Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stuart Bonar

GET UPDATES FROM Stuart Bonar
 

Have the Voters Started Listening to the Lib Dems?

Posted: 20/09/11 01:00

Coming to Liberal Democrat conference has changed over the years. It used to be the case that you were ignored. You'd spend your days earnestly debating policy motions and amendments then read precisely zilch about it in the next day's papers.

Then came the Coalition, and suddenly we got lots of attention. Sadly, as at March's spring conference in Sheffield, the attention took the form of an angry mob yelling at us through megaphones on the other side of a ring of steel.

Being here at this year's autumn conference, there is a definite sense that the white heat of anger seems to have gone. Well, that is if the experience of the first few days are repeated over the remaining few days anyway. A fenced-off, pre-prepared protest area next to the conference venue stood sadly vacant on Monday, and on Sunday was home to just an inflatable white elephant - something to do with High Speed Rail, I think.

And far from being ignored, what is being said in the conference hall is making it onto the front pages of our national newspapers. Monday's Guardian, for example, leads on Vince Cable's work to tackle excessive pay for corporate fat cats.

It is not just the lack of people yelling at us that leads me to believe that the anti-Lib Dem fury of last year is dissipating. There is proper evidence too. I sat in on a meeting on the conference fringe, hosted by the Times and Populus, the opinion pollsters, and the numbers they have show a clear upward tick in popular sentiment towards the Lib Dems. Yes, the numbers are all worse than before the election, but they have started an upward advance.

This backs up a poll this month in my home region of the South West, which showed party support up for the second month, to stand at 22%.

The chatter around conference is that the reason for this is that the impact Liberal Democrats are having in government is becoming more explicit. No longer are we called upon, as party activists, to promote a kind of Conservative/Lib Dem policy blancmange, where voters have no real idea what bit of a policy comes from the Lib Dems and what bit from the Tories. The sting of May's election results made us rethink that strategy.

From here on in the Lib Dem input will get ever clearer, and that's good. At the next election the two parties will fight as two separate, independent parties. In many constituencies, the two parties will go head-to-head, with Labour nowhere in sight. So, it's right that when that time comes - in 2015 - the electorate is able to decide on the separate records of the two parties, and be able to tell what five more years or either of them will likely mean to them and their families.

Indeed, we're even turning some of our attention to the next election. Danny Alexander, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, spoke about his ambition to see the tax-free allowance working people get lifted beyond £10,000 - which is the number one Lib Dem achievement from being in government. He wants to see it lifted to around £12,500, which would mean someone working full-time on the National Minimum Wage would pay no income tax at all. I am tempted to claim credit that I suggested something like this quite recently, but modesty forbids it.

Lib Dems are proud that our conference stills makes decisions, that it still decides on policy. Any local Lib Dem group can table a motion, or indeed an amendment to a motion. An example of this comes from my own experience, from this week. I spoke at conference for the first time on Sunday, moving an amendment tabled by my local party (Plymouth). It amended a motion on schools funding and sought to ensure that more money would be set aside to help the children of our servicemen and women. These children often suffer anxiety and stress, especially if their mother or father is posted overseas to a warzone like Afghanistan. Extra money will enable children to receive the support they need to get through it. I was very proud to have made that change to our national party policy.

I do hope that the angry mob protest of spring's conference was just a flash in the pan as it's on policies like the one I helped bring in on Sunday that voters should begin to judge us once again.

 

Follow Stuart Bonar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/stuartbonar

Coming to Liberal Democrat conference has changed over the years. It used to be the case that you were ignored. You'd spend your days earnestly debating policy motions and amendments then read precise...
Coming to Liberal Democrat conference has changed over the years. It used to be the case that you were ignored. You'd spend your days earnestly debating policy motions and amendments then read precise...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:28 on 21/09/2011
Although Nick Clegg has reneged on some of his election promises, I still think he's a pretty decent guy as far as politicians go. He's had some tough decisions to make, which have obviously upset a lot of his own party but at the same time, the Tories (although they did not win a majority) still received a greater share of the vote. The Lib Dem's should not forget that.

Also, we don't want political stalemate like we are seeing in the US at the moment - it's only adding to their problems. Our country needs strong leadership and policies in these difficult times, whether you like them or not.

The Lib Dems are idealists. I agree with some of their basic ideas in principle.

If we lived in an ideal world I would vote for them. Sadly, the reality of this world is far from idealistic.

Consequently I will not be voting for them anytime soon.
lastpost
see biography
15:18 on 20/09/2011
"an angry mob"
or the people. As they are known to some.

"something to do with High Speed Rail, I think."
But to be honest, I couldn’t be bothered finding out.

"From here on in the Lib Dem input will get ever clearer."
Why not legalize the sale of honors. Goodness knows the country needs the money.

"his ambition to see the tax-free allowance working people get lifted beyond £10,000"
Did he mention anything about a sponsorship deal with Dreams?

"I do hope that the angry mob protest of spring's conference was just a flash in the pan"
and that they in future confine their demonstrations of displeasure, to simply not turning out to vote.
As that selfless act allows us to more easily enact polices for which no majority mandate exists. Long Live the Republic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
13:03 on 20/09/2011
Listen to them say one thing... watch them do another.
12:50 on 20/09/2011
Aren't the Lib Dems opposed to a referendum on the unelected, bureaucratic E.U? What's Liberal or Democratic about that? Maybe something to do with the fact that Clegg is till on their payroll perhaps?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
11:59 on 20/09/2011
Mayeb the voters have started to listen to the Lib Dems, and to look at their performance in power (albeit shared power) and that is why the Lib Dems look set to lose out significantly at the next election.

As far as I recall the Lib Dems were always a protest vote - you didn't want Tory or Labour to win - but now that they have a real chance of influencing government people are beginning to realise that their idealistic policies just can't stand up to the real world.

Of course I could be wrong - I usually am :-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
08:45 on 20/09/2011
The question should be "Have the Lib Dems started listening to the voters?". Judging by Clegg on radio 5 this morning the answer is no.
Just cause they aren't screaming in your face doesn't mean the angers gone.

And well done on your local area. Shame the national polls show you about 11% so I wouldnt break out the bubbly yet.
Especially as a poll reported at the weekend showed the Lib Dems would be virtually wiped out if an election happened now.