Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sue Cross

GET UPDATES FROM Sue Cross
 

Will Antibiotic Resistance Put an End to Factory Farming? A Case for the Vegan Option Continued

Posted: 15/03/2013 23:00

In the fetid atmosphere of factory farms, animals are crammed together in such close confinement they have barely room to move. Poultry spend their entire growth cycles on beds of excrement. Pigs, cattle and calves are reared on slatted floors. Their faeces fall beneath them into manure pits. Ammonia fumes permeate the atmosphere and burn the animals' respiratory tracts and weaken immune systems. With injuries and sores from pecking, biting or kicking, and suffering indigestion from unnatural, fast fattening diets, the ability of intensively reared animals to fight infection becomes ever more diminished.

In such a contaminated environment the prospect of disease is an ever-present, all-pervading threat. Only the heavy use of antibiotics keeps animals alive. It is estimated that about 70% of the world's antibiotics are fed to farm animals: the precise amount used in agriculture is poorly recorded. But what seems sure - as the number of intensively farmed animals grows - is that their use increases too, particularly in the most intensive sectors: poultry and pigs. Even in countries where the routine feeding of antibiotics is banned (as in the EU) spot checks show considerable misuse.

If we are concerned about the over-use of antibiotics in human medicine then alarm bells should sound louder still when it comes to their use in intensive farming.

In factory farms infections spread fast. Avipoxvirus, fowl cholera and Newcastle Disease are just a few that kill poultry very quickly. But some - like the undefinable disease outbreak in chickens in Burundi in 2008 - are unrecognisable and untreatable. But it is the potential impact on human health - when a virus crosses the species barrier - that causes the greatest concern: Mad Cow Disease linked to Creutzfeld-Jacob disease in humans in 1996; the bird flu that passed from chickens to humans in Hong Kong in1997; the 2009 swine flu pandemic (believed to have originated from a 950,000 pig unit in Mexico) that killed 12,200 people. In the last hundred years the only outbreak that has reached catastrophic proportions on a global scale is the 1918 -1919 'Spanish Flu' pandemic. Linked to avian and swine flu it affected 20% - 40% of the world's population and 50 million people died. In comparison subsequent flare-ups have been relatively minor.

But where diseases run rife, viruses and bacteria thrive too, and as they do they can form into resistant strains. The changing classification of the swine flu viruses reflect the pace of mutation: H5N1, H1N1, H1N2, H2N3, H3N2v. The original H5N1 is extremely deadly but does not spread fast. H1N1 is less deadly but very contagious. If the two were to link together a pandemic would be in the making. According to the Worldwatch Institute approximately 75 percent of the new diseases that affected humans between 1999 and 2009 originated in animals or animal products. Yet we remain complacent.

In intensive farming units biosecurity is crucial to disease prevention: managing the risk of infection with disinfectants; protective clothing; vaccines to combat viruses (delivered in drinking water or sprayed into the air); and antibiotics to fight harmful bacteria. Antibiotics are fed to livestock on a routine basis but if disease breaks out that dose is upped further still. If all preventative measures fail the last-ditch remedy is to 'cull' the entire 'crop' of animals.

65 billion animals are reared world-wide every year, a number that is predicted to reach 120 billion by 2050. As production increases so does the number of hitherto unknown infectious diseases. In Asia, according to the International Livestock Research Institute, a new disease emerges every four months: the main causes are the increase in intensive livestock production and poor biosecurity. Animals - dead or alive - are obvious vectors. But manure, transporters, slaughterhouses, slaughterhouse waste, wild animals and employees are also potential carriers of infection.

Farm animal welfare activists argue that factory farming causes cruelty on a massive scale. But it makes no difference. The mass production of farm animals intensifies unremittingly, supported by consumers who buy its products. Yet as the bulk use of antibiotics encourages resistant bacteria to thrive, intensive farming practices become ever more deadly. Outbreaks of new strains of disease seem a certainty. The prospect of a pandemic that reaches global proportions seems more a question of when rather than if. And then the eruption of disease of global proportions will surely do what the animal welfare activists cannot: put an end to factory farming.

