed politicians who banned all research into LSD."

Sessa wonders what would happen if a government took a 'moral stance' on opiates in medicine? "Doctors wouldn't have much they could use, such is opiates' proven efficacy. They'd be up in arms!"

"Psychiatry is crying out for innovative new treatments. The drugs and treatments on the market are not very effective in many cases, and a 'thinking outside the box' approach is sorely needed". This view is privately held by many practitioners in the field.

A raft of research has been carried out lately into LSD, Ketamine, mescaline and psilocybin (from magic mushrooms). A 2011 study into psilocybin found that it can improve personality characteristics in patients - something Sessa says could help people with Personality Disorder. "Personality characteristics can only be changed by intense, sometimes religious experiences. The research you mention gave such experiences to the patients." The paper in question suggests that those who tripped on mushrooms had certain personality characteristics changed for the better for up to 12 months after the event.

Personality Disorder is widely regarded as almost untreatable in psychiatry. The UK went as far as passing new laws on detention without trial for people who had dangerous forms of PD.

Sessa wouldn't go to prescribing psychedelics immediately, nor would he consider a full blown trial giving people with PD a trip on the drugs. "More research needs to be done. We need to apply the same scientific principles to these drugs that we would anything else. None of them are even close to being licensed, so it would not be legal to try it out. Indeed, all I'm calling for is this research to be done. I'd be happy if they were found to cause more problems they solved, and they were thrown on the scrapheap from diligent scientific research".

The Daily Mail is full of the risks of taking these drugs. Sessa counters "In the 50 years since they have been used recreationally, the prevalence of schizophrenia has not increased at all in the world population. If someone is predisposed to schizophrenia they should not take LSD as it will likely send them over the edge. Most people aren't predisposed so it won't cause the illness. That has been proven by their widespread use."

For my part, I have had a bad trip on mushrooms. I believe that that really bad experience in 1996 finally gave me schizophrenia after 2 years of psychedelic drug abuse and intense stress. I do have a lot of anecdote from family history that I am predisposed to the illness. I looked at predisposition in my family in an article for Community Care Magazine a couple of years ago. One of my group of student trip heads is now a senior Army officer and found no ill effects. Of 5 of us only I lost the plot. Statistically if 100 of us were tripping as much as the 5 of us did at university, based on international prevalence, only I would have would have been tipped over the edge.

The real obstacle to such research is the political climate. "I don't want the hippy movement discussing the pros and cons of therapeutic psychedelics. The Daily Mail is the conscience of the public and it is that paper I want to draw in. If we had its readers supporting, then the cause to research the therapeutic benefits would be well on the road to achieving our goals. Hippies just rub them up the wrong way!

 

Follow Richard Shrubb on Twitter: www.twitter.com/#Shrubberz

 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
15:30 on 28/10/2011
I agree with almost all of this, and enjoy your articles in general.
I don't feel the Daily Mail is the conscience of the public - more like a sounding board for poor interpretations of scientific studies - or outright lies - bent to a right wing viewpoint.

99% of Mail articles I have read on drugs have been filled with either outright lies or poor interpretation of a study or its press release.
photo
PoetPeter
Better known as Peter Reynolds, leader of CLEAR
15:09 on 28/10/2011
It's nothing to do with the "political climate". It's to do with the ignorant, prejudiced personal opinions of politicians and Paul Dacre, editor of the most malevolent institution in Britain - the Daily Mail.

Politicians and the Daily Mail lie, misinform and deceive over and over again with impunity. If the public were told the truth and weren't subject to government propaganda, just as evil as anything from the Soviets or the Nazis, then of course they would support research into medicinal use of psychedelics and of cannabis.

There's no other conclusion you can draw except to say that the ministers responsible; David Cameron, Andrew Lansley and Theresa May are cruel, negligent and irresponsible.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Shrubb
15:51 on 28/10/2011
Sadly the evil Mail and the jackboot wearers are the dominant hegemonic power at the moment. When the Mail starts losing £50 million a year and the Guardian makes wet dreams of profit with a right thinking liberal government, so the Mail readership won't be the ones we need to appeal to...