Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ros Altmann

GET UPDATES FROM Ros Altmann
 

The Solution to an Ageing Population? Re-Think Retirement

Posted: 19/07/2012 00:00

The great news is that many more people are living longer nowadays thanks to major advances in health and medical care. But, of course, this means there is now a challenge ahead. As a nation, we need to completely change our attitude to what is 'old', and by doing so we can also change our attitude to what a fantastic resource older people are; they're not a drain on our future, they are potentially really valuable resource in themselves.

Of course we've known about the huge baby boom generation for decades - they were born about 50 or 60 years ago. Medical science has seen such success in keeping people alive longer, so it should not be a surprise that there are more older people now. Many of the illnesses people used to die of, they can now live well with or recover from. That is something to celebrate. The real shame is that politicians failed to prepare people for longer lives properly. Working longer, saving more and keeping active are vital ingredients of managing the ageing population. We need to help older people look after themselves, help younger people appreciate the value of elders and move away from old fashioned stereotypes of old people being not fit to do anything!

There is a whole new phase of life open to us, in our 60s, and even 70s, where most of us will be fitter and healthier than previous generations, and still have many years of life ahead. These are 'bonus years' which most of us can hope to embrace. Of course not everyone will be able to (just as not all people in their 50s now are in good health) but the majority should benefit from these successes.

Nevertheless, we are currently wasting vital resources as millions are not using the skills they've acquired throughout their lives. By embracing and in fact welcoming the opportunities of working during part of these bonus years, we can help boost the ailing economy, reduce reliance on the state and ultimately make retirement more fulfilling.

This would be a win-win for the economy and society - it will help elders have higher incomes and create more jobs for the young. If we carry on as we are, then many older people will stop working, have low pension incomes and reduced spending power, which will stifle growth.

Saga's research shows that many over 50s already want to work past 65. Some 71% would like to work part time rather than retiring and in fact 7% are already working past the age of 70 - and it's not just for the money. Job satisfaction, feeling useful and the social benefits of working are key reasons why people say they want to continue.

When the current concepts of pensions and retirement were introduced, people in their sixties were classed as old. Now many are still fit and healthy into their seventies or beyond. We cannot afford to let them believe they have to leave the labour force altogether if they are not sure they want to. The affordability of the ageing population demands new thinking.

Pension incomes for most people are simply not enough to sustain them through their now longer lives. It is really not sustainable to expect that private pension savings - whether organised by employers or individuals - can guarantee a good income for an ever-increasing length of time. As later life extends, the parameters of pensions need to adjust accordingly. And people need to think about saving for later life care needs too.

If we are encouraged to consider embracing the opportunity of a new phase of life, a phase between full time work and full time retirement - instead of traditional retirement - we could have a better work-life balance working part-time in a fashion and at a pace that suits us best.

Of course employer attitudes and age discrimination in the workplace need to change. Of course, not everyone will be able to stay in the same line of work and some may need to retrain. Of course, the current unemployment situation makes later life working more difficult. However, if we merely think short-term and force older people out of work too soon, ultimately there will be far fewer jobs for younger people. The increasing numbers of retired citizens with disappointing pension incomes will have less money to spend and this will weaken the economy, damaging medium growth and job prospects for everyone.

Just saving more will not be enough to ensure decent income in later life. It's only one part of the picture. Enabling older individuals and wider sections of the population to keep economically active, continuing to generate an income - or even substantial wealth - not just for themselves, but for the country as a whole, is another vital part of managing an ageing population. Lives are changing so attitudes and expectations need to change too.

 

Follow Ros Altmann on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SagaRosAltmann

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
The great news is that many more people are living longer nowadays thanks to major advances in health and medical care. But, of course, this means there is now a challenge ahead. As a nation, we need ...
The great news is that many more people are living longer nowadays thanks to major advances in health and medical care. But, of course, this means there is now a challenge ahead. As a nation, we need ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:35 PM on 07/21/2012
I "retired" at 42. By that I mean I was lucky enough to quit my career and have worked part time ever since. For me working part time (no dependents) was the way to go and my lifestyle had to change dramatically to do this.
Since then I have got active with a local charity and we are always short of volunteers. Where are all the bored able and skilled people? Are they too busy complaining about having nothing to do?

Surely this is a more realistic approach to retirement , a gradual easing of of work as stamina, interests and financial needs dictate rather than an all or nothing approach. A lot of employers could accommodate this easily.
12:32 AM on 07/20/2012
I am 67 years of age, reasonably fit and healthy, cycle, walk, ride motorcycles and own a car! I have worked continuously from the age of sixteen, studied and worked at the same time!

I retired two years ago, through personal choice, as a consultant engineer and I am enjoying every minute of my retirement. I have no desire to continue working, in fact I am probably "busier" now than I was when I was working.

