Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Scholes-Fogg

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Scholes-Fogg

Afghanistan: Ten Years On

Posted: 07/10/11 11:32 BST

It started with a terrorist atrocity that claimed the lives of almost 3000 people from over 90 countries including 67 Britons - 9/11 as it became known as. A terrorist attack that united the world shoulder to shoulder with the United States.

As the President of the United States, George W. Bush declared the 'war on terror' the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair commented on helping a friend in need. Less than a month after 9/11 Operation Enduring Freedom was launched. The aim of the mission was to capture Al Qaeda leaders, destroy terrorist training camps, remove the Taliban from power and create a democratic state. The war in Afghanistan has lasted ten years and it could continue until 2014 or beyond. So far during the conflict 382 British service men and women have been killed with some 4000 being injured. Most of those killed (198) were killed via improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Afghanistan has changed within the last ten years. There has been a change of government and Osama Bin Laden and many other Al Qaeda leaders have been killed. But there is still a lot of work to do to rebuild an Afghanistan free from Al Qaeda. I don't think there will be an Afghanistan without the Taliban and it may well be that in order to rebuild the country this may have to involve negotiations with terrorists.

Tens of thousands of coalition troops have fought in Afghanistan since 2001 with nearly 3000 members of the allied forces killed and over 20,000 injured. Afghanistan in 2001 is not Afghanistan in 2011 - there are different leaders in both Britain and America and some of the Al Qaeda big hitters have been taken out of the picture. President Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron have indicated that troops will be pulling out of Afghanistan in the next few years, but it should not be as simple as that. Simply pulling out could mean the re-emergence of the Taliban. It should be a gradual withdrawal and it should only happen once there is a fully effective Afghan army, government and police force which there currently isn't. The war in Afghanistan may not be popular with the British public but withdrawing without fully completing the mission may well mean those soldiers who have died have died in vain.

Out of the 382 British service men and women killed in the war 32 were 19 or under whilst 260 were aged between 20 and 29. They are incredibly young yet brave service men who gave their lives in order to defeat terrorists. Like everyday, we remember those troops not just British but of the allied forces - that have either been injured in the line of duty or have made the ultimate sacrifice.

Lest we forget

 

Follow Tom Scholes-Fogg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tscholesfogg

It started with a terrorist atrocity that claimed the lives of almost 3000 people from over 90 countries including 67 Britons - 9/11 as it became known as. A terrorist attack that united the world sho...
It started with a terrorist atrocity that claimed the lives of almost 3000 people from over 90 countries including 67 Britons - 9/11 as it became known as. A terrorist attack that united the world sho...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Scholes-Fogg
02:56 PM on 10/08/2011
Thanks for the comments. It's always interesting to see what others think. TSF
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
11:43 PM on 10/07/2011
Spare a thought for the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans murdered multilated, blasted and burned, even though entirely innocent of any wrongdoing. Next time there's a terrorist attack on America or britain dont expect a worldwide outpouring of sympathy - look to the terrorist attacks that WE launch against innocent people for the reason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
07:38 PM on 10/07/2011
The British tried in the 19th C, the Russians in the 20th C and the Americans in the 21st C. No-one doubts the bravery of those serving over there, nor should they doubt the commitment of those whose country we have invaded.

Read Rudyard Kipling's "Young British Soldier", nothing's really changed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:42 PM on 10/07/2011
There's an argument that this started with the CIA funding the loonies as a way to irritate the Russians way back in the late 70's.

Let's have our boys and girls home soon as possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marchmont
02:37 PM on 10/07/2011
Recalling that when the US was attacked in 1941 the perpetrators were nuked it is clear that even with the saintly Al Gore in the White House, 9/11 would have been avenged. However, it might not have cost $4 trillion and having Gore as a wartime consigliere would have prevented him driving the even more expensive global-warming racket. The Bush-Blair fiasco in Iraq and the ten year (and counting) bloodbath in Afghanistan are two of the most stupid wars in recent history - only slightly less idiotic than WWI. The Afghan occupation has been a catalogue of unrelieved folly with tribal and drug-lord feuds demonstrating the hilarious incompetence of its western-trained police and army. The Anglo-American demand that Afghans abandon their culture and history by adopting democracy, capitalism and gender equality is imperial arrogance at its most sublime.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
01:12 PM on 10/07/2011
Almost all of the soldiers who have died in Afghanistan have already died in vain. That isn't going to change. The key thing is not to start things which will end that way. When you choose to finish them
matters too, but not now. When was the time to leave? When the taliban government fell.
01:08 PM on 10/07/2011
". . . withdrawing without fully completing the mission may well mean those soldiers who have died have died in vain. "
As a Vietnam veteran I can assure you that such excuses are sheer nonsense, mere buncombe designed to lure the gullible into accepting yet another ridiculous war. The real question is how Brits and Americans can be so naive as to swallow the same old regurgitated excuses while the special interests who profit from these wars continue to make huge profits. What makes anyone think that Afghanistan 10 years from now will be any better than it is today? Certainly there is no evidence to indicate that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffreygeez
12:47 PM on 10/07/2011
Wasted lives, most know that, few admit it, hence this article.The Taliban will be in Afghanistan long after the unwelcome invading troops leave or rather crawl out.. Their country. Ten years later , and ? what is better, anywhere?