Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Vladimir Putin

GET UPDATES FROM Vladimir Putin
 

Being Strong: National Security Guarantees for Russia

Posted: 23/02/2012 00:00

In a world of upheaval there is always the temptation to resolve one's problems at another's expense, through pressure and force.

It is no surprise that some are calling for resources of global significance to be freed from the exclusive sovereignty of a single nation. This cannot happen to Russia, not even hypothetically.

In other words, we should not tempt anyone by allowing ourselves to be weak. We will, under no circumstances, surrender our strategic deterrent capability. Indeed, we will strengthen it.

We will not be able to strengthen our international position or develop our economy or our democratic institutions if we are unable to protect Russia.

We see ever new regional and local wars breaking out. We see new areas of instability and deliberately managed chaos. Determined attempts are being made to provoke such conflicts even close to Russia's and its allies' borders. The basic principles of international law are being degraded and eroded, especially in terms of international security.

Under these circumstances, Russia cannot rely on diplomatic and economic methods alone to resolve conflicts. Our country faces the task of sufficiently developing its military potential as part of a deterrence strategy. This is an indispensable condition for Russia to feel secure and for our partners to listen to our country's arguments.

We have adopted and are implementing unprecedented programmes to develop our armed forces and modernise Russia's defence industry. We will allocate around 23 trillion roubles for these purposes over the next decade. This is not a militarisation of the Russian budget, however.

Our goal should be to build a fully professional army. Servicemen must have a full package of social benefits, adequate to their enormous social responsibility.

It's clear there have been plenty of discussions over the amount and timing of this large-scale financing. The goal of creating modern armed forces and of comprehensively strengthening our defensive potential cannot be put off.

In fact, our defence centres and enterprises have missed several modernisation cycles in the last 30 years. Yet we have made great strides in reforming the army. High-readiness forces manned with contract soldiers have been formed in all strategic areas. Self-sufficient units have been created. A unit of this type carried out the peace enforcement operation in Georgia in 2008 and protected the peoples of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Our Navy has resumed its presence in strategic areas of the World Ocean, including the Mediterranean.

So what does the future have in store for us? The probability of a global war between nuclear powers is not high, because that would mean the end of civilisation. Nobody will dare launch a large-scale aggression...

High-precision long-range conventional weapons will become increasingly common. An important, if not decisive, role in determining the nature of armed conflict will be played by the military capability of a country to counter space or information related threats, especially in cyberspace.

We must also take decisive steps to strengthen our aerospace defences. We are being pushed by the policies of the US and NATO on the deployment of their antimissile system. In order to keep the global balance of forces, we either have to create our own antimissile system or, more efficiently, to ensure our capability to overcome any antimissile system and defend Russia's potential for retaliation. Russia's military and technical response to the US global antimissile shield and its European section will be effective and asymmetrical.

Similarly, the activities that the world's leading military powers have initiated around the Arctic are forcing Russia to secure our interests in that region.

Some people argue that rebuilding our military-industrial complex will saddle the economy with a heavy burden, the same burden that bankrupted the Soviet Union. I am sure this is profoundly delusionary.

The USSR collapsed due to the suppression of natural market forces in the economy and long-running disregard for the interests of the people. We cannot repeat the errors of the past.

The huge resources invested in modernising our military-industrial complex and re-equipping the Army must serve as fuel to feed the engines of modernisation in our economy, creating real growth and a situation where government expenditure funds new jobs, supports market demand and facilitates scientific research.

We will be resolute in eliminating corruption from the defence industry and the Armed Forces, ensuring that punishment for those who fall foul of the law is inevitable. Corruption in the national security sector is essentially treason.

We must rely on the very latest developments in the art of war. Falling behind means becoming vulnerable. It means putting our country and the lives of our soldiers and officers at risk.

The objective is to expand, not weaken, the country's economy and create an Army and military-industrial complex that will secure Russia's sovereignty, the respect of our foreign partners and lasting peace.

A longer version of this article appeared in the Russian newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta. The full English-language version is available at the prime minister's website, here.

