Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Leunig

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Leunig
 

Is Cameron as Ruthless as Murdoch?

Posted: 10/07/11 19:26 BST

In shutting the News of the World, the Murdochs have shown themselves to be ruthless. Their ruthlessness changed the story, although it has not killed it.

David Cameron needs to be as ruthless. So long as the Murdochs have a powerful media presence, his hiring of Andy Coulson and his closeness to Rebekah Brooks are real issues. The retoxification of the Tory party is underway.

Cameron should announce that he was lied to by Coulson, and that the level of rot can only have happened if people at the top were not managing the paper properly. It was Brooks and the Murdochs' job to know how their reporters got their scoops: whether they actually knew about the phone tapping and corrupt payments to the Police is irrelevant.

Cameron should state his view that they are not fit and proper people to hold any form of media licence, and that he has written to OFCOM accordingly. The bid for BSkyB would be dead. He should also announce that the government will place no advertising in any Murdoch paper from now on, and call on other advertisers to do likewise.

He should then announce an immediate ban on all Murdoch staff from all government press conferences, and state that no government minister will grant interviews, brief or take calls from any part of the Murdoch Press. He should challenge Labour to do likewise. They could hardly refuse.

Murdoch is a global player, and there comes a point when it is simply not worth his staying in Britain. He would be angry, very angry, but today Cameron holds more cards than Murdoch. The Sun is hardly going to back Milliband in revenge. In any case the evidence that the Sun and other papers sways voters is very slim indeed. The Sun would either limp on under Murdoch ownership, fold, or be sold. There is a market for a right-wing red top, and no doubt in some form the market will supply that. Cameron need not worry about his coverage in the medium term.

This strategy would undercut Cameron's opponents, reassert his primacy in the news cycle, win him plaudits from all other papers (including the Mail, which is important in Tory circles), and turn a retoxification event into a detoxification event. Of course it would involve Cameron admitting a mistake in hiring Coulson, but that is already obvious to everyone, and he can blame Coulson for lying to him.

So Mr Cameron, are you as ruthless as Mr Murdoch?

 

Follow Tim Leunig on Twitter: www.twitter.com/timleunig

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:11 AM on 07/11/2011
There's no fool like an old fool. Murdoch is a busted flush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul679
12:19 AM on 07/11/2011
Cameron, ruthless? Are you kidding? He hasn't the guts to be. Look at him during P.M.'s Questions: In denial, squirming, unapologetic; and that was to Ed Milliband, hardly the great inquisitor.

He should have announced (during that session) that he was going to order Public Inquiries asap, plus admissions of his bad judgement, and then he would have looked like a man in control.

As for Milliband, he forced the issue but could have done so well before now, and still looks like a paper tiger. What a bunch of hypocritical wimps we have running this country.
12:46 AM on 07/11/2011
It's pretty bad when Ed Milliband can punk you...just not national leader material.
11:56 PM on 07/10/2011
I am so pleased that Murdoch's bid will be under 'scope. But who will take advantage? Are we allowing a worse contender? Journalists, please analyse.
07:34 PM on 07/10/2011
Music to my ears. Taking such action would likely have knock on effects in other countries. The Murdoch's would be fighting for their corporate lives; in James Murdoch's case he might be fighting for his liberty.
07:24 PM on 07/10/2011
When the film rights to "Street of Shame" come up for auction, will Murdoch be a buyer or a seller?
05:06 PM on 07/11/2011
he has no shame
07:06 PM on 07/10/2011
how about Fox (faux) News in USA? time to get rid of that murdoch monstrosity also.
i believe the Canadians did not allow Murdoch to get his False Press into their media, since they have laws against telling fibs to the public (so i have heard).

murdoch is like a cancer on the democratic system, with his criminal manipulations. time to stamp out this abomination.
12:50 PM on 07/10/2011
i like this article :) but banning all newscorp press is a bit unrealistic.

Camerons looking more like murdochs poodle with each day that passes without calling for Brooks' resignation. Milliband has been quite balls out about it which is nice to see.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
Microbiologists have found my microbio contagious.
07:53 AM on 07/10/2011
Yeah, I DON'T think David Cameron is going to turn against Rupert Murdoch. Zero chance of him doing that. He's a politician, and politicians like to hang out with big shots like Rupert Murdoch and tell them how great they are. If David Cameron did this, Rupert Murdoch would find some way to exact his revenge on the Tories so badly that they come in third in the next election, with Labour and Lib Dems as either first and second or second and first. That would teach right-wingers in the United States and Australia, as well as the U.K., that you don't mess with Rupert Murdoch if you value your political career.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
10:33 PM on 07/10/2011
The whole vision that arises of the various players madly chopping away at their own noses in a vicious tit-for-tat power game is amusing. One can only hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MohammedAbbasi
Co-Director, Association of British Muslims
03:18 AM on 07/10/2011
we will see - more likely all MPs are scared silly of Murdoch! One wonders who the Members of Parliament serve Murdoch or the British people?