BBC Sherlock Nudity Row - Naked Lara Pulver Whips Benedict Cumberbatch Pre-Watershed (PHOTOS)

Sherlock Lara Pulver

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 03/01/12 09:51 Updated: 03/01/12 10:45

Sherlock's return to the small screen was enjoyed by nearly ten million viewers on New Year's Day, most of whom revelled in the visual invention, witty banter, romantic revelations and intrigue on display in Steven Moffat's contemporary take on an old favourite.

REVIEW: Elementary, Erotic TV At Its Best

But some viewers were left disturbed by the sight of actress Lara Pulver, playing self-described 'recreational scolder' Irene Adler, completely naked apart from high heels and diamond earrings, tantalising Sherlock Holmes with her svelte form and a gleefully brandished whip - all nearly half an hour before the 9pm watershed.

The Daily Mail reports a bunch of Twitter complaints, including this one: "Dominatrix?! Watershed anyone? My ten-year-old was watching that."

And the Telegraph pointed out that Adler had already been seen wearing a thong, walking towards a woman tied to a bed, again with whip in hand.

Quick Poll

Do you think the BBC went too far with the nudity scenes in 'Sherlock'?

VOTE

A BBC spokesman said: "We're delighted with the critical and audience response to the first episode, which has been extremely positive, and have received no complaints at this stage."

Lara Pulver, the actress behind Irene Adler's mischievous style, has thrown her hat into the mix, telling Sun readers that star Benedict Cumberbatch who plays Holmes told her to "whip him harder".

"I was like, 'Oh can I now, Benedict Cumberbatch?" the actress told the Sun.

"Imagine how many whips I am going to receive in the post now!"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK ENTERTAINMENT

Sherlock's return to the small screen was enjoyed by nearly ten million viewers on New Year's Day, most of whom revelled in the visual invention, witty banter, romantic revelations and intrigue on dis...
Sherlock's return to the small screen was enjoyed by nearly ten million viewers on New Year's Day, most of whom revelled in the visual invention, witty banter, romantic revelations and intrigue on dis...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
17:42 on 07/01/2012
Sherlock is a phenomenal show and I can't believe the fuss people are making. In all fairness the nudity was very tastefully done and she showed everything yet showed nothing so what exactly is the problem? If you don't like it don't watch it. Plus it was completely relevant to both the story and the characters. Personally I say bring on the next episode Benedict is by far the best actor to portray Sherlock!! I high 5 your awesomeness :D x
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peggy Kendrick
Edited micro-bio. Happy now!?
12:11 on 07/01/2012
I'm amused by people who are righteous about the "Holmes Cannon". He and Watson are the most adapted fictional characters in history. There have been many abuses of official cannon in the past, there will be more in the future. The remedy for purists is never watch or listen or read anything Conan Doyle did not personally write and to leave the rest to those of us who can't get enough. There is only really one thing adaptations must always get right: Holmes must have a sharp, analytical mind and a certain amount of contempt for those who do not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
16:21 on 05/01/2012
I remember there being nudity on one episode of the Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes. How far we have come.
21:45 on 04/01/2012
it was porn.....how dare they conan doyles masterpiece as a vehicle to display this
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whapgra
01:44 on 05/01/2012
was not porn... it was well filmed and tastfully done.. the program is only based on the character created by conan doyle...
11:54 on 04/01/2012
A Big Fan Of Jeremny Bret,But This Series Is Good, Very Good!!
10:22 on 04/01/2012
Nothing wrong with pre-watershed Sherlock. Screening it half an hour later wouldn't have made a scrap of difference. Brilliant series.
22:11 on 03/01/2012
I might be missing something here, but if one wanted to keep the worlds greatest detective with the mind of a computer and they observational skills of a Hawk guessing, the best thing to show him is nothing. They did sort of give that away.
Now what we actually saw was of course in our minds, so I suggest the problem is not with the BBC but with the individual.
02:18 on 04/01/2012
No, what you have highlighted is the difference we perceive, between watching a ''Carry-on'' film, and something rather darker. That is the intent of the writer/producer, above and beyond the observer. The 'Sherlock' episode was excellent, but it should have been shown later in the evening.
21:22 on 03/01/2012
New year, same old Daily Mail faux outrage at the BBC.. Yawn....
21:18 on 03/01/2012
The sad thing is that programme producers now perceive viewers as mentally limited and unable to translate suggestion into what was implied as taking place without actually demonstrating nudity or highly technical and detailed sexual presentation. Just as sadly they are probably right even though implied sexuality like implied horror and an implied evil villain are much more exciting and sometimes frightening than actually seeing the character/monster on screen (usually a let down).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
20:38 on 03/01/2012
Typical "Daily Mail" story about "Outrage" at the BBC, and then reproduces the photos just to show what the readers should be outraged about.
20:09 on 03/01/2012
Children are subjected to these kinds of images and far worse in music videos and magazines. I can think of several female 'celebrities' who delight in 'getting them out' at the slightest provocation to generate cheap publicity. They show far more flesh than was visible here and nothing is said. If parents want their children 'protected' from such images, it's up to them to censor what their little darlings see. They know where the off switch is.

On the subject of this programme, I have to say I LOATHE it. I was brought up reading the Conan Doyle stories and for me this adaptation is so wide of the mark, it make me want to take out my teeth and scratch my gums. If you want to experience the character of Irene Adler and her relationship with Holmes first hand read the story 'A Scandal in Bohemia' rather than relying on this modernised twaddle
19:31 on 03/01/2012
Yes, it was shown too early, and yes it was 'adult' in content. It was also superb, and intelligent entertainment.
19:20 on 03/01/2012
I thought we were living in a modern world with digital TV and Remote control hndsets that mean we can pause the programme, change the channel or even switch to another programme without even leaving our seat...SO whats the big deal, if the content was unsuitabl in your opinion, why not switch/record/or get off your fat arses and play with your child instead osf moaning how inappropriate the TV was.
PS3 Gamebox your own behaviour and language, are these always suitable for children??
18:08 on 03/01/2012
ive never watched this modern day sherlock b4, so for the first time i was very much glued to what i was watching.... b4 the naked scenes... so when the bit of body flesh was shown, i did glance at the clock...that means ive had the 9pm watershed implanted in my brain somehow. ( must watch limitless again).. theres worse out there than what i saw that night, blimey kids watch 18 movies in the afternoon after moaning to parents for the pin numbers on sky.
14:34 on 03/01/2012
Some viewers were left disturbed.......Bloody rubbish !! Something tells me they were disturbed long before this programme was on screen. Also what is this "watershed" ? sounds like an outside toilet. What exactly happens at 9pm ? Is that when Mary Whitehouse went to bed ? My kids are still up at that time and they loved Sherlock. STOP COMPLAINING YOU MORONS !!