Change In Rules Regulating Taxi Drivers Is Putting Londoners' Safety At Risk, Says Transport For London

Taxi

Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 25/07/11 18:55 BST Updated: 24/09/11 11:12 BST

The safety of Londoners is being put at risk because of proposed changes to the rules regulating taxi drivers, industry bodies have said.

Transport for London and black cab drivers are outraged at government plans to relax criminal checks on minicab and taxi drivers in the capital.

A TfL spokesperson told the Huffington Post UK that the Home Office's decision could "compromise the safety" of Londoners.

"The safety of passengers remains our number one priority. Every applicant for a taxi or private hire driver license in London is subject to an enhanced CRB check, which is repeated every three years upon renewal. It is vital that when making a licensing decision we have access to all relevant information.

"We are greatly concerned that the restrictions proposed by the CRB and the Home Office will compromise the safety of the travelling public."

The government is proposing to stop enhanced criminal record (CRB) checks - meaning taxi and mini cab drivers will only be prevented from getting a licence if they have a relevant conviction. General information about their criminal records will not be provided.

The changes are likely to worry those who travel alone. A number of women told the Huffington Post UK that the new laws would not protect them.

Lorna, a 39-year-old from Highgate said it was "nonsense" and could lead to more "dodgy" taxi drivers.

"If you ask a taxi driver about their worst customers, they say it's the drunk girls. They have to follow specific rules. If you don't exercise the right caution about their background you're going to get more dodgy taxi drivers," she said.

She said one friend had been locked in a cab in Covent Garden after the taxi driver started arguing with her.

"This seems like a way to save money not make people safe," she said.

Samantha, 24, from Stockwell said the decision was a "disgrace". Her colleague Claudia, 44 from Acton agreed saying taxi drivers should be "fully vetted" to help protect the public.

The move has also provoked outrage from pressure group London TravelWatch who wrote to home office minister Lynne Featherstone over the decision.

Their chair Sharon Grant said enhanced CRB checks help ensure drivers are "suitable".

"It's unthinkable that important information held by the police should be denied to the licensing authorities during the vetting process."

Black cab driver Charlie, 30, said the decision could ruin the reputation of his trade.

"The London Black Cab trade in particular prides itself on the monitoring of its drivers, and the highly secure environments which we provide.

"We take pride in offering a safe, secure service.

"When a passenger hails a cab on the street, they are putting great trust in us; they are entering a vehicle with a complete stranger and putting themselves in that driver's control."

But a Home Office spokeswoman said taxi drivers did not always need to go through enhanced checks: "The law has not changed. All taxi drivers are still required to undergo a standard criminal record check which will reveal details of any convictions, cautions and warnings held by police."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The safety of Londoners is being put at risk because of proposed changes to the rules regulating taxi drivers, industry bodies have said. Transport for London and black cab drivers are outraged at ...
The safety of Londoners is being put at risk because of proposed changes to the rules regulating taxi drivers, industry bodies have said. Transport for London and black cab drivers are outraged at ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:36 PM on 07/29/2011
What's the difference between a "standard criminal record check" and an "enhanced" one? Surely that's relevant for understanding the change, yet this article doesn't elaborate.
12:45 PM on 07/26/2011
A criminal is only a criminal, when they have been caught and prosecuted, and CRB checks to see if you are a criminal. If you have never been caught, then you will not show up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:42 AM on 07/26/2011
The argument that someone is a risk because they have a criminal record is meaningless. One thing that everyone with a criminal record has in common is that when they were an actual danger (assuming they're guilty), they didn't have a criminal record. That came after they were convicted.

Also, there are millions of people in the country with criminal records that never re-offend. How many people commit an offence and never get convicted is unknown. So linking a criminal record with risk doesn't seem reasonable to me.

This 'religion of risk' is going to end up creating an Orwellian state of surveillance and a culture of media induced hysteria.
09:42 PM on 07/25/2011
This shocking. The whole reason these checks were introduced in the first place was to protect people (ie females traveling alone etc) from all the dodgy drivers that were lurking around. Will it take another 7/7 for the govt to realise that some of its cost-cutting measures are putting us ALL at risk.
09:12 PM on 07/25/2011
"The London Black Cab trade in particular prides itself on the monitoring of its drivers, and the highly secure environments which we provide.

"We take pride in offering a safe, secure service."

The Black Cab drivers have too much of a good press and this HuffPost article ignores John Warboys. He was a Black cab driver who could have attacked over one hundred women.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/oct/26/black-cab-rapist-victims
09:22 PM on 07/26/2011
True, Warboys did commit many rapes, but his was an extremely rare case.

How many other cases do you know of in which a London Black Cab driver has been charged with such a crime?

Unlicensed cabs on the other hand are notorious breeding grounds for sexual attacks.

Using Worboys as a benchmark is ridiculous. Shipman, an NHS Doctor, used his job to kill many victims. Despite that, the vast majority of GPs are highly trustworthy, and 1,000s of people put their faith in them every day.

I also disagree that Black Cab drivers have too much of a good press. They are frequently singled out in the media for causing pollution, being a menace to cyclists, being too expensive, being reactionary and so on.

Most London cabbies see their jobs as a respectful career, and do in fact take great pride in offering a safe and secure service. After all, why wouldn't they?
09:40 PM on 07/26/2011
The reason I mentioned Warboys is simple. For years and years the Black cabbies, through a sympathetic hearing in the media, would always go on about unlicensed cabs being " notorious breeding grounds for sexual attacks." I noticed you didn't name a unlicensed cabbie with the magnitude of crimes Warboys had been accused of (never mind the number he has been found guilty of). I am sure you will google a name of such a nasty person(unless you are working for the Black Cabbies PR department). However, I will throw back this - using (unlicensed cabbies name) as a benchmark is ridiculous.

NB - I am not a cabbie. licensed or not. Are you a Black cab driver? I am totally impartial in my opinion.