Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
William Hague

GET UPDATES FROM William Hague
 

A Safer Future Is Within Our Grasp - We Will Not Rest Until We Have Secured It

Posted: 13/02/2013 00:00

On average a man, women or child dies every minute as a result of armed violence. Two thirds die in countries that are not officially in conflict. Violence fuelled by illegal arms diverts resources away from schools, healthcare and critical infrastructure. It undermines sustainable development, eats away at stability and robs millions of their future.

To find something that weighs in the balance against such tragedy has been an international goal for some time. So the case for an effective treaty, an arms trade treaty, that will save lives, reduce human suffering and bring consistency to the global trade in conventional arms is overwhelming. There is no more poignant reminder of this than the tragic events in Algeria last month. When terrorists are the beneficiaries of an unfettered proliferation of conventional arms they threaten the security of not just the countries where they seek refuge, but also their neighbours and the rest of the world. It is clear our endeavour is more urgent than ever. And so next month Britain will return to the United Nations determined that, after more than six years of hard work, the international community will conclude a treaty whose legacy will endure for generations to come.

In 2012 we made great progress towards this. In July, along with the majority of UN states, we supported a draft chair's Treaty agreed after intensive negotiations. But we were clear then - as we are now - that to be fully effective, a Treaty needs the widest possible participation and that we should take time to ensure this. That is why our ministers and diplomats have continued their efforts and in November secured overwhelming support for a conference to conclude an Arms Trade Treaty in 2013. 157 Member States pledged their support including the US, China and India. A treaty is now within our grasp and - together with our civil society partners - we must do everything we can to secure it.

There are still some who harbour doubts and have yet to commit fully to a treaty. My message to them is this: history will judge you harshly if you miss this moment. The treaty on the table will not stigmatise the legitimate trade in arms. Instead it will protect it, establishing global commitments on national arms export controls and a baseline for robust controls that ensure countries can defend their citizens without undermining human development.

Its shape is clear. States with little or no regulation would have to introduce legislation and develop export control mechanisms. And, despite the reservations of a few, it should require all to assess arms exports - including small arms and light weapons, ammunition and military parts and components - on the basis of criteria including respect for international humanitarian law and human rights. Where there is an unacceptable risk it should be mandatory to refuse exports.

Yet if these requirements are to be meaningful and effective, a treaty needs to apply globally and the major arms exporters of today and tomorrow must be part of it. Together the United States, Russia and China account for over 50% of the international arms trade. Our endeavour cannot succeed without them and I call on them to work with us to fulfil our moral responsibility to protect the world's most vulnerable.

Therefore, as we look towards negotiations in March, our priority must be to secure agreement on the basis of consensus. We should continue to seek to improve the current text but we must also defend what was won in July and resist unravelling hard fought agreements. Our aim must be to establish the common principles and legally binding framework that will make the world a safer place, that we can implement tirelessly and that we can strengthen in the future.

The ATT will not solve all our problems, but it offers us the chance to take a very significant step forward. A global Arms Trade Treaty that denies rogue states illegal arms will make us all more secure. It will help prevent instability and stop arms reaching terrorists. But more than this it will offer the prospect of a better future to millions who live in the shadow of conflict. This is the prize on offer in March. History will not forgive those who seek to prevent it and we will not rest until we have secured it.

 

Follow William Hague on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WilliamJHague

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
On average a man, women or child dies every minute as a result of armed violence. Two thirds die in countries that are not officially in conflict. Violence fuelled by illegal arms diverts resources aw...
On average a man, women or child dies every minute as a result of armed violence. Two thirds die in countries that are not officially in conflict. Violence fuelled by illegal arms diverts resources aw...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:29 PM on 02/24/2013
whats sad is the passion to possess the damb things in first place with the intent to use on a so called war based thing over usually selfish and prejudice objection that benefits no one really whoever "wins" .they exsist so that wont change but the fact it is such a big buissness involving huge profit and gains to those involved at the cost of supplying the means to go round blowing each other up cause someone wants their own way at all cost and feels they have some super right to start wars involving thousands and millions of innocent and completely non conected to the issue people getting blow away like trash along with homes and common decentcy ect ect has to be a big part of the problem . if we didnt keep making the things they would be damb site harder to obtain and the whole taboo unspoken truth that there are people of influence getting very rich on the buissness of trading arms yet illegal in many cases to own one for protection on apersonal level but ok for "sport" can someone see the logic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barrysturn
Ut Veniant Omnes
12:40 PM on 02/24/2013
Baldness, Baldness they call it Baldness!
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
09:50 AM on 02/18/2013
Let's start by getting rid of Trident!
01:34 AM on 02/18/2013
Commendable this righteous global initiative of the FCO may be, but I hope not at the expense of protecting and furthering British interests abroad, particularly where it promotes our badly needed economic growth.
07:34 PM on 02/17/2013
This is cynical indeed from a chap who sends troops wherever his yankee masters tell him they should be sent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saviour1263
04:05 PM on 02/17/2013
And poverty in the uk....errrr no comment,and homeless in the uk.......errr no comment ,pensioners freezing to death thru' fear of unaffordable bills ...errr no comment ...hundreds of thousands of immigrants due here next year with record unemployment ... errr no comment ... retired / redundant ex-soldiers sleeping on the streets because homeless ...err no comment , suspected terrorists housed with benefits ...errr no comment.
Wars in other countries and their poverty ahhh wait a minute .....A Safer Future Is Within Our Grasp - We Will Not Rest Until We Have Secured It blah,blah,blah
This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Booth
02:04 PM on 02/17/2013
the Ministry of Truth is here to educate us all so pay attention.
there will be questions later - much later.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:59 PM on 02/17/2013
This government hasn't stopped selling arms, it hasn't made any real effort to disarm itself....... we don't believe you Mr H.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
08:39 AM on 02/17/2013
Here's a thought Billy boy...stop producing arms...oh yeah,I forgot,there's money to be made.

