17/08/2018 08:39 BST | Updated 17/08/2018 14:22 BST

Union Boss Len McCluskey Slammed For 'Disgraceful' Attack On Jewish Leaders After Wreath Row

'Unfair and unwarranted.'

Chris J Ratcliffe via Getty Images

Len McCluskey has been accused of launching an “unfair and unwarranted” attack on Jewish leaders after the union boss claimed that Jeremy Corbyn was being unfairly treated in his attempts to resolve Labour’s anti-Semitism row. 

Writing for HuffPost UK, the general secretary of the Unite union and close ally of the Labour leader hit out at what he calls the “intransigent hostility” of Jewish community leaders and claimed the more Corbyn sought to “build bridges” the “worse the rhetoric has become”.

After the blog was published on Thursday, the Board of Deputies, which is the main representative body of British Jews, said McCluskey’s “attack on the Jewish community is both unfair and unwarranted”.

The spokesman added: “We have had a deluge of words from the Labour leadership.

“It is about time that the party resolved this crisis by taking the firm and decisive action which the communal leadership set out for them in detail months ago.

“They have so far failed to do what is right.”

Corbyn and the party have been engulfed in controversy after failing to endorse the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism in its entirety.

The Labour leader has also come under fire for attending a controversial event at a Palestinian Martyrs Cemetery in Tunis in 2014.

Labour MP Ian Austin, who is also being investigated over his behaviour during a row about the party’s anti-Semitism code, branded McCluskey’s blog “disgraceful”. 

Writing for HuffPost UK on Friday morning, Austin said: “It is completely unacceptable for McCluskey to blame the leadership of the Jewish community for the failure to resolve the crisis of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.

“The Jewish community have been caused immense distress and offence, Labour MPs like Chuka Umunna are right to demand it is sorted out and they must not be silenced on this.”

McCluskey wrote that Labour risked descending “into a vortex of McCarthyism” and accused  “Blairite” Labour MPs of exploiting the anti-Semitism row to provoke a split in the party.

He added that the problem of anti-Semitism in the party was “not manufactured but has certainly been wildly exaggerated by now”.

“I am at a loss to understand the motives of the leadership of the Jewish community – the Board of Deputies, the Jewish Leadership Council and the Jewish Labour Movement,” he said.

“They raised entirely proper concerns, but have simply refused to take ‘yes’ for an answer.”

McCluskey said Corbyn’s attempts to resolve the situation had been met with hostility by the Jewish community. 

“What is the response from the leading Jewish community organisations to this record of reaching out, of understanding, and of action? Intransigent hostility and an utter refusal to engage in dialogue about building on what has been done and resolving outstanding difficulties,” he said.

“I therefore appeal to the leadership of the Jewish community to abandon their truculent hostility, engage in dialogue and dial down the rhetoric, before the political estrangement between them and the Labour Party becomes entrenched.”

The union boss said the leadership of the Jewish community should “grasp the hand stretched out towards them”.

McClusky further accused the three newspapers; the Jewish Chronicle, Jewish News and Jewish Telegraph; that claimed Corbyn was an “an existential threat to Jewish life” of a “thoroughly irresponsible act of fear-mongering”.

However, he acknowledged that Labour should now adopt all eleven IHRA examples as not having done so was “insensitive”, something that the Board of Deputies acknowledged in their criticism of his blog.  

But McCluskey warned there remained “free-speech problems” with the example concerning ‘Israel as a racist endeavour’. 

“While rooting out the anti-Semites, we cannot descend into a vortex of McCarthyism, however much Labour’s opponents might enjoy the spectacle,” he said.

The Unite leader used his blog to accuse Chuka Umunna and other Labour MPs of using the row over anti-Semitism as a method to “provide rocket fuel for a split in the Party”. 

“Let those few Labour MPs looking to break away from the Party do so on an honest basis, embracing capitalism, the free market and the alliance with Trump’s America, and not pretend that Labour is something it is not, an institutionally racist Party,” he said.

In response, Umunna said he would not be “bullied into silence” by McCluskey.

Dame Margaret Hodge, who faced a disciplinary investigation after a confrontation about anti-Semitism with Corbyn, also rounded on McCluskey’s comments about McCarthyism.

She said: “I find that offensive, I think that’s trivialising the issue of anti-Semitism to pretend that somehow we’re using that for cheap party political purposes. I’m not, and I think most of those colleagues who are with me, Jews and non-Jewish MPs feel exactly the same as I do.”

In an interview with Sky News, the former Labour minister told how when she learned of the investigation she “kept thinking what did it feel like to be a Jew in Germany in the Thirties”.