The Chinese government never wanted anyone to know about Akmal Shaikh. They wanted him to remain one of the nameless thousands executed each year for crimes ranging from corruption to destroying cultural artefacts. Instead his execution on 29 December, 2009 was covered by almost every newspaper between London and Beijing. Instead the world's attention turned to one of China's most abhorrent and hidden human rights abuses.
Akmal, a British citizen, was arrested in September 2007 at Urumqi Airport in China. He was convicted of drug smuggling under article 347 of China's Criminal Code. His trial took place just three months later and lasted 30 minutes. It was not until October 2008, after the Beijing Games were over, that the British government and Akmal's family were informed that he has been sentenced to death. The British government referred the case to Reprieve and we started to work with his family to piece together his story.
Whilst Chinese officials repeated blocked our attempts to meet Akmal, we spoke with colleagues, neighbours, doctors, family members who all told of us of his erratic and bizarre behaviour, characteristic of someone suffering from bipolar disorder. However, in the face of overwhelming evidence, the Chinese prosecutors never allowed Akmal to have his mental health evaluated or for it to be introduced in court to mitigate his sentence.
The tragic and bitter irony of this story is that Akmal travelled to China to find fame. He had recorded a song in Poland, Come Little Rabbit, calling for world peace. He believed his new-found friends were promoting his music career by arranging a concert in Shanghai. One such friend gave him a bag and said he would fly out and join him in Urumqi on a later flight. When Akmal landed in China, the police stopped him, searched his bag and arrested him on drug charges, thereby setting him on the path to execution.
Akmal did, eventually, become something of a media sensation in China. When he was executed, the story was the most read article on SINA, a Chinese media outlet, with the public sentiment overwhelmingly in favour his execution due the very negative coverage it received. By then, saving Akmal's life was an almost impossible task.
On the eve of his execution, FCO minister Ivan Lewis went on a life-saving mission to meet with the Chinese Ambassador to the UK. In an emotional plea, he said he hoped "that our relationship with China will count for something and at this very, very last moment; they will make the right decision." This was the twenty-seventh representation made by the British government to the Chinese on behalf of Akmal Shaikh, all of which fell on deaf ears. The Chinese government ignored every single one. Akmal was executed by lethal injection at 10:30am on 29 December and his body was buried the following day at an unmarked grave in nearby Muslim cemetery.
In the last two years, tentative steps have been taken to reform the death penalty in China. For example, the number of crimes which carry the death sentence has dropped from 68 to 55. Offenses such as tax fraud, tomb robbing and stealing fossils no longer carry the death penalty. China's criminal code was also revised recently to prevent the execution of prisoners over the age of 75. Most significantly, a set of photos, now six years old, were released earlier this month of young women on the eve of their execution. The photos are an intimate portrait on the final hours of these women's lives: they show them trying on different outfits for their execution and playing card games through the final night.
I'd like to think these tentative steps towards reform are partly due to the battle we fought for Akmal two years ago. And as the Reprieve office slowly emptied at the end of a year marked by extraordinary victories, I was filled with sad memories of those desperate few days: Christmas morning spent drafting a clemency petition; Boxing day in Heathrow airport with Akmal's family before they flew to China to say their last goodbyes; and sitting in bed with my laptop at 2am on the morning of 29 December, waiting. But unlike the thousands of other people executed that year, this time there were millions of other people, like me, waiting, watching and thinking of Akmal. A star.
Follow Sophie Walker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ReprieveSoph
Elizabeth Lynch: Will the Chinese Courts Allow Another Mentally Ill Individual Be Executed?
Ben Cohen: China's Execution a Subtle Power Play
Sarah E. Jones: Shaikh Case Illustrates Need for Sanctions
Akmal Shaikh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Akmal Shaikh's final hours | World news | The Guardian
Akmal Shaikh: China warns Britain as row over executed Briton ...
British Try to Halt Execution of Briton in China - NYTimes.com
Akmal Shaikh: Briton executed by Chinese firing squad, his body will ...
Just some quotes from Wikipedia (emphasis added):
1. "...4 kilograms (9 lb) of heroin HIDDEN in a compartment in HIS baggage".
2. "...HIS LAWYERS said that the evidence against Shaikh was "OVERWHELMING".
3. Shaikh...had NEVER been assessed by mental health experts, DENIED HE WAS MENTALLY ILL. He had requested a psychiatric evaluation TO PROVE HE WAS SANE..."
Most drug traffickers, when caught, will deny the drug were theirs.
Others have pleaded insanity, or mental/emotional problems, or claimed they were forced to, or some other BS circumstances, hoping to get away with murder, literally.
Akmal Shaikh was no different. Schapelle Corby, Australian drug trafficker when caught in Indonesia, acted "erratic and bizarre" too. There are many other "actors" like that.
Secondly, how did the Chinese government acted to ensure it "never wanted anyone to know about Akmal Shaikh"?
China was devastated by Britain's opium trafficking - would anyone now expect leniency for any drug trafficker?
But, because it's CHINA, enforcing its WELL-KNOWN laws, you seek to demonize China. You want China to be a nation of laws. Yet when those laws are applied - to your disadvantage - you cry foul!
Maybe you presumed that China's laws should not apply to your superior citizens, and forget about those worthless Chinese citizens who will be harmed by Shaikh's drugs? Maybe EXTRA-TERRITORIALITY, like in the 'good old days', is what you want?
Was he mentally incompetent? We may never know. If he was incompetent to the point where he made a choice like he did, why was he travelling alone?
Also, have you even taken the time to read up on this guy? Have you heard the "song" he recorded? Stop trying to mythologize him. He was a failed businessman with substance abuse problems that made the dumb choice of trying to engage in international narcotics smuggling and paid a terrible price for it. Are there really no better causes that people can be involved in than crying foul every time a dumb human makes a dumb choice and bumps up against the law?
This man had a mental health problem. He was vulnerable, and not in his right mind. And he was executed like an animal.
This is yet another example as to why the death penalty is such an inhumane method of punishment.
If he was mentally incompetent to the point where he could not understand that question, why was he travelling alone? Why did he himself claim that he wasn't mentally ill?
I wrote something incorrectly in my first post - I meant to say that no one would argue that China DOESN'T have harsh laws and sentences, but the responsibility is on travelers not to break fairly iron-clad rules of international travel.
I personally don't think the death penalty solves anything, but the laws of China are China's to uphold and live by, and when any of us is visiting China, it's our LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY to be aware of them and abide by them.
Again, I'm not debating that he may have been mentally incompetent. In fact, his mental incompetence might have made him a perfect target for drug smugglers. The fact remains, if he was incompetent to the point where he carried a bag for someone else, where was his family? Where were his guardians?carrying. I have little sympathy for him. At most, it shows that he lacked caring guardians if he was truly mentally ill. The other, more likely possibility, is that Occam's Razor holds true, and this guy was trying to smuggle drugs.