Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sarah O'Meara

GET UPDATES FROM Sarah O'Meara
 

Why Face Creams Won't Make You Beautiful

Posted: 28/08/2012 00:00

There are few times in real-life, when I feel I'm being talked down to because I'm a woman.

While the odd sexist comment might pop up in the office, the occasion feels so laughably retro, I can't help smiling with nostalgia, before taking the culprit down.

However, watching TV with my husband reminds me that my perception of gender equality is superficial.

During any advert break, a flawless Scandinavian goddess will encourage female viewers to buy a patented, scientifically-proven face cream that will unlock their luminous qualities. And she's not talking about their personalities.

Despite the fact, we are told time and time again there is no conclusive, scientific evidence that rubbing anything on your face, apart from sun block, will do anything to slow the process of ageing, mainstream beauty product commercials still work on the basic assumption that women aren't clever enough to see through their bogus claims.

See also:


Miss World: Would You Try These International Beauty Tips? (PICTURES)

Barefaced Celebs - Why Our Makeup Obsession Completely Misses the Point

Eat Your Way Past The Most Common Skin Problems

Face Cream That Costs More Than A Pot Of Gold: Would You Spend £8k On Skincare?

I recently cringed through an advert targeted at women-like-me, in which a model said her moisturiser would improve my skin tone using 'gene therapy'. The implication being that if you used the cream, you'd be a genetically modified person. And a prettier one.

Now, I know I haven't got a Phd... but...

Making up excruciatingly obvious, scientific-sounding lies about your products to encourage gullible women to buy your products is not only deeply cynical but worryingly out of step with our modern value system.

LIKE HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE ON FACEBOOK | FOLLOW US ON TWITTER

In other areas of industry, science has brought clarity and transparency to modern life. But in beauty marketing, it is used to confuse and warp our understanding of the female body.

One chink of light in this suffocating cloak field of demeaning, sexist clap-trap has to be the growing gap between women and men's performance at school.

It is predicted that by 2017 female doctors will be in a majority. And surely, if more women study science, almost all beauty products will have to be recalled.

After all, how long can 'mineral cosmetology' last in a world where women confidently interpret everything on the boxes as mumbo-jumbo.

Interestingly, younger, cooler beauty brands, avoid pseudo-science, preferring to enjoy the playful side of beauty. They indulge in clever designs to titillate women's sensibilities, rather than peddling non-science that mocks female credulity.

But, even when the advertising teams of the future finally air-brush made-up science out of their campaigns, and replace it with patented, 'beauty-is-only-skin-deep-technology'... there's one truth that will probably never appear our television screens.

Fat is good for radiant skin. Plump and glowing complexions after the age of 35 tends to belong to one group of women: and they're a size 16.

So instead of obsessing about being thin, the best beauty advice would involve large portions of toast and butter.

However, I doubt I'll hear that in my lifetime, despite the fact that when it comes to soft, radiant skin, nothing looks as good as curvy feels.

 

Follow Sarah O'Meara on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sarahomeara

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
There are few times in real-life, when I feel I'm being talked down to because I'm a woman. While the odd sexist comment might pop up in the office, the occasion feels so laughably retro, I can't hel...
There are few times in real-life, when I feel I'm being talked down to because I'm a woman. While the odd sexist comment might pop up in the office, the occasion feels so laughably retro, I can't hel...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:05 on 16/09/2012
Having tried everything from baby lotion to Decleor, I think there is something in the creams even if most of their claims are clearly fake. Baby lotion is pretty good but leaves an oily film on my face that gives me spots. Decleor smells delicious, but is crazily expensive and far too rich for my skin. A lot of skin care ranges solve certain problems but create others. I'd really like someone to tell me the truth! I just want a skin care regime that actually works. I'm sorry, but vaseline doesn't quite work. I agree there's something in it, but I want something a bit better than that. And I don't want to waste money. The cheap range I get at Boots (UK chemist) isn't quite good enough. There doesn't seem to be anythign that actually quite works. And I still haven't found what I'm looking for.
00:33 on 25/09/2012
Check out Liz Earle's range. Reasonable priced , amazing customer care staff, and the 1 product I couldnt live without? Cleanse and Polish, well worth a try.
09:21 on 15/09/2012
"Fat is good for radiant skin. Plump and glowing complexions after the age of 35 tends to belong to one group of women: and they're a size 16.

