Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Will Straw

GET UPDATES FROM Will Straw
 

Five Reasons to Be Cautious About Today's Growth Figures

Posted: 25/10/2012 10:31

Today's GDP figures - showing growth of 1.0 per cent in the third quarter - should give us all something to cheer. Certainly George Osborne will be relieved to witness the fastest pace of growth since he entered No. 11 Downing Street. But these latest figures, welcome though they are, do not yet show that we are marching towards the sunny uplands.

Given that GDP contracted in each of the last three quarters and has barely grown at all since George Osborne came to power, even growth of 1.0% in Q3 will mean that GDP is on course to have been flat in 2012. This is quite a contrast from the 0.8% growth predicted by the OBR as recently as March, never mind their 2.8% prediction in the June 2010 pre-budget forecast.

Given the OBR's poor track record in predicting growth there are five reasons to be cautious about whether the UK is now on an upward trajectory. First, today's figures include a bounce of at least 0.5% due to lost output from the Jubilee bank holiday and sales of Olympic tickets and TV rights all scoring in the third quarter.

Second, 80% of the spending cuts are still to come. As the IMF admitted earlier this month, austerity may have had a bigger impact on growth than previously predicted. If true, this is likely to further dampen domestic demand and, worse still, affect confidence by discouraging people from spending and businesses from investing.

Third, there is no sign that the squeeze in living standards is letting up. It is now well established that average household incomes have been flat since 2004. This is compounded by rising food, energy and transport costs. The severe drought in the US, wet British summer and Russian heatwave have all affected crop yields pushing up prices. Four of the 'Big Six' energy firms have announced increases in gas and electricity prices ranging from 6 to 9 per cent with the other two expected to follow. Meanwhile, there was outrage when it was announced in August that rail fares would rise over 6 per cent in January.

Fourth, the OBR are expecting investment to rebound from 0.7% this year to 6.4% next year (Table 1.1) in order to see growth of 1.3 per cent. This seemed surprising at the time but now looks extremely unlikely. Over the last year, investment has grown just 0.3% and the Government's policy framework is deterring major infrastructure projects in energy generation, rail and airport expansion.

Finally, the slowing pace of growth in the global economy will affect Britain's export markets. The eurozone is expected to contract this year and barely grow next. But things could get much worse if Spain's banks go belly up. Growth in the BRICs is also down, particularly in Brazil and India, which have become important new markets for the UK. In the last two years, exports to India increased by 78% and to Brazil by 45%.

Britain's recession is already the longest since records began. Even with today's positive figures, it will be 2014 before the UK economy returns to its previous peak. But don't bet against further bad news ahead.

 

Follow Will Straw on Twitter: www.twitter.com/wdjstraw

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
12:38 PM on 10/29/2012
growth should be viewed over at least a year and up to 5 years to reveal trends

viewed like that there is very little reason to be optimistic - flat at best is what we can hope for but with spending cuts, fuel duty rises and domestic energy bill rises there is a definite chance of further recession
10:11 PM on 10/27/2012
What doesn't seem to feature in economists' ball-gazing or politicians' navel gazing is that there will probably never be full employment on the scale it enjoyed during the 1940s-1970s, what with automation talking over human toil in just about every sphere, be it agriculture, share dealing, engineering/manufacturing; and now creeping across "middle-class" semi-skilled work.

With the population growing exponentially (what? 14 billion in 2030) how will the diminishing supply of human work be shared out? How will money be distributed so that "consumers" (we used to be called customers!) can buy things to perpetuate demand?

Perhaps we'll have to acclimatise to no-growth - sooner or later.
11:48 PM on 10/25/2012
Olympics etc. account for most of the growth its hardly stunning although any is welcome but i have a horrible feeling next quarters will be a more informative picture unless we get the wrong snow !!!.
03:00 PM on 10/25/2012
A further 3,000 job losses announced, with knock on effects to suppliers and sub contractors. Retailers will no doubt feel a further pinch at Christmas!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OD4U
If its OK for one then its OK for all.
10:39 AM on 10/25/2012
From this article I do not feel euphoric about this 'blip' in our economy, certainly no one should feel relieved because from what is written here it is likely that we will nose dive again, especially as 80% of government spending cuts are still waiting to be put into the system. In other words giving people less can only equate to less available to spend. Cameron and Osborne may think that the public are willing to accept their upbeat rhetoric, unfortunately some of us remain cynical for very good reasons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cardiff1963
Free the Five
01:29 AM on 10/26/2012
You're right to remain cynical, but this writer is from some put you left foot forward organization, I don't think he's programmed to say anything but.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
10:37 AM on 10/25/2012
I totally agree, this increase is not as good as politicians make out to be, there are to many variables to be taken into account in this last period...And lets face it, once all the benefit cuts start to bite early next year millions of people are going to feel a lot worse off, so are going to be spending less in our high streets, which in its self have a knock on effect to businesses....So beware politicians claiming we are over the worst...The worst is yet to come........
10:32 AM on 10/25/2012
The 6th reason is that no margin of error is cited. There's some amount of uncertainty in these figures over and above the amount by which they are revised over time. GDP figures are measures with built in statistical errors. The ONS make these figures very difficult to find and assess. I'm encouraging professionals to write something on this subject so the rest of us can get a clearer picture of the significance of these figures.
11:14 AM on 10/25/2012
The margin of error is 0.7% so growth could have been anywhere between 0.3% and 1.7%.

I'm not sure there are champagne corks popping in Downing Street, but if a 0.1% quarterly contraction is disaster (as was gleefully professed by those such as Ed Balls) I'm not sure we need to pour too much cold water on even a 0.3% rise.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 10/25/2012
Source for that Margin of error? Presumably you looked it up somewhere.
- As the Original Poster said; the provenance of a lot of these figures is very opaque.