 
In a world of upheaval there is always the temptation to resolve one's problems at another's expense, through pressure and force. It is no surprise that some are calling for resources of global sign...
In a world of upheaval there is always the temptation to resolve one's problems at another's expense, through pressure and force. It is no surprise that some are calling for resources of global sign...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jfoste3
01:20 on 28/02/2012
Putin is a formidable leader that the west does not have the likes of him, he has transformed Russia from an economic basket case to a Russia that works for the good of the Russian people. The world needs another super power to control the USA that has been focused on wars, two I consider useless Iraq and Afghanistan. The west due it its bad policy has now allowed two super powers Russia and China come to gather in time in a conventional war the west will never be able to match the powers of these two countries, we have missed the opportunity in getting these two countries be part of our military planning, we began meddling with Russia back yard beginning with Georgia and failed. Today we are considering attacking a country of the likes of Iran that has thus far not made a nuke bomb, we are threatened that they have the knowledge are we saying countires in the future that aquire knowledge shall be attacked. Joseph Foster, Author ‘’Seeing Red’’ ‘How America is losing the future’ Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Seeing-Red-Joseph-Foster/dp/1613468121/ my blog Stand Up For America! – Seeing Red; http://boblupoli.blogspot.com/
06:16 on 24/02/2012
I hate to admit it, but I wish we could make this badass the president of our country. He lays out the basics of having a strong country. Rely on the market, build up military strength, and don't oppress people.
04:24 on 26/02/2012
run a corrupt country that everyone is trying to leave. it amazes me when isee hot russian wome with guys who ;ook like they could be in the revenge of the nerds.they want out that bad.
04:27 on 26/02/2012
I think they do oppress the people. their freedom of press is a bit weak.. I figure it must be a bad place to live when totally hot russian women will hook up with guys who look like the belong in a revenge of the nerds movie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dale Netherton
21:52 on 23/02/2012
A little historical perspective would indicate a nation that doesn't primarily focus on defense and is more concerned with protection of its citizen's individual rights has a more invigorated source of manpower, a more productive economy and is able to respond , if necessary, to any outside aggression. This also would include a policy of not defending aggressors or becoming friendly with them. I would think the incident with Hitler would be a lesson learned.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
10:13 on 24/02/2012
Astute comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
20:05 on 23/02/2012
Every politician talks about the country and the people as these two are the most important issues in politics to be focussed
jhNY
Mercy.
19:59 on 23/02/2012
"Some people argue that rebuilding our military-industrial complex will saddle the economy with a heavy burden, the same burden that bankrupted the Soviet Union. I am sure this is profoundly delusionary."

Well, as long as he's sure...
04:31 on 26/02/2012
The US is on its way to that direction. We spend alomost half of the world defense spending.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
17:42 on 26/02/2012
Can we please not call it defence? The US hasn't had to defend itself for 65 years.
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
19:25 on 23/02/2012
I hear the sound of distant drums, a simple question of deja vu!
17:29 on 23/02/2012
In the Arab spring people are dying to obtain democracy and be able to vote,electing Putin would be
a vote to diminish democratic freedom!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
17:13 on 23/02/2012
Who are we to talk ?

ALL of them are organised criminal gangs !

Whether it's the unelected descendants of land thieves sitting in the House Of Lords . . or corrupt MPs in the commons . . defending oil companies and banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
21:39 on 23/02/2012
"all" is quite a statement... you can probably prove it other than anecdotally
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
18:21 on 24/02/2012
You are right. I can probably prove it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:00 on 25/02/2012
May I draw your attention to one of your earlier comments. Not dissimilar to my own. .

Diamond Jubilee
Commented 11 Feb 2012 at 22:37:21 in UK Comedy

“ Because you assume the Crown should keep the estate that, rightfully, belongs to the people and the government. this is the remnants of a family that basically reigned over millions over the centuries, stealing money and wealth from everyone. The whole estate should be owned by the government. ”

you can probably prove it other than anecdotally ? ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
newshoundmama
My bite's worse than my bark
17:01 on 23/02/2012
I don't know why anyone would want to be part of your military, considering the contemptuous manner in which the sailors on the Kursk and their families were treated.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
15:08 on 23/02/2012
I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind Comrade Putin's article. It sounds to me like he's trying to rationalize the build up of Russia's military to an audience that he assumes will be receptive to his argument. It also sounds to me like he's trying to introduce Soviet Russia version 2.0.

He says that "the world's leading military powers have initiated around the Arctic are forcing Russia to secure our interests in that region." No pun intended, but since when is the Arctic a hot spot for military activity? Regardless, is this really "forcing" Russia to secure its interests?

So let me get this straight, the Arctic is of more concern to Putin than Syria? Really?? Mr. Putin, your government, along with the Communist Chinese government, have persistently blocked any sanctions against Iran, Syria and North Korea, three nations that threaten the stability of the entire world (not just your precious Arctic) You continue to use these violent rogue nations as leverage, mainly against the United States. And now you beat your chest and tell us that you are building your military even more.

This sounds like the rhetoric of a former KGB agent to me.
14:30 on 23/02/2012
Why is this gangster being given a platform here?
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
10:20 on 23/02/2012
Why are you wasting time writing for HuffPost when you could be tacitly supporting the hatred of, and violence against, homosexuals?

Come on Vlad, priorities, yeah?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
09:25 on 23/02/2012
IF Russia is serious about having its country secure then it has to start by making its economy functional, having a legal system that is worthy of respect by its own people, and funding that which makes a country worth something. The latter I am referring to is the science that drives prosperity, and the businesses that take ideas from the findings fo science and turn it into global products of value to the world. If you do not do this, then you will be left behind by China & India. The lack of spending on science is already being practiced by the USA, which is slowly decaying as a result of its lack of investment in education and science at all levels. Russia has the potential to be great, but it must set up the framework for this to happen, paranoia about security accomplishes nothng except the wastage of large amounts of money which could make your country great.
06:36 on 23/02/2012
I think russia has huge problem and will continue to get it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
03:45 on 23/02/2012
I think Russia is fed up with the US throwing it's weight around and have finally said enough is enough.
04:47 on 23/02/2012
The don't stamd a chance againist us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
04:57 on 23/02/2012
I'd say a few thousand nukes they have in their arsenal would disagree with that.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
11:23 on 24/02/2012
Hmmm, I seem to remember Adolf saying the same thing!