Tom Watson Refers James Murdoch Statement To Police Investigating Phone Hacking

Murdoch

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 22/07/11 11:44 BST Updated: 21/09/11 11:12 BST

A Labour MP has referred James Murdoch's testimony before parliament to the police investigating phone hacking, after two former News International executives called the businessman's evidence into question.

Tom Watson told the BBC on Friday he has asked the Metropolitan police to investigate the statements of the News International chairman. He said he would formally bring the testimony to the attention of Sue Akers, the Assistant Commissioner leading an official investigation into the scandal.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed they had received a letter from the Labour MP.

His comments came after Colin Myler, former News of the World Editor and ex-legal chief Tom Crone said that Murdoch knew phone hacking was more widespread at the organisation. In a statement released on Thursday the pair said that they had informed James Murdoch about an email from the lawyers of the Professional Footballers' Association's Gordon Taylor, which indicated phone hacking went beyond one "rogue" reporter.

"Just by way of clarification relating to Tuesday's CMS Select Committee hearing, we would like to point out that James Murdoch's recollection of what he was told when agreeing to settle the Gordon Taylor litigation was mistaken," the statement said.

"In fact, we did inform him of the "for Neville" email which had been produced to us by Gordon Taylor's lawyers."

James Murdoch, who looks after News Corp's Europe and Asia interests, has said he stands by his testimony before the Commons select committee, which he appeared at alongside his father Rupert, the News Corporation chairman.

During that hearing he told the committee that he was not aware of the email suggesting that hacking was more widespread at the organisation.

Watson told the BBC that the latest development was "the most significant moment" into the phone hacking investigation. He also said that if Crone and Myler's allegations were correct, then Murdoch had "bought the silence" of Taylor, who he is reported to have paid £700,000.

"It shows that he not only failed to report a crime to the police, but because there was a confidentiality clause involved in the settlement, it means that he bought the silence of Gordon Taylor and that could mean that he is facing investigation for perverting the course of justice," he told the BBC.

Prime Minister David Cameron said Murdoch had "questions to answer in parliament" following the latest developments.

"Clearly James Murdoch has got questions to answer in parliament and I’m sure that he will do that and clearly News International has got some big issues to deal with, and a mess to clear up.

But he said it was up to the company to sort its management issues out.

John Whittingdale chairman of the Commons culture select committee, said James Murdoch will be asked to provide additional information on the claims made by Myler and Crone.

“Obviously those two statements are in conflict, we were going to ask James Murdoch in any case to supply us with additional information and we will certainly be asking him to address this point when he does so," he said.

Chris Bryant, another Labour MP who campaigned to bring the phone hacking scandal to light, has written to News Corporation non-executive directors calling for Rupert and James Murdoch to be suspended.

In an email to the directors, seen by Sky News, Bryant wrote:

"James Murdoch was expressly asked about the question of the payout of £700,000 to Gordon Taylor.

"As you will know, this is far in excess of any normal amount payable for a privacy case.

"The Max Moseley case which was adjudicated around the same time awarded just £60,000 whilst James Murdoch maintains that he was advised that a court would be likely to award £250,000, which when added to the legal costs of £500,000 to £1 million would make £700,000 a saving to the company.

"I'm afraid this either represents really bad legal advice that completely ignores the part 36 procedure whereby claimants are at risk of paying the defendant's legal costs if they refuse an offer - or else it is a plain lie."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

A Labour MP has referred James Murdoch's testimony before parliament to the police investigating phone hacking, after two former News International executives called the businessman's evidence into qu...
A Labour MP has referred James Murdoch's testimony before parliament to the police investigating phone hacking, after two former News International executives called the businessman's evidence into qu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:23 PM on 07/24/2011
In the US all too often he have heard "testimony" like James Murdoch's in a variety of cases and scandals. But none stand out like the coverup that brought the late US president Richard M. Nixon down, and that's what this smug James Murdoch's testimony is apt to do.

He could have survived the wrongdoing, but it was the coverup that brought him down.

It is an inevitable car crash with many victims. The UK doesn't need a scapegoat, it needs the truth and to be rid of the poisonous atmosphere of deceit, corruption and improper and unbalanced influence as practiced by the Murdochs.
09:51 AM on 07/24/2011
If James Murdoch is guilty of a crime he should be prosecuted like anyone else. Problem is that the wealthy are not like anyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Burgess
George Bush. The Worst President Ever!
04:42 PM on 07/24/2011
What? They're not human?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:23 AM on 07/30/2011
Oh yes they are.

They fit into the usual, instantly recognizable types which every kindergarten supervisor knows inside-out.
photo
leonel
Lotus flower
01:54 AM on 07/24/2011
It seems that in Britain, the Murdoch media has corrupted all political parties and police, while in the United States it has restricted itself to corrupting the political culture in general by siding with reactionary elements of the Republican Party and is largely responsible for adding a lot of momentum to the most reactionary elements in the Tea Party.

This scandal will be around for quite some time. Many Americans hate what Rupert Murdoch has done to create so much damage, and on the other hand are surprised that he has been brought down so completely and unexpectedly.
09:06 PM on 07/23/2011
Are the police truly independent?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JavaJuice
11:09 AM on 07/23/2011
I love how the government and media is pretending the MET hasn't been corrupted by the Murdochs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:26 AM on 07/30/2011
It really is a great show they're putting on, isn't it.

It works so well when the actors are bad amateurs...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George McAulay
Delighted to meet you
10:00 AM on 07/23/2011
If you listen carefully to James reply to the question, half a yes slips out before he says no
09:31 AM on 07/23/2011
Parliament must be the only organisation where when in the middle of a number of crisis - i.e.phone hacking, economy - every member decides to sign off for the holidays.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Lucie-Smith
Art historian, photographer, poet
07:35 AM on 07/23/2011
It would be just wonderful if they could get smug Jamesie into court and on oath. Then they might have a chance of doing him for perjury.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ponderus
Enriched with lanolin.
04:01 AM on 07/23/2011
In a very strange way, the manner in which this is playing out echoes the relationship between the character Henry Wilcox and his son Charles in Forster's "Howards End". Henry was also a powerful man, whose son in a rash moment commits manslaughter and goes to prison. This breaks Henry's spirit and signals the end of his undisputed power over his business and his family.
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
03:01 AM on 07/23/2011
And to think, all James had to do was say 'No Dad, what you want me to do by appointing me to this new position is wrong.'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
01:54 AM on 07/23/2011
"I'm afraid this either represents really bad legal advice that completely ignores the part 36 procedure whereby claimants are at risk of paying the defendant's legal costs if they refuse an offer - or else it is a plain lie."

Oh, come now.

Just because he's a phone-hacker, and by extension most probably a black mailer, does not mean, Mr Speaker, that he's a liar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterinSydney
01:11 AM on 07/23/2011
I hope James Murdoch gets arrested.
12:38 AM on 07/23/2011
Now that Coulson is to be investigated for perjury, I wonder if there will be an as intent focus on James Murdoch's alleged perjury before Parliament this past week? Who actually thought he would tell the truth when he got up there, though?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
08:48 PM on 07/22/2011
Looks like the Murdochs are in trouble in USA too, they are too slick for their own good.
photo
gfm975
A Proud Progressive
08:45 PM on 07/22/2011
James, you smug little Pr__k, you are going down. And hopefully so is your sub human father.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:28 AM on 07/30/2011
Amen to that...