Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Beardsworth

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Beardsworth
 

Is It Still Worth Climbing the Greasy Pole of Oxford Politics?

Posted: 17/08/2012 01:00

Aside from yet another tedious round of Oxbridge bashing, the BBC's new series Young, Bright and On the Right fundamentally misunderstands the nature of our Oxbridge-educated political elite.

There indeed used to be a time when climbing up the greasy pole of Oxford politics promised 'glittering prizes' to those fierce and ambitious enough to brave it. William Gladstone famously captivated the debate chamber of the Oxford Union in vociferous opposition to the impending 1832 Great Reform Act. He would go on to become President, before entering Parliament a year after his graduation. Asquith and Heath would similarly come to dominate Westminster via ascendancy of the Oxford Union.

This is plainly the path to power that Chris and Joe, the Tory boys, have in mind. Unfortunately that path, however well worn, is disintegrating.

Glancing at today's 'big beasts' it admittedly doesn't seem so. BoJo, whose flirtations with the Tory crown have almost induced Tory backbenchers to orgasm, was a Union President. And William Hague established himself by achieving the elusive Oxford 'triple': President of the Union, the Conservative Association and First Class Honours in PPE. Command of student politics still sets one up nicely for the big-boy stuff, it seems.

However the trend is moving firmly in the other direction. Consider today's leaders of both Left and Right: Cameron, Osborne and Miliband. All at Oxford, and all wholly withdrawn from the murky world of student politics. The reasons for their detachment vary. Cameron preferred chasing girls and playing tennis, with success in both. Miliband was just a bit square (reportedly his fame as a student rested on being able to solve a Rubik's cube in 30 seconds). Osborne was simply an awful hack. Before entering Parliament he had only contested one prior election, for Magdalen College JCR Entz Rep. He lost.

But they all had one thing in common: connections. These were of differing types and natures, but all made it to the despatch box by utilising them.

Cameron infamously received his first job at the Conservative Research Department following a call of recommendation from Buckingham Palace (who placed the call is pure speculation). Osborne secured a similar job after a tip-off from a friend. And in the Hampstead suburbs in which the Milibands were left-wing aristocracy, Ed had no trouble pursuing the Special Adviser route into politics.

Oxford matters of course, but not in the way Chris and Joe think. The Bullingdon matters. Cultivating the right friendships matters. College alumni can be helpful. Most of all though the attributes of family wealth, a baronetcy and private education all spawn a prodigious network of contacts that far outweighs the social assets accumulated at the dwindling political societies. I know of three people - no doubt there are more - who have got their foot in the door by exploiting contacts. One received an internship at CCHQ through his brother's girlfriend; another spent a fortnight in Downing Street courtesy of her father, a prominent Tory donor and the third shadowed a Cabinet Minister who was a close family acquaintance. None hold any position at OCA or the Union.

Tomorrow's Camerons and Osbornes already have their future figured out, even if the exact details haven't yet fallen into place. They don't need CUCA or OCA for fulfil their aspirations in the acute sense that Chris and Joe feel they do. So they don't bother going. And anyway, a litany of scandals (resulting in OCA being stripped by the University if its 'U') has depleted the kudos that would otherwise come with being OUCA President. Consequently the Oxford Tories I know are a generally unambitious bunch. They enjoy the company of those of similar political persuasion and mutual acquaintance, but are immediately suspicious of attempts to use the Association as a 'platform' from which to launch a political career. Joe, a former President of OCA, is seen by his contemporaries in precisely this light.

So Chris and Joe, do carry on moving in Tory circles, squeezing the flesh of fellow hacks. But don't expect political fortune to come your way. In 21st century Britain the networks of power bypass mere clubs and societies. If you haven't had the good sense to be born of good stock, there's no making up for that by ingratiating yourselves with those who have.

And please, for your sakes, don't go pleading your case on the BBC. It'll be the last time you make it onto a television screen.

 

Follow Tom Beardsworth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TBeardsworth

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
Aside from yet another tedious round of Oxbridge bashing, the BBC's new series Young, Bright and On the Right fundamentally misunderstands the nature of our Oxbridge-educated political elite. There i...
Aside from yet another tedious round of Oxbridge bashing, the BBC's new series Young, Bright and On the Right fundamentally misunderstands the nature of our Oxbridge-educated political elite. There i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:46 PM on 10/11/2012
'Forget about being a Tory politico, you peasants! Brown-nosing round baronet's sons and joining societies with them just doesn't wash any more, I'm afraid. And don't go running to the BBC, either - you'll only show yourselves up even more as terrible oiks who probably prefer doing Rubik cubes of an evening to joining drinking clubs and chasing girls. Unfortunately for you, the BBC are ONE's BFs anyway, so you won't be doing yourselves any favours. Luckily, us PLUs don't have to do anything vulgar or arriviste, like showing an interest in politics, whilst we're at Oxford, which is a jolly good because it leaves more time for playing tennis and rogering. Apparently, just being friends with Prince Andrew and owning half of Lincolnshire is enough to assure a political future if we want one, which is nice.'