 

Follow Sue Cross on Twitter: www.twitter.com/notafactoryfarm

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
In the fetid atmosphere of factory farms, animals are crammed together in such close confinement they have barely room to move. Poultry spend their entire growth cycles on beds of excrement. Pigs, ca...
In the fetid atmosphere of factory farms, animals are crammed together in such close confinement they have barely room to move. Poultry spend their entire growth cycles on beds of excrement. Pigs, ca...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Reith
what's a micro-bio?
15:47 on 17/03/2013
It's an alarming prospect, particularly as animals offer only a fraction of the nutrition given by other foods by weight. I sometimes wonder what kind of living we'll suffer by 2050, assuming there is a 2050 what with exponentially increasing population; crop production unpredicatable thanks to climate change, oxygen levels threatened as we hack down our forests. We mess with the ecology, force it to readjust but the ecolocy doesn't give a monkey's for human antics, it will simply rebalance without sentience for our needs. There's a case for suggesting that humanity is the planet's cancer. One wonders how long it will be before Nature decides to weed Her garden; before some mutant arises under the conditions you describe that puts us in real trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abrisk01
I just tell it like it is
14:00 on 17/03/2013
oh for god's sake not all farms are big company farms, my grandfather was a farmer who grew corn and raised cows while being a diesel mechanic. They had a damn good life and farmers like him and the Amish farmers do not treat their animals like that. A few big farms may but get off your high yes HIGH horse. what are put on the corn crops the strawberry fields and soy beans crops to name a few pesticide to keep the bugs out, maybe you should also boycott veggies because you are killing live BUGS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
11:14 on 17/03/2013
People right now should be learning how to be self sufficient, learn to grow your own food or buy it from someone who already does. Learn how to can your veggies, meats and other stuff. Learn how to barter for these things, by the looks of the way Washington is running things we are all gonna have to learn to do these things eventually anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
21:11 on 16/03/2013
The answer to factory farming doesn't have to be veganism. We haven't bought any meat, poultry, or dairy from the grocery store in over 5 years. We're lucky enough to have made contacts with local farmers committed to clean husbandry and buy straight from them. We get our produce through a local CSA. Do a little research on the subject and you'll find lots more of what the post talks about and worse. Factory farmed food is poison.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FSMbaby
Life is good!
13:59 on 17/03/2013
Agreed!
21:47 on 17/03/2013
It's a pity that ethically-minded people are under the illusion that local meat, eggs and dairy are either sustainable or humane. Whether sourced from a local farm or not (including free range or organic farms), there is no avoiding the vast amounts of land, fuel and water required in order to bring animal products to your plate. In fact, extensive operations use more land and grass-fed ruminants emit more methane.

Nor is it possible to escape the fact that treating animals as units of production is inconsistent with acting in their best interests. Husbandry on local farms still entails routine mutilation such as branding and castration without anaesthetic, denying animals the expression of their natural social and familial behaviours, and sending them to a violent death.

Sources of further information abound but I highly recommend Dr. Richard Oppenlander: Why Eating Local, Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Won’t Work www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fws0f9s4Bas.

Returning to the health issue, local, organic and 'high welfare' farmers use antibiotics too (not to do so would breach the most basic animal welfare regulations) – but even putting aside their contribution to the enormous issue of antibiotic resistance, eating the flesh and secretions of animals is simply not a good choice for your health: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/15/barbara-ellen-meat-eaters-stupid
21:00 on 16/03/2013
It's pervasive, because Congress is paid to look the other way, period!
02:41 on 17/03/2013
It's pervasive because the rich invest in industrial farms, control the wholesale markets and put the small farmers at a disadvantage or out of business and consumers have little choice but to buy the product or pay higher prices from local small farm operations. Keep congress and the feds out of the picture and keep monopolists from orchestrating their fraud on the people and industrial farms will go the way of the dinosaur. Keep people like Corzine from stealing hard working farmers money and they will thrive. "I don't know where the money went" ? I don't know that much about farming but I do know that when the federal government started subsidizing farmers that's when they started flooding to the cities to find work in factories. Most of the farmers I've known personally had to work a full time job along with farming their 40 to 80 acres in order to keep their land. Without a full time job they'd have to sell the land to pay the taxes.
20:41 on 16/03/2013
"Mad Cow Disease linked to Creutzfeld-Jacob disease in humans in 1996"

Not to take away from the main thrust of the article, but Mad Cow, like Creutzfeld-Jacob, is not caused by a virus. It is caused by a prion, which is a mis-folded protein. There is no vaccine or medicine for this, but it "lives" (and I use the term loosely, since this is a simpler organic form than a virus) in the central nerve tissue of the animal - brain and spine. Cows get it from feed that contains these parts from other animals (like sheep and other cows that are infected [but obviously before said animal was showing symptoms]).

