Murdoch Asked To Clarify Evidence Given To MPs Over Phone Hacking

Murdoch

Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 29/07/11 12:02 BST Updated: 28/09/11 11:12 BST

MPs are to write to James Murdoch to ask him to clarify evidence he gave to a parliamentary committee.

After his evidence was contradicted by a statement from News of the World's former lawyer and editor, members of the culture, media and sport select committee decided to ask Murdoch to clarify if he knew about a set of emails which indicated that phone hacking was widespread.

They will also write to former editor Colin Myler, lawyer Tom Crone and former NI legal director Tom Chapman.

Chair of the committee John Whittingdale told the BBC on Friday that Murdoch may still be recalled.

"I think that’s very likely, I think we will almost certainly want to hear from Colin Myler and Tom Crone, particularly since the evidence they previously gave to the committee two years ago seems completely contradictory to what is being said now and at the same time if they do dispute some of the evidence that James Murdoch has given to us then I think it’s very possible we may wish to call James Murdoch back to address that particular point."

Committee member Tom Watson, who has campaigned for the scandal to be exposed, told the BBC on Thursday evening that he wanted Murdoch to be recalled. However he told reporters on Friday his attempt to recall Murdoch had been voted down.

News International released a statement last week saying that James Murdoch stands by his evidence.

The news came after the BSkyB board gave the younger Murdoch unanimous backing to remain as chairman.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

MPs are to write to James Murdoch to ask him to clarify evidence he gave to a parliamentary committee. After his evidence was contradicted by a statement from News of the World's former lawyer and ...
MPs are to write to James Murdoch to ask him to clarify evidence he gave to a parliamentary committee. After his evidence was contradicted by a statement from News of the World's former lawyer and ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:51 AM on 07/31/2011
If it good enough for echelon than it's good enough for the media. Hacking everyone's doing it.
11:02 AM on 07/30/2011
Why weren't MPs smart enough to catch Murdoch's lies on the spot? And let's not forget that Rebekah admitted on camera that they paid the police for information.."within the law", which is absolutely not true. It is illegal to pay the police for anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:31 AM on 07/30/2011
It's only wrong if other people do it...
07:21 PM on 07/29/2011
Lets hope the letter is delivered by courier
04:00 PM on 07/29/2011
What James M. (probably) meant was, that he is standing by( ...to alter) his testimony (at any minute). Society offers a Free Pass if you admit to fudging the truth and recant, and you are wealthy and influential. If you are a person of lesser means no pass..you lied.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hawaii5-0
02:34 PM on 07/29/2011
All those who voted against bringing Murdock back should be investigated for receiving payoffs. Perhaps the govt should hack into their phone records.
12:13 PM on 07/29/2011
I think everyone following this story would like to get to the bottom of this, he should go back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Give Me A Pig Foot....
11:40 AM on 07/29/2011
As am American. I can't pretend to understand how these things work in The U.K. It just seems to me that since those appearing before this Parliamentary commission are not under oath, what's the point? James Murdoch is as oily as a can of sardines.
Can they not find a way to press charges of some kind and have him testify in a court of law, under oath?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
12:21 PM on 07/29/2011
Nope, it doesn't. However it is taken as an insult to parliament, and since Murdoch's trying to prove that He is a "fit & proper" person to own UK media interests. Tow Watson MP has evidence provided by outgoing NOTW editor Colin Myler & the senior legal adviser who resigned at the start of this, that last weeks appearance , James wasn't just being evasive he was actively lying. Now Lying to parliament IS a criminal act, Cameron might want to keep his friend out of Gaol, but don't count on the Met. They will have to be seen to be doing the job properly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Give Me A Pig Foot....
12:41 PM on 07/29/2011
Thanks for that. (f&f, for the good info).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:34 AM on 07/30/2011
People are so irreligious today, the oath doesn't mean a thing to them...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterinSydney
11:40 AM on 07/29/2011
I hope they impose some of the tools of the Inquisition to get to the truth!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
agness nutter
What fresh hell is this?
01:11 PM on 07/29/2011
Fear? Surprise? Ruthless efficiency? An almost fanatical devotion to the Pope? Nice red uniforms?

NOT the comfy chair, surely!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
New empty micro-bio
03:36 AM on 07/30/2011
Fat chance of that.

But perhaps it will come into fashion again...?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterinSydney
07:40 AM on 07/30/2011
Actually I was joking, but still Murdoch needs to be dumped as the world's dictator.