In the fetid atmosphere of factory farms, animals are crammed together in such close confinement they have barely room to move. Poultry spend their entire growth cycles on beds of excrement. Pigs, cattle and calves are reared on slatted floors. Their faeces fall beneath them into manure pits. Ammonia fumes permeate the atmosphere and burn the animals' respiratory tracts and weaken immune systems. With injuries and sores from pecking, biting or kicking, and suffering indigestion from unnatural, fast fattening diets, the ability of intensively reared animals to fight infection becomes ever more diminished.
In such a contaminated environment the prospect of disease is an ever-present, all-pervading threat. Only the heavy use of antibiotics keeps animals alive. It is estimated that about 70% of the world's antibiotics are fed to farm animals: the precise amount used in agriculture is poorly recorded. But what seems sure - as the number of intensively farmed animals grows - is that their use increases too, particularly in the most intensive sectors: poultry and pigs. Even in countries where the routine feeding of antibiotics is banned (as in the EU) spot checks show considerable misuse.
If we are concerned about the over-use of antibiotics in human medicine then alarm bells should sound louder still when it comes to their use in intensive farming.
In factory farms infections spread fast. Avipoxvirus, fowl cholera and Newcastle Disease are just a few that kill poultry very quickly. But some - like the undefinable disease outbreak in chickens in Burundi in 2008 - are unrecognisable and untreatable. But it is the potential impact on human health - when a virus crosses the species barrier - that causes the greatest concern: Mad Cow Disease linked to Creutzfeld-Jacob disease in humans in 1996; the bird flu that passed from chickens to humans in Hong Kong in1997; the 2009 swine flu pandemic (believed to have originated from a 950,000 pig unit in Mexico) that killed 12,200 people. In the last hundred years the only outbreak that has reached catastrophic proportions on a global scale is the 1918 -1919 'Spanish Flu' pandemic. Linked to avian and swine flu it affected 20% - 40% of the world's population and 50 million people died. In comparison subsequent flare-ups have been relatively minor.
But where diseases run rife, viruses and bacteria thrive too, and as they do they can form into resistant strains. The changing classification of the swine flu viruses reflect the pace of mutation: H5N1, H1N1, H1N2, H2N3, H3N2v. The original H5N1 is extremely deadly but does not spread fast. H1N1 is less deadly but very contagious. If the two were to link together a pandemic would be in the making. According to the Worldwatch Institute approximately 75 percent of the new diseases that affected humans between 1999 and 2009 originated in animals or animal products. Yet we remain complacent.
In intensive farming units biosecurity is crucial to disease prevention: managing the risk of infection with disinfectants; protective clothing; vaccines to combat viruses (delivered in drinking water or sprayed into the air); and antibiotics to fight harmful bacteria. Antibiotics are fed to livestock on a routine basis but if disease breaks out that dose is upped further still. If all preventative measures fail the last-ditch remedy is to 'cull' the entire 'crop' of animals.
65 billion animals are reared world-wide every year, a number that is predicted to reach 120 billion by 2050. As production increases so does the number of hitherto unknown infectious diseases. In Asia, according to the International Livestock Research Institute, a new disease emerges every four months: the main causes are the increase in intensive livestock production and poor biosecurity. Animals - dead or alive - are obvious vectors. But manure, transporters, slaughterhouses, slaughterhouse waste, wild animals and employees are also potential carriers of infection.
Farm animal welfare activists argue that factory farming causes cruelty on a massive scale. But it makes no difference. The mass production of farm animals intensifies unremittingly, supported by consumers who buy its products. Yet as the bulk use of antibiotics encourages resistant bacteria to thrive, intensive farming practices become ever more deadly. Outbreaks of new strains of disease seem a certainty. The prospect of a pandemic that reaches global proportions seems more a question of when rather than if. And then the eruption of disease of global proportions will surely do what the animal welfare activists cannot: put an end to factory farming.
Follow Sue Cross on Twitter: www.twitter.com/notafactoryfarm
Sandi Mann: Why Are We All So Angry These Days?
Antibiotic awareness - The NHS in England - NHS Choices
Antibiotics | Health | Patient.co.uk
BBC News - Antibiotics resistance 'as big a risk as terrorism ...
Tackling infections | Department of Health
'Catastrophic Threat': UK Government Calls Antibiotic Resistance A 'Ticking ...
How to avoid the antibiotic apocalypse? Look down at the ground
Antibiotic resistance a 'catastrophic threat,' UK medical chief says
Antibiotics resistance a 'catastrophic' global threat, UK warns
Popular antibiotic Zithromax may cause heart rhythm problems, warns US drug ...
Nor is it possible to escape the fact that treating animals as units of production is inconsistent with acting in their best interests. Husbandry on local farms still entails routine mutilation such as branding and castration without anaesthetic, denying animals the expression of their natural social and familial behaviours, and sending them to a violent death.
Sources of further information abound but I highly recommend Dr. Richard Oppenlander: Why Eating Local, Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Won’t Work www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fws0f9s4Bas.
Returning to the health issue, local, organic and 'high welfare' farmers use antibiotics too (not to do so would breach the most basic animal welfare regulations) – but even putting aside their contribution to the enormous issue of antibiotic resistance, eating the flesh and secretions of animals is simply not a good choice for your health: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/15/barbara-ellen-meat-eaters-stupid
Not to take away from the main thrust of the article, but Mad Cow, like Creutzfeld-Jacob, is not caused by a virus. It is caused by a prion, which is a mis-folded protein. There is no vaccine or medicine for this, but it "lives" (and I use the term loosely, since this is a simpler organic form than a virus) in the central nerve tissue of the animal - brain and spine. Cows get it from feed that contains these parts from other animals (like sheep and other cows that are infected [but obviously before said animal was showing symptoms]).
Creutzfeld-Jacob disease was discovered in New Zealand among the (formerly) cannibal tribes there, where the linkage to brain and central nervous tissue was made, these being considered "high prestige" parts of the victim.
Yes, you pay more but you once you've established a connection with your local farmer, you know where your beef comes from (usually from within his/her, herd), that the animals live a pretty luxurious life of fresh water, pasture lands, shelter and then quietly and quickly dispatched after about 18-24 months of Riley life living.
We do not force them into a trailer to be hauled to the processor which pumps adrenalin (foul tasting) through their system, they are fed some tasty alfalfa hay and as they happily munch away, the processor dispatches with one shot, no twitching, no thrashing, just drops like a rock. The mobile processor then takes the carcasses back to their plant etc.,
Because its cold here, these guys have plenty of ultra fine marbling in the meat, which is what helps make it tender. They are not crowded together in yards or pens, gaining heat from one another to stay warmer, they pack it on naturally =)
Vegetarianism or going vegan are not practical, since many will not even consider this and it may not be healthy or sustainable for a great majority. The big problem may be that it is next to impossible to feed so many people in a centralized model. If everyone went vegetarian the consumption of vegetables may be hard pressed to keep up so grains and legumes would most likely become the staples of the diet. I'm sure that has multiple challenges as well and large scale mono crop farming is not exactly good for the environment either.
There isn't an easy answer but something has to be done sooner than later!
http://paleonouveau.com
DEFRA is ultimatley responsible here in the UK and I think they have let things go too far. Only they have they have the power to reduce stocking density's.
Ideally factory farming would cease to exist but then we would have a shortage of meat and poultry becasue the natural time to rear animals is massive compared to factory farming. The cost of meat and poultry would go sky high too.
Reducing stocking densitiy's would increase prices but it would slightly improve animal welfare.