Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stephen Twigg

GET UPDATES FROM Stephen Twigg
 

What Is the Key Ingredient of a Successful School?

Posted: 10/07/2012 09:56

For the government, it seems to be to hark back to a nostalgic view of the past. So Michael Gove has come out in favour of a 1950s exam system for secondary schools, and Victorian-era rote learning at primary school.

Clearly, neither is going to prepare this generation of young people for the pressures of the modern economy.

80% of the debate about school improvement focuses on structures, rather than standards, despite the fact that research from the Institute of Education shows they make less than 8% of the difference in results. So the media, ministers and some on the left are obsessed with free schools and academisation.

In fact, 80% of the difference in standards comes from the quality of teacher in the classroom, not whether 'free school', 'academy' or community school is painted on the sign outside.

Of course changing a school's structure can be a galvanizing force for change - helping to bring in new staff and leadership to a failing school, and focusing on improving standards. Labour did a huge amount to encourage this change during our time in office, setting up academies in some of the toughest neighbourhoods in England.

But ultimately, it is the quality of the teachers and head-teachers that actually improve results.

Professor Dylan Wiliam from the Institute of Education has found that in the classrooms of the best teachers, students learn at twice the rate they do in the classrooms of average teachers.

I'm reminded of the importance of teaching quality this week, on what is the 10th anniversary of Teach First, the charity that Labour supported to get more graduates into the profession. This fundamentally changed the debate about teaching, encouraging high-fliers to see it as an attractive career choice. It turned George Bernard Shaw's dictum on its head, by declaring that "those who can, teach".

Teach First is creating, equipping and mobilising a movement of leaders with a life-long commitment to raising the achievement and aspiration of children from low socio-economic backgrounds. In the last ten years, Teach First has helped 2,500 top graduates get into the profession.

Ten years from now, there will be over 10,000 Teach First ambassadors, each with a unique insight, expertise and commitment.

Teach First has done much to change perceptions of the teaching profession. This year Teach First was placed fourth in The Times newspaper's list of the Top 100 graduate employers.

It also has a high retention rate, something which is a serious problem in teaching. Over 90% of those who start the Summer Institute on average complete two years of teaching - higher than any other route into teaching in the UK.

Sadly, the Government seems more interested in talking down the profession, characterising them as "whingers" or the "enemies of promise".

Instead, they should be focused on how we can attract more quality applicants to the profession, improve the quality of training and on-the-job development, and allowing peer inspection and more collaboration between teachers.

Uxbridge High School is a great example of the success of Teach First. Serving one of the most deprived areas of West London, 31 Teach First teachers have joined Uxbridge since 2003. 17 are still working at the school today; five are in leadership positions. Although several factors were at play, the results have been impressive: In 2003, just 17% of pupils achieved five good GCSEs, including English and Maths. This year the number was 61%.

As well as in England, I believe there is much we can learn in terms of raising standards from countries like Finland and Japan - when it comes to raising the status and quality of both teachers and school leaders.

In Finland, teaching is seen as an elite profession akin to being a surgeon or a lawyer. Only one in ten of every applicant will make it to the classroom. We need to do far more to raise both the quality and status of the profession.

And in Japan, teachers collaborate on lesson planning through a system called jugyou-kenkyuu, which allows professionals to share the best ideas in a process which is scrutinised in public demonstrations of lessons.

As part of Labour's Policy Review, we are examining radical ideas to raise teaching standards across the board. This includes strengthening teacher training and on the job development, but also ensuring we get more quality applicants to the profession.

Teachers make the difference. We all remember a good teacher - mine was the inaptly named Mr Coward - my economics teachers who encouraged me to become the first pupil from Southgate Comprehensive to get into Oxford.

What I want to understand is how we can ensure there are quality teachers across the system who aim high for all their pupils.

Stephen Twigg is a taking part in a Teach First/RSA 'Education Matters' debate this evening on 'Is Education the Answer to Social Mobility? Listen/watch live here.

 

Follow Stephen Twigg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/StephenTwigg

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
For the government, it seems to be to hark back to a nostalgic view of the past. So Michael Gove has come out in favour of a 1950s exam system for secondary schools, and Victorian-era rote learning at...
For the government, it seems to be to hark back to a nostalgic view of the past. So Michael Gove has come out in favour of a 1950s exam system for secondary schools, and Victorian-era rote learning at...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:50 PM on 07/29/2012
This is actually a very difficult and emotive subject, and looking at some of the comments below I am going to have to be careful how I put my points across!

I was educated during the 50s and early 60s, but I am able to look back to that period objectively, and not through rose coloured glasses. I had no issues whatsoever with primary school, they set me up with a good grounding in English language, spelling, grammar, English literature, arithmetic, geography, history, RE, PE. The essential core subjects.

