Holly McCann writes in proposition of this week's motion:
Britain today cannot be labelled as racist in comparative terms. Admittedly, the progress that has been made in cross-cultural relations since the height of the British Empire should not be belittled, but this does not authorise us to claim that we have eradicated racism in the UK. Although public manifestations of racist attitudes are certainly not well received by the majority, the very presence of racial attacks refutes any suggestion that racism no longer exists in Britain. Furthermore, it is to the awkward majority that we must look in order to recognise our inability to overcome cultural dividing lines.
In 2010, 43,426 recorded hate crimes were said to be racially motivated. This is an increase of over 3,000 from the previous year. Yet simply presenting these figures on a page does not reflect the debilitating implications that racist attacks can have on the victims involved, nor does it accurately portray the severity of remaining pockets of racism within Britain. Take the recent acid-attack on a 29-year-old woman, originally from Cameroon, in Salford less than two months ago. Random and unprovoked crimes such as these demonstrate the undeniable prevalence of racist attitudes in the minds of some Britons. To suggest that this country is no longer racist would be to demean the shocking and painful ordeals that many victims of racial hate crimes endure. Such victims are guilty of nothing, but are targeted purely due to racial and cultural differences.
The term 'racism' can no longer be simply defined as the prejudice of white Britons against ethnic minorities. Britain is unquestionably a multi-cultural country, and the notion of a British identity today encompasses a plethora of different ethnicities, cultures and heritages. Yet it is not until the divisive lines between these groups are overcome that Britain can claim to be a truly integrated nation. While overtly racist attitudes may be held by a minority of Britons, racial segregation at the community level is preventing the total abolition of cultural tensions.
Admittedly, many members of ethnic minorities may feel more secure when living amongst those with whom they have a shared heritage and a common culture, but when such segregation exists, the suggestion that racial tensions have been abolished has no platform to stand on. Until there is total integration, and total equality of opportunity, cross-cultural tensions cannot be eradicated.
Racist attitudes in Britain are certainly less overt, and undoubtedly less tolerated, than earlier. However, it cannot be claimed with confidence that we are no longer living in a racist country, and much of this problem lies with definition. Yes, there are blatant displays of racial discrimination, hate crimes being one example and discrimination in the work place being another, but it is not optimistic to hope that the legal institutions and social conscience of modern Britain would go to great lengths to prevent and punish these. It is the overwhelming imperative to act and speak within the boundaries of what is politically correct that has drawn most attention to the racial differences between members of the same British nation. In our determination to avoid the accusation of racism, and our dithering over what term to use to refer to fellow citizens of different cultural backgrounds, we risk drawing too much attention to cultural dividing lines, and consolidate instead of conquer them.
Freya Berry opposes this week's motion:
Twenty-eight years ago, my mother emigrated from India to England to lead what she believed, guided by countless Enid Blyton books, would be a jolly good time of marshmallows, picnics and strawberry sunshine. Now that I've grown up and read the same dubious-yet-awesome literary matter, I can confirm that she was cheated with respect to the picnics and sunshine (though marshmallows, I believe, are readily available). What never entered Blyton's idyllic worlds, however, was racism. This is partly because there were no émigrés in Blyton's books, beyond the odd 'exotic' - and temporary - character. Yet, despite this I have never, in my glorious 20 years of existence, believed that Britain is a racist country.
I am, thanks to joint Indian and English heritage, slightly brown: approximately 'Eastern Spice' on the Dulux colour chart. I get the odd curry reference from my friends. Aged 10, I was called the P-word while on a camping holiday (where else?), whereupon I was forced to explain that I was in fact of Indian descent to the errant youth, and then what a P-word was to all my friends - I believe I used the term 'Mudblood' as an analogy. Harry Potter never fails to be useful.
There have been many depressing news stories of late about police racism: Stephen Lawrence, ethnic minorities' over-representation in stop-and-search, and so on. I am approximately the size of a hamster and about as threatening, so perhaps understandably I have never experienced racist policing; but I would imagine that a profession given increasingly moronic amounts of power and weaponry by the government will only attract those who most have a gripe against certain sections of society and will abuse their positions to show it.
I am also, naturally, outraged by the stupidity of the BNP and those who believe diversity to be some kind of stranglehold on culture; those who say, defensively, 'but Britain's full!' and then conveniently forget about our many thousands of expats, flopping like landed salmon along the beaches of the 'Costar del Sole'.
But I have never, for a second, felt myself not to be a British citizen; never felt it some kind of triumph of integration to willingly sit in the local chippy, or intimidated by some shallow moron willing to judge on appearances alone. I don't notice, because I have never thought that I have not belonged: it has never occurred to me that, because of the colour of my skin, I would be less able to succeed. It is this blissful ignorance of my colour that, I believe, shows that Britain is not a racist country. The only time when I become aware of my skin? As I sit smugly on the beach in Cornwall, surrounded by holidaymakers frantically dolloping on the sun-cream and fake tan. Because if The Only Way is Essex has proved anything, it's that everyone, really, wants to be a little bit brown.'
Follow The Cambridge Union Society on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cambridgeunion
Carla Buzasi: The Week That Was: Racism Uncovered
Myriam Francois-Cerrah: The Danger in Referring to 'Asian' Sex Gangs
Racism in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Student jailed for racist Fabrice Muamba tweets | UK news | The ...
racism noun - definition in British English Dictionary & Thesaurus ...
Perhaps finding someone with a basic understand of the subject might have been a good idea.
Few years back I jumped on the Stansted express, bought my ticket and the conductor checked it. A few minutes later another conductor approached me to check for my ticket, I told him "the black guy already did". He ranted at me that he was an employee of the company and not a "black guy". Quite honestly I was trying to identify the other person to him without knowing his name and it was the easiest identifying mark.
I didn't really feel like arguing a point because "when in Rome". Really though, are things THAT touchy over there? I can't even call them blacks? Do I have to pretend to not see they have different physical characteristics?
I quite literally couldn't care less for race and found it appalling to be considered a racist simply because I was at ease with the topic.
why are we going backwards????????????
It occurs to me that this government is the most active racist group in the country because of its blatant support of wealthy elitism associated with heritage rather than the majority group titled rank and file.
If he is very young, then as a teacher I would have suspected his comment to be strongly influenced by what he hears at home. I would have said nothing to him at the time, but I would certainly have come to you to ask why he felt the need to refuse such a simple request in such antagonistic terms.
If his teacher actually called him a racist in front of others (which I somehow doubt) then said teacher should be strongly disciplined.
Baroness Warsi, spoke out shortly after, the 5 good living religious males, jailed for their actions, she reported "White Female are Class as Third Class Citizens by a Minority in a so called religion", She now bears the brunt of her actions(the search of her so called perks of the job, would never have been raised otherwise), they must silence her & this was the olny way?.
What about Qatada, he insights hatered & whatever else? but still he hides behind the UK & Human Rights?.
Some people use the race card but when it comes to whites, the CPS say race has nothing to do with it, well then I say, "were is the EQUALITY". The Scales of Justices certinaly need CALIBRATED.
As for the expats moving to 'Costar del Sole' most have retired others purchase villas for the "Sunshine" & a little bit of the "quieter life". How many of these so called exparts have put a strain on the Spanish Social Security? BUT how many immigrant come to the UK & put a strain
"I did write another short paragraph at the end it has been removed, I wonder WHY?"
That is a matter of opinion, you can't state that as a fact.
Millions of us native Britons disagree. Oops!