Your crocodile tears fool no one.
fuzzychickens
The higher the power, the bigger the lies
05:01 PM on 02/14/2013
Who trusts these fascists anymore?

All these criminals "protecting" us on an international scale - they are enemies.

How many countries has the IMF trashed? They only seek to enslave countries, after all, they are BANKERS.

Iceland is doing great after telling the IMF to kiss their butts and even arrested bankers in their own country.

When internationalist fascists now come at you with treaties dealing with weapons trade, you can bet there's some slimy fine print in there.

We can hardly trust our own politicians, let alone these people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NTT
Fighting rants with facts
03:20 PM on 02/14/2013
The author talks about a treaty that would impose checks and balances, yet won't "stigmatise legitimate trade in arms".

I wonder whether he (UK's Foreign Minister) classifies as "legitimate trade in arms" selling British weaponry to Saudi Arabia. Because this is what his boss (UK Prime Minister David Cameron) was desperate to do during his latest visit to that country.

And by "that country" I mean Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia: one of the few countries still ruled by an absolute monarch; one of the few countries in which the law discriminates women (Saudi women are not allowed to vote, drive, work in the same workplace with men; they have to dress in black walking coffins; their testimony in a court of law is worth half of a man's; they are treated by law as minors -- being appointed a "guardian" who can legally beat them, rape them, even kill them; who is in charge of every decision affecting the women); a country which imposes medieval punishments (beheading for witchcraft; amputations for stealing); a country which harshly discriminates ethnic and religious minorities; a country which exports jihadi extremism to every corner of the globe, including UK; a country which has recently sent troops to quash the protests in Bahrain.

Before preaching morality to others, the UK government should stop selling weapons to the apartheid regime in Riyadh.
fuzzychickens
The higher the power, the bigger the lies
04:54 PM on 02/14/2013
Hey, don't point out hypocrisy.......it's not politically correct.
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
12:59 PM on 02/14/2013
"...Violence fuelled by illegal arms diverts resources away from schools, healthcare and critical infrastructure...A global Arms Trade Treaty that denies rogue states illegal arms will make us all more secure. It will help prevent instability and stop arms reaching terrorists."

Excuse me Mr Hague, but the so called 'legal' arms trade provides no assurances either! No sooner post 'Arab Spring' did David Cameron fly out there to countries as of yet democratically stable, and offering them planes & weapons when they are still at a vulnerable stage, not knowing which party or regime might be in full power. Even if they, or any other country for that matter were 'stable', arms trade of any legality is immoral, and often change hands into people or groups of criminality, therefore making it a vicious circle. Much like the domestic gun-control debate in America. So sorry this time William, I don't buy it. With Cameron's oily dealings, it's contradiction!
06:32 AM on 02/14/2013
I would be more convinced if David Cameron had not been pimping arms round the middle east a few months ago in order to raise some contributions to the Tory party.
photo
OzzieTonto
“Hatred, the only thing that lasts.”
12:57 AM on 02/14/2013
As Robert Fisk has noted, William Hague is again doing impressions of himself.
06:48 PM on 02/13/2013
this guy (hague) is such a tw*t. blathering on about moral responsibility and reucing the arms trade whilst last week he was shipping "logistical support" to syrian islamist rebels or libyan Islamist rebels - meanwhile his boss is touring the middle ease securing contracts for WMD delivery systems & state of the art fighter jets.