Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Vincent McAviney

GET UPDATES FROM Vincent McAviney
 

Want a Real Prison Revolution? Then Set the Fairer Sex Free

Posted: 22/10/2012 22:53

Earlier today Gordon Brown's former special advisor wrote a terrific advice blog for David Cameron. In it he recommended against doing exactly what the prime minister has gone out and done today with his criminal justice announcement.

If this were the Great British Bake Off Mary Barry would be making that disapproving face at this half-baked policy.

David Cameron, in an attempt to 'get a grip' - as party grandees keep ordering from the front pages - has made the easiest announcement possible, he's going to "get tough" on prison sentencing.

So far so standard for Blair-lite, but he has also promised a "rehabilitation revolution". Well if he wants one of those then how about being bold and original: stop incarcerating women.

Fair and effective sentencing of criminals is an issue all governments struggle to deal with. Simply incarcerating people in Victorian prisons has been proved time and again to be a flawed approach especially for women.

On the 2nd December 2011 the UK prison population reached a record high of 88,179 prisoners. Of these how many do you think are women prisoners, maybe 10,000 or 20,000, or even 30,000?

No, the actual number is not even close to being five figures; it is in fact roughly 4,200. That's just 4.8% of the prison population. Over the past decade the number of female prisoners has increased by just 12%, a much lower rate than that of male prisoners which is approximately 30%.

The vast majority of these women are in prison for non-violent offences and have never been a danger to the public. Yet they are locked away at a cost of £50,296 per year. That's more than students pay for three years at university and more than double the average UK salary for women.

As Baroness Helena Kennedy wrote in Eve Was Framed, her excellent expose of the failings of the criminal justice system, for the majority of incarcerated women who have been failed by society, "prison is the end of a road paved with deprivation, disadvantage, abuse, discrimination and multiple social problems."

For example according to Home Office statistics up to 80% of women in prison in the UK have diagnosable mental health problems, with 66% having symptoms of neurotic disorders. Up to 50% report of having experienced physical, emotional or sexual abuse in their lives.

The purpose of prison is surely to rehabilitate offenders and in turn make society safer however prison undeniably fails to do this. Women are also four times more likely to self-harm in prison and their suicide rate is significantly higher.

If women's prisons were closed statistical evidence has proven that the vast majority of the female prison population would be of no danger to the public and would make a great saving to the public purse. There is of course a very small minority of violent offenders who would still require custodial sentences but the sentencing of non-violent vulnerable women, already excluded from much of society, to imprisonment only serves to push them further out of society compounding their exclusion and making reintegration even harder.

There is no evidence that prison works in terms of reducing the overall crime rate and 64.3% of women released from British prisons in 2004 were reconvicted within two years of release. While overall men and women commit all the same kinds of crime albeit at differing rates, of the sentenced female prison populations the majority are apprehended for property crime and theft; non-violent offences which have been attributed to the 'feminism of poverty' thesis which put simply is a high proportion of female offenders stealing in order to put food on the table for their children.

UK and prisons have been overcrowded every year since 1994. Community prisons, curfewed tagging and alternative sentences are what is really needed and the relatively small female prison population is an ideal test group for these.

For the fairer sex, prison isn't fair and if successful these schemes could be used to reduce the male prison population and reduce the cost of the penal system for a government desperate to cut the deficit. Similar trends for female prisoners have been found around the world however for governments, always keen to look tough on crime the idea of ending incarceration for women is extremely difficult politically despite the widespread unspoken belief that is does not work.

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Earlier today Gordon Brown's former special advisor wrote a terrific advice blog for David Cameron. In it he recommended against doing exactly what the prime minister has gone out and done today with ...
Earlier today Gordon Brown's former special advisor wrote a terrific advice blog for David Cameron. In it he recommended against doing exactly what the prime minister has gone out and done today with ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darlene1964
01:04 PM on 10/28/2012
Everyone always talks about the punishment affects the criminal, how about it's affect on the victim. If someone breaks in my house and steals my tv, laptop and stereo I have to report it to the police which takes time which equals money. Now I know if you catch the criminal I won't get my stuff back but at least he (could be she) will be punished with incarceration. No I won't have my stuff back but at least I know that people can't steal with impunity. It's not much but it's something. What will I have when when there is no punishment at all? Just the knowledge that the thiefs rights are much more important than mine simply because I made the stupid decision to work instead of steal. As a woman won't I be encouraged to make my living this way since there is no deterrent to me at all?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darlene1964
12:49 PM on 10/28/2012
We are not the fairer sex we are the other half of the human equation. If we want equal pay and equal rights we need to shoulder the responsibilities as well as reap the benefits. I'm sure that mental illness is rampant in all prisons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loulou11
06:48 AM on 10/28/2012
Sorry I forgot to add, they won't be free, they will be yet another commodity to trade with!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loulou11
06:46 AM on 10/28/2012
Close women prison for the majority of female offenders? Now we are going mad.

It won't take long for the male members of the criminal world to force females to do the the work for them as they will know they won't be imprisoned.