I saved and made provision for my retirement. What I hate the most are greedy governments who tax my occupational pensions at source, then tax me again on the total. I have paid my share!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
10:26 PM on 07/19/2012
Can we just run that load of twaddle down the drive and see if it comes back up with any wheels on?At a time when there is massive unemployment, you want to add to the workforce by encouraging, or even forcing older people to find work, thereby increasing the average time for which an unemployed young person can expect to be out of work, because he/she is experiencing competition not only from other unemployed young people but older people too. Presumably Saga, under your leadership, are lobbying government to increase unemployment benefit fo young people when older people keep them on the dole? Or doesn't your thinking go that far?
10:07 PM on 07/19/2012
They keep talking about how long our children will live. that they'll all live to be 100 when it's rubbish. That may be the potential but the reality is that most people you see today under 40 ( and plenty over that age) are fat, indolent p***heads who smoke and use recreational drugs. They'll be lucky to make it to 50. The NHS can't afford to treat them and they face a future of cheap 'patching plaster' medication till they finally fall off the perch. The problem then will be who will pay for our pensions if the generation following us starts dying before we do?
07:09 PM on 07/19/2012
What is not mentioned here at all is that many people would love to do voluntary work but the past governments have legislated volunteers out if existence. Enable voluntary work again and the whole quality of life would improve - AT NO COST. But a few "rotten eggs" have media in a tailspin over "acceptable risk" and you are all suffering the consequences.
06:50 PM on 07/19/2012
Whats the point, in 20 years all manual labor will be done by robots. The Japanese are already well on the way to making humanoid robots capable of doing anything physical that a human can. Then it will 80% unemployment. The government needs to think about this now and plan how we respond. It can either be a utopia for all or a dystopia for most. A life of leisure or trying to compete for an ever decreasing number of jobs.
09:14 PM on 07/19/2012
Fear not my friend. The creation of extra capital (machines) brings with it extra output but also a need for extra labour to build and service the machines, plus a society gain in that more is produced from the same original resources. The robots do not create or service themselves. The extra output/income allows for a greater consumption per head of population.

This mistake was made by the 19th C machine wreckers known as the Luddites.
10:12 PM on 07/19/2012
But if a robot can do human work, does that not mean it can ultimately replace human maintenance engineers?? Although robots do not create themselves, they are used in building cars. Is that not a step toward building robots?? How does a robot build more from the same original resources?? Robots cannot create resources.
06:25 PM on 07/19/2012
Retirement needs to me more flexible. Although we may be living longer, many are not mentally or physically fit enough to work. Mandatory retirement age should end, to be replaced by a flexible system allowing those that want to, to work on and those that dont/cant, to retire. Pension incentives would need to be introduced to compensate for worked pensionable years. Too simple?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
05:17 PM on 07/19/2012
Am 62 ,retired a year ago .I now potter around doing exactly what I want.I am a member of Cineworld,cost about £17 a month so I go to the cinema whenever I want to .I have a free travel card,for over 60's so I travel on the tube or buses free.When at home I can now watch a film late on the TV without having to worry about work in the morning.When I want a nap in the afternoon ,I do .Get a hobby ,listen to the radio ,even do a bit of gardening when I want and for how long I want to ,not under a time factor to finish.I no longer miss work ,just enjoy yourselves
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 07/19/2012
I wonder if this is the same SAGA that told a photographer friend of mine (who had worked for their magazine regularly) that his services were no longer required because he was too old?
06:21 PM on 07/19/2012
... and the same SAGA that refused to insure a 90 year old who wanted her car insured for carers to drive!
03:10 PM on 07/19/2012
I've just 'retired' at 60 as I had my last full time job 18 months ago and have been unable to find ANY work since, despite registering with several agencies and sending out countless CV's. I have vast experience in various office work, I'm computer literate and educated to degree level. I've had a few interviews but I can see the 'glazed' look when they realise I'm over 30. I have been told several times I'm 'overqualified'! Come out of retirement - I wish!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
10:32 AM on 07/19/2012
Except Ros...the 65 years old building site labourer,the refuse collector etc....after nearly 50 years of hard labour he can carry on.

Yes we need a rethink...a proper one....about the fairer distribution of wealth.......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:21 AM on 07/19/2012
You're only repeating what has already been said before.
How? You haven't given us that answer.
I'm past my sell-by date and still working but, only through necessity. We need a government that will facilitate our skills, reliability and experience. Oh, and the opportunities to do so, of course. Ways and means please..?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
12:37 AM on 07/19/2012
The other reason old people don't retire"

Retirement means that they would have to do something other than W O R K. They don't know how. They have no interests other that W _ _ _.

Then, there is the problem that retirement would trap them into spending more time with the dreaded spouse.

And of course, having to pay for the kids who are still at home but are pushing 50.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BOBinPS
Really?
12:31 AM on 07/19/2012
Of course, the other view is that old people staying in jobs they are no longer at the forefront to perform prevent the new "movers and shakers" from moving up. Let the oldsters volunteer if they want. Or just play golf........ If they are all that smart (they aren't) they should have plenty of money for retirement.
iridium53
Semper Fi
12:30 AM on 07/19/2012
Great. Rethink retirement.

You had also better rethink age discrimination.