Secondary school and Grammar school (13+) was a completely different matter! Most of the teachers were arrogant bullies and discipline was rigid, but in their defence, most of them had just fought in WWII. The subjects widened to include mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geology, metalwork, woodwork, and Latin!

I realise that not all of the above are relevant in today's digital world! but a sound grounding in the core subjects is an absolute, if students are to go forward! There are some things from the past that can help us move forward in education. We have to do something, as we have failed so many!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:34 PM on 07/12/2012
“What Is the Key Ingredient of a Successful School?” How about the first five years of a child’s life with his/her mother. A person’s education starts at birth, so unfortunately does child care by unrelated people who have no vested interest in the child’s developmental outcome. Stop trading your babies for a flat screen.
10:52 PM on 07/29/2012
You are so right in what you say. There used to be a phrase; Give me the child until aged seven and I will give you the man (woman)!
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
03:42 AM on 07/11/2012
"We all remember a good teacher - mine was the inaptly named Mr Coward - my economics teachers who encouraged me to become the first pupil from Southgate Comprehensive to get into Oxford."

And that sums it all up doesn't it? An education system in the shape of a pyramid where less and less people get more and more education, just like less and less people are getting more and more money.

Typical Labour out-look - we want to be like the toffs! Look! We can manage the economy just like they can! Our kids can go to Oxford just like theirs can!

How about this for an idea - people who don't do that well at school need more education, not less. They are the ones that need the smaller classes and the mentoring. And if you don't provide them with it and help them to be better people, don't be surprised when they burn your shops down and mug you once you've dismissed them as terminally useless.
11:25 PM on 07/10/2012
so why didnt labour change the way teachers are trained and selected to ensure in the years they were in charge they met the standards of teach first. perhaps it was because labour pumped money into these schools via poor and difficult children payments that certain schools could pay more to the teachers retaining them in bthe school. it was in the interests of heads to have children and schools classed as having special needs children as it increased the schools budget. unfortunately that budget was then spent meeting the targets that were set which moved away from core subjects. now we suffer as children have qualifications but have not been taught basic english, maths and science as they were not essential for a school to meet targets. now the emphasis is changing again the head and governors determine the direction and attitude of the school any weak teacher is a symbol of weak management. if they moan they cannot remove them it is because they dont do their jobs properly either.
10:53 PM on 07/10/2012
One of the painful joys of teaching is to make good those few who have an aversion to learning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AllenShone
Hit me with science and facts not anecdotes.
10:07 PM on 07/10/2012
Any adult who wants to take schools back to the past needs to watch this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yintwin
04:47 AM on 07/11/2012
YES! this is great! We have to ask, as the world changes around, WHAT is the objective of schooling? thanks for posting that clip!
06:26 PM on 07/10/2012
I'm afraid you're quite wrong, Twigg.

The simplest, most effective, long lasting and sure way to improve attainment in schools is to provide breakfast and lunch for all students. Research shows that poor nutrition is the single biggest factor adversely affecting cognitive development and performance. If you want to boost schools, don't meddle with peripheral issues like GCSEs/O levels or Academies vs LEA control. These are far less important than you imagine.

Make sure that each student has no sub-clinical deficiencies in iron, iodine, zinc and all vitamins, and THEN you will see a dramatic improvement in schools.
10:40 PM on 07/10/2012
>His, certainly sounds logical. This constant messing about with systems hasn`t been working,
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
05:10 PM on 07/15/2012
Too many children rely on school dinner as their only properly nutritious meal. Plenty of them tell me that they'll have a dinner at maybe 5 or 6pm, usually something with chips or rice, and then go without breakfast (unless it's a packet of crisps) the next morning - so they're effectively starved of nutrients until lunchtime. I see many parents meet their kids in the playground with sweets and crisps - they can't even wait to get home. We have a ban on crisps, so at least now they don't bring them in for playtime, as they used to.

We run a breakfast club and it's effect is twofold - it gets the kids into a good routine (amazing how many arrive late, still half asleep after a late bedtime) and it sets them up nutritionally for the day.