They'll be pimping women out in a crime sense and we will see a massive increase in female offenders. It'll be a new scenario similar to keeping a brothel, oh boy, the establishment seriously underestimate the crimal world.
04:54 PM on 10/24/2012
My daughter lives on benefits, hardly someone with loads of money or advantages, but she doesn't steal to put food on the table for her children. Why should a woman be treated differently than a man, women (and I am one) have been moaning for years they want equality to men. That should include penalities for wrong doing. I have been in the situation where we (my husband and I) were out of work for over two years. A few times we were in the situation of running out of money before running out of month. We sold out wedding rings (much to my mother's horror).

Mental health among women incarcerated, yes there are mental health problems, but there are also mental health issues among male prisoners. This side of things should be looked into with both genders. As a woman I am furious that this item seems to reak of 'Ah poor women.' as if we're inferiour and should be treated as if we're weak because we're women. Also, it might help to remember that there are plenty of one parent families with men looking after the family. Would they get the same consideration if they stole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
02:01 PM on 10/24/2012
Why make this a gender thing? You seem to be arguing that most female prisoners are inside because of mental illness or previous abuse - the same can be said of some male prisoners too. Why not release them too? Why is their status as women so important to your argument?
11:17 AM on 10/24/2012
why not go the whole hog and just do away with prisons eh!!

LUDICROUS.
10:58 AM on 10/24/2012
Why do we need a sexist reason to set a sensible policy? Why is this idea couched in terms of gender, rather than in terms of the type of offense or offender?

How do you square "...64.3% of women released from British prisons in 2004 were reconvicted within two years of release," with " the vast majority of the female prison population would be of no danger to the public."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
09:37 AM on 10/24/2012
There was an old adage in the CJS that female offenders were "either mad or bad".

Why send "mad" offenders to jail rather than dealing with the societal problems?

I have had women on to me who have been sent to prison effectively because the BBC cannot fathom a way to broadcast without charging everyone a licence fee.

That is,the have been fined for not having a licence and then not had the money to pay the fine.

They then end up doing 28 days NPF.
02:50 AM on 10/25/2012
And either of these doesn't happen to men?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
06:34 AM on 10/25/2012
Yes it does but very often this happens to young women parents whose children then end up with social services and I speak as a single parent Dad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:22 AM on 10/24/2012
Do the non dangerous women include the lady with the penchant for ironing the wrinkles from your face jailed this week or rose west myra et al?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
09:33 AM on 10/24/2012
You may have answered your own question.
09:35 AM on 10/24/2012
"There is of course a very small minority of violent offenders who would still require custodial sentences."
08:30 AM on 10/24/2012
Manginas and White Knights writing everywhere...oh my.
07:10 AM on 10/24/2012
Always remember that when it comes to feminists like Vincent McAviney women are good and men are bad.If it appears that a woman might have done something wrong it's because a man made her do it.
06:30 AM on 10/24/2012
So... you can't just set *all* the nonviolent offenders free and reform the prisons? You'd let a woman murderer go, but not a man who stole to feed his family? What makes you think, by the way, that prison isn't the end of a long, crappy road for the men in prison, either?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
09:32 AM on 10/24/2012
I think a woman murderer would be classed as a violent offender...don't you?
01:56 AM on 11/02/2012
Yes- but this article suggested letting *all* women in prisoners go.
04:02 AM on 10/24/2012
The women that you are envisioning are from a different era of people. Reading other news articles with such headlines as "Knives in their handbags, hell-bent on out-drinking men - The TV show that makes me weep for young women today: A new documentary leaves ESTHER RANTZEN horrified - and deeply concerned".

These are the women that you are defending and saying they should shut the prisons down because women are all angels, and can do nothing wrong. They should be coddled and put on a pedestal because they are the fairer sex.

Because of people like you, equality will never happen. Women have choices, men have responsibilities.
02:18 AM on 10/24/2012
This is the worst excuse for journalism that I can recall; absolute drivel. Did you stop to wonder why women account for such a small percentage of inmates? It's because they already receive extremely lenient sentences compared to men. In addition, every reason you voiced for incarcerating less women applies equally to men. Prisons are crowded with male non-violent offenders too, not just women. It costs the state roughly the same amount to imprison men as it costs for women. Did you even bother to do a cursory search on the number of male prisoners who report past abuse, or have mental health problems? How about checking whether men have higher rates of self-harm in prison as well?

Your closing sentence solidifies your status as a barely coherent, pathetic writer: "Similar trends for female prisoners have been found around the world however for governments, always keen to look tough on crime the idea of ending incarceration for women is extremely difficult politically despite the widespread unspoken belief that is does not work."

Holy run-on sentence Batman! Don't you have to learn proper comma usage before obtaining a "journalism" job? And how do you know that there's a widespread belief that incarcerating women doesn't work if it's unspoken? Why do you believe that it doesn't work for women, yet does work for men?

Currently, every comment on this article is disparaging your idiocy. Here's hoping this fact will pound the truth through your thick, incredibly biased skull.