So instead of obsessing about being thin, the best beauty advice would involve large portions of toast and butter."

This advice is what needs to be patented and advertised!! Well said. Leaning naturally towards the curvier size 16 and having spent my whole adult life on a diet, I've often thought my payback will come when I'm 45 and still have good skin and my skinnier friends will be showing their age in their face. Having said that I have very dry skin to need to use a good quality moisturiser morning and night which I've done since the age of 13, obviously the range has changed over the years, my skin is wrinkle free and radiant (I attribute the radiance to the amount of water I drink, 2L a day).
15:30 on 04/09/2012
You can do far more good for your skin from the inside - drinking lots of water, eating loads of fruit and veg, no junk and plenty of sleep will give you good skin and have more effect than moisturiser. Beauty products are a waste of money. But does the author really think we have sexual equality? Not from where I am standing. The very existence of a beauty industry is down to the worth of women being measure in their looks. You'd never see a female TV presenter who looked like John Humphries on the box.
01:43 on 04/09/2012
The best thing anyone can do for their skin is to take care of it by staying out of the sun and applying a moisturizer with an SPF in it even on cloudy days!!
01:18 on 29/08/2012
what a refreshing article to read... im a 46 yr old grandmother of three, im also a healthy size 22 and my skin is radiant, i never use skin creams that promise the earth, just a normal tinted moisturiser, i drink plenty of water and eat my greens.

I also remember my grandmother telling me that she never used anything except vaseline on her skin and although by the time she passed on at 75, when i was 15, and she had time honoured wrinkles her skin was like velvet, so soft to touch i can still remember it.

so maybe there is something in the petroleum that aids skin, i mean look at how soft babies bottoms are lol
23:11 on 29/08/2012
Fat cheeks won't make you look younger, that's just the latest craze, it's why you see the skinny bodies with the lollipop head look in actresses.
07:50 on 30/08/2012
lol i dont think fat cheeks are the curves most ppl are on about, but guess because of media brainwashing us that unless we are a skinny size 0 we are not attractive this will carry on, women should be proud of their curves 
09:22 on 15/09/2012
Lollipop head look is nothing to do with having fat cheeks, it's because they starve themselves so much that their head is actually out of proportion to the size of their body.
16:10 on 28/08/2012
One way to tell if your face cream is junk or not: check the label. If it says somewhere 'mineral oil' or 'petrolatum' it is garbage. There ARE ingredients that work: shea butter contains retinol which is known to improve the skin. aloe vera can stop inflammation. and more . . . I am a cosmetic formulator.
15:34 on 04/09/2012
Yep, the most effective ingredients are things like beeswax and shea butter, but they can't be patented, there's no mystery in them and there's a limit to how much they can be priced at. Far more profitable to mix up water, mineral oil, some patented chemicals and a load of chemical preservatives, then spend a fortune on the advertising. I make my own from beeswax, almond oil and jojoba, which is very good and very cheap!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loulou11
Never steal. The goverment hates competition.
07:46 on 28/08/2012
Clinique dramatically different, I swear by it and my friends do too now. It'll look after your skin perfectly, it won't make you a model but your skin will thrive.

Beauty is a strange thing really because I have met some beautiful people but they have turned out to be truly ugly.

Fortunately when you get past your teens and twenties you begin to realize that its not so much whats on the outside but whats on the inside that matters.
00:21 on 28/08/2012
I read a long time ago, that most of the most expensive skin moisturizers were really petroleum jelly plus an additive or two (like water). So since then I have only used that for my face, and while I'm not trying to undo time, that very low cost ingredient has kept my face from drying up completely. And I have fewer wrinkles than many my age.