Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sam Brodbeck

GET UPDATES FROM Sam Brodbeck
 

We Must Be Careful Not to Let Tuition Fees Drown Out Arts Subjects

Posted: 22/11/2011 22:00

What with £27,000 being the new price tag for 2012 undergraduate degrees, application figures for next year's enrolment will soon make for very interesting reading.

It is almost certain that degrees with less career oomph will be spurned by the masses. Goodbye English Literature, Philosophy, History; hello Accounting and Admin Studies.

In these expensive, jobless times it would be stupid to undertake three years of study to get a first class certificate valid only for bohemian coffee shops and bars. "You'll need a good knowledge of postmodernism to chat with the clientele," head baristas will say.

If this does come to pass - and the number of arts students does indeed plummet - we may see such subjects back to their pre-war position, an exclusively moneyed set. The work of the last 50 years will have been reversed in a moment, you'll have to be a Duke or the child of an industrialist to read Harold Pinter's pauses or discover Ken Saro-Wiwa's ghost.

But maybe less reliance on English and History will be a good thing. We can't realistically have a nation of admirers and gentle critics. Maybe we should encourage the young to express themselves discovering cures, further propelling rocket science and reprogramming the information age. Maybe...

I was one of a handful from my North London comprehensive that thought studying the arts at university was a good idea. A snip, we thought, at £9,000. Sussex, Manchester, Kent would propel us into the arms of a lovely growing economy where we'd make thousands publishing e-books or buying and selling houses or something.

Occasionally I dream of going back to my school in 20 years' time, as successful as Will Self, Charles Saatchi and Richard Desmond - fellow old boys all. I shake hands with my old, shrivelled English teacher and walk onto the crumbling stage in the hall that only half the pupils can fit into, and recite the rousing tale of my glorious career.

On less happy nights I arrive for the speech and my English teacher isn't there. I'm told the work dried up and she took a job at Harrow to pay the bills. My rousing tale falls flat. None of the class of 2031 can understand the need for writing down ideas and anyway, they say, the Chinese would never allow it - their sector's rocket ship production is down as it is...

Despite the undoubted good of an increase in practical knowledge and economy-boosting expertise, the Arts must sustain (and increase) its uptake from all strata of society. For it is here, in the reflection and creation of words, art, journalism and film, that humanity's take on the world is largely set. And it must not only be set by those with the money to.

 

Follow Sam Brodbeck on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sambrodbeck

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:24 PM on 11/24/2011
I disagree David. Practicality is one aspect of modern life, but it is not (or at least I believe SHOULD not) control every other aspect. Art for, well, art's sake is still a good thing for many reasons that have nothing to do with practicality or commercial interests.

Kevin Chamow
05:02 PM on 11/24/2011
a valid point, but arts degrees are already for the comfortable. We should always focus on the sciences, but include those with creative tendencies in the artistic and developmental processes of the commercial ends of such endeavours to create practical, progressive, innovative products. Economies and societies must always look forward and do so with practicality.
09:12 AM on 11/23/2011
Is this happening in every industrialized (post-industrial) society? Or is it just in the US and UK?

Kevin Chamow
04:24 AM on 11/23/2011
The people you've to blame for this are the university lecturers and Labour bods who went on a massive spending spree with stats, facts, chat and hot air when industry had been saying for a decade "We do not need 50% of the country with a degree".

The problem is simple - economics can never be driven by anything other than the imperatives of supply and demand. I came from a poor family in London, did Economic History and Politics, went into finance, and off I went. It was Labour that killed off free university education and yet I voted for them in 97 (the last year for no fees education) and have regretted it ever since.

£30k of debt for a degree that was never going to guarantee a job in the first place...that's just a sin, and I hope Mr Blair and Mr Brown reflect long and hard on what they've done to the brightest and poorest students in our country.