Creutzfeld-Jacob disease was discovered in New Zealand among the (formerly) cannibal tribes there, where the linkage to brain and central nervous tissue was made, these being considered "high prestige" parts of the victim.
02:44 on 17/03/2013
I guess they should have cooked the brains of their victims thoroughly before ingestion.
04:12 on 17/03/2013
To destroy the prion through cooking you have to cook it until all the proteins have been destroyed - that's so well done it's beyond shoe leather and any nutritional value by that time has been lost.
photo
Scholastica8
RINOS & Bull-Mooses UNITE! People Matter!
17:20 on 16/03/2013
There is one problem with a vegan diet that never gets mentioned.... and it's something that doesn't get mentioned with the US diet in general. Since Pasturization for food safety, we no longer get the dietary collagen necessary to maintain elasticity in tendons, blood vessels, etc. There's a theory that collagen deficiency is more of a problem than cholesterol. Collagen is an animal protein, which all animals manufacture in their bodies, including humans, Some, genetically, do a better job for longer, but as we age, our production decreases (it's why we wrinkle) . We supplement our own production with dietary collagen, mostly from all the ugly parts of animals (the by-products: tendons, cartiledge, blood vessels, eyeballs, marrow, etc) that once went into an ever-present stock pot kept simmering on the hearth or the fish stew favored in Asia. Before tea and coffee, this was our morning drink. It was the basis of stews and soups. But, collagen does not survive high heat of Pasturization... and we've virtually eliminated it from our diets in our drive for lean protein and plant based diets. If the blood vessels lose elasticity and become brittle, cholesterol repairs the cracks. Because the blood vessels remain stiff, rather than breaking away due to normal contraction and expansion of the vessels, the cholesterol patch continues to harden and build into plaque. How much dietary collagen one needs depends on the genetics of one's own body.
03:04 on 17/03/2013
I'm not an expert on pasteurization but the basic principle is to bring the product to a boil (approx. 212 degrees Fahrenheit) which kills all the bacteria. In essence the stock pot you speak of in times past was initially brought to a boil and then simmered for long periods of time. Although for sterilization purposes products are brought to a boil, most bacteria and viruses cannot survive above 150 degrees Fahrenheit. A product simmering on the stove would generally stay at or above 150 degrees or at least reach that temperature at some point (especially on the old wood or coal fired cook stoves). In essence, what you are saying is that collagen will break down at 212 degrees or above but will not break down at 150 degrees. I'm interested in finding the truth on all subjects and this is an interesting concept to me. What becomes of the collagen at high temperatures? Does it turn into a useless piece of carbon? Why is it not destroyed at 150 degrees?
photo
Scholastica8
RINOS & Bull-Mooses UNITE! People Matter!
04:44 on 17/03/2013
Apparently, Pasturization brings it too high for too long... and as I understand it the protein strands are altered.. When you do bone broth or chicken stock, you take the "ugly" bits, bones, even chicken feet, etc. Bring the water to a boil, but then drop it down to a very long, slow, low simmer. Chicken for 12 hrs.... bone broth for as much as 24 hrs.... in a crock pot the setting is between 1 and 2. All of the cartilage disolves, the joint heads get long channels in them. It's interesting to see what happens over that duration. There's a website that includes information if you look up "bone broth". However, where I 1st learned about it was from a nutrionist who was also a doctor of Chinese medicine. I was having a lot of tendon troubles in my knees and I happened have my dog in the same dog class. We got to talking about it. It was her theory that diminished collagen was more the issue in vascular problems rather than cholesterol. If the veins were expanding and contracting correctly, cholesterol wouldn't matter that much. Increased blockages in young people was 1st noted during the Vietnam War, the 1st generation to have lived their whole lives with most everything Pasturized. She was trying to get funding for a study of some sort. The 2 types of cooking that still tend to rely most on the homemade, slowly simmered stocks are: the Mediterranean diet... and the "poor" people's diets in Asia which have a
15:19 on 16/03/2013
More reason to support your local farmers who humanely raise, without chemicals, without GMO grains, pasture and grass raised livestock who are then humanely processed.