(Sorry, I realize this is rather crass, particularly when other responses have been so courteous and restrained, but really, this was the subtext for me. Yes, Milliband and the Labour party are mentioned for the appearance of balance, but my reading of the piece is that it is essentially addressed to Chris and Joe, aspiring Tories, but hopelessly middle class. What depresses is me the complacency and cynicism of (presumably) a Tory about Tories, celebrating the fact that his party is composed of and represents the toff élite and is less democratic than it ever was. Snobby Margaret Roberts would never make it these days, apparently.)
01:46 PM on 08/21/2012
I have to LOL at the BBC as most of their top people actually are from the Oxbridge elite
04:13 PM on 08/17/2012
Welcome to the machine Tom. It works in all walks of professional life, and is clearly unjust , unfair & undemocratic. With Assange in the news, it reminds me what the US ambassador to London was revealed to have said in the leaked cables about Cameron & Osbourne. Something like "lightweights, not up to the job".
Your right about nothing changing anytime soon, as our society has been so fragmented by the neo-liberal, market is god, consumerist ideology foisted upon us (it helps that it panders to human nature, ie fear filled & greedy) by this 'elite'.
You'll get over it, madness lies the other way.
07:33 PM on 08/20/2012
Thanks for your comment. Have to say I don't entirely but into your analysis re free markets but an economic understanding certainly adds to the debate
08:33 PM on 08/20/2012
Ta for the reply tom. Forgive me if i seem a tad cynical, i blame life experience. You've probably seen / read Melanie Klien, on Milton Freeman & the chicago boys.
It explains why we are, where we are at.
Good luck with the 'career'. Would be good if a few were conviction politician's ...
11:38 AM on 08/17/2012
Erm, shouldn't this article point out that is dreadful that the representatives of our nation come from a tiny and wealthy group of men (and the occasional woman). Our whole democratic system needs a shake up, we need to bring in proportional representation, we need properly paid internships enforced by law and we need to keep a far closer eye upon the 'elites' (a word that shouldn't be used, re definition: "A group of people considered to be the best in a particular society", they are certainly not 'the best')
01:50 PM on 08/17/2012
Wholly agree with the need for paid internships - see my interview with Hazel Blears, who's leading the campaign for paid parliamentary internships, here. http://www.cherwell.org/comment/opinion/2012/07/04/interview-hazel-blears

Less sure about what PR would do. The constituency link remains the key route into Westminster for local champions
02:21 PM on 08/17/2012
Thanks for replying :) I'm glad you support paid internships, I think it is one of the biggest things keeping people from disadvantaged or even just average backgrounds like mine out of experience which is required for many careers. 

In terms of PR, I think it would motivate more people to be interested or involved in politics. People see Labour and the Conservatives as monoliths that they can't help influence or alter. With PR, other parties can flourish, providing a range of voices for a wide range of people, which is democratic and may give a kick to the three main parties to try and be more inclusive. 
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:44 PM on 08/17/2012
Ha - yes! I refrained from using the word "elite" for that very reason, joshkie1, preferring the more accurate "toff".

Also, it would be truer to say that democracy in our country doesn't exist. We each vote for whomever is most aligned to the policies we wish to see implemented and lo! and behold! even if that party is successful in an election, scant notice is taken of promises made by that party pre- election.

So who is served by the current set-up? A bunch of toffs.
03:24 PM on 08/17/2012
I can't remember who said it, but I remember reading a description that we are essentially all Kings in a constitutional monarchy. A monarch who decides only formally, whose function it is to sign off on measures proposed by the executive administration. It essentially bypasses the masses from any real decision making, leaving all decisions to a small 'elite' group of people.

There are many problems with democracy and they will not be addressed any time soon as the consensus is that 'we have the best system, there is no better system' and that is drilled into us and that anyone who questions its structure must be mad.

However, I would like to see alterations made to our democracy in the meanwhile to make it more fair to everyone. Fine, they are still essentially deciding for us, but I'd rather elect someone who is more understanding of the average persons life, than some champagne swilling fortune heir who's biggest trouble in life was the time he got injured playing Eton wall
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:51 AM on 08/17/2012
Interesting and yet unsurprising.

Easy to see, given the current incumbents of high office, that such factors as aptitude and ability and experience play no part in job acquisition. All that's required is a mention from some toff to another.

No wonder the country is grinding to a halt.
07:36 PM on 08/20/2012
I'm a little perturbed by the use of 'toffs' instead of 'networked elites' or something similar. I mentioned the Milibands in my piece for precisely this reason