Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rosie Fenton

GET UPDATES FROM Rosie Fenton
 

Tesco Retro

Posted: 08/01/2013 11:47

2013-01-08-tescoretro.png

My local Tesco's separate their magazines into 'Women's interests' and 'Men's interests'. Presumably just in case my ovaries don't automatically direct me on a nuclear mission trackpath to choose cupcakes and TOWIE and I accidentally buy something I couldn't possibly be interested in - like Private Eye or The Economist, or The Spectator. I don't think (or I really really don't like to think) that Tesco organises its magazines on the basis that women aren't interested in politics, the economy or current events, and that it's some sort of patriarchal-oppression drive by one of the biggest supermarkets in Britain. I don't think that, and I don't WANT to think that. But routinely, for several months, this particular Tesco has sorted its magazines by placing those magazines, and others, into 'Men's interests'. It's the ignorance that I find most depressing, apparently no one has had a brainwave that a woman might be interested in wider affairs.

My tits do not prevent me from wanting to read about current affairs, in fact, the mere presence of them encourages my interest in politics - women are routinely underpaid, underrepresented and unfairly treated in businesses and wider society. A YouGov survey has just released figures showing that just over 40% of young women in London have experienced sexual harassment in public spaces over the last year. I have a vested interest in current affairs, and the fact that Tesco designates them as anything else than 'General interests' is utter bollocks. I try not to get too sweary in my writing but things like this, that can be easily ignored and overlooked, cause me to put on my biggest Doc Martens and start getting sweary with even the smallest and sweetest old lady.

The majority of women's magazines make me feel like I'm not conforming to society's unobtainable ideals of femininity. I don't care about who shaves or doesn't shave their armpits and I subscribe to the Caitlin Moran school of thinking - that I will only wear high heels that allow me to dance to Lady Gaga and run away from murderers. The most frustrating aspect is that a generation of children are walking through these shops, seeing that these magazines are for men, and this affecting their attitudes of acceptable reading material for men and women. My XX chromosomes only serve to make me brilliantly awesome, and in no way do they define my reading interests. Sort it out Tesco.

 

Follow Rosie Fenton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/_rfenton

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
My local Tesco's separate their magazines into 'Women's interests' and 'Men's interests'. Presumably just in case my ovaries don't automatically direct me on a nuclear mission trackpath to choose cu...
My local Tesco's separate their magazines into 'Women's interests' and 'Men's interests'. Presumably just in case my ovaries don't automatically direct me on a nuclear mission trackpath to choose cu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:40 PM on 01/10/2013
It does suck that there's so rarely a 'general interest' section, even if they won't stop splitting it into 'men' and 'women', 'cause all the magazines I would see as neutral (i.e. any music magazines, Dazed & Confused and so on) are always put in the men's section. I suppose that's because it's less shameful for women to peruse the men's section than the other way round. That's pretty depressing in itself.
10:47 PM on 01/09/2013
Re JoshwaMs comment. He is right to say that there is no force field around the men's interest section. However, the difficulty with a force field is that you can't see it....but wow can it be felt. I am so glad that there are women around who see the unseen! We could just leave it and deal with the bigger issues but to be honest? This small stuff is all around us and not diminishing - it's taken as the norm. Specsavers is the same -pink section for all females and blue for......you got it. Rosie?more power to your elbow; let's have more of this. Super.
04:14 AM on 01/10/2013
Yes, I do understand it's everywhere. But it's the same thing everywhere. There is nothing stopping you buying blue glasses.You won't be judged for it, the same way you won't be judged for reading about science and politics. Also note that this goes both ways. What about guys who want to read gossip magazines? Should they also be placed in a general section? I personally know a few females who enjoy reading 'Lads mags' like Nut and Front. Should they also be placed in general? The labels make they easy to find because people know that the majority of people who read gossips mags are females and the majority of people who read politics magazines are males. That isn't sexist, that's just fact.
The labels are there to separate the magazines by key demographic. It's not sexist, it's just marketing (albeit slightly outdated marketing). It is nothing to do with the supermarkets, but the magazine publishers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
07:01 PM on 01/09/2013
The trouble is that as long as these magazines are in the men's section and women buy them, stores will be dumb enough to think it's only men buying them.

Well done Rosie for highlighting this issue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
12:17 AM on 01/10/2013
When are you getting the operation done ?
06:24 PM on 01/09/2013
Right, over the past few months, I have seen multiple articles about this topic and every time I think the exact same thing; there is NOTHING stopping you from picking up a magazine, be it political or scientific. I would understand the uproar if there was, for example, a force field that stopped you entering the 'Men's Section' but there isn't. Instead there is a printed label saying 'Men's Section'.

What I find most confusing about these articles is that they all bring up very serious issues about women in the workplace, such as lower pay and sexual harassment. To me, these are important issues that need to be addressed and personal I find it disgusting that things like this still happen frequently. These issues effect both personal and professional lives. A label on a magazine rack however, does not. Why not focus all this passion on a worthwhile cause instead of attacking supermarkets about something you could just ignore.

Yes, women enjoy science, music, gaming and politics and may want to pick up magazines about these topics, the same way men may want to pick up material about celebrity gossip and cooking from the 'Women's Section'. Just pick up your magazine and get on with your day.
06:46 PM on 01/09/2013
Sorry for the double post. I was told the first comment didn't go through so I typed it again. Then the first one obviously worked
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
12:22 AM on 01/10/2013
It was worth reading twice.
06:09 PM on 01/09/2013
Right, over the past few months I have seen so many articles about this topic and every time I think the exact same thing. There is NOTHING stopping you from picking up a political or scientific magazine. The amount of uproar about this is getting ridiculous. If there was a force field that stopped women going into the 'Men's Section' then I could fully understand. But guess what, there isn't. There is a tiny label printed on a piece of paper saying 'Men's Section'.

What I find most interesting about these articles however is the mention of some genuine issues about women being paid less and being harassed in the work place. I am all for equality and find it disgusting things like this still occur. To me, as a young male, those are serious issues that need to be addressed. They affect lives, both personal and professional. A magazine placed under a certain label however, really doesn't. Why not focus efforts on those causes instead of attacking supermarkets over a label that you could just ignore. Yes women can be interested in politics, science, gaming and music, the same as a guy can be interested in celebrity gossip and cooking. Just pick up your magazine and get on with your day.
01:09 PM on 01/09/2013
I think this is done in pretty much every store that sells magazines. My local WH Smith groups together under the headings of men's or women's interests, the only titles considered truly gender-neutral are things like travel and history. Most weeks/months I'd buy things like the NME or Q, and these titles were filed under the 'men's' section. If I wanted to buy something the New Statesman, I'd have to stretch past Nuts and Zoo to reach it. It's all well and good grouping similar subjects (like cookery, baking, arts and crafts) together in some sort of order so people can easily find what they want, but assuming gender lends to particular interests is insulting to everyone.

I used to work in the shop, and I was particularly concerned by the children's magazines. Titles tend to be 'coded' pink or blue so you can quickly tell which will be appropriate for your child. The free gifts vary vastly between 'girls' and 'boys' magazines, too. The 'pink' magazines offer lipsticks, bracelets, hair accessories; the 'blue' give things like toy mobile phones or water pistols. Even before they really realise it, children are being taught that their gender dictates the sorts of things they should be interested in.