Yes, you pay more but you once you've established a connection with your local farmer, you know where your beef comes from (usually from within his/her, herd), that the animals live a pretty luxurious life of fresh water, pasture lands, shelter and then quietly and quickly dispatched after about 18-24 months of Riley life living.
03:10 on 17/03/2013
A lot of vegans are probably not happy with your comment but ..... I like your style. Dispatched? Cute. I think it's more like 10 to 15 months of pasture and then a month of penning with a grain enriched diet before "dispatch". But I guess it all depends on the stature of the beast and personal judgment. I think at 24 months the meat would begin to be a little tough, especially if it's only grass fed.
15:51 on 17/03/2013
King72, we raise our own, very, very small scale (2) and our cattle graze native grass pasures (60 acres) until they are 2 which helps develop flavor, NOT toughness. Ours are not chased or run (which does help toughen meat), they have quite a leisurely life, get apples from our trees, fresh water, shelter and lots of friendship from the two Highlander cows, goats, turkeys etc,.

We do not force them into a trailer to be hauled to the processor which pumps adrenalin (foul tasting) through their system, they are fed some tasty alfalfa hay and as they happily munch away, the processor dispatches with one shot, no twitching, no thrashing, just drops like a rock. The mobile processor then takes the carcasses back to their plant etc.,

Because its cold here, these guys have plenty of ultra fine marbling in the meat, which is what helps make it tender. They are not crowded together in yards or pens, gaining heat from one another to stay warmer, they pack it on naturally =)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cetude
14:36 on 16/03/2013
Don't count on it. About half the meat sold in USA are infected with MRSA highly contagious just by handling it. You think Americans care? NO! People eat anything that moves. Soon dogs and cats will be on the menu and people will smack their lips and would care less. Humans are disgusting.
photo
Scholastica8
RINOS & Bull-Mooses UNITE! People Matter!
17:00 on 16/03/2013
Guess what? Since you were writing that, I suspect you are human, too.
03:35 on 17/03/2013
MRSA is no more contagious than the original strain of Staphylococcus aureus, it is just harder to treat. And if truth be told, it's more likely to contract a staph infection at a hospital than by handling/eating meat. It's only contagious if the handler or someone coming in contact with the handler has an open wound or abrasion. Staph bacteria only needs a place of entry and that place of entry determines the type and severity of the infection. Impetigo is the most common form of staph infection and is rarely serious unless it is MRSA. Although it is contagious it generally needs an open wound or abrasion of the skin to enter. As a more threatening disorder it causes blood poisoning, usually through a puncture wound, and proceeds through the system (usually seen as a red line going up the appendage) and if not checked can cause death. The most severe form is "flesh eating disease", a very aggressive form that affects both the skin and penetrates throughout the system usually resulting in death. You're right though, humans are disgusting and as a meat eater I'll be the first one to admit it. But then, without animal skins to wear our ancestors wouldn't have been able to survive the last ice age and we wouldn't be here in a discourse on whether to be vegan or not. Kudos to our ancestors and Kudos to choice.
13:44 on 16/03/2013
Here's a more sensible suggestion to stop the developmnet of resistant bacteria: stop demanding antibiotics from your physician for every sniffle and cough.
03:52 on 17/03/2013
That is very true but the fact of the matter is, the antibiotics given to animals not only give the bacteria in the farm environment a chance to form resistance to it but eating animals treated with antibiotics also transfers those antibiotics to the person eating it. Eventually everyone eating it has low doses of antibiotics in their system almost continually and when a bacteria enters the body it gives it a chance to become resistant to it. The pervasive use of antibiotics in animals has a direct effect on humans and bacteria. In the old days before penicillin animal husbandry consisted of small farms with limited room for large herds of livestock and oversight of the herd was tantamount to the livelihood of the farmer. If an animal had an infection it had to run it's course and if it died it was the farmers loss but no other animals or humans were affected by it. Now herds of animals and most humans are affected by it for the fact that something that can only be seen under a microscope has found a way to kill all of it's hosts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
11:26 on 17/03/2013
I haven't had antibiotics for three years already and this year, just about 2 weeks ago i got the flu and have so far survived it without getting the vaccine shot. I hate antibiotics and the overuse of them.
13:25 on 16/03/2013
I gave up meat many years ago and have never felt better. I never get sick and my skin cleared up, I lost 10 lbs and all my blood tests turned up normal. I figure there are so many vegan food options out there, why not go with the healthiest options. It took a little effort but I got there. Most veggies that are contaminated are done with e-coli through some meat source and who wants to consume food laden with antibiotics, dioxin, hormones, steroids and God knows what else. I am also helping out the planet as meat production is one of the foremost causes of environmental pollution. I started with a wonderful site called Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, PCRM. It starts one out with babysteps and has many easy recipes, and health blogs.
cbrown4115
"The mind that is not baffled is not employed." We
19:06 on 16/03/2013
I'm with you on not eating meat... One of the big reasons that I gave it up was due to the use of antibiotics. I thought that I was doing okay... until I heard a story on NPR in the past week or so. This story pointed out that the manure used to fertilize crops comes from antibiotic treated animals... So, it's not only e-coli and other nasties that we need to be concerned about on our vegetables... it's the antibiotics that are in the manure that end up in the vegetables. I mean really... I don't mind going the organic route but I don't know if organic means that the manure comes from non-treated animals. Do you know? It would be great if someone reading this who really knows would respond...
04:02 on 17/03/2013
As far as I can tell antibiotics are not absorbed by plants through the ground. Most antibiotics are made from mold and would not be absorbed systemically through the plants. If animals are treated with antibiotics the manure more than likely doesn't have much of a trace in it. Even if the manure has trace amounts and is put on vegetable gardens (most manure is spread on corn fields and other crops that in turn are re-fed to animals) the washing of the vegetables would suffice to remove most of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
11:30 on 17/03/2013
I would suggest looking to youtube videos for answers on organic veggies and fruits. there are alot of videos that talk about that sort of thing. You would be surprised at what you could find on youtube.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
11:27 on 17/03/2013
Love that website good choice. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paleo Nouveau
"It's not really about Paleo!"
13:20 on 16/03/2013
CAFO are probably unsustainable. They are cruel, inhumane and polluting the environment. There needs to be a better model designed. It may cause meat prices to increase. Fast food and processed food prices certainly will. Not a bad thing in my opinion.

