NEWS
09/03/2021 13:19 GMT | Updated 09/03/2021 13:23 GMT

Union Calls For Inquest To Address 'Unanswered Questions' Over Belly Mujinga's Death

The rail worker died of coronavirus in April last year, two weeks after allegedly being spat at in London's Victoria station.

Family handout/ PA
Belly Mujinga leaves behind a widow and a 12-year-old daughter 

The union that supported rail transport worker Belly Mujinga says it is “vital” that an inquest is held into her death to address “unanswered questions”.

Mujinga died aged 47 in April last year, around two weeks after she was allegedly spat at while working in London’s Victoria station by a man who claimed to have Covid-19.  

Prosecutors ruled out criminal charges over her death after medical tests confirmed the suspect had not been infected with coronavirus.

British Transport Police (BTP) interviewed a 57-year-old man over the incident but said there was not enough evidence a crime had taken place, following a review of statements from key witnesses, including colleagues, and CCTV footage.

Family handout/ PA
Belly Mujinga leaves behind a widow and a 12-year-old daughter 

Detectives found there was insufficient evidence of spitting or any other action that could lead to infection and concluded Mujinga’s death did not occur because of that incident. Prosecutors considered charges of manslaughter, assault and public order offences but concluded there were no grounds to alter the police decision to take no further action.

But Mujinga’s union, the Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) has written directly to north London coroner Andrew Walker, calling for an inquest because “a number of important questions remain unanswered.”

In it, the TSSA raises whether the spitting allegation was properly examined, why the footage of the incident hasn’t been released, and why Mujinga was working on the station concourse despite having an underlying medical condition which affected her breathing.

TSSA general secretary Manuel Cortes said: “It’s now vital we have an inquest into Belly’s death, to establish the facts’.

The letter states: “As you are probably aware there has been a number of investigations into Belly’s death. However, none have been open to public scrutiny, thus denying her family the closure they need. Our union called for an inquest at the time Belly died and we have no hesitation in repeating this call to you formally today, given the pressing need to illuminate the facts of this case.

“An inquest would also give a clear signal to transport workers and many others on the front-line during this pandemic that their lives really do matter. Formal inquest proceedings are also likely to help prevent similar cases arising in future.”

In a BBC Panorama documentary featuring Mujinga’s story, a lawyer said the family ought to be allowed to push for justice.

Barrister Christopher Williams told the programme: “If the family of Belly want to pursue an inquest, then that is a way of getting justice.

“It may be that the outcome of the inquest won’t give them the result that they seek, but the important thing is that they have the opportunity to go through the process.”

Andrew Walker

Coroner

North London Coroner’s Court

29 Wood St

Barnet EN5 4BE

8th March 2021

Dear Mr Walker

I’m writing to call for an inquest into the death of our member, Belly Mujinga, as the first anniversary of the incident at Victora station approaches (21st March 2020) and in the light of the BBC Panorama investigation (12th October 2020), ‘Belly Mujinga: Searching for the Truth’.

As our union has consistently pointed out - a number of important questions remain unanswered about Belly Mujinga’s death. Also highlighted by the programme these relate to the alleged coughing incident at Victoria station involving a man who, it was reported at the time, had been acting in an agitated and aggressive manner.

You will be aware how deeply her tragic death from Covid-19 touched the nation; she was a front-line transport worker with a young daughter who died so early in the pandemic, just two weeks after the incident at Victoria. An inquest would allow proper public scrutiny of the events which led to Belly’s death, as well as being of considerable material benefit to her relatives.

As you are probably aware there has been a number of investigations into Belly’s death. However, none have been open to public scrutiny, thus denying her family the closure they need. Our union called for an inquest at the time Belly died and we have no hesitation in repeating this call to you formally today, given the pressing need to illuminate the facts of this case.

An inquest would also give a clear signal to transport workers and many others on the front-line during this pandemic that their lives really do matter. Formal inquest proceedings are also likely to help prevent similar cases arising in future.

In short - it’s now vital we have an inquest into Belly’s death, to establish the facts which remain, in Panorama’s words, “bitterly contested”.

As things stand there are simply too many gaps and glaring omissions - as highlighted by a range of expert doctors, scientists and lawyers interviewed in the documentary.

Questions I have raised with the Prime Minister, and which require further examination, are -

*Has the spitting allegation been properly and fully examined? Belly’s family claim she told them she had been spat at, and a police officer is quoted in the BBC film saying “we are in no doubt something has happened there.”

*When Belly’s employer, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) learned of the incident how did the company react to protect Belly and other staff?

*Why was Belly allowed to work on the station concourse given she had an underlying serious medical condition (sarcoidosis) which affected her breathing?

*Why did it take a phone call from one of Belly’s doctors before she was stood down from work?

*Why did GTR produce two different versions of its internal investigation findings – with only one showing that Belly’s condition had led to throat surgery and required regular medical check-ups?

*When GTR began their own investigation why did the company not call in the police?

*Why was it seven weeks after the incident before British Transport Police (BTP) were alerted?

*Why hasn’t the footage of the incident been released?

*How can police be sure the 57 year-old man interviewed about the incident did not have, or had not had, the virus given that the negative antibody test he’d had at that time may have been unreliable?

NB: This point is highlighted in the BBC programme by both a Professor of Microbiology and a Professor of Clinical Immunology. Indeed, Professor Jon Deeks, Professor of Biostatistics at the University of Birmingham, tells the BBC “the police have made a mistake here with the interpretation of that evidence.”

*Panorama also highlighted conflicting reports about whether the man told Belly and her colleague, Motolani Sunmola, that he “had the virus.”

As Martin Forde QC told the programme: “I feel there are sufficient doubts and conflicts around the facts of this case to justify an investigation.”

Please act without delay, and in the national interest, by holding an inquest into the death of Belly Mujinga.

Yours sincerely

Manuel Cortes

TSSA General Secretary