And the battle we have with some parents not to put cr*ppy non nutritious 'food' in their children's packed lunch bags is still going on. It's like they are fighting for the right for their children to have the most unhealthy diet possible. Thankfully those people seem to be a minority, but still...
06:00 PM on 07/10/2012
Key ingredient is a strong head teacher of a school who is not afraid of the NUT union and sacking slacker teachers, which there are many.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
05:12 PM on 07/15/2012
Darn it, I faved this by mistake. I agree with your comment except the last 5 syllables, because there are NOT many - there's a few, like in most professions. P'raps you've been unlucky.
04:57 PM on 07/10/2012
It was Labour that destroyed the UK education system by forcing teachers to teach 'by the book' (The National Curriculum) and burdening them with vast amounts of claptrap paperwork. Those who disrupt classes repeatedly should be dressed in canvas and clogs and placed in remedial institutions until they realise the error of their ways.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AllenShone
Hit me with science and facts not anecdotes.
09:54 PM on 07/10/2012
It was the tories that introduced the NC. It was Labour that then introduced how it should be taught with Ofsted insisting on 3 part lessons. Both parties are failing the system, but Gove has definitley been the worst. Take education out of the political arena entirely.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
05:18 PM on 07/15/2012
Yes, the Tories introduced the national curriculum, and by and large it skilled up a lot of teachers, especially in Science and Maths - a really good thing. And the paperwork at the time of it's introduction in the late 80s was a total nightmare, I remember. It started then and has never got any better, despite a lot of empty rhetoric from politicians of all colours. The problem with politicians is that their lives revolve around the blame culture -everything that goes wrong is always somebody else's fault, and that's what they've been imposing on schools for the last 25 years. Backed up by a lot of members of the public who know very little about it, except their own experience, often dating back decades.
04:07 PM on 07/10/2012
"So Michael Gove has come out in favour of a 1950s exam system for secondary schools, and Victorian-era rote learning at primary school.

Clearly, neither is going to prepare this generation of young people for the pressures of the modern economy."

What a load of scare-mongering claptrap. It is terrifying to see how poorly educated most people in Britain are, particularly those under the age of 30. Most of the latter seem to have few opinions on politics, economics, religion, philosophy, history or the like. Just as damningly, too many of them can't spell or use grammar properly. I know, because I employ them.

If our education system goes back to one where students are examined, at secondary school, on what they actually know, rather than what they can copy out in the current modular system, and where the basics of grammar and spelling are instilled in children in primary school, I for one am a big supporter.

13 years of failed Labour education policy is not a firm footing from which to criticise, Mr Twigg.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
03:32 AM on 07/11/2012
That's a load of old nonsense. Kids are much better educated and far more sophisticated today than 30 years ago. There's a lot of knee jerkery from people who like to think they were educated in a golden age, and it's all just woeful paranoia.

I work with a good number of folk in their twenties, all of whom are diligent, insightful and well informed - far more so than a similar sampling would have been 30 years ago.

Teachers teach as well as they can despite being crushed by the forces of the left and the right looking to prove how brilliant they are at running education by changing the goal-posts and finding new ways to measure the score every change of education minister.

Let teachers teach, take politics out of education, and empower teachers to exclude disruptive and dysfunctional children, and you'd be making progress. Stop subsidising private schooling and force more of the rich to send their kids to public schools - they'll soon want them to improve after that!

The class system is perpetuated by the public school system. It's a disgrace - a waste of the nation's talent.
lastpost
see biography
02:21 PM on 07/10/2012
“What Is the Key Ingredient of a Successful School?”
A successful strategy? Let those that can teach, teach. Let those that can’t teach, dictate how to teach to teachers.

“neither is going to prepare this generation”
for a return of the workhouse?

“setting up academies”
appears to have sucessfully kicked the can of cost down the road. Now it’s the size of a gasometer.

“a serious problem in teaching”
is the one way mirror of information. Where is the means to verify the provenance of what is being proffered? Or do those in authority not want the population trained in the art of enquiry?

“we can learn in terms of raising standards from ”
every aspect of this process and from every other nation. Even if that’s just what not to do.

“What I want to understand is how we can ensure there are quality teachers across the system who aim high for all their pupils.”
Well, if all those involved (educators and those to be educated) regularly debated the issues amongst themselves. They might come to a consensus, concerning what it is they are actually attempting. Thereafter, they could function as a team.
12:41 PM on 07/10/2012
Being a teacher myself, I think education concerns not only teachers but parents and pupils. In Finland, as you say teachers are highly considered by society because for their society education is really important. But there are other socities (Spanish one) where education and specially teachers are really despised by not only society but also by politicians and where education is not really important. And in Spain, every time there is a new government, there is a new education law.
Anyway, thanks for having this view on how teachers can make a difference and not blaming them for everything that goes wrong on education.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
12:36 PM on 07/10/2012
The Cane! "It nevva did me any 'arm..."

SCARE the little so-and-so's into learning!

Then get rid of the commie teachers and bring in the army!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
12:30 PM on 07/10/2012
You are putting teachers on a pedastel.
Teachers are no longer just teachers, they have to be surrogate parents, social workers, counsellors, confidantes and much more, which ALL impact on the time they need to actually TEACH our children.
Look at why children are dirty, insolent, hungry, selfish, unwilling to learn, unable to tie shoelaces even and ask what could we have done better in our 13 years of MAJORITY GOVERNMENT.
Politicians have created and moulded the society we now live in and their culpability needs to be recognised.
I await your response...... but will NOT be holding my breath!
11:43 AM on 07/10/2012
Not needing to address mass non-compliance is the key to success.
So, Stephen, how are Teach First changing schools where the kids are non-compliant?

Gove wants to move these schools back to systems of subordination.
I would move them forward ro systems of consent.

What do you want?