Vegetarianism or going vegan are not practical, since many will not even consider this and it may not be healthy or sustainable for a great majority. The big problem may be that it is next to impossible to feed so many people in a centralized model. If everyone went vegetarian the consumption of vegetables may be hard pressed to keep up so grains and legumes would most likely become the staples of the diet. I'm sure that has multiple challenges as well and large scale mono crop farming is not exactly good for the environment either.

There isn't an easy answer but something has to be done sooner than later!

http://paleonouveau.com
04:20 on 17/03/2013
I agree with all you've said. The only solution is population control. The world population needs to be not just arrested but reduced. People aren't now and never have been in favor of anyone telling them how many children they can have. So the bottom line is if governments can't control their population levels it will spiral out of control. China has had a model of only allowing each family one child for a very long time, yet it's population has still increased due to the fact that people don't follow the policy. Forced abortions have only curbed the population increase slightly. Governments like in the U.S. have an even harder job ahead of them because they have to feign protection of human rights, so inevitably if the people cannot be educated to only allow 1 to 2 children per family and the government can't enforce that policy then the people are in for a rude awakening when the old adage "familiarity breeds contempt" leads to all out war for survival, with people fighting over the last few scraps of food left and "survival of the fittest" is the war cry. Hopefully people will come to their senses before then and learn that having only 1 to 2 children per generation will be the only intelligent and sane thing to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
11:32 on 17/03/2013
check out the "venus project" about the sustainabilty of growing food, vegtables, fruits etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluefish123
Democrats= detritus of liars.
12:20 on 16/03/2013
keep your vegan to yourself.............
13:01 on 16/03/2013
There's nothing wrong with educating people about factory farming/veganism so they can make an informed decision. As a vegan that believes in the lifestyle for a whole host of reasons, I see nothing wrong with making this kind of information available. People can do with it what they choose. Many will read this and not care enough or at all, therefore not change their lifestyle, and that's fine, but someone else may read it and consider the idea of rejecting animal products. Articles like this aren't made to force people into veganism, it's just educating them so they can decide for themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jillcvin
13:46 on 16/03/2013
What are you afraid of? The truth?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loulou11
Never steal. The goverment hates competition.
09:20 on 16/03/2013
I agree the treatment of factory farmed animals is not acceptable. Even free range is not what people think.

DEFRA is ultimatley responsible here in the UK and I think they have let things go too far. Only they have they have the power to reduce stocking density's.

Ideally factory farming would cease to exist but then we would have a shortage of meat and poultry becasue the natural time to rear animals is massive compared to factory farming. The cost of meat and poultry would go sky high too.

Reducing stocking densitiy's would increase prices but it would slightly improve animal welfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 on 16/03/2013
Maybe so, but what about all the food-borne illnesses found in vegetables such as E-Coli? And what about all the pesticides used on fields (and they don't know where the "organic" border is). There is no perfect food source. It would be well if they could get everything chemical, not to mention sugar, salt and hormones out of our food. And yes, I love sardines.